Abstract
We consider a two person max—min problem in which the maximizing player moves first and the minimizing player has perfect information of the outcome of this move. The move of the maximizing player influences not only the objective function but also the constraints of the minimizing player. The joint constraints as well as the objective function are assumed to be linear.
For this problem it is shown that the familiar inequality min max ⩾ max min is reversed due to the influence of the joint constraints. The problem is characterized as a nonconvex program and a method of solution based on the branch and bound philosophy is given. A small example is presented to illlustrate the algorithm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Balinski, “An algorithm for finding all vertices of a convex polyhedral set”,SIAM Journal 9 (1) (1961) 72–88.
C.A. Burdet, “Deux modèles de minimisation d'une fonction économique concave”, R.I.R.O. No. V-1-1970 (1970) 79–84.
A.V. Cabot, “Variations on a cutting plane method for solving concave minimization problems with linear constraints”, Indiana University (1972).
J.M. Danskin,The theory of max—min (Springer, Berlin, 1967).
H. Konno, “Bilinear programming: Part I. Algorithm for solving bilinear programs”, Technical Report No. 71-9, Operations Research House, Stanford, Calif. (1971).
H. Konno, “Bilinear programming: Part II. Applications of bilinear programming”, Technical Report No. 71-10, Operations Research House, Stanford, Calif. (1971).
R.T. Rockafellar,Convex analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970).
H. Tuy, “Concave programming under linear constraints”,Soviet Mathematics, Doklady 5 (6) (1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Support of this work has been provided by the Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-67-A-0214, Task 0001, Project NR 347 020, and by the Department of the Army Contract DAHC 19-69-C-0017.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Falk, J.E. A linear max—min problem. Mathematical Programming 5, 169–188 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580119
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580119