Abstract
Cervical cancer surgery has strict indications that are limited to early-stage cervical cancer. Radical cervical cancer resection is generally perform in a tumor-free environment, whereas both standard open surgery and classic minimally invasive vaginal surgery emphasize the principles of tumor-free operations. On one hand, with the increasing promotion of laparoscopic or da Vinci surgery, radical cervical cancer resection using these approaches has been widely commended as they facilitate the excellent surgical field visualization and a long-arm effect. However, this procedure involves direct compression of the lesion during uterine manipulation and opening of the lesion during vaginal transection, which has cast doubt over the efficacy of this technique. On the other hand, vaginal radical cervical cancer resection is a mature technique adopted for the surgical treatment of cervical cancer since the beginning of the twentieth century, and can be considered a classic minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer. However, its disadvantages, including the need for retrograde dissection and a limited surgical field, have impeded its technical advancement, and the learning curve associated with the procedure has also hindered its widespread promotion. Therefore, use of the two surgical approaches as complements to each other will not only simplify the surgical techniques involved but also help surgeons adhere to the tumor-free principle of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Christhardt K, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff – a multicenter analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(5):845–50.
Hwang JH, et al. Comparison of urologic complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy: a nationwide study from the National Health Insurance. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158(1):117–22.
Lee CL, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in adnexal procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(4):509–13.
Liang C, et al. Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004–2015. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156(1):115–23.
Ramirez PT, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–904.
Xiaobin H, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery combined with radical vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage cervical carcinoma. Chin J Min Inv Surg. 2019;19(6):512–4.
Xishan W, et al. Current challenges and prospects of NOSES in China. Chin J Colorec Dis (Electronic Edition). 2018;7(1):2–7.
Yanzhou W, et al. Chopstick technique used in laparoendoscopic single site radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6882–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 People's Medical Publishing House, PR of China
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wang, D. (2023). Vaginal-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cervical Cancer Resection Without Uterine Manipulation. In: Wang, X. (eds) Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2750-0_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2750-0_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-2749-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-2750-0
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine