Skip to main content

The San Francisco System in Southeast Asia and Japan’s Search for a Regional Order in the 1950s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking the San Francisco System in Indo-Pacific Security
  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

The San Francisco System, constituted by the San Francisco Peace Treaty and its concomitant bilateral security pacts (Besides the Security Treaty with Japan, a tripartite pact with Australia and New Zealand, and a mutual defense pact with the Philippines were concluded in 1951), laid the foundations for the regional political and economic order in Southeast Asia after the Asia–Pacific War. The San Francisco Peace System established a regional order in Southeast Asia under US hegemony which was not fully accepted by either Japan or the Southeast Asian nations in the early post-war period. Japan supported the anti-communist political agenda, but sought to amend the economic configuration in order to realize its economic and political regional aspirations, while mitigating the Southeast Asian nations’ opposition to the San Francisco System.This chapter analyses how Japan in the 1950s, through a series of political initiatives that ran counter to the American regional economic strategy, sought to re-define its regional role in apolitical terms, to re-conceptualize the meaning of the US—Japan alliance, and to establish a regional order of economic integration under Japanese leadership. While Japan’s efforts aimed at the modification of the economic structure of the regional order, they ultimately worked to stabilize the San Francisco System in Southeast Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Besides the Security Treaty with Japan, a tripartite pact with Australia and New Zealand, and a mutual defense pact with the Philippines were concluded in 1951.

  2. 2.

    The US Asia policy found its most succinct expression in the National Security Council’s “New Asia Policy” (NSC 48/5) of 1951.

  3. 3.

    The economic policy of providing only “minimalist” aid (Shimizu 2001, 198) to Southeast Asia and rejecting regional integration was settled on 21st January 1955 in NSC 5506 (“Future United States Economic Assistance for Asia”).

  4. 4.

    Among the Southeast Asian signatories of the Peace Treaty in 1951, only Pakistan and Ceylon unequivocally supported the system; as Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos represented French interests, they cannot be included in the category of Southeast Asian supporters of the San Francisco Agreement (Price 2001, 52). Indonesia refused to ratify the treaty, and the Philippines did so only after it had come into force.

  5. 5.

    For more on these conferences, see Goto (2003, 248ff.).

  6. 6.

    Japan concluded the first agreement of reparations with Burma in 1954. In 1956, it reached a settlement with the Philippines, followed by accords with Indonesia in 1958 and with South Vietnam in 1959.

  7. 7.

    The refusal, by the Japanese delegation, to take a position in political issues was strongly criticized by the contemporary left-wing discourse (Lang 2020, 291).

  8. 8.

    Yoshida’s economic regional policy initiatives in Southeast Asia—the proposals for an Asian Payment Union, and Asian Development Fund, or an Asian Marshall Plan—had already posed a challenge to the US economic bilateralism, and were rejected by the United States (Tomaru 2000, 151).

  9. 9.

    For more on the conceptual continuities between Japan’s pre-war Southeast Asia strategy and its post-war approach during the 1950s in the strategic thinking of leading members of the conservative political elite, see Lang (2020, 345–353).

References

  • Anonymous. 1957. “Ajia kaihatsu kikin kōsō e no urazuke (The Foundation for the Asian Development Fund Proposal).” Daiyamondo 6, no. 4: 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abel, Jessamyn R. 2015. The International Minimum: Creativity and Contradiction in Japan’s Global Engagement, 1933–1964. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akagi, Kanji. 1995. “Sengo Nihon no Tōnan Ajia kaiki to Amerika no reisen seisaku (Postwar Japan’s Return to Asia and America’s Cold War Strategy).” Hōgaku kenkyū 68, no. 11: 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ampiah, Kweku. 1995. “Japan at the Bandung Conference: The Cat Goes to the Mice’s Convention.” Japan Forum 7, no. 1: 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa, Shōji. 1957. “Keizai kyōryoku e no wagakuni no hōto (The Way for Our Nation Towards Economic Coopera-tion).” Ajia mondai 3: 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, Kent. 2004. “Securing Security Through Prosperity: The San Francisco System in Comparative Perspective.” The Pacific Review 17, no. 1: 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denney, Kristine. 2006. “Overcoming Colonialism at Bandung.” In Pan-Asianism in Modern Japanese History, edited by Sven Saaler and Victor J. Koschmann, 213–225. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, Cindy. 2019. “The Colombo Powers: Crafting Diplomacy in the Third World and Launching Afro-Asia at Bandung.” Cold War History 19, no. 1: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiyama, Aiichirō. 1959. “Jiritsu gaikō no kadai (The Issue of an Independent Foreign Policy).” Gaikō jihō 1, no. 6: 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Jürg Martin. 2002. “Neutrality and Neutralism in Southeast Asia, 1960–1970.” Working Paper, ETH Zürich Research Collection 36 (June): 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto, Ken’ichi. 2003. Tensions of Empire: Japan and Southeast Asia in the Colonial and Postcolonial World. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, Sumio. 1997. “Ajia-taiheiyō no ‘chiiki-shugi’ to Nihon (‘Regionalism’ in the Asia-Pacific and Japan).” In Kokusai chiiki tōgō no furontia (The Frontier of Regional Integration), edited by H. Kleinschmitt et al., 173–208. Tōkyō: Sairyūsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiwatari, Yumi. 1989. “Kishi-gaikō ni okeru Tōnan Ajia to Amerika (Southeast Asia and the United States in Kishi’s Diplomacy).” In Kyōcho seisaku no genkai: Nichi-bei kankeishi, 1905–1960 (The Limits to Cooperative Policies: The History of US-Japan Relations, 1905–1960), edited by Kindai Nihon kenkyū kai, 211–242. Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshiro, Hiroyuki. 2008. Ajia chiiki-shugi gaikō no yukue: 1952–1966 (The Rise and Fall of Japan’s Regional Diplomacy: 1952–1966). Tōkyō: Bokutakusha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichimata, Hisato. 1960. “Tōnan Ajia keizai kyōryoku e no shin-teigen (A New Opinion on Economic Cooperation with Southeast Asia).” Keizai jidai 1: 86–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karashima, Masato. 2013. “Kaihatsu shisō ni okeru senzen to sengo: Shokumin seisaku-gaku to shakai minshu-shugi (Thought About Development in the Prewar and Postwar: Colonial Studies and Social Democracy).” In Gaikō shisō (Foreign Policy Thought), edited by Tetsuya Sakai, 151–174. Tōkyō: Iwanami shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kase, Toshikazu. 1957. “Japan and the United Nations.” Japan Quarterly 4, no. 3: 296–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katada, Saori. 2000. “Japan’s Foreign Aid after the San Francisco Peace Treaty.” The Journal of American-East Asian Relations 9, no. 3/4 (Fall-Winter): 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Burton Ira. 1982. Trade and Aid: Eisenhower’s Foreign Economic Policy, 1953–1961. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishi, Nobusuke. 1957. “Ajia ni taisuru waga hōfu (Our Aspiriations Towards Asia).” Ajia mondai 8: 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishi, Nobusuke. 1981. Kishi Nobusuke no Kaiso (Memoirs of Kishi Nobusuke). Tokyo: Bungei Shunjusha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitaoka, Shin’ichi. 1996. “Sengo Nihon gaikō no keisei: Kōwa ikō no Yoshida rosen to han-Yoshida rosen (The Formation of Japan’s Postwar Diplomacy: The Yoshida Line and the Anti-Yoshida Line after the Peace Treaty).” In Sengo Nihon no keisei (The Formation of Postwar Japan), edited by Akio Watanabe, 59–73. Tōkyō: Nihon gakujutsu shinkō-kai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, Yongseok. 2008: Kishi seiken-ki no ‘Ajia gaikō’: ‘Taibei jishu’ to ‘Ajia- shugi’ no gyakusetsu (“Asian Diplomacy” of the Kishi Administration: The Paradox of “Asianism” and “Autonomous Diplomacy toward the United States”). Tōkyō: Kokusai shoin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Heiko. 2020. Competing Visions of Japan’s Relations with Southeast Asia, 1938–1960: Identity, Asianism, and the Search for a Regional Role. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewelyn, James. 2014. “Japan’s Cold War Diplomacy and its Return to Southeast Asia.” Asia-Pacific Review 21, no. 2: 86–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macekura, Stephen. 2013. “The Point Four Program and U.S. International Development Policy.” Political Science Quarterly 128, no. 1 (Spring): 127–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Robert J. 2003. “The United States and Southeast Asia in an Era of Decolonization, 1945–1965.” In The Transformation of Southeast Asia: International Perspectives on Decolonization, edited by Marc Frey, Ronald W. Pruessen, and Tan Tai Yong, 213–225. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagi, Taizō. 2008. ‘Kaiyō kokka’ Nihon no sengo-shi (Postwar History of ‘Maritime Nation’ Japan). Tōkyō: Chikuma Shobō.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagi, Taizo. 2011. “Post-War Asia and Japan―Moving beyond the Cold War: An Historical Perspective.” Asia-Pacific Review 18, no. 1: 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyagi, Taizō. 2013. “Ajia no henyō to Nihon gaikō (The Transformation of Asia and Japan’s Diplomacy).” In Nihon no gaikō dai 2-kan gaikōshi sengo-hen (Japan’s Diplomacy Volume 2: Diplomatic History of the Postwar), edited by Sumio Hatano, 145–168. Tōkyō: Iwanami shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Ann Marie. 2008. “United States Relations with Southeast Asia: The Legacy of Policy Changes.” In Legacy of Engagement in Southeast Asia, edited by Ann Marie Murphy and Bridget Welsh, 249–280. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, Tōru. 1957. “Sengo Ajia gaikō no honshitsu-teki henka (Essential Changes in the Post-War Asia Diplomacy).” Ajia mondai 8: 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, John. 2001. “Cold War Relic: The 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty and the Politics of Memory.” Asian Perspective 25, no. 3: 31–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satō, Susumu. 1999. “Sengo Nihon gaikō no sentaku to Ajia chitsujo kōsō (Choices in Postwar Japan’s Diplomacy and Concepts of Asian Order).” Hōgaku seijigaku kenkyū 41: 165–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satō, Susumu. 2004. “Satō seiken-ki no Ajia seisaku (Asia Policy During the Satō Government).” In keda - Satō seiken-ki no Nihon gaikō (Japan’s Foreign Policy During the Governments of Ikeda and Satō), edited by Sumio Hatano, 131–165. Kyōto: Minerva shobō.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, Michael. 1997. Altered States: The United States and Japan since the Occupation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada, Kazuhisa. 2013. “Working Together” for Peace and Prosperity of Southeast Asia, 1945–1968. Okayama: Daigaku Kyoiku Shuppan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, Sayuri. 2001. Creating People of Plenty: The United States and Japan’s Economic Alternatives, 1950–1960. Kent: Kent State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suehiro, Akira. 1999. “The Road to Economic Re-Entry: Japan’s Policy toward Southeast Asian Development in the 1950s and 1960s.” Social Science Japan Journal 2, no. 1: 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takasaki, Tatsunosuke. 1958. “Ajia no han’ei to Nihon no unmei (Asia’s Prosperity and Japan’s Fate).” Chūō kōron 1: 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Mitsuo. 1955. “Nihon Biruma no yūkō kankei naru (Forming Friendly Relations Between Japan and Burma).” Jikei (1955/1): 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarling, Nicholas. 2006. Regionalism in Southeast Asia: To Foster the Political Will. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaru, Junko. 2000. The Postwar Rapprochement of Malaya and Japan, 1945–61: The Roles of Britain and Japan in South-East Asia. Basingstoke and London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsushima, Juichi. 1954. “Nihon gaikō seisaku no kihon-teki mokuhyō (The Principal Purposes of Japan’s Foreign Policy Strategy)”. Saiken 7: 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Akio. 2001 [1989]. “Southeast Asia in U.S.-Japanese Relations.” In Japan and Southeast Asia, edited by Wolf Mendl, 30–44. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherbee, Donald E. 2008. International Relations in Southeast Asia: The Struggle for Autonomy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki, Ryūzō. 1957. “Nihon no tai-Ajia keizai kyōryoku no jisseki to mondai ten (Results and Problems of Japan’s Economic Cooperation with Asia).” Ajia mondai 4: 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, Chikara. 1957. “Kishi shushō hōmon no Tōnan Ajia (The Southeast Asia of Prime Minister Kishi’s Visit).” Sekai shūhō 18: 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heiko Lang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lang, H. (2022). The San Francisco System in Southeast Asia and Japan’s Search for a Regional Order in the 1950s. In: Sugita, Y., Teo, V. (eds) Rethinking the San Francisco System in Indo-Pacific Security. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1231-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1231-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1230-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1231-3

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics