Skip to main content

Predicting Question Response Rate in Different Topics in Zhihu

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
LISS 2020
  • 737 Accesses

Abstract

As a popular social question answering platform in China, Zhihu is facing the problem of a low question response rate. In order to find out the reason, we conduct a predictive research on the question response rate of different topics. By comparing the influencing factors of the question response rate of different topics, we tend to find a solution which is beneficial to increase users’ activity. We obtain a total of 4293 data in six hot topics. A binary logistic regression method is used to construct a question response rate prediction model for different topics from the characteristics of the question and the questioner. Using 600 data to verify 6 prediction models, the prediction accuracy rate of which is more than 80%. We find carrier richness, question length, polite expression, expression of urgency and reliability of the questioner affect the question response rate of six topics. Moreover, posting period, affective tendency expression, the questioners degree of social learning, extended centrality and inward centrality cast different effects in different topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Z. He, Z. Chen, S. Oh et al., Enriching consumer health vocabulary through mining a social Q&A site: a similarity-based approach. J. Biomed. Inform. 69, 75–85 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Distribution of global social content sharing activities as of 2nd quarter 2016, by social network. Retrieved from. https://www.statista.com/statistics/283889/content-sharing-primary-social-networks-worldwide/, Accessed date: 14 March 2019

  3. L. Wenyin, T. Hao, W. Chen et al., A web-based platform for user-interactive question-answering. World Wide Web 12(2), 107–124 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Rafaeli, D.R. Raban, G. Ravid, How social motivation enhances economic activity and incentives in the Google answers knowledge sharing market. Int. J. Knowl. Learn. 3(1), 1–11 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Ding, Zhihu: the operation of the Q & A community [J]. Shanghai Informatization (09), 74–76 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Shi, Analysis on the development status and improvement strategies of knowledge payment—Taking Zhihu as an example [J]. Commer. Econ. (05), 137–139 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Li, T. Zhang, Research on Influencing factors of users’ perceived usefulness of knowledge sharing based on the social Q & A community—Taking Zhihu as an example [J]. Mod. Intell. 38(04), 20–28 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Deng, Research on knowledge communication in the social Q & A community from the perspective of consumer culture [D]. Nanjing Normal University, (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Liu, R. Lin, Research on knowledge sharing and communication behavior of “Zhihu” in the social Q & A community [J]. Libr. Inf. Knowl. (06), 109–119 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Choi, V. Kitzie, C. Shah, “10 Points for the best answer!” – Baiting for explicating knowledge contributions within online Q&A, in Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 50. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001101 (2013)

  11. S. Oh, The characteristics and motivations of health answerers for sharing information, knowledge, and experiences in online environments. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63, 543–557 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Dearman, K.N. Truong, Why users of Yahoo! answers do not answer questions [C].//Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 2010, pp. 329–332 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. K.K. Nam, M.S. Ackerman, L.A. Adamic, Questions in knowledge in?: a study of naver’s question answering community [C].//Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 2009, pp. 779–788 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Shengli, F. Shaoxiong, L. Jin, Prediction research on question response rate of social question answering platform—taking “Baidu Knows” as an example. Lib. Inf. Serv. 63(10), 97–105 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. E.A. Ramalho, J.J.S. Ramalho, Is neglected heterogeneity really an issue in binary and fractional regression models? A simulation exercise for logit, probit and loglog models. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 54(4), 987–1001 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.J. McMillan, Effects of structural and perceptual factors on attitude toward the website. J. Advertising Res. 43(4), 400–421 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. E.J. Brookes, The anatomy of a Facebook post. Study on post performance by Type, Day of Week, and Time of Day. [2018–10–01]

    Google Scholar 

  18. Applied Intelligence; Recent findings from Beijing Institute of Technology provides new insights into applied intelligence (User correlation model for question recommendation in community question answering). J. Robot. Mach. Learn. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Bolkan, J.L. Holmgren, “You are such a great teacher and I hate to bother you but…”: instructors’ perceptions of students and their use of email messages with varying politeness strategies. Commun. Educ. 61(3), 253–270 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Joyce, R.E. Kraut, Predicting continued participation in ne- wsgroups. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 11(3), 723–747 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. Hellier, J. Edworthy, B. Weedon, K. Walters, A. Adams, The perceived urgency of speech warnings: semantics versus acoustics. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 44(1), 1–17 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Y.M. Kalman, D. Gergle, CMC cues enrich lean online communication: the case of letter and punctuation mark repetitions (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.W. Picard, E. Vyzas, J. Healey, Toward machine emotional intelligence: analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 23(10), 1175–1191

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Ekman, T. Dalgleish, M. Power, Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (Wiley, Chichester, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Yaping, D. Xuebing, Effects of the content characteristics of virtual community consumer information on information sharing behavior. J. Inf. 33(1), 200–206 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Weng, E.P. Lim, J. Jiang, et al., Twitter rank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitters, in Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (ACM, New York, 2010), pp. 261–270

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Ferguson, S.B. Shum, Social learning analytics: five approaches, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, ed. by S.B. Shum, D. Gasevic, R. Ferguson (ACM, New York , 2012), pp. 23–33

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Duan, S. Yu, Construction of learning model based on social knowledge network. Res. Mod. Dist. Educ. 04, 91–102 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. C.H. Bates, An applied test of the social learning theory of deviance to college alcohol use in the context of a community enforcement campaign. Dissertations & Theses Gradworks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is supported by Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (No. 2462020YXZZ041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, Hd., Li, M., Yang, Cq. (2021). Predicting Question Response Rate in Different Topics in Zhihu. In: Liu, S., Bohács, G., Shi, X., Shang, X., Huang, A. (eds) LISS 2020. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4359-7_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics