Abstract
The recent economic growth in the Philippines has been accompanied by a rising rate of urbanization. While some places are able to benefit from the economic expansion and increasing urbanization, others are left behind. To better understand the problem of widening spatial disparity and craft policies that would make urbanization more inclusive, it is vital to look at how cities are organized and how that affects socio-economic conditions. This study analyzes the structure of the city system within the provinces in the Philippines from 1990–2020. In general, the structure of the city system in provinces has remained almost unchanged for the past three decades. Cities or municipalities were able to preserve their sizes and rank in the system. This study also explores the link between the city system and socio-economic conditions. Provinces with a city system, where cities are geographically adjacent to one another and where the population is concentrated, typically have superior socioeconomic conditions. While provinces with a city system in which both population and cities are relatively dispersed, tend to have an inferior socio-economic condition. This study also classifies provinces based on the link between the city system and socio-economic conditions and outlines appropriate policy recommendations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This study did not include the following provinces: Compostela Valley used to be part of Davao del Norte until 1998; Dinagat Island which used to part of Surigao del Sur until 2012; Davao Occidental, the youngest province which was created in 2013.
- 2.
With the exception of regions, all other units are considered as official local governments units. Regions are used only for administrative management or statistic reference by the Executive branch.
- 3.
Highly Urbanized Cities (HUCs) are autonomous from the province and have a minimum population of 200,000 and latest annual income of PhP50 million; 2) Independent Component Cities (ICCs) are also autonomous and have charters that prohibit their residents in voting for provincial officials; and 3) Component Cities which do not meet the requirements for HUCs and ICCs and still considered a part of the provinces.
- 4.
For conformity, the top highest for CSI value is reversed as the low value indicates concentration.
- 5.
The average number of cities per province is 1.3 and the municipalities per city is 18.
References
Alonso, W. (1973). Urban zero population growth. Daedalus, 109, 191–206.
Antipolo, S. (2010). Globalization and localization in the 21st century: The case of mindanao regions in the Philippines. Paper virtually presented to the International Conference on Learning and Community Enrichment (ICOLACE 2010), July 27–29. Singapore.
Balisacan, A., & Hill, H., & Piza, S. F. (2008). Spatial disparities and development policy in the Philippines. In Huang Y.M & Bocchi, A. (eds.). Reshaping Economic Geography in Asia. World Bank.
Boquet, Y. (2017). Spatial structures of the Philippines: Urbanization and regional inequalities. In Y. Boquet, The Philippine Archipelago (pp. 419–464). Springer Cham.
Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Caragliu, A. (2013). One or infinite optimal city sizes? In search of an equilibrium size for cities. Annals of Regional Science, 51, 309–341.
Camagni, R., & Capello, R.(2004). The city network paradigm: Theory and evidence, in R.Capello and and P. Nijkamp (eds.).Urban Dynamics and Growth: Advances in Urban Economics, 495–532.
Camagni R. (1993). From city hierarchy to city network: Reflections about an emerging paradigm, in Laschmanan T. & P. Nijkamp (eds.). Structure and Change in the Space Economy. Springer Verlag: 66–90.
Capello, R. (2004). Beyond optimal city size: Theory and evidence reconsidered. In R. Capello and P. Nijkamp (eds.). Urban Dynamics and Growth: Advances in Urban Economics, 57–86. Elsevier.
Capuno, J. J. (2005). The quality of local governance and development under decentralization in the Philippines. University of the Philippines School of Economics Discussion Paper No. 2005–6.
Capuno, J. (2013). Fiscal transfers and gerrymandering under decentralization in the Philippines. University of the Philippines—School of Economics Discussion Paper No. 2013–04.
Christaller, W. (1933). Die ZentralenOrte in Suddeutscland. Fischer, Jena. In: Baskinm, L.W., Ed., Central Places in Southern Germany. Prentice Hall.
Desmet, K., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2014). Analyzing urban systems: Have megacities become too large? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS 6872.
Doeppers, D. (1972). The development of Philippine cities before 1900. The Journal of Asian Studies, 31(4), 769–792.
Dumayas, A. (2015c). City development in emerging economies: The case of the Philippines. Institute of Economic Research Chuo University Journal No. 2015c–47.
Dumayas A. (2015a). City development in emerging economies: The case of Davao city in the Philippines, in T. Ishikawa (ed.), Firms’ Location Selections and Regional Economic Policy: Industrial Location in the Highly Globalized Economy, 163–182. Tokyo: Springer.
Dumayas A. (2015b). Regional development policies in the Philippines: From diffusion to integration, in T. Ishikawa (ed.), Firms’ Location Selections and Regional Economic Policy: Industrial Location in the Highly Globalized Economy, 267–280. Tokyo: Springer.
El-Shakhs, S. (1972). Development, primacy, and systems of cities. The Journal of Developing Areas, 7(1), 11–36.
Fujita, M. (2007). The development of regional integration in East Asia: From the viewpoint of spatial Economics. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 19(1), 2–20.
Henderson, V. (2000). How urbanization affects economic growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2326.
Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of Panel Data (second ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ishikawa, T. (2012). A role of the urban system in the regional government’s location policy. Paper Presented to the European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Conference 2012. Vienna.
Ishikawa, T. (2015). Effects of corporation tax rates on factory locations through the function of the transfer price. In T. Ishikawa (ed.), Firms’ Location Selections and Regional Policy in the Global Economy. Tokyo: Springer.
Ishikawa, T., & Oh, T. (2015). Reexamination and expansion of the theory about city size distribution (Toshi kibo bunpu ni kansuru riron no saikentō to kakuchō). Institute of Economic Research Chuo University Journal No. 2015–251.
Ishikawa, T., & Wall, R. (2015). Significance of constructing city systems in regional policy, in T. Ishikawa (ed.), Firms’ Location Selections and Regional Economic Policy: Industrial Location in the Highly Globalized Economy, 281–288. Tokyo: Springer.
Jefferson, M. (1939). The law of the primate city. Geographical Review, 226–239
Llanto, G. (2007). Infrastructure and regional growth. In Balisacan, A., & Hill, H. The Dynamics of Regional Development: The Philippines in Asia. Edward Elgar
Llanto, G. (2009). Fiscal decentralization and local finance reforms in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS) Discussion Paper Series No. 2009–10.
Llanto, G. (2012). The assignment of functions and intergovernmental fiscal relations in the Philippines twenty years after decentralization. University of the Philippines-School of Economics Discussion Paper No. 2012–05.
Losch, A. (1940). The Economics of Location. Yale University Press.
Manasan, R. G. (2007). IRA design issues and challenges. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Policy Notes No. 2007–09.
Marshall, A. (1920). Principle of Economics. Macmillan and Co.
Mendoza, R., Beja-Jr. E., Venida, V., & Yap, D. (2013). Political dynasties and poverty: Evidence from the Philippines. Paper presented to the 12th National Convention on Statistics. Manila
Mercado, R. G. (2002). Regional development in the Philippines: A review of experience, state of the art, and agenda for research and action. Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS) Discussion Paper Series No. 2002–03.
Moomaw, R., & a. (1996). Urbanization and economic development: A bias toward large cities? Journal of Urban Economics, 40, 13–37.
Ortega, A., Acielo, J., & Hermida, M. (2015). Mega-regions in the Philippines: Accounting for special economic zones and global-local dynamics. Cities, 48, 130–139.
Pernia, E. (1982). The performance and prospects of small and intermediate size cities in the Philippines. University of the Philippines School of Economics Discussion Paper No. 1982–08.
Pernia, E., & Quising, P. (2003). Economic openness and regional development in the Philippines. Asian Development Bank ERD Working Paper No. 34.
Pernia, E., Paderanga Jr., C., & Hermoso, V. (1983). The Spatial and Urban Dimension of Development in the Philippines. Philippines Institute for Development Studies.
Philippine Statistics Authority (2012). The Philippine Countryside in Figures: 2012 Edition. Philippines Statistics Authority (PSA).
Philippine Statistics Authority (various years). Provincial Quickstat (various years). Philippines Statistics Authority (PSA).
Rosen, K. (1980). The size distribution of cities—An examination of the Pareto law and primacy. Journal of Urban Economics, 8(2), 165–186.
Sheppard, E. (1982). City size distribution and spatial economic change. International Regional Science Review, 7(2), 127–151.
Tecson, G. (2007). Trade and promotion policy in Philippine industrial development. The Developing Economies, 21(4), 386–414.
Uchimura, H., & Suzuki, Y. (2009). Measuring fiscal decentralization in the Philippines. Institute of Developing Economies IDE Discussion Paper No. 209.
World Bank. (2009). World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography.World Bank.
World Bank. (2015).East Asia’s Changing Urban Landscape: Measuring a Decade of Spatial Growth. World Bank.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behaviour and the Principles of Least Effort. Addison Wesley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dumayas, A. (2023). The Structure and Evolution of City System in the Philippines. In: Ishikawa, T., Nakamura, D. (eds) Industrial Location and Vitalization of Regional Economy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8128-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8128-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8127-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8128-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)