Abstract
Micro-expression is the facial expression that is extremely quick and lasts less than half a second. As a spontaneous expression, it is usually produced when people try to suppress their emotions and can reveal the true emotions of human beings. It plays an important role in lie detection. In recent years, with the progress of neural network technology, the research on micro-expression recognition has made significant progress. However, because our understanding of the psychological process of micro-expression recognition is far from complete, the existing method of recognizing micro-expression still cannot meet the standard of practical application. In the present research, we investigated the effects of facial feedback and social identity of the expresser on the recognition of micro-expressions by one behavioral experiment. The results showed that facial feedback can moderate the intergroup bias in micro-expression recognition, which suggests that humans will imitate other people's facial expressions to different degrees in the recognition of micro-expression. At shorter duration, facial feedback has a stronger effect on the recognition of micro-expression of outgroup members. And at longer duration, facial feedback has a stronger effect on the recognition of micro-expressions of ingroup members. This further suggests that we need to consider the identity of the model and the identity of the coder to obtain more accurate and effective data coding when establishing the micro-expression database.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Laith, A.S., Daniel, C.B., Kelly, A., David, M.B.: Human emotions: an evolutionary psychological perspective. Emot. Rev. 8(2), 173–186 (2015)
Carroll, E.I.: Innate and universal facials expressions: evidence from developmental and cross-culture research. Psychol. Bull. 115(2), 288–299 (1994)
Ekman, P.: Darwin, deception, and facial expression. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1000(1), 205–221 (2006)
Zhang, L.-F., Ognjen, A.: Review of automatic micro-expression recognition in the past decade. MAKE 3(2), 414–434 (2021)
Olufisayo, S.E., Serestina, V.: Facial expression recognition: a review of trends and techniques. IEEE Access 9, 136944–136973 (2021)
Yan, W.-J., Wu, Q., Liang, J., Chen, Y.-H., Fu, X.: How fast are the leaked facial expressions: the duration of micro-expressions. J. Nonverbal Behav. 37(4), 217–230 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0159-8
Porter, S., Ten, B.L.: Reading between the lies: identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychol. Sci. 19(5), 508–514 (2008)
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Detecting deception from the body or face. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 29(3), 288–298 (1974)
Matsumoto, D., Leroux, J., Wilsoncohn, C.: A new test to measure emotion recognition ability: Matsumoto and Ekman’s Japanese and Caucasian Brief Affect Recognition Test (JACBERT). J. Nonverbal Behav. 24(3), 179–209 (2000)
Ekman, P.: Microexpression Training Tool [EB]. http://www.paulekman.com. Accessed 15 April 2009
Frank, M.G., Herbasz, M., Sinuk, K., Keller, A., Nolan, C.: I see how you feel: training laypeople and professionals to recognize fleeting emotions. In: The Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p15018_index.html. Accessed 1 July 2009
Matsumoto, D., Hwang, H.S.: Evidence for training the ability to read microexpressions of emotion. Motiv. Emot. 35(2), 181–191 (2011)
Kang, J., Chen, X.-Y., Liu, Q.-Y., Jin, S.-H., Yang, C.-H., Hu, C.: Research on a microexpression recognition technology based on multimodal fusion. Complexity 2021, 1–15 (2021)
Kathleen, R.B., David, M.: Facial mimicry is not necessary to recognize emotion: facial expression recognition by people with Moebius syndrome. Soc. Neurosci. 5(2), 241–251 (2010)
William, F.: Peripheral feedback effects of facial expressions, bodily postures, and vocal expressions on emotional feelings. Cogn. Emot. 20(2), 177–195 (2006)
Wang, J.-J.: The Effect of Facial Feedback on Facial Expression Recognition and Its Influence Factor. ZheJiang Normal University (2015) (in Chinese)
Wu, Q., Guo, H., He, L.-L.: Facial feedback and micro-expression recognition. J. Psychol. Sci. 39(6), 1353–1358 (2016). (in Chinese)
Zeng, X.-M., Wu, Q., Zhang, S.-W., Liu, Z.-Y., Zhou, Q., Zhang, M.-S.: A false trail to follow: differential effects of the facial feedback signals from the upper and lower face on the recognition of micro-expressions. Front. Psychol. 9 (2015)
Elfenbein, H.A., Ambady, N.: Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition? Psychol. Bull. 128(2), 243–249 (2002)
Hillary, A.E., Manas, K.M., Nalini, A., Susumu, H., Surender, K.: Hemifacial differences in the in-group advantage in emotion recognition. Cogn. Emot. 18(5), 613–629 (2004)
Gray, H.M., Mendes, W.B., Dennybrown, C.: An in-group advantage in detecting intergroup anxiety. Psychol. Sci. 19(12), 1233–1237 (2008)
Xie, Y.-N., Zhong, C.-Y., Zhang, F.-Q., Wu, Q.: The ingroup disadvantage in the recognition of micro-expressions. In: 14th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2019), pp. 1–5. IEEE, Lille, France (2019)
Miller, S.L., Maner, J.K., Becker, D.V.: Self-protective biases in group categorization: threat cues shape the psychological boundary between “us” and “them.” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99(1), 62–77 (2010)
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., Lang, A.G.: Statistical power analyses using GPower 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 41(4), 1149–1160 (2009)
Yin, L., Wei, X., Sun, Y., Wang, J., Rosato, M.J.: A 3D facial expression database for facial behavior research. In: 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06), pp. 211–216. IEEE, Southampton (2006)
Neal, D.T., Chartrand, T.L.: Embodied emotion perception: amplifying and dampening facial feedback modulates emotion perception accuracy. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 2(6), 673–678 (2011)
Beilock, S.L., Kulp, C.A., Holt, L.E., Carr, T.H.: More on the fragility of performance: choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. J. Exp. Psychol. 133(4), 584–600 (2004)
Yan, W.-J., Li, X.-B., Wang, S.-J., Zhao, J.-Y., Liu, Y.-J., Chen, Y.-H., Fu, X.-L.: CASME II: an improved spontaneous micro-expression database and the baseline evaluation. PLoS ONE 9(1), e86041 (2014)
Young, S.G., Hugenberg, K.: Mere social categorization modulates identification of facial expressions of emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99(6), 964–977 (2010)
Saranya, R., Poongodi, C., Somasundaram, D., Nirmala, M.: Novel deep learning model for facial expression recognition based on maximum boosted CNN and LSTM. Emot. Rev. 8(2), 173–186 (2016)
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Outstanding Young Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (19B361).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Peng, K., Wang, Y., Wu, Q. (2023). The Intergroup Bias in the Effects of Facial Feedback on the Recognition of Micro-expressions. In: Cheng, E.C.K., Wang, T., Schlippe, T., Beligiannis, G.N. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education Technologies: New Development and Innovative Practices. AIET 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 154. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8040-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8040-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8039-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8040-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)