Probing top-Higgs non-standard interactions at the LHC

Effective interactions involving both the top quark and the Higgs field are among the least constrained of all possible (gauge invariant) dimension-six operators in the Standard Model. Such a handful of operators, in particular the top quark chromomagnetic dipole moment, might encapsulate signs of the new physics responsible for electroweak symmetry breaking. In this work, we compute the contributions of these operators to inclusive Higgs and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$ t\overline t h $\end{document} productions. We argue that: i) rather strong constraints on the overall size of these operators can already be obtained from the current limits/evidence on Higgs production at the LHC; ii) \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$ t\overline t h $\end{document} production will provide further key information that is complementary to \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$ t\overline t $\end{document} measurements, and the possibility of discriminating among different contributions by performing accurate measurements of total and differential rates.


Introduction
The Standard Model (SM) has been tested with an impressive accuracy and is so far in excellent agreement with the experimental data. The room left for new physics at the TeV scale is therefore getting more and more squeezed, thanks to the LHC. Effective field theory (EFT) provides a model independent parametrization of the potential deviations from the SM while keeping its successes if the new degrees of freedom are heavy. EFT has been intensively used for instance in flavor physics to translate the accuracy of the measurements into strong constraints on the coefficients of the associated operators [1]. Slightly softer constraints on the operators involving weak bosons have also been derived from the electroweak precision measurements [2,3]. In comparison, the operators involving the top quark are poorly constrained so far [4], especially the chromomagnetic moment operator of the top quark [5,6], while those involving the Higgs field remain largely unconstrained. However, this status is about to change. In particular, modifications of the top quark interactions can significantly change the main Higgs production mechanism at hadron colliders, which is under scrutiny at the LHC.
In this paper, we focus on operators that involve both the top quark and the Higgs field. Not only they are little tested, but it is also where one might expect new physics associated with electroweak symmetry breaking to show up. First, we compute their contributions to gg → h due to a top loop. The only non-trivial contribution due to the chromomagnetic operator turns out to be finite and not logarithmic divergent as one would have expected by naive power counting. We then derive the constraints from the experimental bound on the Higgs production rate. Higgs production by gluon fusion alone does not allow to distinguish the new contributions since they are all proportional to the SM amplitude. In section 4, we argue that tth production can provide complementary information to further constrain and to disentangle the various top-Higgs operators.

JHEP07(2012)036 2 Operators of interest
Recently, constraints on effective Higgs interactions from the latest Higgs searches have been derived [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], with an emphasis on the d = 6 operators built from the Higgs and SM gauge bosons. These papers display global fits in a large parameter space. While ref. [8] and ref. [9], are restricted to a particular UV set-up where only a sub-class of operators are important, refs. [7,10] included the modification of all Higgs interactions to the SM particles but considered that only the Yukawa coupling of the fermions were changed, and therefore have not considered the chromomagnetic operator. The spirit of this work is different in that our motivation is to focus only on d = 6 operators that involve both the Higgs field and the top quark. We study their effect on Higgs production by gluon fusion and associated with a tt pair, assuming in particular that hW W and hZZ treelevel couplings are not affected by new physics. The results of our analysis can easily be updated once the hW W and hZZ couplings are better determined. We start with the effective lagrangian [14][15][16] The chromomagnetic dipole moment operator modifies the interactions between the gluons and the top quark, Other operators of dimension 6 play a role in the top-Higgs interaction even though they do not contain both fields. One of them is which amounts to an overall renormalization of the Higgs wave function and therefore to a trivial shift of the top-quark Yukawa coupling [17]. The corrections from those operators to Higgs production by gluon fusion are shown in figure 1. In the large top mass limit, the contribution of the operators in eqs. ( generated by the scale anomaly. Therefore, we are going to derive the constraints on O HG from Higgs production, which we will then re-express in terms of limits on a combination of the above operators. One should remark that not only the Higgs production rate is sensitive to the modifications of the top interactions but also the h → γγ decay. The operator O H does not change the branching ratios since it multiplies all partial widths by the same factor. However, O Hy and the electromagnetic version of O hg induce The main effect of this operator will be to relax the constraints from the h → γγ channel. We reiterate that we do not consider corrections to hW W and hZZ vertices. New top interactions affect all these channels at one-loop. However, their effects to the loop-induced processes h → γγ and gg → h are expected to be relatively larger than for h → W W and h → ZZ because the new operators modify the SM leading order in the first case and the NLO corrections in the second.

Higgs production by gluon fusion
O HG is the only dimension-six operator inducing Higgs production by gluon fusion at tree-level. Its effect on the partonic cross-section is (see also refs. [18,19]) where we have taken the heavy top limit for the SM, i.e., m t > m H /2, and v ≈ 246 GeV is the Higgs vacuum expectation value (vev). The contribution from O HG is quite large compared to the SM one (6πv 2 /α s ∼ 10 TeV 2 ) because the latter is only generated at the loop-level. Consequently, the upper limits on the Higgs production cross-section from the Tevatron [20] and the LHC [21][22][23] strongly constrain the allowed range for c HG , as shown on figure 2. For this figure, we assume that only O HG is added to the SM Lagrangian, i.e., we neglect the modifications of the other production mechanisms or of the decay widths except for h → gg. We used the same NNLO K factor for the contribution of the O HG as for the SM [24] since both amplitudes are the same up to a global factor. The errors on these limits have been estimated by varying simultaneously the renormalization (µ R ) and factorization scales (µ F ) for the SM and the O HG tree-level contributions. Other theoretical  operator O HG is expected to diverge logarithmically since both operators are of dimensionsix. However, its one-loop contribution is finite [25] and can be written as since the dependence on m H is very weak for a light Higgs boson. To derive eq.
and/or the top Yukawa coupling, Their contributions are then easily obtained as a simple rescaling of the SM contribution [17,26] δc The other three operators listed in eq. (2.4) do not contribute to Higgs production by gluon fusion. In fact, the vertex htt comes from the sum of those operators and of their Hermitian conjugates. 1 The relevant part of the operators can thus be written as because the vector current is conserved. Their contributions to Higgs production through the effective operator H † HG µν G µν , generated by the axial anomaly, vanish in the SM due to parity. This result is consistent with the operator relations derived in ref. [27]. In Two-Higgs-Doublet-Models with a light pseudo-scalar, this effective operator should be taken into account [28].
Taking m t = 174.3 GeV, m H = 125 GeV, v = 246 GeV and g s = 1.2, we obtain  Even if the effects due to the new interactions of the top quark are loop suppressed, they cannot be neglected. The coefficient c y , probing the relation between the top mass and its Yukawa coupling, is not constrained by any other process than Higgs production (see recent and rather weak constraints on c = 1 − c y (v/Λ) 2 in refs. [8,9]). Similarly, the present constraints on c hg due to top pair production [5] including the latest ATLAS combination [29], i.e., −0.75 c hg (TeV/Λ) 2 3 at 1 σ and −1.2 c hg (TeV/Λ) 2 3.5 at 2 σ, still allow the contribution from the chromomagnetic operator to have a noticeable effect on the allowed range for c HG as will be illustrated in the summary plots of section 4.
The next question concerns the typical expectation for the size of the coefficient c HG . For example, the one-loop contributions from O H and O Hy have been shown to be as large as the O HG contribution in little Higgs models [26]. The reason is that those operators O H and O Hy can be induced by the tree-level exchange of a heavy particle while O HG is only generated at the loop-level in a perturbative UV completion of the SM (see figure 4). The operator O H is also enhanced compared to O HG in strongly interacting Higgs models [17].
On the contrary, the chromomagnetic operator can hardly be enhanced. It is also generated only at the loop-level (see figure 5)  loop and not the operator O HG . An explicit example is given in appendix A. While dominant in this example, the effects from the chromomagnetic operator are too small to be observed. Alternatively, the hierarchy may come from strongly coupled theories and can be estimated with the help of Naive Dimensional Analysis [30,31]. If only the righthanded top is strongly coupled, the dominant operator involves four top quarks yet does not contribute even at two-loop [32]. In that case, the coefficient of the chromomagnetic operator is only suppressed by one power of the strong coupling compared to two for c HG and both operators can have similar contribution when the strong coupling approaches 4π. However, its effects may again be to small to be observed. So, let us now move to study the effect of these operators on tth production.

tth production
While both Higgs direct coupling to the gluons and new top interactions significantly affect Higgs production, they cannot be distinguished using this process only. Contrary to Higgs production by gluon fusion, the four operators O HG , O hg , O H and O Hy all contribute to tth at the tree-level (see figure 6). Again, the three operators in eq. (2.4) have no contribution for this process due to parity. There is only one additional operator affecting this process, However, this operator involves neither the top quark nor the Higgs boson and is thus not expected to be enhanced. Moreover, the interference between O G and the SM has a suppression similar to that associated with the octet exchange in top pair production (∝ β 2 m 2 t ) [33]. Indeed, the contribution proportional to c G in the squared amplitude for gg → tth vanishes at threshold and becomes constant at large s. Large shape effects on energy dependent distributions are thus not expected from this operator. Consequently, although we include this operator in the calculation of the cross section, we do not consider it in our phenomenological analysis and set c G = 0 in all plots. The four-fermion operators cannot modify the main process, i.e., gluon fusion. and this relation holds at NLO (at least in the flavor universal limit). The total crosssection at 14 TeV is given by for m H = 125 GeV. We included c G and c 2 G terms for indication (but not c G c i terms), however, as mentioned earlier, we will set c G = 0 in the rest of the analysis. The same factorization and renormalization scales as for top pair production, i.e., µ F = µ R = m t have been used since we have only considered a light Higgs boson. The cross-section will slightly decrease if higher values taking into account the Higgs mass are chosen. The errors JHEP07(2012)036 are again obtained by varying the factorization and renormalization scales simultaneously from µ F = µ R = m t /2 to µ F = µ R = 2m t , except for the last two terms ℜ(c Hy )c HG and c H c HG for which the numerical errors are larger. Results have been obtained via the FeynRules-MadGraph 5 simulation chain [34][35][36][37]. The new physics has been computed at the tree-level and the SM contribution at NLO [24,38,39]. The O(1/Λ 4 ) terms have been computed to check the 1/Λ expansion and only take into account the operators that contribute also at the 1/Λ 2 order, i.e., contain either squares of the operators O(1/Λ 2 ) or the interference of the SM with an amplitude involving two new vertices. Additional contributions from the operators in eq. (2.4) or dimension-eight operators and proportional to the imaginary part of c Hy or c hg are not included. The values of the 1/Λ 4 coefficients tell us that the 1/Λ expansion breaks down around the TeV for c i = 1. This lower value compared to top pair production [5] is expected due to the higher energy required for this final state. While eqs.   illustrated in figure 8, which displays the c hg range allowed by the present measurements of the tt cross section. By the time the tth cross section will be measured, the improved constraints from tt measurements will also help in reducing further the allowed range for c hg according to ref. [5]: Like for top pair production, the theoretical uncertainty is responsible for a sizable part of the allowed region. Since those errors mainly affect the overall normalisation, this JHEP07(2012)036 issue could be solved by measuring the shapes of the distributions. Additionally, shape effects could also lift the remaining degeneracy between the four operators. While the contributions of the operators O Hy and O H have the same shapes as the SM ones, the operators O hg and O HG can induce shape distortions. However, only the contribution of the chromomagnetic operator might have a higher energy dependence than the SM. If the Higgs leg is attached to the effective vertex, the diagrams contain only one chirality flip such that no other chirality flip is needed to interfere with the SM amplitude ( figure 6(c)). Moreover, the vertex is not proportional to the Higgs vev like for top pair production. Those advantages are lost if the Higgs is attached to the top line or to a gluon (figures 6(b) and (d)). For those diagrams, the amplitude is proportional to m t and v and no room is left for extra powers of the energy of the process.
The distributions of the transverse momentum of the Higgs, the total H T and the invariant mass of the Higgs-top system are displayed on figure 9. The shapes of the 1/Λ 4 contributions are also shown for comparison. They are clearly stretched to high energy while the interference and the SM contributions have a very similar behavior. The interference with the diagrams in which the Higgs is connected at the effective vertex do not vanish but are apparently suppressed. The shape effects are only expected if the new physics scale Λ is close to the maximal energy probed because they are due only to the 1/Λ 4 contributions. The plots on the right show how the distributions can differ with respect to the SM in the case c hg (TeV 2 /Λ 2 ) = 1.
Finally, spin correlations could exhibit some dependence on c hg . In the case of tt production, the deviations due to c hg were of the order of a few percents [5]. For tth, the measurement will be much more challenging and we therefore do not compute the associated spin correlations here but might return to them in due time.

Conclusion
Only one dimension-six operator, O HG , generates a tree level coupling between the Higgs boson and the gluons. This operator has the largest contribution to Higgs production. Nevertheless, the three operators modifying the contribution from the top loop also have sizable effects compared to the SM one and, in a large class of models, can be comparable to the effect of O HG due to the hierarchy between their coefficients. All those operators are already constrained by the present limits on Higgs production at hadron colliders. However, Higgs production by gluon fusion only constrains a linear combination of these operators and cannot discriminate between them. Interestingly, a light Higgs makes real the possibility of partially solving this issue by using Higgs production in association with a pair of top quarks. Contrary to Higgs production, the leading contribution in this process comes from the chromomagnetic operator O hg , which can therefore be further constrained from the measurement of the total tth cross-section. Shape effects do not come from the interference terms and are dominated by the square of the amplitude involving an effective vertex and could thus be observable for large c hg values only. where Y = 2/3 to avoid the mixing of T with the SM top and Y = −1/3 to avoid the mixing between Φ and the Higgs doublet. The extra piece of the Lagrangian is given by where the parameters M , M S , M Φ and M 3 are around or above the TeV scale. The model has an accidental Z 2 symmetry under which all the SM model particles are even while the new ones are odd. This symmetry prevents any tree-level generation of the higher dimensional operators when the heavy particles are integrated out. The operator O HG cannot be generated at one-loop since the colored particle does not couple to the Higgs. On the contrary, the equivalent operator for the photon cannot be avoided. Indeed, even if the fermions can be chosen to be neutral, all the new scalars cannot be simultaneously neutral. The constraints from gluon fusion in the low mass will change with the branching ratio to two photons. Nevertheless, the chromomagnetic operator is induced at one-loop and its coefficient given by where R S ≡ M S M and R Φ ≡ M Φ M .

JHEP07(2012)036
Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.