Marginal and non-commutative deformations via non-abelian T-duality

In this short article we develop recent proposals to relate Yang-Baxter sigma-models and non-abelian T-duality. We demonstrate explicitly that the holographic space-times associated to both (multi-parameter)-$\beta$-deformations and non-commutative deformations of ${\cal N}=4$ super Yang-Mills gauge theory including the RR fluxes can be obtained via the machinery of non-abelian T-duality in Type II supergravity.


Introduction
There is a rich interplay between the three ideas of T-duality, integrability and holography.
Perhaps the most well studied example of this is the use of the TsT transformation to ascertain the gravitational dual space-times to certain marginal deformations of N = 4 super Yang-Mills gauge theory [1]. Whilst this employs familiar T-dualities of U (1) isometries in space-time, T-duality can be extended to both non-abelian isometry groups and to fermionic directions in superspace.
Such generalised T-dualities also have applications to holography. Fermionic T-duality [2,3] was critical in understanding the scattering amplitude/Wilson loop duality at strong coupling. Tduality of non-abelian isometries has been employed as a solution generating technique in Type II supergravity [4], relating for instance AdS 5 × S 5 to (a limit 1 of) the space-times corresponding to N = 2 non-Lagrangian gauge theories. Developing the recent results of [6,7] this note will investigate further the role generalised notions of T-duality can play in holography.
A new perspective on deformations of the AdS 5 × S 5 superstring has come from the study of Yang-Baxter deformations of string σ-models [8][9][10][11][12]. These are integrable algebraic constructions which deform the target space of the σ-model through the specification of an antisymmetric rmatrix solving the (modified) classical Yang-Baxter equation ((m)cYBE).
If the r-matrix solves the mcYBE then, applied to the supercoset formulation of strings in AdS 5 × S 5 [13,14], these give rise to η-deformed space-times which are conjectured to encode a quantum group q-deformation of N = 4 super Yang-Mills with a deformation parameter q ∈ R [15][16][17]. However the η-deformed worldsheet theory appears to be only globally scale invariant [18,19], the target space-time does not solve exactly the Type II supergravity equations [17] but rather a generalisation thereof [20]. Classically η-deformations are related via a generalised Poisson-Lie T-duality [21,18,[22][23][24][25] to a class of integrable deformation of (gauged) WZW models known as λ-deformations [26][27][28], which do however have target space-times solving the usual supergravity equations of motion [29][30][31][32]. There is also evidence that the latter class corresponds to a quantum group deformation of the gauge theory, but with q a root of unity [33].
If instead the r-matrix solves the unmodified cYBE (a homogeneous r-matrix), first considered in [34], the YB σ-models have been demonstrated to give a wide variety of integrable target space-times including those generated by TsT transformations [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. For these models the corresponding dual theory can be understood in terms of a non-commutative N = 4 super Yang-Mills with the non-commutativity governed by the r-matrix and the corresponding Drinfel'd twist [42,43]. Recently it has been shown that such YB σ-models can be also be understood in terms of non-abelian T-duality: given an r-matrix one can specify a (potentially non-abelian) group of isometries of the target space with respect to which one should T-dualise [6]. The deformation parameter appears by first centrally extending this isometry group and then Tdualising. Following a Buscher-type procedure, the Lagrange multiplier corresponding to the central extension is non-dynamical. In particular it is frozen to a constant value and thereby plays the role of the deformation parameter. This conjecture was proven in the NS sector in [7], 1 A more precise field theoretic explanation of what this limit means has been proposed in [5].
where a slightly different perspective was also given. If one integrates out only the central extension, the procedure above can be seen to be equivalent to adding a total derivative B-field constructed from a 2-cocycle on the isometry group with respect to which we dualise and then dualising.
In this note we develop this line of reasoning. We begin by outlining the essential features of Yang-Baxter σ-models and the technology of non-abelian T-duality in Type II supergravity.
After demonstrating that a centrally-extended T-duality can be reinterpreted as as non-abelian T-duality of a coset based on the Heisenberg algebra, we show how the machinery of non-abelian T-duality developed for Type II backgrounds can be readily applied to the construction of [6,7].
We confirm that the centrally-extended non-abelian T-duals produce the full Type II supergravity backgrounds corresponding to β-deformations (when the duality takes place in the S 5 factor of AdS 5 × S 5 ), non-commutative deformations (when performed in the Poincaré patch of AdS 5 ) and dipole deformations (when performed in both the S 5 and AdS 5 simultaneously). In appendices A and B we outline our conventions for supergravity and certain relevant algebras respectively.
As a third appendix C we include some additional worked examples including one for which the non-abelian T-duality is anomalous and the target space solves the generalised supergravity equations.
The supergravity backgrounds in this note have appeared in the literature in the past but the derivation and technique presented here is both novel, simple and, we hope may have utility in the construction of more general supergravity backgrounds.

Yang Baxter σ-models
Given a semi-simple Lie algebra f (and corresponding group F ) we define an antisymmetric operator R obeying where the cases c = ±1 and c = 0 are known as the classical and modified classical Yang Baxter equations (cYBE and mcYBE) respectively. We adopt some notation and define e.g.
We define an inner product by the matrix trace of generators, Tr(T A T B ), and lower and raise indices with this inner product and its inverse. In this way the r-matrix acts as Suppose we have a Z 2 grading f = g ⊕ k for a subgroup g. Let T A be generators for f, T α those of g and T i the remaining orthogonal generators of k. We introduce a projector to the coset defined by P (T α ) = 0 and P (T i ) = T i or, in matrix form, We also define the adjoint action for g ∈ F by Let the two-dimensional worldsheet field g be a coset representative for F/G with which we define the currents where we use light-cone coordinates ∂ ± = ∂ 0 ± ∂ 1 .
The standard (bosonic) σ-model whose target is the coset space F/G is To define the Yang-Baxter model first we let and define the operator in which we have explicitly introduced the deformation parameter η. Later we will restrict to the case c = 0 in (2.1), in which case the parameter η can be absorbed into the definition of R. The Yang-Baxter σ-model on a coset is given by [15,35] (2.10)

Non-abelian T-duality Technology
In this section we will mainly follow the approach of [4,44,45] including the transformation of RR fluxes. Some subtleties are caused by the dualisation in a coset space and the approach here is slightly different to the one in [44].
Let us consider the standard (bosonic) σ-model whose target is the coset space F/G whose Lagrangian is given in eq. (2.7), and perform the non-abelian T-dual with respect to a subgroup H ⊂ F (which need not, and in our applications mostly will not be, either semi-simple or a subgroup of G). Let H a be the generators of h andH a generators of a dual algebra h normalised such that Tr(H aH b ) = δ b a . Let us we parametrise the coset representative as g = hĝ. We defineĴ =ĝ −1 dĝ and L = L a H a = h −1 dh such that J =Ĵ + L a Hĝ a , Hĝ a = Adĝ−1 H a . (3.1) We also define G ab = Tr(Hĝ a P (Hĝ b )) , Q a = Tr(ĴP (Hĝ a )) . (3.2) In this notation the H isometry of the target space is manifest since the metric corresponding to eq. (2.7) is where we introduce the frame fields We perform the dualisation by introducing a h-valued connection with components A ± = A a ± H a and a h -valued Lagrange multiplier V = v aH a . We covariantise currents such that we are gauging a left action of someh ∈ H and consider where the field strength is We continue by gauge fixing on the group element g =ĝ i.e. h = 1. 2 Integrating the Lagrange multipliers enforces a flat connection and one recovers the starting model since and upon substituting back into the action one recovers the starting σ-model.
On the other hand, integrating by parts the derivative terms of the gauge fields yields in which we have pulled back the one-forms Q andĴ to the worldsheet and defined The gauge field equations of motion now read

12)
2 In some cases it can be that this doesn't fully fix the gauge and additional fixing should be imposed on the Lagrange multipliers V = vaH a , details of this are discussed in [44].
where in the first line A ± are evaluated on the gauge field equation of motion eq. (3.11).
The NS fields can be read directly from this σ-model and in particular the dual metric is given as 13) with e ± given by the push forwards to target space of evaluated on the gauge field equation of motion (3.11). On the worldsheet left and right moving fermionic sectors couple to the frame fields e + and e − respectively. Since they define the same metric they are related by a local Lorentz rotation This Lorentz rotation lifts to spinors via Using the Clifford isomorphism we convert the poly-form sum of RR fluxes to a bi-spinor matrix. The T-duality rule is then given by The relationship between the local Lorentz rotations and RR field transformation in the case of abelian T-duality in curved space was made explicit in the work of Hassan [46] and developed in the present context in [4]. Note that although we have "bootstrapped" the transformation rule for the RR sector from knowledge of the NS sector it seems rather likely that the same conclusion can be reached in e.g. the pure spinor superstring by a straightforward extension of the arguments presented for abelian [47] and fermionic T-duality [48]. 3 Finally let us turn to the transformation of the dilaton field under non-abelian T-duality.
For the non-abelian duality to preserve conformality the dualisation procedure must avoid the introduction of a mixed gravitational-gauge anomaly [50,51] and the structure constants of the algebra in which we dualise should satisfy When this is the case the dual dilaton comes from the Gaussian integration in the path integral [52] (3.20) 3 An explicit demonstration of the RR transformation law in the context of supersymmetry in SU (2) non-Abelian T-duality can be found in [49].
On the other hand if n a = 0 the dual model is not expected to be conformal, however it will be globally scale invariant. In this case we still define the dual "dilaton" to be given by (3.20). The global scale invariance then implies that, for example, the one-loop metric and B- It transpires that the globally scale invariant models that arise from dualising with n a = 0 satisfy a stronger set of equations than those of global scale invariance [6]. These are a modification of the Type II supergravity equations [20,53,54] that depend on a particular Killing vector I of the background such that when I = 0 standard Type II supergravity is recovered. These equations are given in eqs. (A.3) of appendix A.
As mentioned above we take the dual "dilaton" field in these equations to still be defined in To show that the dual background solves the modified supergravity equations we follow the derivation in [6]. After splitting the Lagrange multiplier as v a = u a + yn a , it transpires that shifting y is a symmetry of the dual background and T-dualising y →ỹ gives a conformal σmodel with a dilaton linear inỹ. From the results of [20] this then implies that, in our conventions, the dual model solves the modified supergravity equations with I y = −1.
The classical bosonic string Lagrangian in conformal gauge, has the property that when we replace ∂ − x m → I m it equals W n ∂ + x n where the one-form W , defined in eq. (A.5), is given by Following this procedure in the dual model (3.12) with I y = −1 and the remaining components vanishing, we find that with A + evaluated on the gauge field equation of motion (3.11). To summarise; if the T-duality is anomalous then the background solves the modified supergravity equations with the one-form W , which can be used to define the modification, given by the push forward of the A + component of the gauge field evaluated on its equations of motion.

Centrally-extended duality
Let us now consider non-abelian T-dualities with respect to centrally-extended algebras. In particular we consider the setup considered in [6,7] in which case the dualities are equivalent to Yang-Baxter deformations for homogeneous r-matrices. The aim of this section is to extend this to the RR fluxes using the technology outlined in section 3. We start by recalling that for a homogeneous r-matrix for a Lie algebra f the generators {X ij , Y ij } (for each fixed j) form a basis for a subalgebra h, which admits a central extension. In eq. (4.1) η j are free parameters, while a ij are fixed real coefficients. For each free parameter we introduce a central extension, such that the centrally-extended algebra has a basis This is the centrally-extended algebra with respect to which we dualise.
The precise relation between the centrally-extended non-abelian T-dual and the Yang-Baxter deformation was made in the NS sector in [7]. The R-operator (see eq. (2.3)) governing a certain Yang-Baxter deformation defines an invertible map from h to h. Recalling our parametrisation of the F/G coset representative g = hĝ with h ∈ H, we may write h = exp(R(X)) for X ∈ h . If h is abelian then the relation between the Lagrange multipliers parametrising the T-dual model and the YB deformed model is simple: When h is non-abelian the relation is more involved [7].  We let T 1 = X, T 2 = Y and T 3 = Z and hence the only non-vanishing structure constant is We introduce the matrix generators and the group element The left-invariant one-forms g −1 dg = L i T i are We consider a σ-model based on this algebra limit λ → 0 the theory develops a gauge invariance (the coordinate x 3 drops out of the action all together) and reduces to the σ-model whose target space is simply ds 2 = f 1 dx 2 1 + f 2 dx 2 2 . This Rube Goldberg construction allows us to now go head and perform a non-abelian T-duality on the coset following the techniques of [44].
The resulting dual σ-model is given by in which (4.8) The matrix M −1 diverges in the limit of interest λ → 0. In particular, the coefficient of the kinetic term for v 3 becomes infinite in the limit and this can be understood as freezing v 3 to a constant value. To see this let us rewrite the dual σ-model as where we integrate over a ± . Now taking λ → 0 and then integrating out a ± we find ∂ ± v 3 = 0 and indeed v 3 is frozen to a constant value. This final step is analogous to the Buscher procedure considered in [6]. The true target space of the dual model is then spanned by the coordinates v 1 ≡ y 2 and v 2 ≡ y 1 , while v 3 ≡ ν is a constant parameter. The dual metric, B-field and dilaton shift are easily ascertained: Frame fields for the dual geometry as seen by left and right movers [44] are given by . (4.12) The plus and minus frames are then related by a Lorentz rotation

Applications
Let us now turn to specific examples for which we construct the dual RR fluxes corresponding to various centrally-extended non-abelian T-dualities of AdS 5 × S 5 using the technology outlined in section 3. Here we will consider certain deformations that are well-known to correspond to TsT transformations. In appendix C we consider further examples that correspond to Yang-Baxter deformations with time-like abelian and non-abelian r-matrices.

Application 1: Non-Commutative Deformations
The first application we consider is the string background dual to non-commutative N = 4 super Yang-Mills [55,56] Starting from the undeformed background we now consider the non-abelian T-dual with respect to the central extension of U (1) 2 , where the U (1) 2 is generated by shifts in x 2 and x 3 . Using eqs. (4.10) -(4.13) with y 1 = x 3 a 2 , y 2 = x 2 a 2 , f 1 = f 2 = u 2 and setting the deformation parameter ν = a −2 we find that the plus and minus frames are given by The Lorentz rotation of (4.13) induces a spinorial action according to (3.16) given by The corresponding poly-form of eq. (3.17) is then given by The transformation of the poly-form under T-duality is given by Extracting the dual background from the above data we find This is always the case in these comparisons [6,7] and from now on by agreement we always mean up to a gauge term in the B-field. preserve N = 1 supersymmetry [57]. The corresponding superpotential for these theories is integrability not expected and, as of now, no known complete gravitational dual constructed.

Application 2: Marginal Deformations
A more general class of non-supersymmetric deformations 4 of this gauge theory are defined by a scalar potential 4 Care needs be taken in the interpretation of this deformation. Away from the supersymmetric point the γi deformation is not conformal due a running coupling of a double-trace operator [64] and indeed the gravitational dual has a tachyon [65].
where q i = e −2πiγ i . This three parameter deformation, known as the γ-deformation, enjoys integrability both in the gauge theory [66] and in the worldsheet σ-model with the target space given by the postulated gravitational dual background constructed in [59]. Upon setting all three deformation parameters equal this reduces to the β-deformation with enhanced N = 1 supersymmetry and hence we will proceed with the general case.
Rather remarkably the string σ-model in the γ-deformed target space can be obtained as Yang-Baxter σ-model [40,41]. Let us consider the bosonic sector, restricting our attention to the five-sphere of AdS 5 × S 5 ; the AdS factor plays no role in what follows. It is convenient to follow [59] and parametrise the S 5 in coordinates adapted to the U (1) 3 isometry where r 1 = C α , r 2 = S α C ξ , r 3 = S α S ξ with C x and S x denoting cos x and sin x respectively. The sphere can be realised as the coset SU (4)/SO(5) for which a particular coset representative is given by where γ 13 and γ 1 are certain SU (4) generators (see appendix B for conventions) and h i are the three Cartan generators. Letting P be the projector onto the coset and J ± = g −1 ∂ ± g pull backs of the left-invariant one-form, the S 5 σ-model Lagrangian is with the parametrisation (5.13) giving the σ-model with target space metric (5.12).
Starting with the r-matrix it was shown in [35,39] that the NS sector of the Yang-Baxter σ-model matches the γ-deformed target space explicitly given by with where the parameters ν i are related to the γ i of the field theory by a factor of the AdS radius [59], which we suppress throughout.
We would like to interpret this in terms of the centrally-extended (non-)abelian T-duality introduced in section 4. To do so we find it expedient to make a basis transformation of the Cartan generators; let us assume ν 3 = 0 and definẽ In this basis the r-matrix simply reads We also introduce a new set of angles such thath iφi = h i φ i (where the sum over i is implicit).
Written in this way it is clear that we should consider a centrally-extended (non-)abelian Tduality along theh 1 andh 2 directions. To proceed we defined a slightly exotic set of frame fields for the S 5 , adapted to the dualisation as described where ϕ = (r 2 2 ν 2 3 + r 3 3 ν 2 2 ) and by parametrising the Lagrange multiplier parameters as After some work one finds the dual metric is exactly that of eq. (5.16) with a B-field matching up to a gauge transformation. 5 The dual dilaton is given by The frame fields produced by dualisation, using eq. (3.14), are e α = e α , e ξ = e ξ , e 3 = e 3 , Following the dualisation procedure the Lorentz transformation in eq. (3.15) is given by for which the corresponding action on spinors is simply (5.26) 5 As with the previous example the B-field obtained by the central extension dualisation procedure differs by a closed piece ∆B = Then acting on the poly-form we ascertain the T-dual fluxes 27) in complete agreement with the results of [59].
To close this section let us make a small observation. For the β-deformation ν 1 = ν 2 = ν 3 ≡ γ there a special simplification that happens when γ = 1 n , n ∈ Z. In this case the deformed gauge theory is equivalent to that of D3 branes on the discrete torsion orbifold C 3 /Γ with Γ = Z n ×Z n . These cases are also special in the dualisation procedure above. Notice that the Lagrange multiplier v corresponding to the central extension is inversely proportional to γ and hence the orbifold points correspond to cases where v is integer quantised. Moreover, recalling that nonabelian T-duality with respect to a centrally-extended U (1) 2 is equivalent to first adding a total derivative B-field, i.e. making a large gauge transformation, and then T-dualising with respect to U (1) 2 , where the required total derivative is again given by the expression in footnote 5, we find that at the orbifold points (ν 1 = ν 2 = ν 3 ≡ γ = 1 n ) the integral of this total derivative 1 is also integer quantised.

Application 3: Dipole Deformations
Dipole theories [67,68] are a class of non-local field theories obtained from regular (or even noncommutative) field theories by associating to each non-gauge field Φ a a vector L µ a and replacing the product of fields with a non-commutative product Whilst intrinsically non-local, these theories can be mapped to local field theories with a tower of higher-order corrections. For small L the leading correction is the coupling to a dimension 5 operator, which for N = 4 SYM was identified in [67] as In [68] the supergravity dual to this dipole deformation was constructed. When aligned in the x 3 direction the dipole vector L specifies a constant element in su(4) which defines in the 4 a 4 × 4 traceless hermitian matrix U and in the 6 a 6 × 6 real antisymmetric matrix M . In terms of these matrices the supergravity metric is given by [68] where n is a unit vector in R 6 , λ = R 4 (α ) −2 = 4πg 2 Y M N and where we have set R = 1. Though this case preserves no supersymmetry, it does yield a simple metric on the five-sphere; viewed as a U (1) fibration over CP 2 (given in appendix B in eq. (B.14)) the deformation acts to change the radius of this fibration such that it depends on the function f 1 [68], which now only depends on the AdS radial coordinate.
To arrive at this dipole deformation via centrally-extended non-abelian T-duality we gauge the central extension of the U (1) 2 subgroup generated by {P 3 , (S 12 + S 34 + S 56 )}. We gauge fix the coset representativeĝ where g AdS 5 is the parametrisation relevant for the Poincaré patch (B.6) and g S 5 is given in eq. (B.12). The Lagrange multipliers are then parametrised as Following the general formulae one arrives at the T-dual frame fields in which Ψ is the global one-form corresponding to the U (1) fibration defined in eq. (B.14). It is a simple matter to extract the Lorentz rotation in the spinor representation Here Γ 12 refers to the directions in tangent space given by frames e 1 and e 2 . This is a product of two gamma matrices, one with legs in S 5 and the other in AdS 5 . Therefore, the action of Ω only produces a five-form in the dualised target space. In fact since, for example, z e 2 + − l e 1 + = −zΨ one finds that F 5 is only altered by an overall constant scaling that could be re-absorbed into a shift of the dilaton. The final result is the target space geometry

Concluding Comment
In this article we have demonstrated that the holographic dual of many known deformations of gauge theories can be understood in terms of non-abelian T-duality, extending the construction in the NS sector of [6,7] to the RR sector. In section 5 we tested the construction on a number of examples: a non-commutative deformation, the γ-deformation, a dipole deformation and, in appendix C, a unimodular non-abelian deformation and a jordanian deformation.
There are a number of interesting open directions. Our construction involved only bosonic generators of the psu(2, 2|4) algebra of the superstring; it would be interesting to extend this to more general r-matrices, including those containing fermionic generators. Furthermore, to formalise the relation between the Yang-Baxter deformations and non-abelian dualities it would be useful to understand how the spinor rotation defining the deformed RR fluxes in the former [69] is related to that in the latter, which was the subject of the present article. Additionally, one would like to understand whether solutions of the modified cYBE (i.e. η-deformations and their Poisson-Lie dual λ-deformations) can be understood in this framework. Finally, and perhaps optimistically, one might hope that generalised notions of T-duality can be employed to find gravitational duals of other non-integrable marginal deformations of gauge theories.

Acknowledgements
It is a pleasure to thank Saskia Demulder, Carlos Núñez, Arkady Tseytlin, Linus Wulff and Konstantinos Zoubos for discussions concerning aspects of this work. The work of BH is partially

A (Modified) Supergravity Conventions
In this appendix we summarise our conventions for the (modified) Type IIB supergravity equations. Similar equations exist for Type IIA. Let us define the following beta-functions For a globally scale invariant σ-model the beta-functions for the metric and B-field vanish up to diffeomorphisms and gauge transformations. There should then be similar second-order equations for the RR fluxes.
There exists a modification to the supergravity equations that still imply the global scale invariance conditions, but now depend on an additional Killing vector of the background I.
These modified supergravity equations can be understood as follows. We start from a solution of the Type II supergravity equations for which the metric, B-field and weighted RR fluxes  [20]. Alternatively they follow from the requirement that the Type II Green-Schwarz string action is κ-symmetric [53]. Recently they have also been formulated in an O(d, d) invariant manner, as a modification of Type II double field theory [54]. The modified Type IIB supergravity equations are where I is a one-form corresponding to a certain Killing vector of the background, i.e.
and the one-forms Z, X and W are constructed from I and Φ It is important to note that for the modified system of equations to be invariant under the gauge freedom B → B + dΛ (where for simplicity we assume that L I Λ = 0) the "dilaton" field Φ must now transform as Φ → Φ − ι I Λ, and hence is not unique. This can be understood by starting from a Weyl-invariant background with a dilaton linear in an isometric direction y, Φ = cy + . . .. If we shift y by an arbitrary function of the transverse coordinates this ansatz is preserved, however the explicit form of the dilaton is changed. After "T-dualising" in y this coordinate redefinition then maps to a gauge transformation under which the dual "dilaton" field now transforms.

B Conventions for Algebras
In this appendix we outline our conventions for the algebras so(4, 2) and so (6) for which we largely adopt those of [70]. For SO(4, 2) we start by defining the γ matrices in terms of which the generators of SO(4, 2) are given by The SO(4, 1) subgroup is generated by T ij for i, j = 0, . . . , 4. The projector onto the orthogonal complement is given by A useful adapted basis when considering Poincaré patch is We also use M +i = M 0i + M 1i for i = 2, 3. The bosonic AdS 5 σ-model is given by for J = g −1 dg and when the gauged fixed group element is parametrised as the target space metric is given on the Poincaré patch by As usual the coordinate u used in section 5.1 is related to z by u = z −1 .
In the examples that we consider we dualise with respect to a subalgebra h ⊂ so(4, 2) which does not necessarily need to be a subgroup of the so(4, 1) subalgebra specified above.
For so(6) ∼ = su(4) we supplement γ i i = 1, . . . , 4, defined above with γ 5 = −iγ 0 and construct the (anti-hermitian) generators The Cartan subalgebra is generated by We take the so(5) subalgebra to be generated by S ij for i = 1, . . . , 5, such that the projector onto the orthogonal complement of this subgroup is Tr(X · S i6 )S i6 , (B.10) where here Tr stands for the negative of the matrix trace. A coset representative for SO(6)/SO (5) can be chosen as leading to the σ-model parametrisation of S 5 employed in section 5.2.
An alternative parametrisation is given by These coordinates give a metric on S 5 that makes manifest the structure of S 5 as a U (1) fibration (B.14) The global one-form Ψ = i=1...3 x i dy i − y i dx i where z i = x i + iy i are coordinates on C 3 given by One can think of Ψ as a contact form whose corresponding Reeb vector has orbits which are the S 1 fibres. For computational purposes we note that frame fields for CP 2 can be found in e.g. [71].
When dealing with the dipole deformation in section 5.3 we will need the full ten-dimensional space-time. This is readily achieved by taking a block diagonal decomposition, i.e. g = g AdS 5 ⊕ g S 5 , with the generators of su(2, 2) ⊕ su(4) given by 8 × 8 matrices, with the su(2, 2) and su (4) generators in the upper left and lower right 4 × 4 blocks respectively. Traces are then replaced with "supertrace" (the bosonic restriction of the supertrace on psu(2, 2|4)) given by the matrix trace of the upper su(2, 2) block minus the matrix trace of the lower su(4) block.

C Further Examples of Deformations in AdS 5
In section 5 we considered non-abelian T-dualities with respect to a centrally-extended twodimensional abelian algebra, demonstrating that this is equivalent to a TsT transformation of the full supergravity background. There are additional classes of deformations that can be constructed as non-abelian T-duals. These come from considering particular non-semisimple subalgebras of su(2, 2) ⊕ su(4), whose existence relies on the non-compactness of su(2, 2). There are a number of such algebras that are non-abelian and admit central extensions [69], such that when we T-dualise the metric with respect to this centrally-extended subalgebra we find a deformation of the original metric [6,7] that coincides with a certain Yang-Baxter deformation. To illustrate this richer story we present a summary of two examples showing how the techniques described in this paper also apply, i.e. the R-R fluxes following from non-abelian T-duality agree with those of the Yang-Baxter σ-model.
is said to be non-abelian if [T a , T b ] = 0 for at least some of the generators. An r-matrix is said to be unimodular if For a solution of the classical Yang-Baxter equation the unimodularity of the r-matrix is equivalent to the unimodularity (f ab b = 0) of the corresponding subalgebra. In [69] it was shown that the background defined by a Yang-Baxter σ-model based on a non-unimodular non-abelian r-matrix is not a supergravity background, but rather solves the modified supergravity described above. The first example we discuss corresponds to a non-abelian but unimodular r-matrix, while the second is a non-unimodular r-matrix.

C.1 Unimodular r-matrix
The first example corresponds to an r-matrix considered in [69] r = η M 23 ∧ P 1 + ζ P 2 ∧ P 3 . (C. 3) The Lorentz rotation Λe − = e + is given by with the corresponding spinor representation This completes the IIB supergravity solution with the three-form and five-form flux in agreement with the expressions following from the Yang-Baxter σ-model [69].
(C. 16) This gives the fluxes The expressions for the metric, e Φ F and I agree with those of the background presented in [74].
Recalling that the "dilaton" field now transforms under the gauge freedom B → B + dΛ, we also find that the "dilaton" and B-field match up to a gauge transformation.