Skip to main content

Evaluating Telepresence Robot for Supporting Formal and Informal Caregivers in the Care Support Service: A Six-Month Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2023)

Abstract

Many older adults are living socially isolated. Telepresence robots could aid older people in supporting independent living and facilitate social interaction. The present study investigates the usability and acceptability of telepresence technology by older adults and their formal and informal caregivers over the course of 6 months. Secondly, the evaluation of the telepresence robot compared to video-calling using a smart TV. Lastly, how informal and formal caregivers perceived the two systems. We found that at the beginning of the study the telepresence robot was not deemed usable compared to the TV by older adults, however the usability increased, whereas the TV decreased after 6 months. Regarding acceptability, the telepresence robot was scored higher than the TV in terms of usefulness, intention to use, enjoyment and trustworthiness in all three groups. Additionally, formal caregivers expressed that the older adults felt more secure, independent and in contact with loved ones, the operator felt that the older adults did not need their physical presence to interact with technology and that their job was helped by having more contact with his/her assisted. Overall, this study suggested that although the perceived usability by older adults might be negative at the beginning, after 6 months the telepresence robot could positively impact the lives of older adults and their caregivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smale, B., Wilson, J., Akubueze, N.: Exploring the determinants and mitigating factors of loneliness among older adults. Wellbeing, Space Soc. 3, 100089 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2022.100089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholson, N.R.: A review of social isolation: an important but underassessed condition in older adults. J. Prim. Prev. 33, 137–152 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Onofrio, G., et al.: Pilots for healthy and active ageing (PHArA-ON) project: definition of new technological solutions for older people in Italian pilot sites based on elicited user needs. Sensors 22, 163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mooses, K., et al.: Involving older adults during COVID-19 restrictions in developing an ecosystem supporting active aging: overview of alternative elicitation methods and common requirements from five European Countries. Front. Psychol. 13, 676 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.818706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Orlandini, A., Tiberio, L.: Long-term evaluation of a telepresence robot for the elderly: methodology and ecological case study. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 8, 421–441 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0337-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hung, L., et al.: Facilitators and barriers to using telepresence robots in aged care settings: a scoping review. J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng. 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211072385

  7. Moyle, W., Arnautovska, U., Ownsworth, T., Jones, C.: Potential of telepresence robots to enhance social connectedness in older adults with dementia: an integrative review of feasibility. Int. Psychogeriatr. 29, 1951–1964 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Isabet, B., et al.: Social telepresence robots: a narrative review of experiments involving older adults before and during the covid-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 3597 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hung, L., et al.: Using telepresence robots as a tool to engage patient and family partners in dementia research during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative participatory study. Res. Involv. Engagem. 9, 1–12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00421-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiorini, L., et al.: On the use of assistive technology during the COVID-19 outbreak: results and lessons learned from pilot studies. Sensors 22, 6631 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., McHugh, P.R.: “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician (1975). J. Psychiatr. Res. 12 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., Cutrona, C.E.: The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 472 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorusso, L., et al.: Design and evaluation of personalized services to foster active aging: the experience of technology pre-validation in Italian pilots. Sensors 23, 797 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/S23020797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rockwood, K., et al.: A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ Can. Med. Assoc. J. 173, 489–495 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brooke, J.: SUS: A “Quick And Dirty” Usability Scale. Usability Evaluation in industry, pp. 189–194(4–7) (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5

  17. Oberschmidt, K., Grünloh, C., Nijboer, F., van Velsen, L.: Best practices and lessons learned for action research in eHealth design and implementation: literature review. J. Med. Internet Res. 24(1), e31795 (2022). https://www.jmir.org/2022/1/e31795, https://doi.org/10.2196/31795

  18. Fiorini, L., et al.: Living with a telepresence robot: results from a field-trial. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 7, 5405–5412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3155237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saari, U.A., Tossavainen, A., Kaipainen, K., Mäkinen, S.J.: Exploring factors influencing the acceptance of social robots among early adopters and mass market representatives. Rob. Auton. Syst. 151, 104033 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104033

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The research work reported in this article has received funding from the Pilots for Healthy and Active Ageing (Pharaon) project of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 857188.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Fiorini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fiorini, L. et al. (2024). Evaluating Telepresence Robot for Supporting Formal and Informal Caregivers in the Care Support Service: A Six-Month Case Study. In: Ali, A.A., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14454. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8718-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8718-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8717-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8718-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics