Skip to main content
Log in

Prior Learning and Equivalence Class Formation

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Verbally competent volunteers, 6 male and 6 female, served as participants. They were exposed to two experimental procedures. Initially two nonsense syllables (A2 and C1) were paired with positive adjectives and two nonsense syllables (A1 and C2) were paired with negative adjectives, using a procedure analogous to classical conditioning. Following this they were exposed to a stimulus equivalence training procedure. They were taught to match three nonsense syllables A1, A2, and A3 to three novel nonsense syllables B1, B2, and B3 respectively, and subsequently to match B1, B2, and B3 to three new nonsense syllables C1, C2, and C3. Testing revealed that the equivalence class involving entirely neutral stimuli (A3, B3, and C3) emerged for most participants but that the classes involving A and C stimuli that had acquired opposite meanings from the first procedure did not emerge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BARNES, D., LAWLOR, H., SMEETS, R M., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and academic self-concept among mildly mentally handicapped and nonhandicapped children. The Psychological Record, 46, 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAIRNS, E. (1980). The development of ethnic discrimination in young children in Northern Ireland. In J. Harbison & J. Harbison (Eds.), Children and young people in Northern Ireland: A society under stress. Somerset: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEADER, G., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LESLIE, J. C., TIERNEY, K. J., ROBINSON, C. P., KEENAN, M., & WATT, A. (1993). Differences between clinically anxious and non-anxious subjects in a stimulus equivalence training task involving threat words. The Psychological Record, 43, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOXON, P. D., KEENAN, M., & HINE, L. (1993). Gender role stereotyping and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSGOOD, C. E., SÚCI, G. J., & TANNENBAUM, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioural units (pp. 213–245). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • STAATS, C. K., & STAATS, A. W. (1957). Meaning established by classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • STEELE, D. M. (1987). Teaching the relations of same, opposite, and different. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Greensboro.

    Google Scholar 

  • WATT, A., KEENAN, M., BARNES, D., & CAIRNS, E. (1991). Social categorization and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WILCOXON, F. (1947). Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics, 3, 119–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peoples, M., Tierney, K.J., Bracken, M. et al. Prior Learning and Equivalence Class Formation. Psychol Rec 48, 111–120 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395261

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395261

Navigation