Abstract
Subjects viewed videotapes of truthful and deceptive messages. Channels presented were either face or body with or without speech. Subjects were instructed to segment each message into either large, medium, or small units; following the segmentation of a message, subjects rated its truthfulness. Results showed that subjects who organized the behavior into small units perceived the messages as more truthful than those who organized the behavior into either medium or large units. In addition, when speech was available, accuracy of lie detection was highest when the behavior was segmented into medium units; when speech was not available, accuracy of lie detection was highest when the behavior was segmented into small units. The effects of observation set on the perception of deception were discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, M.L., & Allen, V.L. Level of analysis as a determinant of the meaning of nonverbal behavior.Social Psychology Quarterly 1979,42 270–274.
Atkinson, M.L., & Allen, V.L. Perceived structure of nonverbal behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983,45 458–463.
Buck, R., Baron, R., & Barrette, D. Temporal organization of spontaneous emotional expression: A segmentation analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982,42 506–517.
Buck, R., Baron, R., Goodman, N., & Shapiro, B. Unitization of spontaneous nonverbal behavior in the study of emotion communication.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980,39 522–529.
Cohen, C.E., & Ebbesen, E.B. Observational goals and schema activation: A theoretical framework for behavior perception.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1979,15 305–329.
DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. Telling lies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979,37 1713–1722.
Newtson, D. Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973,28 28–38.
Newtson, D. Foundations of attribution: The perception of ongoing behavior. In J.H. Harvey, W.J. Ickes, & R.F. Kidd (Eds.),New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley, 1976.
Newtson, D., Engquist, G., & Bois, J. The objective basis of behavior units.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977,35 847–862.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L.Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. A single, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect.Journal of Educational Psychology 1982,74 166–169.
Zuckerman, M., Kernis, M.R., Driver, R., & Koestner, R. Segmentation of behavior: Effects of actual deception and expected deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984,46 1173–1182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zuckerman, M., Driver, R. & Guadagno, N.S. Effects of segmentation patterns on the perception of deception. J Nonverbal Behav 9, 160–168 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000737
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000737