Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Hearing-Impaired Students’ Intellectual Styles and Their Influence pp 71–80Cite as

Style Overlap

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter first introduces the issue of style overlap and review-related studies. It then reports findings concerning the overlap of thinking styles and FDI, before comparing style overlap between students with and without hearing impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Explorations in human intelligence: Some uncharted routes. Applied Measurement in Education, 1(3), 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokoros, M. A., Goldstein, M. B., & Sweeney, M. M. (1992). Common factors in five measures of cognitive style. Current Psychology: Research & Reviews, 11, 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostic, J. Q., & Tallent­Runnels, M. K. (1991). Cognitive styles: A factor analysis of six dimensions with implications for consolidation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 1299–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. C., Fleming, S. D., & Roberts, D. Y. (1989). The Myers-Briggs type indicator as a measure of aspects of cognitive style. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22(2), 94–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. J. (1991). Planning for a student learning style. Journal of Education for Business, 66(6), 356–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A., & Smith, A. J. (2006). Validity of index of learning styles scores: Multitrait-multimethod comparison with three cognitive/learning style instruments. Medical Education, 40(9), 900–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corman, L. S., & Platt, R. G. (1988). Correlations among the group embedded figures test, the Myers-Briggs type indicator and demographic characteristics: A business school study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66(2), 507–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning styles theory and constructs. ERIC Document, 235, 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W. B., & House, W. J. (1978). On the relationship between reflection–impulsivity and field-dependence–independence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(1), 306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, R., & Stoddard, A. H. (1992). Learning style and personality type. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(1), 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2009). Is psychological research really as good as medical research? Effect size comparisons between psychology and medicine. Review of General Psychology, 13(2), 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. M., & Blackman, S. (1981). Cognitive styles. In F. Fransella (Ed.), Personality: Theory, measurement and research (pp. 119–143). Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership, 36, 234–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorc, A. F. (1982). Gregorc style delineator. Gabriel Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205–230). Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1974). Personality research form manual. Research Psychologists Press. Rev. ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behaviour, 10(4), 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, B. G., Almerich Cerveró, G., Rodríguez, J. M. S., Félix, E. G., & Garfella Esteban, P. R. (2013). Learning styles and approaches to learning in excellent and average first-year university students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1361–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschark, M., & Hauser, P. C. (2008). Cognitive underpinnings of learning by deaf and hard-of-hearing students: Differences, diversity, and directions. In M. Marschark & P. C. Hauser (Eds.), Deaf cognition: Foundations and outcomes (pp. 3–23). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles: An integrated model. Educational Psychology, 7(4), 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1988). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosal, C. S. (1990). Psychologiczne modele umyslu [Psychological models of mind]. PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. A., & Turner, T. E. (2000). Field dependence revisited I: Intelligence. Educational Psychology, 20, 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3–4), 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). Learning style: Frameworks and instruments. Educational Psychology, 17(1–2), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, S., & Shipman, V. (1985). Cognitive styles: Some conceptual, methodological and applied issues. In E. W. Gordon (Ed.), Review of educational research (Vol. 12). American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., & Berry, J. W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6(1), 4–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). Embedded figures test, children’s embedded figures test: Manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. F. (2000). Relationship between thinking styles inventory and study process questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 841–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. F. (2004). Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability?—Validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(6), 1295–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan, China

    Sanyin Cheng

Authors
  1. Sanyin Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanyin Cheng .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheng, S. (2023). Style Overlap. In: Hearing-Impaired Students’ Intellectual Styles and Their Influence. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8810-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation