Skip to main content

Quantitative Analysis of Scholarly References on YouTube

Focusing on Their Research Fields and Contributors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Leveraging Generative Intelligence in Digital Libraries: Towards Human-Machine Collaboration (ICADL 2023)

Abstract

Scholarly communication through video by various people and institutions has spread more and more in recent years and impacts the dissemination of scholarly knowledge and people’s daily lives. However, most of the previous works were conducted to measure the impacts of these research outputs as Altmetrics studies; little is known about characteristics and trends of scholarly articles and their associated videos. E.g., how many of these articles and videos are available since when?, and who has been publishing these videos? Hence, we analyzed 410,101 articles with 228,192 unique DOIs referenced in 137,629 videos uploaded by 39,416 channels, using data provided by Altmetric.com. As a result, the total number of scholarly references on YouTube has increased rapidly since 2016 and has continued to grow. The top research fields of scholarly articles were Clinical Medicine and Multidisciplinary consistently. The most common channels in the number of videos associated with scholarly references were hosted by publishers and academic societies, SciShow, and other individuals/organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aggarwal, V.: Visual abstracts do not increase some impact scores more than conventional abstracts of clinical research: a retrospective cohort study. Health Inf. Lib. J. 38(4), 259–267 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allgaier, J.: Science and medicine on YouTube. In: Hunsinger, J., Allen, M.M., Klastrup, L. (eds.) Second International Handbook of Internet Research, pp. 7–27. Springer, Dordrecht (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Altmetric: YouTube tracking : Altmetric (2020). https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000236682-youtube

  4. Altmetric: Introduction to the Altmetric Explorer (2023). https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000240622-introduction-to-the-altmetric-explorer

  5. BioMed Central: Cell Communication and Signaling \(|\) Submission guidelines (2023). https://biosignaling.biomedcentral.com/submission-guidelines

  6. BioMed Central: Microbiome \(|\) Submission guidelines (2023). https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/submission-guidelines

  7. Bonnevie, T., et al.: Video abstracts are associated with an increase in research reports citations, views and social attention: a cross-sectional study. Scientometrics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04675-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarivate: ESI Journal List (2023). https://esi.help.clarivate.com/Content/journal-list.htm

  9. Clarivate: Web of Science Master Journal List - Collection List Downloads (2023). https://mjl.clarivate.com/collection-list-downloads

  10. Crossref: Crossref Metadata API JSON Format (2023). https://github.com/CrossRef/rest-api-doc/blob/master/api_format.md

  11. Crossref: Crossref REST API (2023). https://api.crossref.org/

  12. Dove Press: Medical Research Papers Preparation & Submission Guidelines \(|\) Dove Press \(|\) Dove Press Author guidelines (2023). https://www.dovepress.com/author-guidelines

  13. Elsevier: Video guidelines: Cell Press (2023). https://www.cell.com/video-guidelines

  14. Google for Developers: YouTube Data API (2023). https://developers.google.com/youtube/v3

  15. MyJoVE Corporation: JoVE Journal (2023). https://www.jove.com/journal

  16. Research Square: Research Promotion \(|\) Research Square (2023). https://www.researchsquare.com/researchers/promotion

  17. SciShow: Channels - SciShow (2023). https://www.scishow.com/channels/

  18. SciShow: SciShow (2023). https://www.scishow.com/

  19. Shaikh, A.R., Alhoori, H., Sun, M.: YouTube and science: models for research impact. Scientometrics 128(2), 933–955 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04574-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Spicer, S.: Exploring Video Abstracts in Science Journals: An Overview and Case Study. J. Librarianship Schol. Commun. 2(22) (2014). https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1110

  21. SpringerNature: Promote your publication \(|\) For Researchers \(|\) Springer Nature (2023). https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/publication-promotion

  22. Sugimoto, C.R., Work, S., Larivière, V., Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 68(9), 2037–2062 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zong, Q., Xie, Y., Tuo, R., Huang, J., Yang, Y.: The impact of video abstract on citation counts: evidence from a retrospective cohort study of New Journal of Physics. Scientometrics 119(3), 1715–1727 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03108-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP22K18147, JP21K12592, and JP23K11761. We are grateful to Altmetric.com (https://www.altmetric.com/) for providing valuable data through the researcher data access program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiro Kikkawa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., Yoshikane, F. (2023). Quantitative Analysis of Scholarly References on YouTube. In: Goh, D.H., Chen, SJ., Tuarob, S. (eds) Leveraging Generative Intelligence in Digital Libraries: Towards Human-Machine Collaboration. ICADL 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14457. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8085-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8085-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-8084-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-8085-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics