Abstract
Chemical specifications for high purity gold have grown increasingly stringent as manufacturers strive to improve quality control. Once 999. 9-fine grain and bullion bars were accepted without question; today sophisticated users insist on knowing impurity levels or, at least, the source of the gold. This paper demonstrates why. Using glow discharge mass spectrometry, concentrations of seventeen elements were measured in hallmarked bullion bars and grain from different sources. In 89 percent of the samples, gold bullion met or exceeded hallmarked purities. As expected, the principal impurity was silver followed by iron, copper and lead. At surprisingly low levels, some impurities can impact manufacturing processes, resulting in hard spots, embrittlement, blistering, and discoloration. After reviewing why various impurities are not entirely removed by the prevalent refining processes, this paper examines the effect of the significant impurities on manufacturing processes. Since the only means of dealing with excessive impurity levels is to refine contaminated metal, we conclude that manufacturers are exercising reasonable prudence by carefully evaluating incoming gold bullion in order to hold down overall production costs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. M. Nadkarni and D. P. Agarwal, ‘Impurities in Gold: Pedigree versus Specification’,Precious Metals 1988, Int. Precious Metals Inst., Allentown, PA, p. 283
A. Savolainen, ‘Modern Gold Assaying’,Precious Metals 1988, Int. Precious Metals Inst., Allentown, PA, p. 55
D. P. Agarwal and G. Raykhtsaum, ‘Materials Characterization and Failure Analysis in Jewelry Scientific Instrumentation’, presented at the Santa Fe Symposium on Jewelry Manufacturing Technology, 1992
R. M. Nadkarni, D. J. Kinneberg, M. B. Mooiman and P. Cettou, ‘Precious Metals Processing’, Elliott Symposium, Iron and Steel Society, Warrendale P. A. 1990, p. 96
D. J. Kinneberg, M. B. Mooiman and W. D. Müller, ‘Gold Refining — Past, Present and Future’,Precious Metals 1996, Int. Precious Metals Inst., Allentown, PA, 1996, p. 433
D. Schneller, ‘Silver Contamination in Fine Gold’, presented at ‘Refining and Recovery of Precious Metals’, Int. Precious Metals Inst., Los Angeles, CA, March 1986
J. D. McIntyre and W. F. Peck, Jr., ‘Electrodeposition of Gold’, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1976,123 (12), 1800
T. K. Rose and W. A. C. Newman, ‘The Metallurgy of Gold’, Reprint of 7th Ed., MetChem Research, Inc., Boulder, CO, 1986, p. 36
Z. Nowack,Z. anorg. Chem., 1926,154, 395
G. Raykhtsaum and D. P. Agarwal, ‘Gold in Jewelry’,Precious Metals 1993, Int. Precious Metals Inst., Allentown, PA, p. 169
G. Raykhtsaum and D. P. Agarwal, ‘Defects in Castings and Wrought Products Associated with the Phenomenon of Segregation in Karat Golds’, presented at the Santa Fe Symposium on Jewelry Manufacturing Technology, 1993
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based on a presentation given at the Santa Fe Symposium on Jewelry Manufacturing Technology, 1997
David Kinneberg is Director of Research and Development and Stephen Williams is Vice President of Sales and Marketing in Metalor Refining Corporation, USA; D.P. Agarwal is Vice President of Leach and Garner Company. They each have a special interest in the production of pure gold.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kinneberg, D.J., Williams, S.R. & Agarwal, D.P. Origin and effects of impurities in high purity gold. Gold Bull 31, 58–67 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03214762
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03214762