Abstract
Drift of the retinal images of the surroundings elicits optomotor responses of flight control in the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster, and in the housefly, Musca domestica. The present investigation deals with the responses of tethered flies in still air. The responses were elicited by continuous movement of striped patterns in front of the eyes, and characterized by the magnitude and elevation of the resulting force of flight which is the average of the forces produced during a wingbeat cycle. The force of flight is resolved into the upward directed lift and the forward directed thrust.
In either species, pattern movement acts upon the magnitude, but not upon the elevation of the force of flight. The elevation relative to the longitudinal body axis is almost invariably 24° in Drosophila, and 29° in Musca. The lift/thrust ratio in still air is fixed accordingly, and can be changed only by variation of the body angle. Keeping an angle of minimum body drag does not contribute significantly to the efficiency of insect flight at very low Reynolds numbers (Re). Control of the lift/thrust ratio by variation of the body angle is, therefore, less surprising in Drosophila where Re is in the order of 102, than in Musca, where Re is in the order of 103. Control of this ratio without variation of the body angle is actually established in insects flying at even higher Re.
Covariance of lift and thrust in the investigated flies is achieved by control of wingbeat amplitude or wingbeat frequency, but not by control of wing pitch or stroke plane. A change in the latter parameters would have deflected the force of flight and is, therefore, inconsistent with the constant elevation found in the present experiments. The results obtained, so far, do not exclude active deflections of the force vector during occasional bouts of aerobatics, or passive deflections of this vector during flight at non-zero airspeed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blondeau, J.: Aerodynamic capabilities of flies, as revealed by a new technique. J. Exp. Biol. 92, 155–163 (1981)
David, C.T.: The relationship between body angle and flight speed in free-flying Drosophila. Physiol. Entomol. 3, 191–195 (1978)
David, C.T.: Visual control of the partition of the forceproduced by the wings between lift and thrust in free-flying Drosophila. Nature (in press)
David, C.T.: The dynamics of height control in Drosophila. Physiol. Entomol. (in press)
Esch, H., Nachtigall, W., Kogge, S.N.: Correlation between aerodynamic output, electrical activity in the indirect flight muscles and wing positions of bees flying in a servomechanically controlled wind tunnel. J. Comp. Physiol. 100, 147–159 (1975)
Faust, R.: Untersuchungen zum Halterenproblem. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Allg. Zool. Physiol. 63, 325–366 (1952)
Gettrup, E., Wilson, D.M.: The lift-control reaction of flying locusts. J. Exp. Biol. 41, 183–190 (1964)
Götz, K.G.: Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion. Kybernetik 4, 199–208 (1968)
Götz, K.G.: Movement discrimination in insects. In: Processing of optical data by organisms and by machines. Rendiconti S.I.F. XLIII, pp. 494–509 Reichardt, W., ed. London, New York: Academic Press 1969
Götz, K.G.: Bewegungssehen und Flugsteuerung bei der Fliege Drosophila. BIONA report 2, pp. 21–33 Nachtigall, W., ed. Mainz: Akad. Wiss. 1983
Götz, K.G., Biesinger, R.: Wind-controlled selection of motion detectors in the eyes of Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila Inf. Serv. 59, 39–40 (1983)
Götz, K.G., Wehrhahn, C.: Optomotor control of the force of flight in Drosophila and Musca. I. Homology of wingbeatinhibiting movement detectors. Biol. Cybern. 51, 129–134 (1984)
Heide, G.: Neural mechanisms of flight control in diptera. BIONA report 2, pp. 35–52 Nachtigall, W. ed., Mainz: Akad. Wiss. (1983)
Nachtigall, W., Roth, W.: Correlation between stationary measurable parameters of wing movement and aerodynamic force production in the blowfly (Calliphora vicina R.-D.) J. Comp. Physiol. 150, 251–260 (1983)
Vogel, S.: Flight in Drosophila. I. Flight performance in tethered flies. J. Exp. Biol. 44, 567–578 (1966)
Vogel, S.: Flight in Drosophila. II. Variations in stroke parameters and wing contour. J. Exp. Biol. 46, 383–392 (1967)
Wagner, H.: Flight performance and visual control of flight of the free flying housefly (Musca domestica). Thesis, Universität Tübingen (in preparation)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Götz, K.G., Wandel, U. Optomotor control of the force of flight in Drosophila and Musca . Biol. Cybern. 51, 135–139 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357927
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357927