Skip to main content

The Intergroup Bias in the Effects of Facial Feedback on the Recognition of Micro-expressions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education Technologies: New Development and Innovative Practices (AIET 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 154))

  • 607 Accesses

Abstract

Micro-expression is the facial expression that is extremely quick and lasts less than half a second. As a spontaneous expression, it is usually produced when people try to suppress their emotions and can reveal the true emotions of human beings. It plays an important role in lie detection. In recent years, with the progress of neural network technology, the research on micro-expression recognition has made significant progress. However, because our understanding of the psychological process of micro-expression recognition is far from complete, the existing method of recognizing micro-expression still cannot meet the standard of practical application. In the present research, we investigated the effects of facial feedback and social identity of the expresser on the recognition of micro-expressions by one behavioral experiment. The results showed that facial feedback can moderate the intergroup bias in micro-expression recognition, which suggests that humans will imitate other people's facial expressions to different degrees in the recognition of micro-expression. At shorter duration, facial feedback has a stronger effect on the recognition of micro-expression of outgroup members. And at longer duration, facial feedback has a stronger effect on the recognition of micro-expressions of ingroup members. This further suggests that we need to consider the identity of the model and the identity of the coder to obtain more accurate and effective data coding when establishing the micro-expression database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Laith, A.S., Daniel, C.B., Kelly, A., David, M.B.: Human emotions: an evolutionary psychological perspective. Emot. Rev. 8(2), 173–186 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll, E.I.: Innate and universal facials expressions: evidence from developmental and cross-culture research. Psychol. Bull. 115(2), 288–299 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ekman, P.: Darwin, deception, and facial expression. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1000(1), 205–221 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, L.-F., Ognjen, A.: Review of automatic micro-expression recognition in the past decade. MAKE 3(2), 414–434 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olufisayo, S.E., Serestina, V.: Facial expression recognition: a review of trends and techniques. IEEE Access 9, 136944–136973 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan, W.-J., Wu, Q., Liang, J., Chen, Y.-H., Fu, X.: How fast are the leaked facial expressions: the duration of micro-expressions. J. Nonverbal Behav. 37(4), 217–230 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0159-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Porter, S., Ten, B.L.: Reading between the lies: identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychol. Sci. 19(5), 508–514 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Detecting deception from the body or face. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 29(3), 288–298 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumoto, D., Leroux, J., Wilsoncohn, C.: A new test to measure emotion recognition ability: Matsumoto and Ekman’s Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test (JACBERT). J. Nonverbal Behav. 24(3), 179–209 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ekman, P.: Microexpression Training Tool [EB]. http://www.paulekman.com. Accessed 15 April 2009

  11. Frank, M.G., Herbasz, M., Sinuk, K., Keller, A., Nolan, C.: I see how you feel: training laypeople and professionals to recognize fleeting emotions. In: The Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p15018_index.html. Accessed 1 July 2009

  12. Matsumoto, D., Hwang, H.S.: Evidence for training the ability to read microexpressions of emotion. Motiv. Emot. 35(2), 181–191 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang, J., Chen, X.-Y., Liu, Q.-Y., Jin, S.-H., Yang, C.-H., Hu, C.: Research on a microexpression recognition technology based on multimodal fusion. Complexity 2021, 1–15 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kathleen, R.B., David, M.: Facial mimicry is not necessary to recognize emotion: facial expression recognition by people with Moebius syndrome. Soc. Neurosci. 5(2), 241–251 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. William, F.: Peripheral feedback effects of facial expressions, bodily postures, and vocal expressions on emotional feelings. Cogn. Emot. 20(2), 177–195 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, J.-J.: The Effect of Facial Feedback on Facial Expression Recognition and Its Influence Factor. ZheJiang Normal University (2015) (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu, Q., Guo, H., He, L.-L.: Facial feedback and micro-expression recognition. J. Psychol. Sci. 39(6), 1353–1358 (2016). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zeng, X.-M., Wu, Q., Zhang, S.-W., Liu, Z.-Y., Zhou, Q., Zhang, M.-S.: A false trail to follow: differential effects of the facial feedback signals from the upper and lower face on the recognition of micro-expressions. Front. Psychol. 9 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elfenbein, H.A., Ambady, N.: Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition? Psychol. Bull. 128(2), 243–249 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hillary, A.E., Manas, K.M., Nalini, A., Susumu, H., Surender, K.: Hemifacial differences in the in-group advantage in emotion recognition. Cogn. Emot. 18(5), 613–629 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gray, H.M., Mendes, W.B., Dennybrown, C.: An in-group advantage in detecting intergroup anxiety. Psychol. Sci. 19(12), 1233–1237 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xie, Y.-N., Zhong, C.-Y., Zhang, F.-Q., Wu, Q.: The ingroup disadvantage in the recognition of micro-expressions. In: 14th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2019), pp. 1–5. IEEE, Lille, France (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, S.L., Maner, J.K., Becker, D.V.: Self-protective biases in group categorization: threat cues shape the psychological boundary between “us” and “them.” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99(1), 62–77 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., Lang, A.G.: Statistical power analyses using GPower 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 41(4), 1149–1160 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yin, L., Wei, X., Sun, Y., Wang, J., Rosato, M.J.: A 3D facial expression database for facial behavior research. In: 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06), pp. 211–216. IEEE, Southampton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Neal, D.T., Chartrand, T.L.: Embodied emotion perception: amplifying and dampening facial feedback modulates emotion perception accuracy. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 2(6), 673–678 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Beilock, S.L., Kulp, C.A., Holt, L.E., Carr, T.H.: More on the fragility of performance: choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. J. Exp. Psychol. 133(4), 584–600 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yan, W.-J., Li, X.-B., Wang, S.-J., Zhao, J.-Y., Liu, Y.-J., Chen, Y.-H., Fu, X.-L.: CASME II: an improved spontaneous micro-expression database and the baseline evaluation. PLoS ONE 9(1), e86041 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Young, S.G., Hugenberg, K.: Mere social categorization modulates identification of facial expressions of emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99(6), 964–977 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saranya, R., Poongodi, C., Somasundaram, D., Nirmala, M.: Novel deep learning model for facial expression recognition based on maximum boosted CNN and LSTM. Emot. Rev. 8(2), 173–186 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Outstanding Young Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (19B361).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Peng, K., Wang, Y., Wu, Q. (2023). The Intergroup Bias in the Effects of Facial Feedback on the Recognition of Micro-expressions. In: Cheng, E.C.K., Wang, T., Schlippe, T., Beligiannis, G.N. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education Technologies: New Development and Innovative Practices. AIET 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 154. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8040-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8040-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8039-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8040-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics