Supersymmetric AdS6 vacua in six-dimensional N = (1,1) gauged supergravity

We study fully supersymmetric AdS6 vacua of half-maximal N = (1, 1) gauged supergravity in six space-time dimensions coupled to n vector multiplets. We show that the existence of AdS6 backgrounds requires that the gauge group is of the form G′ × G″ ⊂ SO(4, n) where G′ ⊂ SO(3, m) and G″ ⊂ SO(1, n − m). In the AdS6 vacua this gauge group is broken to its maximal compact subgroup SO(3) × H′′ × H″ where H′ ⊂ SO(m) and H″ ⊂ SO(n − m). Furthermore, the SO(3) factor is the R-symmetry gauged by three of the four graviphotons. We further show that the AdS6 vacua have no moduli that preserve all supercharges. This is precisely in agreement with the absence of supersymmetric marginal deformations in holographically dual five-dimensional superconformal field theories.


Introduction
Supersymmetric anti-de Sitter (AdS) vacua and their moduli spaces of gauged supergravities are of particular interest in the AdS/CFT correspondence [1]. The AdS vacua correspond to conformal fixed points of the holographically dual field theories while the moduli spaces describe the conformal manifolds near these fixed points [2,3]. The latter encode useful information about the exactly marginal deformations of the corresponding superconformal field theories (SCFTs).
AdS backgrounds of gauged supergravities and their moduli spaces have been studied in various space-time dimensions with different numbers of supercharges. In this paper we exclusively focus on the half-maximal gauged N = (1, 1) supergravity in six spacetime dimensions (d = 6) and their maximally supersymmetric AdS 6 backgrounds. 1 This supergravity is also known as F (4) supergravity and was first constructed in [6]. It is non-chiral and can be coupled to an arbitrary number n of vector multiplets. Each vector multiplet contains four scalars and together with the dilaton in the gravity multiplet, they parametrize the (4n + 1)-dimensional coset manifold R + × SO(4, n)/SO(4) × SO(n). The corresponding gauged supergravity was constructed in [7,8] by extending the pure F (4) supergravity using the geometric group manifold approach. [7,8] also showed that for a gauge group SU(2) R × G and G ⊂ SO(n) a maximally supersymmetric AdS 6 vacuum exists where the full SU(2) R × G symmetry is realized at the origin of the scalar manifold. This vacuum could be identified with the near horizon geometry of the D4-D8 brane system [9]. For the case of n = 3 vector multiplets and G = SO(3), another non-trivial AdS 6 vacuum breaking the SU(2) R × SO(3) symmetry to SO(3) diag and preserving the full N = (1, 1) supersymmetry has been identified in [10].
In this paper we do not specify the gauge group upfront but instead follow the strategy of [11][12][13][14][15] in that we first determine the general conditions on the parameters of the gauged JHEP01(2017)069 supergravity such that AdS 6 backgrounds which preserve all supercharges can exist. In half-maximal supergravities it is then possible to also give all possible gauge groups that can have such vacua. Concretely we find that the gauge group has to be of the form G × G ⊂ SO(4, n) where G ⊂ SO(3, m) and G ⊂ SO(1, n − m). In the AdS 6 vacua this gauge group is broken to its maximal compact subgroup SO(3)×H ×H where H ⊂ SO(m) and H ⊂ SO(n − m). The SO(3) ∼ SU(2) factor precisely is the R-symmetry and it is gauged by three of the four graviphotons. Finally, we derive the necessary conditions for the existence of a supersymmetric moduli space near these vacua. For the case at hand we find that no moduli space is possible which is again consistent with the fact that the holographically dual SCFTs have no supersymmetric exactly marginal deformations.
In the AdS/CFT correspondence, AdS 6 vacua are also relevant for studying strongly coupled five-dimensional SCFTs arising from the dynamics of D4-D8 branes [9,16]. The interpretation in terms of AdS 6 geometry in [17] inspired various studies considering gravity duals of these SCFTs including a recent generalization to quiver gauge theories in [18]. Finding AdS 6 solutions in type II and eleven dimensional supergravities also deserves detailed investigations. 2 In this paper, however, we stay in d = 6 throughout the analysis leaving the higher dimensional origins of these vacua for future work.
The paper is organized as follow. In section 2, we set the stage for our analysis and recall the relevant features of N = (1, 1) gauged supergravity. The conditions for the existence of maximally supersymmetric AdS 6 vacua are then derived in section 3, and the analysis of the moduli space is carried out in section 4. We finally end the paper by giving some conclusions and comments on the results in section 5.

N = (1, 1) gauged supergravity in six dimensions
In this section, we briefly review N = (1, 1) gauged supergravity coupled to n vector multiplets in order to set up the notation for the later analysis. More details on this gauged supergravity can be found in [7,8]. We will follow most of the conventions in these two references.
The fermionic fields consist of two gravitini ψ A µ , two spin-1 2 fields χ A and 2n gauginos λ I A . All of these fields and the supersymmetry parameter A are eight-component

JHEP01(2017)069
pseudo-Majorana spinors and transform in the fundamental representation of the SU(2) R ∼ USp(2) R R-symmetry denoted by indices A, B = 1, 2. The dilaton and the 4n scalars φ αI of the vector multiplets span the coset manifold The second factor can in turn be parametrized by the coset representative L Λ Σ with Λ, Σ, . . . = 1, 2, . . . , n + 4. It is convenient to split the indices transforming under the compact group SO(4) × SO(n) as Λ = (α, I) and further under the SO(3) R × SO(n) as Λ = (0, r, I) with r, s, . (4). The coset representative can be accordingly decomposed as Furthermore, all of the n+4 vector fields will be collectively denoted by . Being SO(4, n) matrices, the L Λ Σ satisfy the relation We now turn to the gauged version of this supergravity. The most complete gauged N = (1, 1) supergravity up to now is given in [7,8]. As in seven dimensions, the full SO(4, n) covariant formulation in terms of the embedding tensors has not been worked out yet although the corresponding components of the embedding tensor have been identified in [23] using the Kac-Moody approach. In this paper, we will restrict ourselves to the gauged supergravity constructed in [7,8].
Gauging is implemented by making a particular subgroup G of SO(4, n) local such that the adjoint representation of G can be embedded in the fundamental representation, n + 4, of SO(4, n), and η ΛΣ contains the Cartan-Killing form of the gauge group. Consistency with supersymmetry requires that the structure constants are totally anti-symmetric, i.e.
In the embedding tensor formalism, this condition is called the linear constraint.
The f Γ ΛΣ appear as structure constants in the gauge algebra in which T Λ are gauge generators. These structure constants must satisfy the Jacobi identity which in the embedding tensor formalism is the so-called quadratic constraint. In general, this constraint comes from the requirement that the gauge generators, obtained from appropriate projections of the global symmetry generators by the embedding tensor, form a closed Lie algebra of the corresponding gauge group. The bosonic Lagrangian with only the metric and scalars non-vanishing reads where the scalar kinetic term is written in terms of the Maurer-Cartan one-forms The scalar potential V is given by where m is the mass of the two-form in the gravitational multiplet and we abbreviated with the "dressed" structure constants given by (2.11) The supersymmetry transformations of the fermions which will play an important role in the following analysis are given by where the fermion-shift matrices are defined as (2.13) In the present convention, the anti-symmetric matrix AB = − BA is taken to be 12 = 12 = 1. The σ t AB matrices are related to the usual Pauli matrices σ tA B by the relation 3 (2.14) Finally, the chirality matrix γ 7 is defined by with γ 2 7 = −I and γ T 7 = −γ 7 .

JHEP01(2017)069
3 Maximally supersymmetric AdS 6 vacua We now determine the maximally supersymmetric AdS 6 vacua preserving all sixteen supercharges. In order to do so, we impose that the following conditions vanish for all supercharges in the background Due to the symmetries of σ t AB = σ t (AB) and AB = [AB] , the linear independence of γ 7 and I and by using (2.12) and (2.13) we infer that the second and third equations imply

4)
From (2.10) we learn that the first condition in (3.5) is equivalent to The second condition in (3.5) yields K 0It = 0 so that together we have Using (2.10) we can rewrite condition (3.2) as for an arbitrary SU(2) R gauge coupling g. We can accordingly determine the background value of the dilaton by inserting (3.9) into (3.8) The remaining conditions (3.3) and (3.4) give Using the component-(0I) and -(0i) of the relation (2.4) and the identity L −1 = ηL T η, we find that L 0I = 0 implies L 0i = 0 and thus B t = 0 .

JHEP01(2017)069
By taking the (00)-component of the relation (2.4), we find that L 0I = L 0i = 0 also implies L 00 = 1. Inserting the results obtained so far into (2.9) we conclude that the background value of the scalar potential (related to the cosmological constant) in an AdS 6 vacuum is given by (3.14) We see that AdS vacua do not exist for m = 0 as already pointed out in [7,8]. 4 This is very similar to AdS backgrounds of half-maximal supergravities in seven dimensions [13,24,25]. Note also that by shifting the value of σ we can choose g = 3m as in [7,8].
In order to continue let us recall that we are left with the unconstrained structure constants whose choice specify the particular supergravity at hand. We can now use the quadratic constraint to determine the corresponding gauge groups. These are the gauge groups which can occur in the supergravities that admit maximally supersymmetric AdS 6 vacua. For the case at hand the quadratic constraint reduces to the usual Jacobi identity given in (2.6). As a warm up let us first consider the simple situation where K rIJ = K 0IJ = K IJK = 0 and we only have K rst non-zero. In this case, equation (2.6) reduces to the Jacobi identity of an SO(3) algebra with the structure constants K rst = g rst . We then simply recover the pure F (4) gauged supergravity with an SU(2) ∼ SO(3) gauge group constructed in [6].
For K rIJ = K 0IJ = 0 but K IJK = 0, the condition (2.6) gives rise to two separate Jacobi identities for K rst and K IJK which correspond to two commuting compact groups. The gauge group is accordingly SO(3) × H with H ⊂ SO(n) and compact. This gauge group and the resulting AdS 6 vacuum together with the dual five-dimensional SCFT have already been studied in [7,8].
As a next step let us also take K rIJ = 0 but still have K 0IJ = 0. In this case the SO(3)-singlet graviphoton A 0 decouples from all other gauge bosons. This is very similar to the seven-dimensional case studied in [13] where the gauge groups are embedded in SO(3, n) ⊂ SO(4, n). If one additionally assumes that the gauge group is semi-simple one can in fact list all possibilities. The Cartan-Killing form of these gauge groups must be embeddable in the SO(3, n) invariant tensor η = (δ rs , −δ IJ ) which imposes a strong constraint. Furthermore, the existence of supersymmetric AdS 6 vacua requires that the gauge groups must contain SO (3)  We finally consider the most general case with all structure constants in (3.15) nonzero. Follow a similar analysis in [14] we introduce the gauge generators embedded in SO(4, n) as Recall that m is the mass parameter of the two-form in the gravitational multiplet.

JHEP01(2017)069
where (t Σ∆ ) Π Γ = δ Π [Σ η ∆]Γ are SO(4, n) generators in the vector representation. Splitting the indies Λ = (0, i, I) decomposes the gauge generators as which couple to the vector fields A 0 , A i and A I , respectively. It is more convenient to write down the various independent components of the Jacobi identity. They read The first two relations (3.19), (3.20) imply that the SO (3) where 0 n indicates an n × n zero matrix. The relation (3.22) corresponds to [T i , T 0 ] = 0 and thus T 0 and T i cannot have common I, J, K indices or equivalently K 0ÎĴ = K 0ĨĴ = 0. This determines the T 0 generator to be (3.26) Equation (3.21) and the (Î,Ĵ,K,M ) components of relation (3.24) imply that the TÎ generators are given by Therefore, the (T i , TÎ ) generators together form a non-compact group G ⊂ SO(3, m), m ≤ n.

JHEP01(2017)069
Finally, the relation (3.23) and the (Ĩ,J,K,M ) components of relation (3.24) determine the structure of TĨ to be (3.28) These generators together with T 0 form another non-compact group G ⊂ SO(1, n − m). We then conclude that the general gauge group admitting maximally supersymmetric AdS 6 vacua take the form G × G To confirm this, we inspect the massive vector fields arising from the above symmetry breaking. Defining AÎ = (L −1 )Î Λ A Λ and AĨ = (L −1 )Ĩ Λ A Λ , we find that various components of the Maurer-Cartan one-form P I α are given by By computing the scalar kinetic terms, we can indeed see that there is precisely one massive vector field corresponding to each non-compact generators K r IĴ and K 0 IJ . These massive vectors correspond to the broken non-compact generators of the full gauge group.

Moduli space of supersymmetric AdS 6 vacua
In this section, we determine the flat directions of the scalar potential V which preserve all 16 supercharges. These are the moduli of the AdS 6 backgrounds corresponding to supersymmetric marginal deformations of the five-dimensional superconformal field theories dual to the AdS 6 vacua identified in the previous section.
Similar to the analysis of [12][13][14], a necessary condition for the existence of these moduli can be determined by considering possible deformations of the supersymmetry conditions (3.1) near the AdS 6 vacua. By varying the conditions in (3.5), we find δ(e 4σ A) = 4 A δσ + e 4 σ δA = 0 , (4.1) We now introduce a parametization of the variation of the coset representative with respect to the 4n scalars φ αI

Conclusions
In this paper, we have analyzed the general conditions for the existence of maximally supersymmetric AdS 6 vacua in the N = (1, 1) half-maximal gauged supergravities in six dimensions. We have found that three of the graviphotons have to gauge an SU(2) R R-symmetry while the forth one can be used to gauge a commuting non-compact group.

JHEP01(2017)069
The fact that the SU(2) R R-symmetry must be gauged is similar to the results in d = 4, 6, 7. This is in general a necessary condition for the existence of AdS vacua as shown in [4]. It is also consistent with the important role played by the corresponding R-symmetry in the dual field theories [16]. Furthermore, all vacua we have identified have no flat directions which preserve all supercharges corresponding to the absence of supersymmetric exactly marginal deformations in the dual five-dimensional SCFTs. We end the paper by briefly giving some comments on the R + × SO(4, n) covariant formulation in term of the embedding tensor. As shown in [23], there are two components of the embedding tensor given by ξ Λ and f ΛΣΓ as well as a massive deformation of the two-form field. The ξ Λ is involved in gauging of the R + factor. Due to many similarities between the six-dimensional N = (1, 1) gauged supergravity considered here and the N = 2 gauged supergravity in seven dimensions, we expect that the R + gauging and the massive deformation could not be turned on simultaneously. Therefore, the existence of maximally supersymmetric AdS 6 vacua would require ξ Λ = 0 as shown in [13] for the seven-dimensional case. It would be of particular interest to explore this issue in particular to construct the complete gauging of N = (1, 1) supergravity in the embedding tensor formulation.