Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sciatic nerve injury after acetabular fractures: a meta-analysis of incidence and outcomes

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the incidence and the outcome of post-traumatic and iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy (SNP) associated with fractures of the acetabulum. The results of sciatic nerve grafting for treatment were also investigated.

Methods

PUBMED, SCOPUS and COCHRANE databases were searched for longitudinal observational studies reporting sciatic nerve palsy related to acetabular fractures in adult patients over the last 20 years. Data regarding patients demographics, type of acetabular fracture, rate of post traumatic and iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsies as well as recovery rate are reported. Studies were assessed for their quality. Random effects meta-analyses were carried out to pool overall proportions of SNP incidence and complete recovery. Variations in SNP incidence by main study characteristics were assessed by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. A narrative review of sciatic nerve grafting was also conducted.

Results

Twenty studies reporting 44 post-operative and 18 iatrogenic SNPs in 651 patients were reviewed. The pooled incidence of posttraumatic SNP was 5.1% (95% CI 2.7–8.2%). The pooled incidence of iatrogenic SNP was 1.4% (95% CI 0.3–2.9%). Complete recovery of post-traumatic and iatrogenic SNP occurred in 64.7% (95% CI 41.7–85.4%) and 74.1% (95% CI 31.5–100%), respectively.

Conclusion

A favorable outcome of both post-traumatic and iatrogenic SNP related to acetabular fractures has been found. Due to the poor results of sciatic nerve grafting, a "wait and see" approach may be the best option, in cases of a contused but anatomically intact sciatic nerve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Issack PS, Helfet DL. Sciatic nerve injury associated with acetabular fractures. HSS J. 2009;5(1):12–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-008-9099-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fassler PR, Swiontkowski MF, Kilroy AW, et al. Injury of the sciatic nerve associated with acetabular fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1993;75(8):1157–66. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199308000-00005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meccariello L, Razzano C, De Dominicis C, et al. A new prognostic pelvic injury outcome score. Med Glas (Zenica). 2021;18(1):299–308. https://doi.org/10.17392/1298-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Issack PS, Toro JB, Buly RL, et al. Sciatic nerve release following fracture or reconstructive surgery of the acetabulum. JBJS. 2007;89(7):1432–7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koenig RW, Schmidt TE, Heinen CP, et al. Intraoperative high-resolution ultrasound: a new technique in the management of peripheral nerve disorders. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(2):514–21. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.JNS10464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein HC. Posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip; long-term follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1974;56(6):1103–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmeling GJ, Perlewitz TJ, Helfet DL. Early complications of acetabular fractures. In: Tile M, Helfet DL, Kellam JF, editors. Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p. 729–40.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giannoudis P, Da Costa A, Raman R, et al. Double-crush syndrome after acetabular fractures: a sign of poor prognosis. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2005;87(3):401–7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeremeyeva E, Kline DG, Kim DH. Iatrogenic sciatic nerve injuries at buttock and thigh levels: the Louisiana State University experience review. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(suppl_4):A63–6. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000346265.17661.1E.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sénès FM, Catena N, Sénès J. Use of tubulization (nerve conduits) in repairing nerve defects in children. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(5):554–60. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.164045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pollock A, Berge E. How to do a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(2):138–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017743796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Prisma Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim DH, Murovic JA, Tiel R, et al. Management and outcomes in 353 surgically treated sciatic nerve lesions. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(1):8–17. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Al Adawy AS, Aziz AHA, El Sherief FA, et al. Modified Stoppa as an alternative surgical approach for fixation of anterior fracture acetabulum: a randomized control clinical trial. J Orthop Surg. 2020;15:154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01660-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paksoy AE, Topal M, Aydin A, Zencirli K, Kose A, Yildiz V. Outcomes of surgical management of acetabular fractures treated with anterior approaches. Eurasian J Med. 2019;51(3):257–61. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2019.0241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gültaç E, İltar S, Özmeriç A, et al. Surgical treatment of acetabulum posterior wall fractures: comparison between undercountering and marginal impaction reconstruction method with odd methods. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(5):900–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.01.023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang S-X, Li B-H, Li J, et al. Middle-term follow-up results of Pipkin type IV femoral head fracture patients treated by reconstruction plate and bioabsorbable screws. Chin J Traumatol. 2018;21(3):170–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta S, Mittal N, Virk JS. Use of tricortical iliac crest strut autograft in comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures: a case series. Chin J Traumatol. 2018;21(1):58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gupta S, Singh J, Virk JS. The role of trochanteric flip osteotomy in fixation of certain acetabular fractures. Chin J Traumatol. 2017;20(3):161–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta RK, Jindal N, Pruthi M. Acetabular fractures labelled poor surgical choices: analysis of operative outcome. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2015;6(2):94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2015.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim HY, Yang DS, Park CK, et al. Modified Stoppa approach for surgical treatment of acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.1.29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Magu NK, Gogna P, Singh A, et al. Long term results after surgical management of posterior wall acetabular fractures. J Orthop Traumatol Off J Ital Soc Orthop Traumatol. 2014;15(3):173–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0297-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Anizar-Faizi A, Hisam A, Sudhagar K, et al. Outcome of surgical treatment for displaced acetabular fractures. Malays Orthop J. 2014;8(3):1–6. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1411.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Harnroongroj T, Riansuwan K, Sudjai N, et al. Posterior acetabular arc angle of unstable posterior hip fracture–dislocation. Int Orthop. 2013;37(12):2443–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2090-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Masse A, Aprato A, Rollero L, et al. Surgical dislocation technique for the treatment of acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop. 2013;471(12):4056–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3228-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu X, Xu S, Zhang C, et al. Application of a shape-memory alloy internal fixator for treatment of acetabular fractures with a follow-up of two to nine years in China. Int Orthop. 2010;34(7):1033–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0867-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta RK, Singh H, Dev B, et al. Results of operative treatment of acetabular fractures from the Third World—how local factors affect the outcome. Int Orthop. 2009;33(2):347–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0461-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ebraheim NA, Patil V, Liu J, et al. Reconstruction of comminuted posterior wall fractures using the buttress technique: a review of 32 fractures. Int Orthop. 2007;31(5):671–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0246-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Malhotra R, Gautam D. Acute total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures using modern porous metal cup. J Orthop Surg Hong Kong. 2019;27(2):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019855438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Iqbal F, Taufiq I, Najjad MKR, et al. Fucntional and radiological outcome of surgical management of acetabular fractures in tertiary care hospital. Hip Pelvis. 2016;28(4):217–24. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2016.28.4.217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Senes FM, Campus R, Becchetti F, et al. Sciatic nerve injection palsy in the child: early microsurgical treatment and long term results. Microsurg Off J Int Microsurg Soc Eur Fed Soc Microsurg. 2009;29(6):443–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Socolovsky M, Di Masi G. Exposure of the sciatic nerve in the gluteal region without sectioning the gluteus maximus: analysis of a series of 18 cases. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:15. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.92929.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Maripuu A, Björkman A, Björkman-Burtscher IM, et al. Reconstruction of sciatic nerve after traumatic injury in humans-factors influencing outcome as related to neurobiological knowledge from animal research. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2012;7(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7221-7-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Letournel E, Judet R. Early Complications of operative treatment. In: Fractures of the acetabulum. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 1981. pp. 311–5.

  36. Helfet DL, Hissa EA, Sergay S, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in the surgical management of acute acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5(2):161–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199105020-00007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Helfet DL, Anand N, Malkani AL, et al. Intraoperative monitoring of motor pathways during operative fixation of acute acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(1):2–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199701000-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar A, Bhattacharya A, Makhija N. Evoked potential monitoring in anaesthesia and analgesia. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(3):225–41. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01120.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Middlebrooks ES, Sims SH, Kellam JF, et al. Incidence of sciatic nerve injury in operatively treated acetabular fractures without somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(5):327–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199707000-00004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Letournel E, Judet R, Elson RA. Late complications of operative treatment within three weeks of injury. (Ed) Reginald A. Elson In: Fractures of the acetabulum.Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 1993. pp. 541–63.

  41. Grinsell D, Keating CP. Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. BioMed Res Int. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/698256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Omer GE, Spinner M. Management of peripheral nerve problems. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Taha A, Taha J. Results of suture of the sciatic nerve after missile injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1998;45(2):340–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199808000-00022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim HT, Ahn J-M, Hur J-O, et al. Reconstruction of acetabular posterior wall fractures. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011;3(2):114–20. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2011.3.2.114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. de Almeida AGI, Garrido CA, Vaz Amaral LE, et al. Prospective study on seventy-six cases of fractured acetabulum with surgical treatment. Rev Bras Ortop. 2011;46(5):520–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30406-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Giordano V, do Amaral NP, Pallottino A, et al. Operative treatment of transverse acetabular fractures: is it really necessary to fix both columns? Int J Med Sci. 2009;6(4):192–9. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.6.192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodoros H. Tosounidis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors report no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15759 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stavrakakis, I.M., Kritsotakis, E.I., Giannoudis, P.V. et al. Sciatic nerve injury after acetabular fractures: a meta-analysis of incidence and outcomes. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 2639–2654 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01896-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01896-0

keywords

Navigation