Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lebensqualität von Stomapatienten

Quality of life of stoma patients

  • Stoma- und Wundmanagement
  • Published:
coloproctology Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die Anlage eines Stomas führt häufig zu einer Verschlechterung der Lebensqualität. Verschiedene patienten-, krankheits- und stomaassoziierte Faktoren spielen hierbei eine Rolle, deren Kenntnis für die Identifizierung und Betreuung von Patienten notwendig ist, deren Lebensqualität durch die Anlage eines Stomas gefährdet ist. Andererseits kann die Stomaanlage in manchen Situationen auch zu einer Verbesserung der Lebensqualität führen. Diese Übersichtsarbeit gibt einen aktuellen Überblick über die Datenlage.

Abstract

Creation of a stoma is frequently associated with a negative impact on the patients’ quality of life. Different patient-, disease-, and stoma-related factors play a role and their knowledge is important to identify and support patients who are at risk to experience impaired quality of life due to a stoma. On the other hand, in some situations a stoma has the potential to improve patient´s quality of life. This review provides an overview on the current literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Pittman J, Kozell K, Gray M (2009) Should WOC nurses measure health-related quality of life in patients undergoing intestinal ostomy surgery? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 36:254–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krouse R, Grant M, Ferrell B et al (2007) Quality of life outcomes in 599 cancer and non-cancer patients with colostomies. J Surg Res 138:79–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siassi M, Weiss M, Hohenberger W et al (2009) Personality rather than clinical variables determines quality of life after major colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 52:662–668

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morris A, Leach B (2017) A qualitative exploration of the lived experiences of patients before and after Ileostomy creation as a result of surgical management for Crohn’s disease. Ostomy Wound Manage 63:34–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kasparek MS, Glatzle J, Temeltcheva T et al (2007) Long-term quality of life in patients with Crohn’s disease and perianal fistulas: influence of fecal diversion. Dis Colon Rectum 50:2067–2074

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kasparek MS, Jauch KW (2010) Stoma creation during low anterior resection: the cons. Chirurg 81:968–973

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D et al (2001) Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study. Arch Surg 136:338–342

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsunoda A, Tsunoda Y, Narita K et al (2008) Quality of life after low anterior resection and temporary loop ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51:218–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neuman HB, Park J, Fuzesi S et al (2012) Rectal cancer patients’ quality of life with a temporary stoma: shifting perspectives. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1117–1124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrle F, Sandra-Petrescu F, Weiss C et al (2016) Quality of life and timing of stoma closure in patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection with diverting stoma: a multicenter longitudinal observational study. Dis Colon Rectum 59:281–290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2002) Prospective analysis of quality of life after reversal of a defunctioning loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 4:167–171

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Siassi M, Hohenberger W, Lösel F et al (2008) Quality of life and patient’s expectations after closure of a temporary stoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1207–1212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Keane C, Park J, Öberg S et al (2019) Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer. Br J Surg 106:645–652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vogel I, Reeves N, Tanis PJ et al (2021) Impact of a defunctioning ileostomy and time to stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 25:751–760

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Keane C, Fearnhead NS, Bordeianou L et al (2020) International consensus definition of low anterior resection syndrome. Colorectal Dis 22:331–341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park J, Danielsen AK, Angenete E et al (2018) Quality of life in a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial). Br J Surg 105:244–251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee KH, Kim HO, Kim JS et al (2019) Prospective study on the safety and feasibility of early ileostomy closure 2 weeks after lower anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res 96:41–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park YY, Yang SY, Han YD et al (2019) Predictive factors for bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cross-sectional study. Dis Colon Rectum 62:925–933

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keane C, Sharma P, Yuan L et al (2020) Impact of temporary ileostomy on long-term quality of life and bowel function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 90:687–692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Clausen FB, Dohrn N, Hölmich ER et al (2021) Safety of early ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 36:203–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Sarma DR et al (2019) Meta-analysis of temporary loop ileostomy closure during or after adjuvant chemotherapy following rectal cancer resection: the dilemma remains. Int J Colorectal Dis 34:1151–1159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Collaborative DCR (2021) Factors impacting time to ileostomy closure after anterior resection: the UK closure of ileostomy timing cohort study (CLOSE-IT). Colorectal Dis 23:1109–1119

    Google Scholar 

  23. Elsner AT, Brosi P, Walensi M et al (2021) Closure of temporary Ileostomy 2 versus 12 weeks after rectal resection for cancer: a word of caution from a prospective, randomized controlled multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 64:1398–1406

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Denost Q, Sylla D, Fleming C et al (2023) A phase III randomized trial evaluating the quality of life impact of a tailored versus systematic use of defunctioning ileostomy following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer-GRECCAR 17 trial protocol. Colorectal Dis 25:443–452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang MA‑O, Ye LA‑O, Yu KX et al (2023) Development of prediction model of low anterior resection syndrome for colorectal cancer patients after surgery based on machine-learning technique. Cancer Med 12(2):1501–1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5041. Epub 2022 Jul 28

  26. Nicotera AA‑O, Falletto E, Arezzo A et al (2022) Risk factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 36(8):6059–6066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-09002-y. Epub 2022 Feb 8

  27. He SA‑O, Zhang J, Wang R et al (2022) Impact of long-course neoadjuvant radiation on postoperative low anterior resection syndrome and stoma status in rectal cancer: long-term functional follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. BJS Open 6(6):zrac127. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac127

  28. Varghese C, Wells CI, O’Grady G et al (2022) The longitudinal course of low-anterior resection syndrome: an individual patient meta-analysis. Ann Surg 276(1):46–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kasparek MS, Hassan I, Cima RR et al (2011) Quality of life after coloanal anastomosis and abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancers: sphincter preservation vs quality of life. Colorectal Dis 13:872–877

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cornish JA, Tilney HS, Heriot AG et al (2007) A meta-analysis of quality of life for abdominoperineal excision of rectum versus anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2056–2068

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P (2012) Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD4323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Algie JPA, van Kooten RT, Tollenaar R et al (2022) Stoma versus anastomosis after sphincter-sparing rectal cancer resection; the impact on health-related quality of life. Int J Colorectal Dis 37:2197–2205

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kristensen HO, Thyo A, Emmertsen KJ et al (2022) Surviving rectal cancer at the cost of a colostomy: global survey of long-term health-related quality of life in 10 countries. BJS Open 6(6):zrac085. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac085

  34. Krogsgaard M, Kristensen HO, Furnee EJB et al (2022) Life with a stoma across five European countries—A cross-sectional study on long-term rectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 30:8969–8979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kent DJ, Arnold Long M, Bauer C (2015) Revisiting colostomy irrigation: a viable option for persons with permanent descending and sigmoid colostomies. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 42:162–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Boutry E, Bertrand MM, Ripoche J et al (2021) Quality of life in colostomy patients practicing colonic irrigation: An observational study. J Visc Surg 158:4–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jansen F, van Uden-Kraan CF, Braakman JA et al (2015) A mixed-method study on the generic and ostomy-specific quality of life of cancer and non-cancer ostomy patients. Support Care Cancer 23:1689–1697

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Abdalla MI, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD et al (2016) The impact of ostomy on quality of life and functional status of Crohn’s disease patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 22:2658–2664

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bianchi R, Mamadou-Pathe B, von Kanel R et al (2022) Effect of closed and permanent stoma on disease course, psychological well-being and working capacity in Swiss IBD cohort study patients. PLoS ONE 17:e274665

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Mahadev S, Young JM, Selby W et al (2012) Self-reported depressive symptoms and suicidal feelings in perianal Crohn’s disease. Colorectal Dis 14:331–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Knowles SR, Wilson J, Wilkinson A et al (2013) Psychological well-being and quality of life in Crohn’s disease patients with an ostomy: a preliminary investigation. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 40:623–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Donnelly M, Ryan OK, Ryan ÉJ et al (2023) Comparison of restorative proctocolectomy with and without defunctioning loop ileostomy in patients with ulcerative colitis—A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis. J Crohns Colitis jjad021. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad021. Online ahead of print

  43. Heikens JT, de Vries J, Goos MR et al (2012) Quality of life and health status before and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 99:263–269

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Koerdt S, Jehle EC, Kreis ME et al (2014) Quality of life after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:545–554

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kuruvilla K, Osler T, Hyman NH (2012) A comparison of the quality of life of ulcerative colitis patients after IPAA vs ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1131–1137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nessar G, Fazio VW, Tekkis P et al (2006) Long-term outcome and quality of life after continent ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:336–344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ecker KW (1999) The continent ileostomy. Current indications, techniques and results. Chirurg 70:635–642

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Angistriotis A, Shen B, Kiran RP (2022) Construction of and conversion to continent Ileostomy: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 65:S26–S36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Risto A, Hallböök O, Andersson P et al (2021) Long-term follow-up, patient satisfaction, and quality of life for patients with Kock’s continent Ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 64:420–428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Deputy M, Worley G, Patel K et al (2021) Long-term outcome and quality of life after continent ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: A systematic review. Colorectal Dis 23:2286–2299

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Salusjärvi JM, Koskenvuo LE, Mali JP et al (2023) Stoma reversal after Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis. Surgery 173:920–926

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Katsura M, Fukuma S, Chida K et al (2023) Which factors influence the decision to perform Hartmann’s reversal in various causative disease situations? A retrospective cohort study between 2006 and 2021. Colorectal Dis 25:305–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kohl A, Rosenberg J, Bock D et al (2018) Two-year results of the randomized clinical trial DILALA comparing laparoscopic lavage with resection as treatment for perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg 105(9):1128–1134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Colquhoun P, Kaiser R Jr., Efron J et al (2006) Is the quality of life better in patients with colostomy than patients with fecal incontience? World J Surg 30:1925–1928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Norton C, Burch J, Kamm MA (2005) Patients’ views of a colostomy for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1062–1069

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Scarpa M, Barollo M, Polese L et al (2004) Quality of life in patients with an ileostomy. Minerva Chir 59:23–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hamashima C (2002) Long-term quality of life of postoperative rectal cancer patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:571–576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Sideris L, Zenasni F, Vernerey D et al (2005) Quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer: impact of the type of surgery and patients’ characteristics. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2180–2191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kement M, Gezen C, Aydin H et al (2014) A descriptive survey study to evaluate the relationship between socio-demographic factors and quality of life in patients with a permanent colostomy. Ostomy Wound Manage 60:18–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mahjoubi B, Mirzaei R, Azizi R et al (2012) A cross-sectional survey of quality of life in colostomates: a report from Iran. Health Qual Life Outcomes 10:136

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Schiergens TS, Hoffmann V, Schobel TN et al (2017) Long-term quality of life of patients with permanent end Ileostomy: results of a nationwide cross-sectional survey. Dis Colon Rectum 60:51–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Baldwin CM, Grant M, Wendel C et al (2009) Gender differences in sleep disruption and fatigue on quality of life among persons with ostomies. J Clin Sleep Med 5:335–343

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Ma N, Harvey J, Stewart J et al (2007) The effect of age on the quality of life of patients living with stomas: a pilot study. ANZ J Surg 77:883–885

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Verweij NM, Bonhof CS, Schiphorst AHW et al (2018) Quality of life in elderly patients with an ostomy—a study from the population-based PROFILES registry. Colorectal Dis 20:O92–o102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Wong SK, Young PY, Widder S et al (2013) A descriptive survey study on the effect of age on quality of life following stoma surgery. Ostomy Wound Manage 59:16–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kristensen HO, Thyo A, Christensen P (2019) Systematic review of the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors on quality of life in ostomized colorectal cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 58:566–572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lundy JJ, Coons SJ, Wendel C et al (2009) Exploring household income as a predictor of psychological well-being among long-term colorectal cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 18:157–161

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Horner DJ, Wendel CS, Skeps R et al (2010) Positive correlation of employment and psychological well-being for veterans with major abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 200:585–590

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Geng Z, Howell D, Xu H et al (2017) Quality of life in Chinese persons living with an ostomy: a multisite cross-sectional study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 44:249–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Maydick D (2016) A descriptive study assessing quality of life for adults with a permanent ostomy and the influence of preoperative stoma site marking. Ostomy Wound Manage 62:14–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Su X, Qin F, Zhen L et al (2016) Self-efficacy and associated factors in patients with temporary ostomies: a cross-sectional survey. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 43:623–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Symms MR, Rawl SM, Grant M et al (2008) Sexual health and quality of life among male veterans with intestinal ostomies. Clin Nurse Spec 22:30–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ayik C, Ozden D, Cenan D (2019) Relationships among spiritual well-being, adjustment, and quality of life in patients with a stoma: a cross-sectional, descriptive study. Wound Manag Prev 65:40–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Rafiei H, Naseh L, Hosseinabadi-farahani M et al (2018) Spiritual wellbeing and quality of life in stoma patients. Gastrointest Nurs 16:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  75. Antoniadis D, Giakoustidis A, Paramythiotis D et al (2022) Mental health well-being and functional adjustment in colorectal cancer patients: a prospective cohort study. Acta Chir Belg 11;1–24. Online ahead of print

  76. Diniz IV, Pereira da Silva I, Silva RA et al (2023) Effects of the quality of life on the adaptation of people with an intestinal stoma. Clin Nurs Res 32:527–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Foster C, Haviland J, Winter J et al (2016) Pre-surgery depression and confidence to manage problems predict recovery trajectories of health and wellbeing in the first two years following colorectal cancer: results from the CREW cohort study. PLoS ONE 11:e155434

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Black P, Notter J (2021) Psychological issues affecting patients living with a stoma. Br J Nurs 30:S20–S32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Nam KH, Kim HY, Kim JH et al (2019) Effects of social support and self-efficacy on the psychosocial adjustment of Korean ostomy patients. Int Wound J 16(Suppl 1):13–20

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Zhang Y, Xian H, Yang Y et al (2019) Relationship between psychosocial adaptation and health-related quality of life of patients with stoma: A descriptive, cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs 28:2880–2888

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Jin Y, Wang Y, Ma H et al (2022) The efficacy and mechanism of positive psychological intervention on well-being for colostomy patients: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 30:5747–5757

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Knowles SR, Tribbick D, Connell WR et al (2017) Exploration of health status, illness perceptions, coping strategies, psychological morbidity, and quality of life in individuals with fecal ostomies. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 44:69–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Iqbal F, Batool Z, Varma S et al (2014) A survey to assess knowledge among international colorectal clinicians and enterostomal therapy nurses about stoma-related faith needs of Muslim patients. Ostomy Wound Manage 60:28–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Iqbal F, Kujan O, Bowley DM et al (2016) Quality of life after ostomy surgery in muslim patients: a systematic review of the literature and suggestions for clinical practice. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 43:385–391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Kuzu MA, Topçu O, Uçar K et al (2002) Effect of sphincter-sacrificing surgery for rectal carcinoma on quality of life in Muslim patients. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1359–1366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Gu J, Valente MA, Remzi FH et al (2015) Factors affecting the fate of faecal diversion in patients with perianal Crohn’s disease. Colorectal Dis 17:66–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J et al (2000) Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs. colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 43:650–655

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Silva MA, Ratnayake G, Deen KI (2003) Quality of life of stoma patients: temporary ileostomy versus colostomy. World J Surg 27:421–424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kumano K, Kitaguchi D, Owada Y et al (2023) A comparative study of stoma-related complications from diverting loop ileostomy or colostomy after colorectal surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 408:139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Boutry E, Bertrand MM, Ripoche J et al (2021) Quality of life in colostomy patients practicing colonic irrigation: An observational study. J Visc Surg 158:4–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Makela JT, Turku PH, Laitinen ST (1997) Analysis of late stomal complications following ostomy surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 86:305–310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Shabbir J, Britton DC (2010) Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis 12:958–964

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Maydick-Youngberg D (2017) A descriptive study to explore the effect of peristomal skin complications on quality of life of adults with a permanent ostomy. Ostomy Wound Manage 63:10–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Osborne W, White M, Aibibula M et al (2022) Prevalence of leakage and its negative impact on quality of life in people living with a stoma in the UK. Br J Nurs 31:S24–S38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Arolfo S, Borgiotto C, Bosio G et al (2018) Preoperative stoma site marking: a simple practice to reduce stoma-related complications. Tech Coloproctol 22:683–687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Person B, Ifargan R, Lachter J et al (2012) The impact of preoperative stoma site marking on the incidence of complications, quality of life, and patient’s independence. Dis Colon Rectum 55:783–787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Forsmo HM, Pfeffer F, Rasdal A et al (2016) Pre- and postoperative stoma education and guidance within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme reduces length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery. Int J Surg 36:121–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Cakmak A, Aylaz G, Kuzu MA (2010) Permanent stoma not only affects patients’ quality of life but also that of their spouses. World J Surg 34:2872–2876

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Fingren J, Lindholm E, Petersén C et al (2018) A prospective, explorative study to assess adjustment 1 year after ostomy surgery among Swedish patients. Ostomy Wound Manage 64:12–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Huang Q, Zhuang Y, Ye X et al (2021) The effect of online training-based continuous nursing care for rectal cancer-patients undergoing permanent colostomy. Am J Transl Res 13:3084–3092

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. de Ponthaud C, Roupret M, Vernerey D et al (2023) StomaCare: quality of life impact after enhanced follow-up of ostomy patients by a home healthcare nursing service—a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 25:128–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Krouse RS, Grant M, McCorkle R et al (2016) A chronic care ostomy self-management program for cancer survivors. Psychooncology 25:574–581

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Su X, Zhen L, Zhu M et al (2017) Determinants of self-efficacy and quality of life in patients with temporary enterostomy: a cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs 26:477–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Khalilzadeh Ganjalikhani M, Tirgari B, Roudi Rashtabadi O et al (2019) Studying the effect of structured ostomy care training on quality of life and anxiety of patients with permanent ostomy. Int Wound J 16:1383–1390

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Yang S, Park JW, Hur H et al (2022) Development of a home health care service platform for ostomy patient management. Ann Coloproctol [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00360.0051

  106. Soares-Pinto I, Braga AMP, Santos I et al (2023) ehealth promoting Stoma self-care for people with an elimination ostomy: focus group study. JMIR Hum Factors 10:e39826

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Wang QQ, Zhao J, Huo XR et al (2018) Effects of a home care mobile app on the outcomes of discharged patients with a stoma: A randomised controlled trial. J Clin Nurs 27:3592–3602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Viszeralchirurgie Klinik Josephinum, Schönfeldstr. 16, 80539, München, Deutschland

    Michael S. Kasparek

Authors
  1. Michael S. Kasparek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Kasparek.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

M.S. Kasparek gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden vom Autor keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasparek, M.S. Lebensqualität von Stomapatienten. coloproctology 45, 242–248 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-023-00709-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-023-00709-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation