Perturbative corrections to Λb → Λ form factors from QCD light-cone sum rules

We compute radiative corrections to Λb → Λ from factors, at next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy, from QCD light-cone sum rules with Λb-baryon distribution amplitudes. Employing the diagrammatic approach factorization of the vacuum-to-Λb-baryon correlation function is justified at leading power in Λ/mb, with the aid of the method of regions. Hard functions entering the factorization formulae are identical to the corresponding matching coefficients of heavy-to-light currents from QCD onto soft-collinear effective theory. The universal jet function from integrating out the hard-collinear fluctuations exhibits richer structures compared with the one involved in the factorization expressions of the vacuum-to-B-meson correlation function. Based upon the QCD resummation improved sum rules we observe that the perturbative corrections at Oαs\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \mathcal{O}\left({\alpha}_s\right) $$\end{document} shift the Λb → Λ from factors at large recoil significantly and the dominant contribution originates from the next-to-leading order jet function instead of the hard coefficient functions. Having at hand the sum rule predictions for the Λb → Λ from factors we further investigate several decay observables in the electro-weak penguin Λb → Λ ℓ+ℓ− transitions in the factorization limit (i.e., ignoring the “non-factorizable” hadronic effects which cannot be expressed in terms of the Λb → Λ from factors), including the invariant mass distribution of the lepton pair, the forward-backward asymmetry in the dilepton system and the longitudinal polarization fraction of the leptonic sector.


Introduction
Electro-weak penguin b → s decays are widely believed to be sensitive probes to physics beyond the Standard Model (SM) and continuous efforts have been devoted to investigations of exclusive B → K ( * ) + − decays towards understanding the strong interaction dynamics in QCD and constructing the optimized angular observables of phenomenological interest. Unfortunately, no evident new physics signals have been revealed in the exclusive B-meson decays yet, albeit with several "anomalies" under extensive discussions and debates. It is therefore natural to explore the dynamics of flavour-changing neutral current induced hadronic transitions in a complementary way.

JHEP02(2016)179
In this respect the baryonic counter channels Λ b → Λ + − can serve the purpose thanks to the dedicated b-physics program at the LHC. Theory descriptions of exclusive heavy baryon decays have been initiated in the early days of the heavy-quark effective theory (HQET) in an attempt to understand the QCD dynamics of heavy quark decays, and they have attracted renewed attentions recently [1][2][3] towards a better understanding of the heavy-to-light baryonic form factors at large recoil in the heavy quark limit. Also, there are good arguments in favor of studying the exclusive Λ b → Λ + − decays on the phenomenological side. First, the polarization asymmetry of the Λ-baryon in the decay products allows a "clean" extraction of the helicity structure of the weak effective Hamiltonian in the factorization limit [4,5]. Second, the angular distribution for the fourbody decays Λ b → Λ(→ N π) + − offers additional information on the Wilson coefficients of effective weak operators [6,7], due to the fact that the cascade weak decay Λ → N π is parity violating. Third, the systematic uncertainty entering the computation of the Λ b → Λ + − amplitude, induced by the Λ-baryon decay width, is negligible compared with the counterpart B → K * + − channels.
Precision QCD calculations of the electro-weak penguin decays Λ b → Λ + − are complicated by the poorly known hadronic form factors and by the notoriously "nonfactorizable" hadronic effects defined by the non-local matrix elements of the weak operators acting together with the QED quark currents. The main purpose of this paper is to perform a complete analysis of 10 independent Λ b → Λ form factors, at O(α s ), from QCD light-cone sum rules (LCSR) with the Λ b -baryon distribution amplitudes (DA) originally developed in the context of the B-meson decays [8][9][10][11], paving the way for the construction of a systematic approach to the exclusive Λ b → Λ + − decays in analogy to the mesonic counterpart case [12]. As already emphasized in [13] one of the primary tasks of constructing the Λ b -baryon LCSR is to demonstrate QCD factorization for the vacuum-to-Λ b -baryon correlation function in the proper kinematic regime. In the framework of soft-collinear effective theory (SCET) factorization of the correlation function defined with the "A-type" weak current and an interpolating current of the Λ-baryon was established at tree level in the heavy quark limit [2]. Instead of using the SCET technique we will, following [13], adopt the method of regions [14] to prove factorization of the vacuum-to-Λ b -baryon correlation function at next-to-leading-order (NLO) in α s diagrammatically and resum large logarithms in the short distance functions with the renormalization-group (RG) approach in momentum space.
Soft QCD dynamics of the vacuum-to-Λ b -baryon correlation function is parameterized by the non-perturbative but universal wave functions of the Λ b -baryon [15] which also serves as fundamental inputs for the theory description of semileptonic Λ b → p ν transitions [16], Λ b → Λ c ν decays [17] and hadronic Λ b → p π, p K decays [18]. Despite the recent progress in understanding the renormalization property of the twist-2 Λ b -baryon DA [19,20], modelling the higher twist DA in compatible with the perturbative QCD constraints still demands dedicated studies. As we will observe later, it is actually the twist-4 DA of the Λ b -baryon entering the QCD factorization formulae of the vacuum-to-Λ b -baryon correction functions, whose RG evolution equation at one loop is not explicitly known yet (though building blocks of the renormalization kernels for the desired light ray operators JHEP02(2016)179 can be found in [21]). Investigating renormalization scale evolution of the convolution integral of the NLO twist-4 partonic DA and the tree-level hard kernel constitutes another non-trivial target of this paper.
Different QCD-based approaches were adopted in the literature to compute the Λ b → Λ form factors in addition to the recent Lattice QCD determinations [22]. A closely related approach was applied to construct the LCSR for Λ b → Λ form factors at tree level from the vacuum-to-Λ-baryon correlation function [23] where the Λ-baryon DA entering the sum rules were only considered at the leading conformal spin accuracy (the non-asymptotic corrections were worked out in [24] now) and the Chernyak-Zhitnitsky [25] type of the Λ-baryon interpolating current was used (see [26,27] for alternative choices and [28] for interesting comments on the choices of the baryonic interpolating currents). Another approach to compute the Λ b → Λ form factors based upon the transverse-momentum-dependent (TMD) factorization was carried out in [29] where the soft overlap contribution was assumed to be suppressed by the Sudakov factor and only the hard spectator interactions induced by twohard-collinear-gluon exchanges are taken into account. A comparison of the resulting form factors from two different methods tends to indicate that the heavy-to-light baryonic form factors at large recoil is numerically dominated by the parametrically sub-leading power contributions induced by soft gluon exchanges instead of the leading power hard spectator contributions which only arise at the second order in the strong coupling α s (see [3] for more details). 1 Both soft and hard contributions to the Λ b → Λ form factors can be computed in the framework of the LCSR approach, however, two-loop computation of the vacuum-to-Λ b -baryon correlation function is in demand to facilitate the comparison with the hard contributions calculated in TMD factorization. A detailed analysis of the interplay of soft and hard contributions for the Λ b → Λ form factors, along the lines of [30] for the electromagnetic pion form factor, is certainly interesting but beyond the scope of this paper.
The paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we first set up convention of the helicity-based parametrization of the Λ b → Λ form factors and then discuss the choice of the interpolating currents for the Λ-baryon and introduce the correlation functions for constructions of the LCSR for all the independent form factors. We also present the essential ingredients for proof of QCD factorization of the correlation functions and derive the tree level LCSR for Λ b → Λ form factors. Applying the method of regions we compute the hard coefficients and the jet functions at O(α s ) entering the QCD factorization formulae in section 3 where we demonstrate explicitly cancellation of the factorization-scale dependence in the correlation functions and resummation of large logarithms in the short-distance functions is also achieved at next-to-leading-logarithmic (NLL) accuracy with the standard RG approach. Resummation improved LCSR for the Λ b → Λ form factors presented in section 4 constitute the main new results of this paper. The details of the numerical analysis of the newly derived LCSR, including various sources of perturbative and systematic uncertainties, the z-series expansion and a comparison with the Lattice determinations at small recoil, are collected in section 5. Phenomenological applications of our results to JHEP02(2016)179 the exclusive electro-weak penguin decays Λ b → Λ + − at large recoil are discussed in the factorization limit in section 6. Section 7 is reserved for the concluding discussion. Appendix A contains dispersion representations of the convolution integrals entering expressions of the factorized correlation functions, which are essential to construct the LCSR for the Λ b → Λ form factors presented in section 4.
Following [2] we define Λ b → Λ form factors in the helicity basis which lead to rather compact expressions for angular distributions, unitary bounds and sum rules, and we collect the definitions as follows where m Λ b (s) is the mass (spin index) of the Λ b -baryon, m Λ (s ) is the mass (spin index) of the Λ-baryon and we introduce We work in the rest frame of the Λ b -baryon with the velocity vector v µ = p µ /m Λ b and define a light-cone vectorn µ parallel to the four-momentum p of the Λ-baryon in the massless limit. Another light-cone vector can be introduced as n µ = 2 v µ −n µ with n ·n = 2 for the JHEP02(2016)179 later convenience. At large hadronic recoil we write Exploiting the heavy quark symmetry and the collinear equations of motion yields [1,2] at large recoil, where the strong interaction dynamics of the hadronic transitions is assumed to be dominated by the soft gluon exchanges. Hard spectator interactions induced by the two-hard-collinear-gluon exchanges are shown to still respect these symmetry relations at leading power in Λ/m b [3], where Λ is a hadronic scale of order Λ QCD . We will first confirm such form factor relations from the tree-level LCSR (see also [2]) and then compute the symmetry-breaking effects induced by the hard fluctuations of QCD decay currents (also known as the matching coefficients of weak currents from QCD onto SCET) and the oneloop jet function in the next section.

Interpolating currents and correlation function
Following the standard strategy we start with construction of the correlation function where the local current j Λ interpolates the Λ-baryon and j µ,a stands for the weak transition currents Γ µ,a b with the index "a" indicating a certain Lorenz structure, i.e., As discussed in [31] the general structure of the Λ-baryon current reads where C is the charge conjugation matrix and the sum runs over the color indices i, j, k. Implementing the isospin constraint of the light diquark [ud] system we are left with three independent choices (2.11) Projecting out the large and small components of the (hard)-collinear quark fields one can readily identify that the two currents j P Λ and j S Λ are power suppressed compared with the axial-vector current j A Λ . As discussed in the context of the nucleon sum rules [28], the correlation function constructed from the leading-twist current is less affected by the modeldependent continuum subtraction. Also, it is conceivable that factorization properties of JHEP02(2016)179 the correlation function defined with the high-twist interpolating current could be more involved in QCD beyond the tree approximation. We will therefore only consider the axialvector current j A Λ for construction of the correlation function, and more detailed discussions on the choices of the baryonic currents can be found in [28,32,33].
To derive the hadronic dispersion relation of the correlation function we need to define the coupling of the Λ-baryon with the j A Λ current where the renormalization scale dependence of f Λ (µ) is indicated explicitly and the corresponding evolution equation is given by [34,35]. It is then a straightforward task to write down the hadronic representations for the correlation functions defined with various weak currents where we have defined Note also that we have naively assumed that effects from the negative-party baryons with J P = 1/2 − can be absorbed into the dispersion integrals in the above expressions and we refer to [31] for a detailed discussion of eliminating the "contamination" from such background contributions in the context of the LCSR with the nucleon DA.

Tree-level LCSR
Now we turn to compute the correlation function Π µ,a (p, q) at space-like interpolating momentum with |n · p | ∼ O(Λ) and n · p fixed by eq. (2.6), where light-cone operatorproduct-expansion (OPE) is applicable. Perturbative factorization of the partonic correlation function Π par µ,a (p, q) (defined as replacing the hadronic state |Λ b (p) by the on-shell partonic state|b(p b )u(k 1 )d(k 2 ) in eq. (2.8)) at tree level takes the following form where the superscript (0) indicates the tree-level approximation and the Lorenz index "µ" is suppressed on the right-hand side in order not to overload the notation. Evaluating the diagram in figure 1 leads to the leading-order hard kernel 20) and the partonic DA of the Λ b -baryon is defined as where the b-quark field needs to be understood as an effective heavy quark field in HQET and the light-cone Wilson line

JHEP02(2016)179
is introduced with the convention of the covariant derivative in QCD as D µ = ∂ µ −ig s T a A a µ . The tree-level partonic DA entering the factorized expression (2.19) can be readily found to be (2.23) Starting with the definition of the general light-cone hadronic matrix element in coordinate space [19] performing the Fourier transformation and including the NLO terms off the light-cone leads to the momentum space light-cone projector in D dimensions where we have adjusted the notation of the Λ b -baryon DA defined in [19]. Applying the equations of motion in the Wandzura-Wilczek approximation [36] yields It is now straightforward to derive the tree-level factorization formulae at leading power in Λ/m b . Employing the parton-hadronic duality approximation for the dispersion integrals in the hadronic representations and performing the continuum subtraction as well as the Borel transformation we obtain the tree-level LCSR Applying the power counting scheme the tree-level contribution (Feynman mechanism) to the Λ b → Λ form factors scales as 1/(n · p ) 3 in the large energy limit of the Λ-baryon, in agreement with the obervations of [1,2]. Since the large-recoil symmetry relations for the form factors are preserved at tree level, the symmetry violation effect, if it emerges at one loop, must be infrared finite due to the vanishing soft subtraction at O(α s ) in order not to invalidate QCD factorization of the correlation functions.

Factorization of the correlation function at O(α s )
The purpose of this section is to compute the short-distance functions entering the factorization formulae of Π µ,a (p, q) at one loop where ⊗ denotes a convolution in the light-cone variables ω 1 and ω 2 . We will closely follow the strategies to prove the one-loop factorization of the vacuum-to-B-meson correlation function detailed in [13] and employ the method of regions to evaluate the hard coefficients and the jet functions simultaneously. We further verify cancellation of the factorizationscale dependence of the correlation functions by computing convolution integrals of the NLO partonic DA and the tree-level hard kernel in (2.20) explicitly. Resummation of large logarithms involved in the perturbative functions is carried out at NLL using the momentum-space RG approach.

Hard and jet functions at NLO
We are now ready to compute the one-loop QCD diagrams displayed in figure 2 for determinations of the perturbative matching coefficients. Since the loop integral entering the amplitude of the diagram (g) with one-gluon exchange between the two soft quarks does not contain any external hard and/or hard-collinear momentum modes, no contribution to the perturbative functions can arise from this diagram and we will compute the remaining diagrams one by one in the following. To facilitate the discussion of the one-loop calculation we will first focus on the (axial)-vector correlation functions Π µ,V (A) (p, q) and generalize the computation to the (pseudo)-tensor correlation functions Π µ,T (T ) (p, q) in the end of this section. Figure 2. Diagrammatical representation of the correlation function Π µ,a (n · p ,n · p ) at one loop. Same conventions as in figure 1.

Weak vertex diagram
Now we turn to compute the one-loop QCD correction to the weak vertex diagram displayed in figure 2(a)

2)
where k = k 1 + k 2 , ω i =n · k i (i = 1, 2) and D = 4 − 2 . We have approximated the b-quark momentum as p b = m b v by dropping out the residual momentum, since we are only interested in extracting the leading power contributions to the correlation functions. The standard strategies to evaluate the perturbative matching coefficients would be: (i) first computing the loop integrals with the method of regions to determine the "bare" perturbative kernels without the ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) subtractions, (ii) decomposing the resulting contributions in terms of independent operator bases (including the so-called "evanescent operators" [37,38] whenever necessary) with the aid of the equations of motion, (iii) implementing the UV renormalization programs and infrared subtractions (determined by matrix elements of the effective operators), (iv) applying the momentum-space light-cone projector of the Λ b -baryon to formulate factorized expressions of the correlation functions in the end. The above-mentioned procedures can be reduced in the absence of the "evanescent operators" as in our case, since no Fierz rearrangement

JHEP02(2016)179
is required in the perturbative matching: The hard function contributed from figure 2(a) can be determined by expanding eq. (3.2) in the hard region and by applying the light-cone projector subsequently and this leads to where the superscript "par" of the partonic correlation functions Π a,h µ,V (A) is suppressed from now on and we have introduced Evaluating the loop integrals with the formulae collected in appendix A of [13] yields where the coefficient functions read with r = n · p /m b . By proceeding in a similar way, we can extract the hard-collinear contribution from figure 2(a) as follows where the loop integrals are identical to the corresponding case in the vacuum-to-B-meson correlation function [13]. We then write To facilitate the determination of the jet function for the (pseudo)-tensor correlation functions Π µ,T (T ) (p, q), we can just expand eq. (3.2) in the hard-collinear region without employing the light-cone projector in momentum space 12) where no information of the weak vertex is used for reduction of the Dirac algebra. It is then evident that the hard-collinear contribution from figure 2(a) is independent of Lorenz structure of the weak vertex, at leading power in Λ/m b .

Λ-baryon vertex diagrams
The one-loop contributions to Π µ,V (A) (p, q) from the Λ-baryon vertex diagrams shown in figure 2(b) and 2(c) are given by where the isospin symmetry has been employed to derive the second equation. As already discussed in [13] it is more transparent to compute the loop integrals in eq. (3.13) exactly instead of applying the method of regions, then keeping only the leading power terms in the resulting partonic amplitude and inserting the light-cone projector of the Λ b -baryon. The three-point integral

JHEP02(2016)179
can be deduced from eq. (120) of [13] with the following replacement rules Based upon the argument from the power counting analysis, the leading power contribution to Π b µ,V (A) (p, q) can only arise from the hard-collinear region and the resulting contribution to the jet function is found to be where we have defined 18) and the first relation in eq. (2.27) due to the equations of motion have been implemented.

Wave function renormalization
The hard-collinear contribution from the self-energy correction to the intermediate quark propagator in figure 2(d) is independent of the Dirac structures of the weak transition current and the baryonic interpolating current. It is straightforward to write The contributions of the wave function renormalization to the external quark fields can be taken from [13] Π bwf,(1) stands for the contribution to Π µ,V (A) from the wave function renormalization of the q-quark field at one loop, and Φ (1) bud,qwf denotes the one-loop contribution to Φ bud defined in eq. (2.21) from field renormalization of the q-quark.

Box diagrams
We proceed to compute the one-loop contributions from the two box diagrams displayed in figure 2(e) and 2(f). We can readily write With the isospin symmetry of exchanging the up and down quark fields we can again find It is evident that no hard contribution can arise from the box diagrams and the contribution to the jet function from figure 2(e) can be determined by expanding eq. (3.22) in the hard collinear region systematically We therefore conclude that the hard-collinear contribution induced by figure 2(e) is independent of the spin structure of the weak current, given the fact that only the Taylor expansion of the integrand in eq. The loop integral entering the hard collinear contribution of figure 2(e) can be deduced from eq. (128) of [13] with the substitution rules n · p → n · p ,n · p →n · p − k 2 ,n · k →n · k 1 . (3.25) Applying the momentum-space projector of the Λ b -baryon we find

The NLO hard-scattering kernels
Now we are ready to determine the one-loop hard kernels entering QCD factorization formulae of the correlation functions Π par µ,V (A) (p, q) by collecting different pieces together where the terms in the first and second square brackets correspond to the hard and jet functions at O(α s ), respectively. Introducing the definition we can readily obtain the following factorization formulae for the vacuum-to-Λ b -baryon correlation functions at NLO where the renormalized hard coefficients are given by 34) and the renormalized jet function reads Several comments on QCD factorization of the correlation functions Π µ,V (A) at NLO are in order.

JHEP02(2016)179
• Since one universal jet function enters the factorization formulae of the correlation functions at O(α s ) and at leading power in Λ/m b , the symmetry breaking effects of the form factor relations in eq. (2.7) can only arise from the perturbative fluctuations at m b scale, as reflected by the distinct hard functions for different weak currents. To determine the hard collinear contribution to the large-energy symmetry violations, we need to evaluate a specific sub-leading power contribution to the correlation functions induced by the Λ-baryon current. Technically, this can be achieved by introducing the vacuum-to-Λ b -baryon correlation functions with the "wrong" light-cone projector acting on the Λ-baryon current as proposed in [2]. The hard-collinear symmetry breaking effects are shown to be of the same power in Λ/m b as the soft overlap contributions, despite the fact that they are computed with the sum rules constructed from the power-suppressed correlation functions. This is by all means not surprising, because hadronic dispersion relations of the sub-leading correlation functions also involve an additional power-suppressed factor m Λ /n · p . However, the numerical impacts of such hard-collinear symmetry violations defined by a hadronic matrix element of the "B-type" SCET current turn out to be insignificant from the same LCSR approach [2], we will therefore not include it in the following analysis. Also, evaluating hadronic matrix elements from the power-suppressed correlation functions are less favored from the standard philosophy of QCD sum rules, since the systematic uncertainty generated by the parton-hadron duality approximation is difficult to be under control.
• In naive dimension regularization the hard matching coefficients satisfy the relations C ⊥,V = C ⊥,A , Cn ,V = Cn ,A and C n,V = C n,A to all orders in perturbation theory due to the U(1) helicity symmetry for both massless QCD and SCET Lagrangian functions [39]. It is then evident that the axial-vector Λ b → Λ form factors at large hadronic recoil will be identical to the corresponding vector form factors within our approximations.
• Only the weak vertex diagram and the two box diagrams could in principle yield hardcollinear contributions sensitive to the Dirac structure of the weak current, however, such sensitivity is shown to disappear at leading power in Λ/m b after expanding the involved loop integrals in the hard-collinear region, as indicated by eqs. (3.12) and (3.24). This leads us to conclude that the hard-collinear contributions to the correlation functions Π µ,a (p, q) are independent of the spin structure of the weak transition current, at leading power in Λ/m b .
We now turn to consider factorization of the (pseudo)-tensor correlation functions Π µ,T (T ) at one loop. The hard coefficient functions can be extracted from the matching calculation of the weak (pseudo)-tensor currents from QCD onto SCET [40] [q(0) (1,

JHEP02(2016)179
where the ellipses stand for the terms absent at O(α s ) as well as the sub-leading power currents, and we have defined the dimensionless convolution variableŝ = s m b . We have introduced the hard-collinear and the soft Wilson lines to construct the building blocks invariant under both soft and hard-collinear gauge transformations. Performing the Fourier transformation from the momentum space to the position space yields [39,40] Decomposing the correlation functions Π µ,T (T ) in terms of Lorenz invariant amplitudes it is straightforward to derive the factorization formulae

Factorization-scale independence
We are now in a position to verify the factorization-scale independence of the correlation functions Π µ,a (p, q) explicitly at one loop. Having the one-loop factorization formulae at hand we can readily write where the second term in the evolution equation (3.44) is due to renormalization of the (pseudo)-tensor currents in QCD, since we do not distinguish the factorization and the renormalization scales in dimensional regularization. At present the one-loop evolution equation of the Λ b -baryon DA ψ 4 (ω 1 , ω 2 , µ) is not explicitly known in the literature, we will compute the factorization-scale dependence of the convolution integral at one loop in detail. This amounts to extract the UV divergence of the amplitude of the 10 diagrams displayed in figure 3.

JHEP02(2016)179
Applying the Wilson-line Feynman rules we can compute the effective diagram displayed in figure 3(a) as Evaluating the loop integral with the standard techniques yields 48) which cancels the factorization-scale dependence of the QCD amplitude from the diagram 2(e) in eq. (3.26) completely. Based upon the isospin symmetry argument we can readily obtain A few comments on evaluating Φ bud,c ⊗ T (0) are in order. • The equation of motion for a soft u-quark field u T (k 1 ) C / k 1 = 0 is needed to reduce the Dirac structure of the light-quark sector where the second step should be understood after performing the integral over the loop momentum l.
• Since the involved loop integral develops both UV and IR singularities, a fictitious gluon mass m g will be introduced to regularize the soft divergence for the sake of separating IR and UV divergences.
• Employing the Georgi parametrization trick leads to • Inspecting the amplitudes of the effective diagrams in figure 3(i) and 3(j) yields bud,e ⊗ T (0) . (3.54) We then conclude that the single logarithmic terms in the evolution equations of cancel against the ones in the QCD amplitudes for the diagrams 2(b) and 2(c) as presented in (3.17) and (3.14), respectively.
We proceed to evaluate the contribution from the effective diagram displayed in figure 3(d) The factorization-scale dependence of Φ bud,d ⊗ T (0) can be readily determined as The self-energy correction to the light-cone Wilson lines shown in figure 3(f) vanishes in Feynman gauge due ton 2 = 0. We further turn to compute the contributions from the heavy-quark-Wilson-line diagrams shown in figure 3(g) and (h) Evaluating the UV divergent terms of Φ which gives the desired cusp anomalous dimension to compensate the corresponding terms in the QCD amplitude of the diagram in figure 2(a) as presented in eqs. (3.6) and (3.11). Finally, we need to consider the LSZ term due to renormalization of the external light quark fields in QCD and of the heavy quark in HQET which gives rise to Putting all the pieces together we obtain from which we can readily deduce The residual µ-dependence of Π ⊥,V (A) in eq. (3.63) stems from the UV renormalization of the baryonic current as displayed in (2.13). Differentiating the renormalization scales for the interpolating current of the Λ-baryon and for the weak transition current in QCD from the factorization scale (see the next section for details), we reach the desired conclusion that the factorization-scale dependence cancels out completely in the factorized expressions of the correlation functions Π µ,a (p, q) at one loop.

Resummation of large logarithms
The objective of this section is to sum the parametrically large logarithms to all orders at NLL in perturbative matching coefficients by solving RG evolution equations in momentum space. Following the argument of [13] the characterized scale of the jet function µ hc is comparable to the hadronic scale µ 0 entering the initial condition of the Λ b -baryon DA in practice, we will not resum logarithms of µ hc /µ 0 from the RG running of the hadronic wave function when the factorization scale is chosen as a hard-collinear scale of order √ n · p Λ. Also, the normalization parameter f Λ b (µ) will be taken from the HQET sum rule calculation directly instead of converting it to the corresponding QCD coupling, thus in contrast to [13] no RG evolution of f (2) Λ b (µ) at the two-loop order is in demand.

JHEP02(2016)179
Prior to presenting the RG evolution equations of the hard functions we need to distinguish the renormalization and the factorization scales which are set to be equal in dimensional regularization. In doing so we introduce ν and ν to denote the renormalization scales for the baryonic current and the weak current in QCD, respectively. It is evident that the dependence of ln ν needs to be separated from the jet function, while the ln ν dependence requires to be factorized from the hard functions C T (T ) . Following [41] the distinction between the renormalization and the factorization scales can be accounted by writing where J µ 2 n·p ω i , ω ī n·p and C A T (T ) (n · p , µ) on the right-hand sides refer to the matching coefficients given by eqs. (3.35) and (3.38). Exploiting the RG evolution equations and implementing the renormalization conditions The anomalous dimensions γ (k) Λ are already defined in eq. (2.13), and the renormalization constants γ (k) T (T ) at two loops are given by [41] γ (1) where n f = 5 denotes the number of active quark flavours. Now we are ready to present the jet function and the hard function for the weak tensor current with the renormalization scales distinct from the factorization scale Resummation of large logarithms in the hard functions at NLL can be achieved by solving the RG equations where C i stands for C ⊥,V (A) , Cn ,V (A) and C A T (T ) , the cusp anomalous dimension Γ cusp (α s ) at the three-loop order and the remaining anomalous dimensions γ(α s ) and γ (k) T (T ) at two loops are needed (see [42] for the detailed expressions). Solving eqs. (3.74) and (3.75) yields where U 1 (n · p /2, µ h , µ) can be deduced from U 1 (E γ , µ h , µ) in [42] with E γ → n · p /2, and U 2 (ν h , ν ) can be read from U 2 (µ h2 , µ) in [13] with the following substituent rules Finally we present NLL resummmation improved factorized formulae for the invariant amplitudes entering the Lorenz decomposition of the correlation functions Π µ,a (p, q)

JHEP02(2016)179
where µ needs to be taken as a hard-collinear scale of order √ n · p Λ and µ h should be set to a hard scale of order n · p ∼ m b . Choosing ν h = m b to eliminate the single logarithmic term ln (ν h /m b ) in C A T (T ) (n · p , µ h , ν h ), the evolution function U 2 (ν h , ν ) can be further reduced to one provided that ν = m b .

The LCSR of Λ b → Λ form factors at O(α s )
It is now a straightforward task to derive the NLL resummmation improved sum rules for the Λ b → Λ form factors. Working out dispersion forms of the factorized correlation functions with the aid of the relations in appendix A and applying the standard strategies to construct QCD sum rules, we find where we need to multiply out all [1 + O(α s )] factors involved in the NLO perturbative matching coefficients and the RG evolution functions, and drop out O(α 2 s ) terms beyond the NLL approximation [42]. The effective "distribution amplitude" ψ 4,eff (ω , µ, ν) is given by where ψ 4 (ω 1 , ω 2 , µ) = ψ 4 (u ω, (1 − u) ω, µ) is supposed to be independent of the momentum fraction u as motivated by [2,15,19] and will be set to φ 4 (ω, µ) for brevity, andψ 4 (ω, µ) defined in eq. (2.30) can be identified asψ 4 (ω, µ) = ω φ 4 (ω, µ) within this approximation.
The ⊕ function is defined as The following observations on the structures of the NLL sum rules can be made.
• Due to the power counting ω ∼ Λ determined by the canonical behavious of the Λ bbaryon DA φ 4 (ω, µ), the logarithmic term ln [(ω − ω )/ω ] appeared in ψ 4,eff (ω , µ, ν) is counted as ln(n · p /Λ) in the heavy-quark limit. Such enhanced logarithm arises from the contributions of the Λ-baryon vertex diagrams and the two box diagrams displayed in figure 2 and it shares the same origin as the rapidity singularities preventing a complete factorization of heavy-to-light form factors in SCET II (see also [11]). It is evident that the standard momentum-space resummation technique cannot be applied to cope with this term which is independent of the factorization scale. Investigating resummation of such logarithm with the rapidity RG evolution equations [43][44][45][46] is apparently of conceptual interest and we will pursue this endeavour in a future work.

Numerical results
Having at hand the NLL resummation improved sum rules for the Λ b → Λ form factors we are ready to explore their phenomenological implications. We will begin the numerical analysis with specifying the non-perturbative models for the Λ b -baryon DA, determining the "internal" sum rule parameters and evaluating the normalization parameters f Λ (ν) and

JHEP02(2016)179
f (2) Λ b (µ). Theory predictions for the Λ b → Λ form factors at large hadronic recoil will be further presented and extrapolation of the form factors toward large momentum transfer will be performed by applying the z-series expansion and matching the calculated form factors from the LCSR approach at low q 2 .

Theory input parameters
Light-cone wave functions of the Λ b -baryon at small transverse separations have attracted renewed attention [15,19,20] due to the available measurements of the baryonic Λ b → Λ + − decays at the LHC and the Tevatron [47][48][49]. Improved models of the twist-2 Λ bbaryon DA in compatible with the RG evolution equation at one loop have been discussed in [19,20], however, no dedicated study of the twist-4 DA ψ 4 (ω 1 , ω 2 , µ) (or φ 4 (ω, µ)), taking into account the QCD constraints, exists in the literature to the best of our knowledge. Motivated by the "on-shell-wave-function" analysis of [19] we consider three different parameterizations of the Λ b -baryon DA φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ) at a soft scale where φ II 4 (ω, µ 0 ) and φ III 4 (ω, µ 0 ) are analogies to the mesonic counterparts proposed in [11] for the sake of maximizing the model dependence of φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ) and the normalization constants are determined by Applying the equations of motion with the Wandzura-Wilczek approximation yields in analogy to the Wandzura-Wilczek relation for the B-meson DA [50]. We will take φ I 4 (ω, µ 0 ) as our default model in computing the Λ b → Λ form factors from the LCSR approach and take into account the numerical impact of the alternative parameterizations φ II,III 4 (ω, µ 0 ) in the uncertainty analysis. To illustrate the main features of the abovementioned three models we present the small ω behaviors of φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ) in figure 4 with a reference value ω 0 = 280 MeV. We remark that these models do not develop the radiative tail at large ω due to perturbative corrections, and they should be merely treated as an effective description of φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ) at small ω where QCD factorization of the correlation functions is established.
Regarding the determination of the internal sum rule parameters we follow closely the strategies proposed to explore the sum rules for the B → π form factors [13]. • The sum rule predictions should be stable with respect to the variation of the Borel mass parameter ω M . More concretely, we impose the following condition on the logarithmic derivative to a given form factor

JHEP02(2016)179
where F i Λ b →Λ stands for a general Λ b → Λ form factor. The allowed regions of the Borel parameter and the effective duality threshold are found to be where the obtained interval of s 0 is in agreement with that adopted in [2,24]. The coupling f Λ b (µ 0 ) will be taken from the NLO HQET sum rule calculation [51] f (2) In order to reduce the theory uncertainty induced by the Borel mass parameter ω M we will employ the two-point QCD sum rules of the normalization parameter f Λ (ν) [52]  at tree level, where the gluon condensate density α s /πGG = 1.2 +0.6 −1.2 × 10 −2 GeV 4 will be used in the numerical analysis.
We now turn to discuss the choices of the renormalization and the factorization scales entering the NLL sum rules. The renormalization scale ν of the baryonic current and the factorization scale µ will be varied in the interval 1 GeV ≤ µ, ν ≤ 2 GeV around the default value µ = ν = 1.5 GeV. The renormalization scale ν of the weak (pseudo)-tensor currents and the hard scale µ h in the hard matching coefficients will be taken as µ h = ν = m b with the variation in the range [m b /2 , 2 m b ]. In addition, we adopt the MS bottom-quark mass m b (m b ) = 4.193 +0.022 −0.035 GeV determined from non-relativistic sum rules for the inclusive e + e − → bb production cross section at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order [53].

Predictions for the Λ b → Λ form factors
After specifying all the necessary input parameters we will first turn to determine the shape parameter ω 0 of the Λ b -baryon DA φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ). Given the sizeable uncertainty of ω 0 estimated from the sum rule analysis in [15], we prefer to, following [13], extract this parameter by matching the LCSR prediction of the form factor f + Λ b →Λ (q 2 ) at zero momentum transfer to that determined from an alternative method. In doing so, we apply the SU(3) flavour symmetry relation between the Λ b → Λ and the Λ b → p form factors motivated by an analogous relation for the B-meson decay form factors which turns out not to be a poor approximation 2 when confronted with the predictions from both the LCSR [54,55] and the TMD factorization [56,57] approaches. Employing the prediction of f + Λ b →p (0) from the LCSR with the nucleon DA [31] and the result of f Λ /f N computed from QCD sum rules [34] yields f + Λ b →Λ (0) = 0.18 ± 0.04. Proceeding with the above-mentioned matching procedure we then find It needs to point out that the SU(3) symmetry breaking effects can be generated by different sources in addition to the decay constants. Hence, the extracted value of f + Λ b →Λ (0) may suffer from systematic uncertainties due to the yet unconsidered SU(3) symmetry violation. However, we only aim at predicting the shape of Λ b → Λ helicity form factors, with the normalization f + Λ b →Λ (0) taken as an input. The strategy presented here can be further applied to update the predictions for the shape parameters of form factors displayed in table 2 and table 3 when more precision determinations of f + Λ b →Λ (0) are available from different non-perturbative QCD approaches.

JHEP02(2016)179
The apparent dependence of the extracted values of ω 0 on the specific parametrization of φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ) implies that the Λ b → Λ form factors cannot be determined by the shape parameter ω 0 satisfactorily to a reasonable approximation and the detailed information of the small ω behaviours of φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ) is in demand to have a better control on the form factors from the sum rule analysis. Having this in mind, our main purpose is to predict the momentumtransfer dependence of all the ten Λ b → Λ form factors in anticipation of the reduced model dependence of φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ) in the form factor ratios. Anatomy of the sum rules numerically indeed indicates the expected insensitivity of the form-factor shapes as displayed in figure 5.
To demonstrate some important numerical features of the LCSR predictions, we show the dependencies of f T Λ b →Λ (0) on the sum rule parameters M 2 and s 0 and on the factorization scale µ in figure 6 as an illustrative example and analogous profiles are also observed for the remaining Λ b → Λ form factors. It is evident that the sum rules of f T Λ b →Λ (0) exhibits extraordinary mild dependence on the Borel mass parameter due to a strong cancellation of the sysmematic uncertainty between the LCSR of f T Λ b →Λ (0) and the QCD sum rules of the coupling f Λ . One can further find that both the leading-logarithmic (LL) and the NLL resummation improved sum rules are insensitive to the factorization scale µ in the allowed interval and resummation of parametrically large logarithms in the hard matching coefficients only induces a minor impact on the sum rules for f T Λ b →Λ (0) numerically compared with the one-loop fixed-order correction. More importantly, the perturbative O(α s ) correction is found to reduce the tree-level sum rule prediction by a factor of 1/2, implying the importance of QCD radiative effect in baryonic sum rule applications (see also [58] for a similar observation on the perturbative spectral function of the vacuum-to-vacuum correlation function defined with two baryonic currents in HQET).
To develop a better understanding of the origin of the significant perturbative correction, we break the complete one-loop contribution to the sum rules of f T Λ b →Λ (0) down into the hard and the hard-collinear corrections, which are defined as replacing ψ 4,eff (ω , µ, ν) in eq. (4.1) byψ 4 (ω ) for the former and as replacing U 1 (n · p /2, µ h , µ) C ⊥,V (A) (n · p , µ h ) by one for the latter. In figure 7 (left panel) we plot the separate perturbative contributions from hard and hard-collinear fluctuations as functions of the momentum transfer squared. We can readily find that the dominant α s correction at one loop is from the NLO jet (hard-collinear) function instead of the NLO hard function and this highlights the importance of the perturbative matching calculations at the hard-collinear scale performed in this paper. The q 2 -dependence of the ratio f T with the theory uncertainty estimated from varying both the renormalization and the factorization scales in the acceptable ranges are displayed in the right panel of figure 7.
We now turn to investigate the Λ-baryon energy dependence of the form factor f T Λ b →Λ (q 2 ), from the sum rules at LL and at NLL accuracy, which is of particular conceptual interest in that the soft overlap contributions and the hard-spectator scattering effects in the heavy-to-light baryonic form factors differ in the scaling of 1/E Λ at large hadronic recoil. For this purpose, we introduce the following ratio originally proposed JHEP02(2016)179  in [11] where we have switched the argument of the form factor from q 2 as used in the remainder of this paper to n · p 2 E Λ . As shown in figure 8, the predicted energy dependence of f T Λ b →Λ from the LL sum rules exhibits a scaling behaviour in between 1/E 2 Λ and 1/E 3 Λ for the default choices of theory input parameters, while the NLL sum rule prediction favors evidently a 1/E 3 Λ behavior in consistent with the power counting analysis. We have also verified that such observation can be made for the energy dependence of all the other Λ b → Λ form factors.
Since the light-cone operator-product expansion of the correlation functions Π µ,a (p, q) can only be justified at low q 2 , we need to extrapolate the sum rule predictions for the Λ b → Λ form factors at q 2 ≤ q 2 max = 8 GeV 2 toward large momentum transfer q 2 . To this end, we apply the simplified z-series parametrization [59] based upon the conformal mapping of the cut q 2 -plane onto the disk |z(q 2 , t 0 )| ≤ 1 in the complex z-plane with the standard transformation The parameter t + is determined by the threshold of the lowest continuum state which can be excited by the weak transition current in QCD. It is evident that all the channels |BK , |B s π and |Λ bΛ can be produced by thes Γ µ,a b current, the form factors can be JHEP02(2016)179 analytical functions in the complex q 2 -plane cut along the real axis for 13) in addition to the potential resonances below the branch cut. We theretofore need to set t + = (m Bs + m π ) 2 for all the Λ b → Λ form factors. The auxiliary parameter t 0 determines the q 2 point that will be mapped onto the origin of the complex z-plane, and in practice we will choose t 0 = (m Λ b − m Λ ) 2 following [60]. Since the helicity form factors are constructed from the hadronic matrix elements of weak transition currents with definite spin-parity quantum numbers by projecting on the polarization vector for a spin-one particle with the four-momentum q µ , we collect some fundamental information of the lowest resonances produced by the helicity-projected weak currents in table 1.
Since the lowest resonances of the scalar and the axial-vector channels are above the continuum threshold √ t + , it is therefore not necessary to introduce a pole factor in the z-series parameterizations of the corresponding form factors. Keeping the series expansion of the form factors to the first power of z-parameter we propose the following parameterizations for the form factors f +,T Λ b →Λ (q 2 ) and h +,T Λ b →Λ (q 2 ), Table 1. Summary of the masses of low-lying resonances produced by the helicity-projected weak currentss Γ µ,a b in QCD. Since the scalar B s0 meson has not been observed experimentally yet, we estimate its mass using an approximate SU (3) which is found to be comparable to that predicted by the heavy quark/chiral symmetry [62].
for the form factor g 0 Λ b →Λ (q 2 ), and for the form factors f 0 Λ b →Λ (q 2 ), g +,T Λ b →Λ (q 2 ), andh +,T Λ b →Λ (q 2 ). The shape parameters b i 1 can be determined by matching the z-series parameterizations to the NLL sum rule predictions at large hadronic recoil, i.e., 0 ≤ q 2 ≤ q 2 max = 8 GeV 2 . The resulting form factors in the allowed kinematical region 0 ≤ q 2 ≤ t 0 are displayed in figures 9 and 10, where independent calculations of these QCD form factors from Lattice determinations of the two HQET form factors at low hadronic recoil [22] are also presented for a comparison.
To facilitate such a comparison we first need to perform the perturbative matching of the heavy-to-light currents from QCD onto HQET [63] s γ µ (1, (5.17) at leading power in Λ/m b , where the matching coefficients at one loop are given by The HQET matrix element defined with an arbitrary Dirac structure of the leading-power effective current can be expressed by two Isgur-Wise functions at low hadronic recoil [63][64][65] 19) due to the heavy-quark spin symmetry. It is then straightforward to write

JHEP02(2016)179
at low recoil. Inspection of figures 9 and 10 indicates that the LCSR calculations with the aid of an extrapolation inspired by the z-series expansion and the Lattice determinations in HQET reach a reasonable agreement in general at low hadronic recoil. However, the Lattice calculations [22], on the other hand, reveal faster growing form factors of f 0 Λ b →Λ , g +,T Λ b →Λ andh +,T Λ b →Λ but slower increasing form factors of f +,T Λ b →Λ , g 0 Λ b →Λ and h +,T Λ b →Λ at high momentum transfer squared when confronted with the LCSR-assisted z-parametrization predictions. The observed shape discrepancies might be attributed to the unaccounted power-enhanced but α s -suppressed hard scattering effects, and to the yet unknown higher order/power corrections, to the sysmematic uncertainties induced by the parton-hadronic quality approximation and truncations of the z-series expansion in our calculations, as well as to the power-suppressed contributions and to the uncounted systemical uncertainties in the Lattice determinations.
We now collect the calculated form factors at zero momentum transfer F i Λ b →Λ (0) and the fitted shape parameters b i 1 in tables 2 and 3, where the numerically important uncertainties due to variations of the theory input parameters are also displayed.
Several comments on the numerical results obtained above are in order.
• The dominant theory uncertainty for the form factors at q 2 = 0 computed from the NLL LCSR is due to the variation of the ω 0 parameter entering the Λ b -baryon DA φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ), while the most significant sources of the theory errors for the shape parameters b i 1 are from the different parameterizations of φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ) and from the variations of the renormalization scale µ and of the factorization scale ν.
• Large-recoil symmetry violation effects for the Λ b → Λ form factors are found to be relatively small, at the level of 20 %, albeit with the observed substantial perturbative QCD corrections to the form factors themselves. This can be readily understood from the fact that the NLO perturbative contributions to the Λ b → Λ form factors are dominated by the hard-collinear corrections which preserve the large-recoil symmetry in the heavy quark limit.
• Large discrepancies of the slope parameters are observed for the two form factors defined by the matrix elements of the two weak currents with the same helicity projections but with the opposite space-time parities, e.g., f T Λ b →Λ and g T Λ b →Λ . This is in a nutshell due to the distinct analytical structures of two types of form factors below the branch cut in the complex-q 2 plane which lead to the different z-series parameterizations adopted in the fitting programmes.

Phenomenological applications
In this section we aim at exploring phenomenological applications of the calculated Λ b → Λ form factors which serve as fundamental ingredients for the theory description of the electro-weak penguin induced Λ b → Λ + − decays. QCD dynamics of the hadronic Λ b → JHEP02(2016)179  Table 2. Summary of the calculated form factors induced by the (axial)-vector weak transition currents at q 2 = 0 and the fitted shape parameters b i 1 with the uncertainties from the variations of various input parameters. Λ + − decay amplitude is, however, more complicated due to the non-factorizable strong interaction effects which arise from QED corrections to the matrix elements of the fourquark operators and the gluonic penguin operator in the weak effective Hamiltonian. Some typical non-factorizable contributions to the Λ b → Λ + − matrix elements at O(α s ) are presented in figure 11, in analogy to the counterpart B → K * + − decays discussed in [12]. It is evident that the spectator interaction effects displayed in the diagrams (b) and (d) and the weak annihilation contributions shown in (e) and (f) cannot be computed with QCD factorization formalism described in [12] and some non-perturbative QCD approaches are in demand to deal with such non-local hadronic matrix elements. We will restrict ourselves to the factorizable contributions to the Λ b → Λ + − decay amplitude, at O(α 0 s ), in this work, and leave a systematic treatment of the non-form-factor corrections for a future work.

JHEP02(2016)179
Parameter Central value  Table 3. Summary of the calculated form factors induced by the (pseudo)-tensor weak transition currents at q 2 = 0 and the fitted shape parameters b i 1 with the uncertainties from the variations of various input parameters.
(e) (f ) Figure 11. Various non-factorizable diagrams contributed to the Λ b → Λ + − decays. The crossed circles indicate possible insertions of the virtual photon line and the black squares stand for the hadronic operator vertices. Taken from [66].

JHEP02(2016)179
The double differential decay distribution of Λ b → Λ + − in terms of the momentum transfer squared q 2 and the angle θ between the positively changed lepton and the Λ-baryon in the rest frame of the lepton pair is given by [2] 1) where in the factorization limit the helicity amplitudes can be computed as The detailed expressions for the effective Wilson coefficients C eff 9 (q 2 ) and C eff 7 in the NDR scheme with anti-commuting γ 5 can be found in [12].
Evaluating the helicity amplitudes with the form factors computed from the NLL LCSR obtained in the above yields the differential branching fraction of Λ b → Λ + − as a function of q 2 plotted in figure 12 and the partially integrated decay rate over the q 2 intervals from [48] displayed in table 4. The theory predictions are also confronted with the experimental measurements from CDF [67] and LHCb [48]. The LHCb data except for the first q 2 -bin are found to be systematically lower than the theory predictions at large hadronic recoil, while the sizeable uncertainties of the CDF measurements prevent us from drawing a definite conclusion.
Following [48] we further consider the forward-backward asymmetry and the longitudinal polarization fraction of the di-lepton system JHEP02(2016)179 Figure 12. The differential branching fraction, the leptonic forward-backward asymmetry and the longitudinal polarization fraction of the di-lepton system for Λ b → Λ + − as functions of q 2 in the factorization limit. The solid (pink) curve corresponds to the NLL sum rule predictions with the central input and the shaded region (pink) indicates the theory uncertainties from the calculated form factors. The experimental data bins are taken from LHCb [48] (purple squares) and CDF [67] (blue full circles).

JHEP02(2016)179
[q 2 min , q 2 max ] dBR/dq 2 (10 −7 GeV −2 ) AFB fL  Table 4. Summary of the theory predictions for the binned distributions of the branching fraction, the forward-backward asymmetry and the longitudinal polarization fraction. We also present the experimental data bins from LHCb [48] for a comparison, where various experimental uncertainties are added in quadrature.
f L (q 2 ) = H L (q 2 ) H L (q 2 ) + H T (q 2 ) , (6.6) where the definition of A FB (q 2 ) differs from [48] due to the distinct convention of the θ angle. We plot the q 2 dependence of the differential forward-backward asymmetry and the longitudinal polarization fraction in figure 12, and collect the theory predictions for the binned distributions of these two observables in table 4. Several comments on the numerical results computed in the above are in order.
• In contrast to the B → K * + − decays, the theory uncertainty of the leptonic forward-backward asymmetry at the zero crossing point is not reduced compared to that at a different value of q 2 . This can be readily understood from the fact that A FB is not an optimized observable which is insensitive to the soft form factors in the former case, while it becomes an optimized observable in the latter case due to a single soft form factor governing the strong interaction dynamics of the Λ b → Λ form factors in the SCET limit. The location of the zero-crossing point of A FB is determined as q 2 0 = 4.1 +0.9 −0.7 GeV 2 .
• The uncertainty band of the longitudinal polarization fraction f L (q 2 ) shown in figure 12 indicates rather interesting features of the different dominant mechanisms contributing to f L (q 2 ) at different momentum transfer. At very large hadronic recoil q 2 1 GeV 2 the longitudinal helicity amplitude H L is strong suppressed compared to the transverse amplitude H T which receives a large contribution from the photon pole. This indicates that f L (q 2 ) at very large recoil receives a suppression factor of

JHEP02(2016)179
Proceeding with the obtained NLL sum rules on the light cone, we carried out an exploratory numerical analysis of the Λ b → Λ form factors, putting an emphasis on the various sources of perturbative and systematic uncertainties. To gain a better control of the shape parameter ω 0 for the Λ b -baryon DA φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ), the prediction of Λ b → p form factor f + Λ b →p (0) from the LCSR with the nucleon DA and the SU(3) flavour symmetry relation were taken as theory input in the matching determination of ω 0 . In analogy to the B → π form factors, the sum rules of Λ b → Λ form factors are not only sensitive to the shape parameter ω 0 but also to the specific behavior of φ 4 (ω, µ 0 ) at small ω. Of particular phenomenological interest are that the perturbative O(α s ) corrections result in a significant (∼ 50 %) reduction of the tree-level sum rule predictions and the dominant one-loop correction is from the NLO jet function instead of the NLO hard functions entering the sum rules of the Λ b → Λ form factors. Such observations evidently highlight the importance of the perturbative matching calculation at the hard-collinear scale as accomplished in this work. Employing the z-series expansion, we extrapolated the LCSR predictions of the form factors toward large momentum transfer where our predictions are already confronted with the Lattice determinations of two HQET form factors. Expressing the QCD transition form factors in terms of the Isgur-Wise functions at low hadronic recoil, we observed a reasonable agreement for the predicted form factors at large momentum transfer between two independent calculations, albeit with the perceivable discrepancies on the q 2 shapes of the Λ b → Λ form factors. In addition, the large-energy symmetry breaking effects for the form factors were found to be relatively small at one loop, since the NLO QCD corrections to the sum rules are dominated by the hard-collinear corrections preserving the symmetry relations.
Having at our disposal the theory predictions for the Λ b → Λ form factors, we investigated their phenomenological applications to the electro-weak penguin decays Λ b → Λ + − in the factorization limit. The calculated differential q 2 distribution in Λ b → Λ + − turned out to be systematically lower than the LHCb measurements, except for the first data bin. We further computed the forward-backward asymmetry and the longitudinal polarization fraction for the di-lepton system which are comparable to the LHCb data for the lowest q 2 bin. The longitudinal polarization fraction f L (q 2 ) was found to be of particular phenomenological interest due to a large cancellation of the theory uncertainties for the Λ b → Λ form factors.
The heavy-to-light baryonic form factors are apparently not sufficient to provide a complete description of the strong interaction dynamics involved in Λ b → Λ + − due to the non-factorizable contributions induced by the QED corrections to the matrix elements of hadronic operators in the weak Hamiltonian. The techniques developed in this work can be readily applied to evaluate the non-form-factor effects induced by the hard spectator interaction and the weak annihilation as displayed in figure 11. Since both the factorizable and the non-factorizable contributions to the Λ b → Λ + − decay amplitude will be parameterized by the Λ b -baryon DA without introducing any additional non-perturbative quantities, we are expected to have more opportunities to construct optimized observables insensitive to the hadronic uncertainties, provided that the systematic uncertainty of the sum rule approach is also cancelled to a large extent for these observables. We postpone a systematic treatment of such non-factorizable contribution as well as a detailed discussion of the angular observables in Λ b → Λ + − for a future work.

JHEP02(2016)179
The strategies of computing the heavy-to-light baryonic form factors at O(α s ) presented here can be further extend to study the topical Λ b → p ν decays [68], which provide an alternative approach to determine the CKM matrix element |V ub |. To this end, a comprehensive analysis of the evolution equations for all the DA defined in eqs. (2.25) and (2.26) at one loop are in demand, since the spin structure of the light di-quark system in the Λ b -baryon is distorted in the decay product, i.e., the nucleon. In this respect, the techniques developed in [21] based upon the spinor formalism and the conformal symmetry can be applied to facilitate the construction of the renormalization kernels in coordinate space. To summarize, we believe that the present work serves as an essential step towards understanding the strong interaction dynamics in various exclusive Λ b -baryon decays and interesting extensions of the present calculations into different directions are expected, especially under the encouragement of the considerable progress on the beauty baryon decays from the experimental side.