A derived dryolestid mammal indicates possible insular endemism in the Late Jurassic of Germany

The Langenberg Quarry near Bad Harzburg has yielded the first Jurassic stem therian mammal of Germany, recovered from Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) near shore deposits of a palaeo-island within the Lower Saxony Basin of the European archipelago. The new stem therian is represented by one lower and three upper molars. Hercynodon germanicus gen. et sp. nov. is attributed to the Dryolestidae, a group of pretribosphenic crown mammals that was common in western Laurasia from the Middle Jurassic to the Early Cretaceous. The new taxon is characterised by small size, a reduced cusp pattern in the upper molars lacking a metacone, and enhancement of the shearing crests paracrista and metacrista. Phylogenetic analysis identified Hercynodon gen. nov. as sister taxon of Crusafontia from the Lower Cretaceous (Barremian) of Spain. Both taxa belong to an endemic European clade of dryolestids, including also Achyrodon and Phascolestes from the earliest Cretaceous (Berriasian) of England. Despite its greater geological age, Hercynodon gen. nov. is the most derived representative of that clade, indicated by the complete reduction of the metacone. The discrepancy between derived morphology and geological age may be explained by an increased rate of character evolution in insular isolation. Other insular phenomena have earlier been observed in vertebrates from the Langenberg Quarry, such as dwarfism in the small sauropod Europasaurus, and possible gigantism in the morganucodontan mammaliaform Storchodon and the pinheirodontid multituberculate mammal Teutonodon which grew unusually large.

Dryolestidans are non-tribosphenic cladotherian mammals characterised by a specialised molar dentition and angular process of the dentary. The molars have an enhanced shearing function with subtransverse cutting edges . The upper molars are wider than the lowers, and all molars have a unilaterally hypsodont crown, which indicates a considerable rotation component of the lower jaw during the chewing cycle (Crompton et al. 1994;Schultz and Martin 2014). The lower molars have a small unicuspid talonid (without basin) and unequal roots: the distal root, supporting the talonid, is distinctly smaller than the mesial root and placed in a lingual position (e.g. Martin 1999). At least some dryolestidans differ from more advanced cladotherians by the retention of paradentary bones (coronoid and splenial) (Krebs 1969(Krebs , 1971Martin 1995). Dryolestidans have an advanced inner ear morphology with the cochlear canal coiled to at least 270°and primary and secondary bony laminae for the basilar membrane (Ruf et al. 2009;Luo et al. 2011Luo et al. , 2012). An almost complete postcranial skeleton is known for Henkelotherium from the Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) of Portugal, which had an arboreal lifestyle (Krebs 1991;Jäger et al. 2020). The oldest dryolestidans have been reported from the Middle Jurassic of Asia (Averianov et al. 2014), but surprisingly, this group is not known from this continent in younger deposits. The oldest European dryolestidans are from Kirtlington and are also of Middle Jurassic age (Freeman 1979). Dryolestidans were among the dominant groups of mammaliaforms in the Late Jurassic of North America and Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of Europe (Kielan-Jaworowska et al. 2004). The geologically youngest record of Dryolestida in the Northern Hemisphere is possibly from the Late Cretaceous (Campanian) of the USA (Lillegraven and McKenna 1986); slightly younger is the Campanian-Maastrichtian Groebertherium from Patagonia (Rougier et al. 2009). Here we report on a new dryolestidan genus and species from the Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) of Germany. Previously, in Europe, Late Jurassic dryolestidans were only known from the Iberian Peninsula (Krebs 2000;Martin 2000).

Material and methods
The mammalian teeth from the Langenberg Quarry were recovered by screen-washing of about 10 tons of fossiliferous marly limestones from the Süntel Formation. The fossiliferous matrix was collected between 2014 and 2016 and brought to Bonn for further treatment. In the laboratory, the matrix was dissolved with 15% hydrogen peroxide and the tensid Rewoquat® (Evonik Industries AG, Essen, Germany), and subsequently screen-washed at a mesh size of 0.5 mm. After drying, microvertebrate remains were picked from the concentrate using a stereomicroscope.
The teeth were scanned with varying resolutions ranging between 3.14 and 4.03 μm using the 180 kV x-ray tube of the v|tome|x s μCT device (GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies GmbH phoenix|x-ray) housed in the Institute of Geosciences, Universität Bonn, Germany. Scan settings varied from 115 to 130 kV and 115 to 130 μA. For all scans, Fig. 1 Location of the Langenberg Quarry (asterisk) at the northern rim of the Harz Mountains in northern Germany the same shutter speed of 400 ms per capture was used. The instrument produced isotropic voxels, and the single image size is 1024 × 1024 pixels. Avizo 8 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for segmentation. The specimens are curated in Niedersächsisches Landesmuseum, Hannover, Germany (NLMH). All measurements are given in millimetres (mm).
Cladotheria were defined originally as a stem-based clade including non-symmetrodontan trechnotherians, with Dryolestoidea implicitly included in that clade (McKenna 1975). This definition was specified as a stem-based clade including all taxa more closely related to living therians than to Spalacotheriidae (Kielan-Jaworowska et al. 2004). According to a slightly different definition, Cladotheria represent a node-based taxon that includes the most recent common ancestor of dryolestidans and living therians and all its descendants (Luo et al. 2002;Martin 2018). According to these definitions, dryolestidans are not "stem cladotherians" as considered by Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (2004), but they represent early cladotherians.
There is some disagreement for the dryolestid molar cusp and crest terminology between the schemes proposed by Martin (1999: fig. 7) and Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (2004: fig. 10.2). We adopt here the following interpretations ( Fig. 2): the stylocone is the largest labial cusp of the upper molars. The stylocone is connected to the paracone by the paracrista, with few exceptions, where the paracrista connects to the parastyle (e.g. Fig. 2e, g, h). In this case, the large labial cusp is called the median cusp by Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (2004: fig. 10.7C2). We call median cusp only the cusp situated between the stylocone and metastyle (Kielan-Jaworowska et al. 2004: fig. 10.2C) (Fig. 2). By this definition, the median cusp cannot exist without the presence of a stylocone, and the large labial cusp in Laolestes andresi is interpreted as stylocone (Fig. 2g, h ), following Martin (1999). The crest connecting paracone and stylocone (or, rarely, parastyle) is the paracrista (Martin 1999) (preparacrista in Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (2004. The crest connecting paracone and metastyle is the metacrista (Martin 1999). In Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (2004), the term metacrista is restricted to the crest between metacone and metastyle and the crest between paracone and metacone is unnamed (should be the postparacrista by homology with tribosphenic molars). In the lower molars, the crest between protoconid and metaconid is termed here protocristid instead of metacristid (Martin 1999;Kielan-Jaworowska et al. 2004), by homology with the tribosphenic lower molar (Kielan-Jaworowska et al. 2004: fig. 11.1B). The distal metacristid, a ridge extending from the metaconid apex towards the talonid (Fox 1975), is present in tribosphenic mammals and some early cladotherians, but not in dryolestidans. In dryolestidans, occasionally, there is a short vertical crest at the base of the distal side of the metaconid, termed previously distal metacristid (Averianov et al. 2014). However, as this crest is not connected with the metaconid apex, it should be named differently.
For the phylogenetic analysis, we used a short version of the data matrix presented by Averianov et al. (2014). Only Dryolestida and two outgroup taxa are included. Some characters and scorings were revised and some new characters added. In Averianov et al. (2014), Comotherium richi was considered a junior synonym of Tathiodon agilis. Here C. richi is considered a junior synonym of Amblotherium gracile. The phylogenetic position of the poorly known T. agilis is uncertain, and this taxon was not included in the phylogenetic analysis. Euthlastus cordiformis from the Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) of the USA was excluded from the matrix because it is more likely a more advanced, Palaeoxonodon-like stem therian rather than a dryolestidan. The resulting matrix comprises 17 taxa and 48 characters (Appendices 1 and 2). All characters are phylogenetically informative. Hercynodon germanicus gen. et sp. nov. is coded by 23 of these characters (48%). The matrix has been analysed using a heuristic parsimony tree-search algorithm that included 1000 random addition sequences (RAS), followed by tree bisection and reconnection (TBR) branch swapping and keeping 10 trees in each replication (traditional search option in TNT version 1.1 (Goloboff et al. 2008;Goloboff and Catalano 2016)). The analysis produced a single most parsimonious tree with a tree length of 68 steps, a consistency index of 0.79, and a retention index of 0.87.
Type species. Hercynodon germanicus, sp. nov. Diagnosis. Referred to Dryolestidae based on combination of the following derived characters: upper molars much wider than long, large stylocone, median cusp present, metaconid more than 40% of protoconid height, and unequal roots of lower molars. Similar to Crusafontia but differing from other Dryolestidae by the combination of the following characters: ectoflexus on upper molars present, reduction of metacone (derived), metaconid pointed, and buccal cingulid on lower molars (derived). Differs from Crusafontia by a narrower crown of the upper molars (derived), a mesially less convex paracrista, and absence of a metacone (derived).
Comments. Crusafontia cuencana from the Lower Cretaceous (Barremian) of Spain was differentiated from all other dryolestids by the lack of the metacone (Kielan- Jaworowska et al. 2004). Actually, a crest-like metacone is present on moderately worn upper molars (Krebs 1993 fig. 3) is nearly identical in size (the size difference is within the measurement error) and morphology with the upper molar from Uña, the type locality of C. cuencana (Krebs 1993: fig. 1). The only difference concerns the direction of the parastylar lobe, which is likely due to positional variation. Crusafontia amoae is considered here a junior subjective synonym of Crusafontia cuencana.
Lakotalestes luoi, based on the single upper molar from the Berriasian-Barremian of the USA, was interpreted originally as a dryolestid structurally closest to Miccylotyrans minimus [=Amblotherium gracile] (Cifelli et al. 2014). However, Lakotalestes is clearly different from Amblotherium and other dryolestids, including Hercynodon gen. nov., in having a large central cusp on the median ridge. In this respect, Lakotalestes luoi is similar to Leonardus cuspidatus from the Campanian of Argentina (Bonaparte 1990;Chornogubsky 2011) and other meridiolestidans and may be rather referred to the Meridiolestida.
Hercynodon germanicus sp. nov. (Figs. 3, 4, 5, and 6) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D79E67E1-4A25-4A4F-B124-006CF214CE88 Etymology. From Germania, Latin name for the historical region in north-central Europe where present-day Germany is located Holotype. NLMH 105668, left upper molar. Type locality and horizon. Langenberg Quarry near the town of Goslar, Lower Saxony, northern Germany (N 51°5 4, 110′ E 10°30, 500′). Bed 83 of Fischer (1991). The material was collected in a temporarily exposed dark lens of marl within a light grey-greenish marly limestone layer (bed 83 of Fischer 1991) (Figs. 3, 4, and 5) have a unilaterally hypsodont crown, which is much higher lingually than buccally. The upper molars are narrow mesio-distally, with triangular, lingually pointed crown in occlusal view. The primary trigon angle of the little worn holotype is~38° (  Fig. 3B). There are three main cusps on the crown, the lingual paracone, the mesiobuccal stylocone, and the distobuccal metastylar cusp C (see "Discussion"). The paracone is much higher than the buccal cusps and somewhat damaged at the apex. The stylocone and cusp C are of similar size but cusp C is placed higher on the crown; in the holotype and NLMH 105669, it bears a linguo-distally oriented wear facet (Figs.  3b and 4b). The paracone is mesio-distally compressed, with flat buccal and convex lingual sides. Its apex is worn in all known specimens. In the holotype and NLMH 105669, mesial and distal flanks of the paracone bear faint, about 45°labiocervically oriented striations (Figs. 3a, c and 4a, c). The paracone and cusp C are vertically oriented, whereas the stylocone is directed somewhat mesio-ventrally . Cusp C is crest-like, with convex mesial and flat distal sides. The two main shearing crests, paracrista and metacrista, are robust and connect the paracone with the stylocone and cusp C, respectively. The paracrista is longer than the metacrista because the stylocone is placed more buccally than cusp C. Both crests are worn in the holotype and NLMH 105669 (Figs. 3b and 4b). In the holotype, the wear facet of the paracrista conjoins the facet on the stylocone (Fig. 3b). The wear facet of the metacrista is separated from the facet on cusp C by a shallow notch. The deepest part of the primary trigon basin is in the middle. The buccal margin of the crown is sinusoidal, with a shallow ectoflexus. On the buccal margin of the crown, between the stylocone and cusp C, there is a median cusp, which has about half the size of the stylocone. There is a distinct short ridge on the mesiobuccal side of this cusp. This ridge connects to a larger vertical ridge on the buccal side of the crown, placed on the level between the buccal roots. There is a prominent hook-like parastylar lobe with a small but distinct parastyle. The parastyle is separated from the paracone by a distinct notch. A short precingulum extends linguo-cervically from the parastylar lobe across the half width of the crown. There are three roots, two small buccal and a large lingual, supporting the paracone. The mesial of the buccal roots is  slightly smaller than the distal. The buccal roots are mesiodistally compressed, whilst the lingual root is more rounded in cross section. The bases of all three roots are connected by ridges.
In NLMH 105669, paracone, stylocone, cusp C, and the parastylar lobe are more strongly worn, with a completely worn out parastyle (Fig. 4b). The stylocone and the median cusp are more crest-like than on the holotype, and are compressed mesio-distally (stylocone) or bucco-lingually (median cusp). The vertical ridge on the buccal crown side is less pronounced than in the holotype. NLMH 105670 is heavily worn, with all the main cusps worn away (bases of stylocone and median cusp still present), and resulting flat occlusal surface (Fig. 5b). The parastylar groove is strongly worn out. Because of this extensive wear, the crown appears mesiodistally wider and less pointed lingually than in the less worn specimens.
The single known drylestid lower molar (NLMH 105671) fits in size and shape the uppers and is therefore attributed to Hercynodon germanicus; it lacks part of the talonid (Fig. 6). The crown is unilaterally hypsodont, much higher buccally than lingually (Fig. 6c, e). The trigonid angle is~49°. The protoconid is distinctly higher than the metaconid (Fig. 6e). It has flat mesiolingual and distal sides and a convex mesiobuccal side. At the base of the mesiobuccal side of the protoconid is a slight cingulid visible which is partly missing due to corrosion (Fig. 6d, e). The distal flank of the protoconid bears faint striations that are oriented at about 45°in linguo-cervical direction (Fig.  6e). The hypoflexid groove is only slightly worn and partly corroded (Fig. 6a). The metaconid has a flat distal side, slightly convex lingual side, and strongly convex mesial side. The paraconid has about half the size of the metaconid and is crest-like, compressed mesio-distally, and tapering buccally (Fig. 6a). It has a slightly convex lingual side and flat mesial and distal sides. The mesial side bears faint, 45°linguo-cervically oriented striations (Fig. 6c). The paraconid is directed mesio-dorsally at the base but becomes more vertical towards the apex (Fig. 6f). The trigonid basin is a transverse, lingually open valley between the bases of metaconid and paraconid (Fig. 6a). The paracristid is slightly convex mesially, whereas the metacristid is convex distally. The lowest point of the paracristid is placed much lower on the crown than the lowest point of the metacristid. On the mesial crown side, there is a rather long, slightly worn, oblique precingulid, separated lingually by a shallow embayment from a poorly pronounced vertical ridge along the mesiolingual corner of the paraconid (Fig. 6c). The mesial root is bean-shaped in cross section, mesio-distally compressed. The incompletely preserved distal root has less than half the size of the mesial root (Fig. 6b, f). Both roots are connected by a pronounced interradical crest, a structure that has also been observed in the mesungulatid meridiolestid Reigitherium (Harper et al. 2019).

Discussion
There is some uncertainty in interpretation of the metastylar cusp C in Hercynodon germanicus gen. et sp. nov. This cusp is preserved in the holotype only (Fig. 3), whereas the corresponding area is damaged or heavily worn in the two other upper molars (Figs. 4 and 5). The interpretation of the single cusp on the metacrista of H. germanicus gen. et sp. nov. as cusp C rather than the metacone is based on the following observations: 1) In most dryolestids, the metacone has a more lingual position, closer to the paracone (Fig. 2).
2) Cusp C of NLMH 105668 is identical in position and structure with cusp C in the posterior upper molar of Crusafontia cuencana (Fig. 2l), in which a poorly defined but still recognisable crest-like metacone is present, separated by a notch from cusp C. A similar notch separates cusp C from the metacrista in NLMH 105668. In more anterior upper Fig. 7 Single most parsimonious tree of Dryolestida produced by TNT traditional search analysis plotted against stratigraphical occurrence. Geographical distribution of taxa: red, Europe; blue, North America; yellow, Central Asia. molars of C. cuencana, the metacone is better pronounced and has the same position as in the posterior molar (Fig. 2j, k).
3) In the upper molar (M?5) of Amblotherium gracile (Fig.  2i), there is a large cusp C between the adjacent metacone and median cusp. In a more anterior upper molar of that specimen (M?4; Fig. 2i), a large cusp C and a median cusp are present, similar in size and position like in the M?5, but the metacone is lacking. This is an example of a dryolestid upper molar with a large metastylar cusp C but without a metacone. The holotype of H. germanicus gen. et sp. nov. is another example of this phenomenon.
The phylogenetic analysis recovered Hercynodon gen. nov. as sister taxon to Crusafontia from the Lower Cretaceous (Hauterivian-Barremian) of Spain (Fig. 7). Both taxa are similar in reduction of the cusp pattern and enhancement of the shearing crests, paracrista and metacrista, in particular, and in reduction of the metacone. A large median cusp, much better developed than in most other dryolestids (Fig. 2), is characteristic for Hercynodon gen. nov. In Crusafontia, this cusp is variably developed, being large, similar in size with that of Hercynodon gen. nov. in specimen Uña 28 (Fig. 2j), but poorly differentiated in two other specimens (Fig. 2k, l). The narrow crown of the holotype and referred specimen NLMH 105669 of H. germanicus gen. et sp. nov. is likely a character of M5 and the more posterior molars (both specimens are interpreted as possible M5s). However, in a supposed similarly worn M5 of Crusafontia, the crown is somewhat wider (Fig. 2l).
Hercynodon gen. nov. and Crusafontia belong to an endemic European clade of dryolestids, including also Achyrodon and Phascolestes from the earliest Cretaceous (Berriasian) of England (Averianov et al. 2013). This clade is characterised by a reduction of the cingula on the premolars (not known for Hercynodon) and of the metacone on the upper molars, which is small and crest-like or absent. The two other clades of Dryolestidae are western Laurasian (Europe and North America) in distribution. The Late Jurassic Hercynodon gen. nov. is the oldest representative of this endemic European clade of Dryolestidae; the other taxa are of Early Cretaceous age. In spite of this, this taxon, as currently understood, is the most derived member of this clade, with completely reduced metacone. This inconsistency of geological age and morphological development may reflect an endemic evolution with increased rate of character evolution in dryolestids on temporarily isolated islands of the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous European archipelago (Colorado Plateau Geosystems 2012). Other insular phenomena such as insular dwarfing and possible gigantism have been described for some Late Jurassic vertebrates from the Langenberg Quarry. The small sauropod Europasaurus holgeri is secondarily dwarfed according to bone histological study (Sander et al. 2006). Martin et al. (2019a) noticed the large size of the morganucodontan Storchodon cingulatus from the Langenberg Quarry, which is the second-largest morganucodontan known from the fossil record. Large size characterises also the pinheirodontid multituberculate Teutonodon langenbergensis from that locality which represents the largest Jurassic multituberculate recovered so far (Martin et al. 2016(Martin et al. , 2019b. These earlier observations, together with the discrepancy between advanced character evolution and geological age in Hercynodon, add to the growing body of evidence that Late Jurassic terrestrial vertebrate evolution in Europe was affected by phenomena of isolation on individual small palaeo-islands of the European archipelago. Using palaeomaps by Ziegler (1990), Sander et al. (2006) calculated that the largest palaeo-islands surrounding the Langenberg Quarry locality in the Lower Saxony Basin had areas of less than 200,000 km 2 which would not have been able to support large-bodied sauropods. Currently, the Late Jurassic mammal assemblage from the Langenberg Quarry is still incompletely known and this hypothesis needs to be tested by new fossils. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.