Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of fractionation on the enzymatic state and behaviour of enzyme activities in different structural soil units

  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The behaviour and state of soil catalase, dehydrogenases, urease and proteases associated with different soil structural fractions were studied. Assays of the enzymatic sensitivity to pH variation, thermal stability and the calculation of kinetics constants of Michaelis were performed. The results indicated that catalase and urease activity in these soils seem to be of the same type, because the activities presented a similar behaviour in the soil fractions studied. However, their state appeared different in each group of soil units. Dehydrogenases showed a similar state and behaviour while proteases were in a different state and behaviour in each soil fraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benesi A, McLaren AD (1976) A microenvironmental redox shift at a charged surface detected by papain activity. J Solid-Phase Biochem 1:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmeyer HU (1983) Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol III. In: BergmeyerHU (ed) Enzymes 1: oxidoreductases, transferases. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmeyer HU (1984) Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol V. In: Bergmeyer HU (ed) Enzymes 3: peptidases, proteinases and their inhibitors. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns RG (1983) Extracellular enzyme-substrate interactions in soil. In: Slater JH, Whittenbury R, Wimpenny JWT (eds) Microbes in their natural environments. Symp 34 Soc Gen Microb. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 249–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabas LJ (1969) Enzimologia. Editorial Cientifico-Médica, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Engasser J, Horvath C (1975) Electrostatic effects on the kinetics of bound enzymes. Biochem J 145:431–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving GC, Cosgrove DJ (1976) The kinetics of soil acid phosphatase. Soil Biol Biochem 8:335–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one criterion variance analysis. J Am Statist An 47:583–621

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren AD, Packer L (1970) Some aspects of enzyme reactions in heterogeneous systems. Adv Enzymol 33:245–308

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren AD, Pukite AH, Barshad I (1975) Isolation of humus with enzymatic activity from soil. Soil Sci 119:178–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Cervelli S, Sequi P (1978) Stability and kinetic properties of humus-urease complexes. Soil Biol Biochem 10:143–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez Mateos M, Gonzalez Carcedo S (1985) Effect of fractionation on location of enzyme activities in soil structural units. Biol Fertil Soils 1:153–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit NM, Smith AR, Freedman RB, Burns RG (1976) Soil urease: activity, stability and kinetic properties. Soil Biol Biochem 8:479–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Skujins J (1978) History of abiontic soil enzyme research. In: Burns RG (ed) Soil enzymes. Academic Press, London, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Teorell L, Stenhagen M (1938) A solution as an universal buffer. Biochem Z 299:416

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaborsky OR (1973) Immobilized enzymes. CRC, Cleveland, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perez Mateos, M., Gonzalez Carcedo, S. Effect of fractionation on the enzymatic state and behaviour of enzyme activities in different structural soil units. Biol Fert Soils 4, 151–154 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256989

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00256989

Key words

Navigation