Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Teachers’ SSI Professional Development in a Reflection-Based In-service Program

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative Approaches to Socioscientific Issues and Sustainability Education

Part of the book series: Learning Sciences for Higher Education ((LSHE))

  • 482 Accesses

Abstract

Teachers’ professional development (PD) of teaching SSI has gained importance because the SSI-based interventions have demonstrated fruitful benefits for students’ higher order thinking and the potential to promote connections between school science and real life. The contradictory and multiple perspectives in the SSI context presents many pedagogical challenges for teachers while teaching students how to discuss and deal with these issues in the classroom. Thus, we developed a PD program and used a systematic measurement to explore the teachers’ discourse when they engaged in this experience. The case study invited 12 in-service teachers to participate; they were separated into three groups based on the teachers’ backgrounds. All teachers’ discourse in the group was collected and analyzed based on epistemic frame theory. The results indicated that (a) teachers’ epistemic frames related to knowledge and skills were the most common forms of discourse and (b) engaging teachers in reflective practice was helpful for promoting their tacit discourse, including epistemology, and identity discourse. These findings suggest that an effective PD program needs to engage teachers in reflective practice in a long-term program and that interacting with teachers from diverse fields might be helpful for promoting their multidisciplinary perspective for teaching SSI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bayram-Jacobs, D., Henze, I., Evagorou, M., Shwartz, Y., Aschim, E. L., Alcaraz-Dominguez, S., Barajas, M., & Dagan, E. (2019). Science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development during enactment of socioscientific curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1207–1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21550

  • Bressler, D. M., Bodzin, A. M., Eagan, B., & Tabatabai, S. (2019). Using epistemic network analysis to examine discourse and scientific practice during a collaborative game. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09786-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burhan-, E., & Ortaçtepe, D. (2016). Reflective practice-oriented online discussions: A study on EFL teachers’ reflection-on, in and for-action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.002

  • Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, Article 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377

  • Csanadi, A., Eagan, B., Kollar, I., Shaffer, D. W., & Fischer, F. (2018). When coding-and-counting is not enough: Using epistemic network analysis (ENA) to analyze verbal data in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9292-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath & Co Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eryasar, A. S., & Kilinc, A. (2021). The coherence between epistemologies and SSI teaching: A multiple-case study with three science teachers. Science and Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00200-7

  • Evagorou, M., & Dillon, J. (2020). Introduction: Socio-scientific issues as promoting responsible citizenship and the relevance of science. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship (pp. 1–11). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_1

  • Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Reflecting on reflective practice: (Re)visiting Dewey and Schön. TESOL Journal, 3(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichsen, P. J., Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., & Zangori, L. (2020). Enacting co-designed socio-scientific issues-based curriculum units: A case of secondary science teacher learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1795576

  • Friedrichsen, P. J., Sadler, T. D., & Zangori, L. (2020). Supporting teachers in the design and enactment of socio-scientific issue-based teaching in the USA. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship (pp. 85–99). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_6

  • Fuchs, T. (2001). The tacit dimension. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 8(4), 323–326. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2002.0018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, M., Taylor, I., Luzuriaga, M., & Podestá, M. E. (2020). Getting ready to work with socio-scientific issues in the classroom: A study with Argentine teachers. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship (pp. 133–151). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_9

  • Garrido Espeja, A., & Couso, D. (2020). Introducing model-based instruction for ssi teaching in primary pre-service teacher education. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship (pp. 153–171). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_10

  • Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Lederman, N. G. (2021). Developing an instrument to assess pedagogical content knowledge for biological socioscientific issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103217

  • Hsu, Y.-S., & Lin, S.-S. (2017). Prompting students to make socioscientific decisions: Embedding metacognitive guidance in an e-learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1312036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. (2019, June). Creation of an engineering epistemic frame for K-12 students (fundamental). CSCL 2013 Conference, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilinc, A., Demiral, U., & Kartal, T. (2017). Resistance to dialogic discourse in SSI teaching: The effects of an argumentation-based workshop, teaching practicum, and induction on a preservice science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 764–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (2016). Conceptualization of an SSI-PCK framework for teaching socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0539

  • Leung, J. S. C. (2021). Shifting the teaching beliefs of preservice science teachers about socioscientific issues in a teacher education course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10177-y

  • Leung, J. S. C., Wong, K. L., & Chan, K. K. H. (2020). Pre-service secondary science teachers’ beliefs about teaching socio-scientific issues. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship (pp. 21–39). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_3

  • Levinson, R. (2013). Practice and theory of socio-scientific issues: An authentic model? Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.746819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. (2018). Introducing socio-scientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL). School Science Review, 100(371), 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. A., Evagorou, M., & Dillon, J. (2020). New perspectives for addressing socioscientific issues in teacher education. In M. Evagorou, J. A. Nielsen, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science teacher education for responsible citizenship (pp. 193–199). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_12

  • Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2019). Teaching practices for enactment of socio-scientific issues instruction: An instrumental case study of an experienced biology teacher. Research in Science Education, 51, 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9799-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M., Siebert-Evenstone, A., Kessler, A., Gasevic, D., & Shaffer, D. W. (2021). Professional decision making: Reframing teachers’ work using epistemic frame theory. In A. R. Ruis & S. B. Lee (Eds.), Advances in quantitative ethnography (pp. 265–276). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_18

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., Merle-Johnson, D., Witzig, S. B., Izci, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2013). A framework for socio-scientific issues based education. Science Educator, 22(1), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socioscientific ossues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 1–9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_1

  • Saunders, K., & Rennie, L. (2013). A pedagogical model for ethical inquiry into socioscientific issues in science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2006a). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education, 46(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2006b). How computer games help children learn. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W., Hatfield, D., Svarovsky, G. N., Nash, P., Nulty, A., Bagley, E., Frank, K., Rupp, A. A., & Mislevy, R. (2009). Epistemic network analysis: A prototype for 21st-century assessment of learning. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm.2009.0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2008). Students’ socio-scientific reasoning on controversies from the viewpoint of education for sustainable development. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 657–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9141-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topçu, M. S., Foulk, J. A., Sadler, T. D., Pitiporntapin, S., & Atabey, N. (2018). The classroom observation protocol for socioscientific issue-based instruction: Development and implementation of a new research tool. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1399353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 12, pp. 697–726). Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W.-X., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2021). The interplay of students’ regulation learning and their collective decision-making performance in a SSI context. International Journal of Science Education, 43(11), 1746–1788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1933250

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under grant number MOST 107-2511-H-003-014-MY3, MOST 110-2511-H-003-025-MY3, and the National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City, Taiwan

    Wen-Xin Zhang & Ying-Shao Hsu

Authors
  1. Wen-Xin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ying-Shao Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying-Shao Hsu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Ying-Shao Hsu

  2. Faculty of Arts and Education, School of Education, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

    Russell Tytler

  3. Faculty of Arts and Education, School of Education, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

    Peta J. White

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, WX., Hsu, YS. (2022). Teachers’ SSI Professional Development in a Reflection-Based In-service Program. In: Hsu, YS., Tytler, R., White, P.J. (eds) Innovative Approaches to Socioscientific Issues and Sustainability Education. Learning Sciences for Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1840-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1840-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1839-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1840-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation