Skip to main content
Log in

Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study

  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about how successful students in Web-based courses self-regulate their learning. This descriptive case study used a social cognitive model of self-regulated learning (SRL) to investigate how six graduate students used and adapted traditional SRL strategies to complete tasks and cope with challenges in a Web-based technology course; it also explored motivational and environmental influences on strategy use. Primary data sources were three transcribed interviews with each of the students over the course of the semester, a transcribed interview with the course instructor, and the students' reflective journals. Archived course documents, including transcripts of threaded discussions and student Web pages, were secondary data sources. Content analysis of the data indicated that these students used many traditional SRL strategies, but they also adapted planning, organization, environmental structuring, help seeking, monitoring, record keeping, and self-reflection strategies in ways that were unique to the Web-based learning environment. The data also suggested that important motivational influences on SRL strategy use—self-efficacy, goal orientation, interest, and attributions—were shaped largely by student successes in managing the technical and social environment of the course. Important environmental influences on SRL strategy use included instructor support, peer support, and course design. Implications for online course instructors and designers, and suggestions for future research are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospectus.Educational Psychology Review, 10(2), 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. H. Schunk, & J. L. Meece (Eds)Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327–348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvan, I., Ory, J. C., Bullock, C. D. Burnaska, K. K., & Hanson, M. (1998): The SCALE efficiency projects.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,2(2). Retrieved February 21, 2004 from http://www. alnresearch.org/Data_Files/articles/full_text/arv an2.htm.

  • Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., Greer, J., McCalla, G., & Kettel, L. (May, 2001). Help-seeking in an asynchronous help forum. In R. Luckin (Ed.)Proceedings of workshop on help provision and help seeking in interactive learnign environments. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, San Antonio. Retrieved February 21, 2004 from http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/users /bend/aied2001/bull.pdf.

  • Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.) (2000).Self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. W., Nolan, D. E., & Gallagher, S. M. (2001).Web-teaching: A guide to designing interactive teaching for the World Wide Web (2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo, K. S., & Ross, J. D. (2000)Strategies to support self-directed learning in a Web-based course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Clark D. (1999). Getting results with distance education.The American Journal of Distance Education, 12(1), 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.)Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 191–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L., & Mandinich, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation.Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style.Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastmond, D. V. (1995).Alone but together: Adult distance study through computer conferencing. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967).Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago:Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computermediated conferencing environment.The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics.Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 45(4), 37–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S. R. (1997). Impacts of college-level courses via asynchronous learning networks: Some preliminary results.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2. Retrieved February 21, 2004 at http://www.aln.org /publications/jaln/v1n2/pdf/v1n2_hiltz.pdf.

  • Kanfer, F. H. (1977). The many faces of self-control, or behavior modification changes its focus. In R. B. Stuart (Ed.)Behavioral self-management: Strategies, techniques, and outcomes (pp. 1–48). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S. A. (1998).Strategic help seeking: Implications for teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1991). Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, K., & Young, D. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulated learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, E., & Guba, E. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry Newbury, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, K. D. (2000). Learning styles and asynchronous learning: Comparing the LASSI model to class performance.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4(1), 23–31. Retrieved February 21, 2004 at http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v4n1/pdf/v4n1_loomis.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, F. C., Belfiore, P. J., & Hutchinson, J. M. (2001). Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.),Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.) (pp. 39–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction.The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., & Virtanen, P. (2003).Towards self-regulation in Web-based learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

  • Patton, M. A. (1990).Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich. P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & Moshe Zeidner (Eds.),Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction.Journal of Asychronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing.Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. In P. D. Pearson & Iran-Nejad (Eds).Review of research in education, 23 (pp 1–24). Washington, DC: AERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and selfregulated learning. In: B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.),Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.) (pp. 125–151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. M. (1982).Learning how to learn. Chicago: Follett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. M. (1990). The promise of learning to learn. In R. M. Smith & Associates (Eds.),Learning to learn across the life span (pp. 3–29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner, F., Jordan, L., Algozzine, B., & Spooner, M. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and on-campus classes.The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake R. E. (1995)The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styles, I., & Zariski, A. (2000). Enhancing student strategies for online learning. In A. Herrmann & M. M. Kulski (Eds.),Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. Perth: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K. (2002). Immediacy, social presence, and asynchronous discussion. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.),Elements of quality online education (Vol. 3). Olin & Babson Colleges: Sloan Center for Online Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K. (2003). Developing social presence in online course discussions. In S. Naidu (Ed.)Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 147–164). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, S. H., Holloway, K.C., & Garton, E. M. (1999). The effects of Internet-based instruction on student learning.Journal of Asychncronous Learning Networks,3(2). Retrieved February 21, 2004 at http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v3n2/pdf/v3n2_wegner.pdf.

  • Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences.Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.)Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.),Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994).Case study research, design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, Ca: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & Moshe Zeidner (Eds.).Handbooik of self-regulation (pp. 749–768). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: What are the key subprocesses?Contemporary Educational Psychology 16, 307–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Eds.)Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice (p. 1–25). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1996).Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. The City University of New York: APA, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.),Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & Moshe Zeidner (Eds.),Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.),Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Achieving academic excellence: A self-regulatory perspective. In M. Ferrari (Ed.).The pursuit of excellence through education (pp. 85–110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview assessing students' use of self-regulated learning strategies.American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whipp, J.L., Chiarelli, S. Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. ETR&D 52, 5–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504714

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504714

Keywords

Navigation