Skip to main content

Potential and Financial Analysis of the Floating PV in Hydropower Dams of Thailand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fundamentals and Innovations in Solar Energy

Part of the book series: Energy Systems in Electrical Engineering ((ESIEE))

Abstract

Solar power is one of the most widely fascinated renewable energy sources because of its cleanliness, simplicity, abundance, and sustainability. During 2014–2018, the cumulative global floating photovoltaic (FPV) installed capacity has been growing exponentially. The advantages of reducing evaporation, increasing efficiency, and the utilization of the existing infrastructure and the installation of large-scale FPV in hydropower dams have attracted attention. In this work, the FPV systems in Thailand’s hydropower dams are evaluated for their potential power production and economic benefits. Further, the potential energy production was carried out in five cases here. For water surface coverage of 2% and 2.5% on average, the annual energy production was estimated to be 5771 GWh, and 7648 GWh, respectively. The total requirement of the installed capacity of the FPV, to replace the annual hydropower production (about 5511 GWh), could be introduced at 3758 MWp. The installation of the FPV systems covered 5% and 10% of the surface area. It was able to produce the highest electric power, which was more than the energy produced from the existing hydropower plants about 3.5 and 7 times, respectively. All five cases of potential energy production were considered for financial analysis. The highest financial benefit was found in the condition that FPV covers 10% of the surface area. As a result, it was expected to produce 40,096 GWh of electricity per year. This equals the amount of GHG reduction of approximately 24.22 million tCO2/year. The annual water evaporation reduction of 335.55 million m3/year is worth for agriculture about 27.85 million USD and the electricity production of 50,461 MWh. Based on the evaluation of various financial indicators, namely NPV, IRR, payback period, benefit–cost ratio (BCR), and electricity production cost (LCOE), the economic analysis results can ensure that all the FPV projects studied are profitable. The installation of the FPV system with 170% of DC to AC ratio can obtain more profits in NPV than a facility with a DC to AC ratio of 125%; however, the installation costs rose by about 30%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akbarzadeh A, Wadowski T (1996) Heat pipe-based cooling systems for photovoltaic cells under concentrated solar radiation. Appl Therm Eng 16(1):81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campana PE, Wästhage L, Nookuea W, Tan Y, Yan J (2019) Optimization and assessment of floating and floating-tracking PV systems integrated in on-and off-grid hybrid energy systems. Sol Energy 177:782–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cazzaniga R, Rosa-Clot M, Rosa-Clot P, Tina GM (2019) Integration of PV floating with hydroelectric power plants. Heliyon 5(6):e01918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charles Lawrence Kamuyu W, Lim J, Won C, Ahn H (2018) Prediction model of photovoltaic module temperature for power performance of floating PVs. Energies 11(2):447

    Google Scholar 

  5. Damnoen P, Ketjoy N (2019) Analysis of investment models for megawatt scale photovoltaic power plant in Thailand. J Renew Energy Smart Grid Technol 14(1)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Department of Foreign Trade (DFT) (2019) Rice production and trade information. Retrieved 8 Feb 2020, from. http://www.thairiceinfo.go.th/?page=DataL3.ShowData&codeData=A1008

  7. Durković V, Đurišić Ž (2017) Analysis of the potential for use of floating PV power plant on the Skadar Lake for electricity supply of aluminium plant in Montenegro. Energies 10(10):1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Edalati S, Ameri M, Iranmanesh M, Tarmahi H, Gholampour M (2016) Technical and economic assessments of grid-connected photovoltaic power plants: Iran case study. Energy 114:923–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) (2016) Retrieved 10 Jan 2020, from. https://www.egat.co.th/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1454:article-20160420-01&catid=49&Itemid=251

  10. Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) (2019) Wholesale electricity rates for MEA and PEA. Retrieved 10 Jan 2020, from. http://www.egat.co.th/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=174&Itemid=222

  11. Fu R, Feldman D, Margolis R, Woodhouse M, Ardani K (2017) US solar photovoltaic system cost benchmark: Q1 2017 (No. NREL/TP-6A20-68925). EERE Publication and Product Library

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fu R, Feldman DJ, Margolis RM (2018) US solar photovoltaic system cost benchmark: Q1 2018 (No. NREL/TP-6A20-72399). National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grana P (2016) Solar inverters and clipping: what DC/AC inverter load ratio is ideal? Retrieve 10 Nov 2019, from. https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2016/07/solar-inverters-clipping-dcac-inverter-load-ratio-ideal/

  14. Hartzell TS (2016) Evaluating potential for floating solar installations on Arizona water management infrastructure

    Google Scholar 

  15. IRENA (2017) Renewable energy outlook: Thailand. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jordan DC, Wohlgemuth JH, Kurtz SR (2012) Technology and climate trends in PV module degradation (No. NREL/CP-5200-56485). National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kalogirou SA, Tripanagnostopoulos Y (2006) Hybrid PV/T solar systems for domestic hot water and electricity production. Energy Convers Manag 47(18–19):3368–3382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SM, Oh M, Park HD (2019) Analysis and prioritization of the floating photovoltaic system potential for reservoirs in Korea. Appl Sci 9(3):395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kost C (2018) Levelized cost of electricity renewable energy technologies, fraunhofer institute for solar energy system ISE

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krishnaveni N, Anbarasu P, Vigneshkumar D (2016) A survey on floating solar power system. Int J Current Res Modern Edu 152–158

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar BS, Sudhakar K (2015) Performance evaluation of 10 MW grid connected solar photovoltaic power plant in India. Energy Rep 1:184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lazard N (2018) Lazard’s levelized cost of energy analysis–version 12

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu L, Wang Q, Lin H, Li H, Sun Q (2017) Power generation efficiency and prospects of floating photovoltaic systems. Energy Procedia 105:1136–1142

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lohsomboon P (2017) Combating climate change with carbon pricing. Retrieved 3 Feb 2020, from. http://www.dsdw2016.dsdw.go.th/doc_pr/ndc_2560-2561/PDF/8459sc/8459Pongwipa Lorsomboon.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Kamalisarvestani M (2012) Effect of dust, humidity and air velocity on efficiency of photovoltaic cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):2920–2925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ministry of energy (2018) Power development plan 2018 (PDP 2018). Retrieved 7 Aug 2019, from. http://www.eppo.go.th/images/Information_service/public_relations/PDP2018/PDP2018.pdf

  27. Mittal D, Saxena BK, Rao KVS (2017) Floating solar photovoltaic systems: An overview and their feasibility at Kota in Rajasthan. In: International conference on circuit, power and computing technologies (ICCPCT), pp 1–7. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  28. Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE) (2019) White rice: arable land, harvesting area, yield and yield per rai, year 2018, by province. Retrieved 8 Feb 2020, from. http://www.oae.go.th/view/1/table showing details of rice paddies/TH-TH

    Google Scholar 

  29. RETScreen international clean energy decision support centre (2005) Clean energy project analysis, RETScreen engineering and cases textbook. CANMET energy technology centre: Montreal, QC, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rauf H, Gull MS, Arshad N (2019) Integrating floating solar pv with hydroelectric power plant: analysis of ghazi Barotha reservoir in Pakistan. Energy Procedia 158:816–821

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosa-Clot M, Tina GM, Nizetic S (2017) Floating photovoltaic plants and wastewater basins: an Australian project. Energy Procedia 134:664–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Royal Irrigation Department (RID) (2019) Water consumption of plants (Evapotranspiration; ET). Retrieved Feb 8 2020, from. http://water.rid.go.th/hwm/cropwater/CWRdata/ET/index.htm

  33. SMA Solar Technology AG. Oversizing White Paper. Retrieved 28 Apr 2020, from. https://www.sma.de/fileadmin/content/global/specials/documents/oversizing/Whitepaper_Oversizing_EN_180530_01.pdf

  34. Sharma AK, Kothari DP (2016) Floating solar PV potential in large reservoirs in India. Int J Innov Res Sci Technol 2:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  35. Song J, Choi Y, Yoon SH (2015) Analysis of photovoltaic potential at abandoned mine promotion districts in Korea. Geosyst Eng

    Google Scholar 

  36. SunSpark Technology Inc (2019) Poly Module 250 W, 255 W, 260 W, 265 W. Retrieved 7 Nov 2019, from. https://www.enfsolar.com/pv/paneldatasheet/crystalline/38332

  37. Thai Rice Mills Association (2018) Average rice price for the year 2018. Retrieved 8 Feb 2020, from. http://www.thairicemillers.org/index.php?lay=show&ac=article&Ntype=16

  38. World Bank Group, ESMAP and SERIS (2019) Where sun meets water: floating solar market report. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jai Govind Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Peanpitak, W., Singh, J.G. (2021). Potential and Financial Analysis of the Floating PV in Hydropower Dams of Thailand. In: Singh, S.N., Tiwari, P., Tiwari, S. (eds) Fundamentals and Innovations in Solar Energy. Energy Systems in Electrical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6456-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6456-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6455-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6456-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics