Abstract
We solve an idealized version of the moment tensor—anisotropy inverse problem. The medium in which faulting occurs has general anisotropy described by 21 parameters. The data are a set of moment tensors for all possible configurations of a unit fault; that is, all combinations of strike, dip and rake (a very idealized assumption, for tectonic constraints may limit available configurations). We first ask whether the anisotropic parameters can be inferred uniquely from the moment tensors and arrive at the answer, “almost”. The data constrain only 20 linear combinations of the 21 parameters; the isotropic Lamé parameter \(\lambda\) cannot be determined. We provide an analytic solution algorithm, valid for both weak and strong anisotropy, that uses the data and a prior value of \(\lambda\). We then ask whether measurements of the trace of the moment tensor and its smallest eigenvalue (proxies for its explosive and compensated linear vector dipole components, respectively) can determine uniquely the anisotropy. Here our analysis is limited to the weak anisotropy case. We find that these data are “almost” sufficient. They constrain only 19 linear combinations of the 21 parameters; the isotropic Lamé parameters \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\) cannot be determined. We provide a semi-analytic algorithm for solving the inverse problem, given prior values of \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\). Numerical tests demonstrate that both solution methods work and can be used to assess the sensitivity of the solution to erroneous prior information. However, because the methods require data for all fault configurations, their application to the sparse data available for most seismic source regions is limited; they complement but do not supplant existing inversion techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aki, K. & Richards, P.G. (2009). Quatitative Seismology (2 ed.), University Science Books (Sausalito, California), 700 pp. ISBN 978-1-891389-64-4.
Burridge, R., & Knopoff, L. (1964). Body force equivalents for seismic dislocations. Seismologial Society of America Bulletin,54, 1875–1888.
Ekström, G., Nettles, M., & Dziewonski, A. M. (2012). The global CMT project 2004–2010: centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors,200, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2012.04.002.
Frohlich, C. (1994). Earthquakes with non-double-couple mechanisms. Science,264, 804–809. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.264.5160.804.
Gradshteyn, I.S. & Ryzhik, L.M. (1980). Table of Integrals, Series and Products, Corrected and Enlarged Edition, Academic Press (San Diego, California, p. 1160), ISBN 0-12-294760-9.
Green, H. W., & Houston, H. (1995). The mechanics of deep earthquakes. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences,23, 169–213. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.23.050195.001125.
Han, L. and Neumann, M. (2014), Inner Product Spaces, Orthogonal Projection, Least Squares, and Singular Value Decomposition, in Hogben, Handbook of Linear Algebra (2nd Edition), 1402 pp, CRC Press, ISBN 978-1-138199-89-7.
Julian, B. R., Miller, A. D., & Foulger, G. R. (1998). Non-double-couple earthquakes: 1. Theory, Reviews of Geophysics,36, 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1029/98RG00716.
Kanamori, H., Ekström, G., Dziewonski, A. M., Barker, J. S., & Sipkin, S. A. (1993). Seismic radiation by magma injection: An anomalous seismic event near Tori Shima, Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research,98, 6511–6522. https://doi.org/10.1029/92JB02867.
Kawasaki, I., & Tanimoto, T. (1981). Radiation patterns of body waves due to the seismic dislocation occurring in an anisotropic source medium. Seismological Society of America Bulletin,71, 37–50.
Kirby, S. H. (1987). Localized polymorphic phase transformation in high-pressure faults and applications to the physical mechanism of deep focus earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research,92, 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB092iB13p13789.
Kirby, S. H., Durham, W. B., & Stern, L. (1991). Mantle phase changes and deep earthquake faulting in subducting lithosphere. Science,252, 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.252.5003.216.
Kuge, K., & Kawakatsu, H. (1993). Significance of non-double couple components of deep and intermediate-depth earthquakes: Implications from moment tensor inversions of long-period seismic waves. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors,75, 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(93)90004-S.
Li, R.C. (2014). Matrix Perturbation Theory, in Hogben, Handbook of Linear Algebra (2nd Edition), 1402 pp, CRC Press, ISBN 978-1-138199-89-7.
Li, J., Zheng, Y., Thomsen, L., Lapen, T. J., & Fang, X. (2018). Deep earthquakes in subducting slabs hosted in highly anisotropic rock fabric. Nature Geoscience,11, 696–700. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0188-3.
Marks II, R.J. (1991). Introduction to Shannon Sampling and Interpolation Theory, Springer-Verlag (New York), 324 pp., ISBN 3-540-97391-5
Menke, W. (2018). Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, Fourth Edition (Textbook), Elsevier, pp 350, ISBN: 9780128135556.
Menke, W. (2019). Construction of equivalent functions in anisotropic radon tomography. Applied Mathematics,10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2019.101001.
Menke, W. & Menke, J. (2016). Environmental Data Analysis with MATLAB, Second Edition Elsevier (Amsterdam), p. 342, ISBN: 9780128044889.
Press, W.H., Teukolski, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. & Flannery, B.P. (2002). Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, p. 994, Cambridge University Press (New York), ISBN 0-521-43108-5.
Robson, G., Barr, K., & Luna, L. (1968). Extension failure: An earthquake mechanism. Nature,218, 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/218028a0.
Ross, A., Foulger, G. R., & Julian, B. R. (1996). Non-double-couple earthquake mechanisms at The Geysers geothermal area, California. Geophysical Research Letters,23, 877–880. https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL00590.
Sohn, R.A. & Menke, W. (2002). Application of maximum likelihood and bootstrap methods to nonlinear curve-fit problems in geochemistry, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems—G3 3; 7(253), https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gc000253.
Tarantola, A., & Valette, B. (1982). Generalized non-linear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics,20, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i002p00219.
Vaišnys, J. R., & Pilbeam, C. C. (1976). Deep-earthquake initiation by phase transformation. Journal of Geophysical Research,81, 985–988. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB081i005p00985.
Vavryčuk, V. (2001). Inversion for parameters of tensile earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research,106, 16339–16355. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000372.
Vavryčuk, V. (2002). Non-double-couple earthquakes of January 1997 in West Bohemia, Czech Republic: evidence of tensile faulting. Geophysical Journal International,149, 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01654.x.
Vavryčuk, V. (2004). Inversion for anisotropy from non-double-couple components of moment tensors. Journal Geophysical Research,109, B07306. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002926.
Vavryčuk, V. (2005). Focal mechanisms in anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International,161, 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02585.x.
Vavryčuk, V. (2011). Tensile earthquakes: theory, modeling, and inversion. Journal of Geophysical Research,116, B12320. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008770.
Vavryčuk, V. (2015). Moment tensor decompositions revisited. Journal of Seismology,19, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-014-9463-y.
Vavryčuk, V., Bohnhoff, M., Jechumtálová, J., Kolář, P., & Šílený, J. (2008). Non-double-couple mechanisms of micro-earthquakes induced during the 2000 injection experiment at the KTB site, Germany: a result of tensile faulting or anisotropy of a rock? Tectonophysics,456, 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.08.019.
Wiens, D. A., McGuire, J. J., & Shore, P. J. (1993). Evidence for transformational faulting from a deep double seismic zone in Tonga. Nature,364, 790–793. https://doi.org/10.1038/364790a0.
Acknowledgements
I thank Josh Russell at Columbia University for valuable discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Data sources
This paper uses no data.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Menke, W. Analytic Solution to the Moment Tensor—Anisotropy Inverse Problem. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 3119–3133 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02468-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02468-2