Abstract
Given the increasingly intensive competition between global markets, competition between companies has shifted from a focus on the performance of companies to supply chain performance. As a business becomes more international, there is a growing need for managing supply chain disruptions from a cross-national perspective. In general, supply chains are faced with increasing possibilities and severity of disruption. Furthermore, disruption management is complex as disruptions may happen due to various types and sources of risks. Trade facilitators, such as air, road and maritime transportation, will disrupt the flow of supply chains when a hazard occurs. This is categorized as transportation disruption. The paper aims to examine the existing strategies which are in place for the purpose of enhancing resilience to transportation disruptions in supply chains. Based on the major limitations of these strategies identified, the study also aims to develop an original approach to address the limitations. This paper introduces an integrated cost and risk management approach for enhancing resilience. The study contributes to the field of risk management by recommending an approach that can enhance supply chain resilience and at the same time being cost-effective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agrell PJ, Hatami-Marbini A (2013) Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management: state of the art and research directions. Comput Ind Eng 66(3):567–583
Bode C, Macdonald JR (2017) Stages of supply chain disruption response: direct, constraining, and mediating factors for impact mitigation. Decis Sci 48(5):836–874
Carvalho H, Barroso AP, Machado VH, Azevedo S, Cruz-Machado V (2012) Supply chain redesign for resilience using simulation. Comput Ind Eng 62(1):329–341
Chopra S, Sodhi MS (2004) Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 46(1):53–61
Christopher M, Peck H (2004) Building the resilient supply chain. Int J Logist Manag 15(2):1–14
Ellram LM (2012) Strategic cost management in the supply chain: a purchasing and supply management perspective. CAPS Research
Ganin AA, Kitsak M, Marchese D, Keisler JM, Seager T, Linkov I (2017) Resilience and efficiency in transportation networks. Sci Adv 3(12):e1701079
Gaudenzi B, Borghesi A (2006) Managing risks in the supply chain using the AHP method. Int J Logist Manag 17(1):114–136
Golan MS, Jernegan LH, Linkov I (2020) Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Environ Syst Decis 40:222–243
Gong Y, Janssen M (2012) From policy implementation to business process management: principles for creating flexibility and agility. Gov Inf Q 29(1):S61–S71
Horngren CT, Foster G, Datar SM, Rajan M, Ittner C (2009) Cost accounting: a managerial emphasis, 13th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Hoboken, NJ
Khemiri R, Elbedoui-Maktouf K, Grabot B, Zouari B (2017) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for managing performance and risk in integrated procurement–production planning. Int J Prod Res 55(18):5305–5329
Kiser J, Cantrell G (2006) 6 steps to managing risk. Supply Chain Manag Rev 10(3):12–17
Kleindorfer PR, Saad GH (2005) Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod Oper Manag 14(1):53–68
Kumar V, Chibuzo EN, Garza-Reyes JA, Kumari A, Rocha-Lona L, Lopez-Torres GC (2017) The impact of supply chain integration on performance: evidence from the UK food sector. Procedia Manuf 11:814–821
Lam JSL, Bai X (2016) A quality function deployment approach to improve maritime supply chain resilience. Transp Res Part E 92:16–27
Lam JSL, Van de Voorde E (2011) Scenario analysis for supply chain integration in container shipping. Marit Policy Manag 38(7):705–725
Lohr S (2011) Stress test for the global supply chain. The New York Times, 20 Mar. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/20/business/20supply.html
Lu HA, Cheng J, Lee TS (2006) An evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping—an empirical study of CKYH. J Mar Sci Technol 14(4):202–212
Mansouri M, Nilchiani R, Mostashari A (2010) A policy making framework for resilient port infrastructure systems. Mar Policy 34(6):1125–1134
Markmann Inga C, Darkow L, von der Gracht H (2013) A Delphi-based risk analysis—identifying and assessing future challenges for supply chain security in a multi-stakeholder environment. Technol Forecast Soc Change 80(9):1815–1833
Martín JC, Rodríguez-Déniz H, Voltes-Dorta A (2013) Determinants of airport cost flexibility in a context of economic recession. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 57(1):70–84
Mitroff II, Alpaslan MC (2003) Preparing for evil. Harvard Business School Pub., Boston, MA
Namdar J, Li X, Sawhney R, Pradhan N (2018) Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks. Int J Prod Res 56(6):2339–2360
Otto C, Willner SN, Wenz L, Frieler K, Levermann A (2017) Modeling loss-propagation in the global supply network: the dynamic agent-based model acclimate. J Econ Dyn Control 83:232–269
Pu S, Lam JSL (2020) Blockchain adoptions in the maritime industry: a conceptual framework. Marit Policy Manag 1–18
Revilla E, Sáenz MJ (2014) Supply chain disruption management: global convergence vs national specificity. J Bus Res 67(6):1123–1135
Rice JB, Caniato F (2003) Building a secure and resilient supply network. Supply Chain Manag Rev 7(5):22–30
Seuring S, Goldbach M (eds) (2002) Cost management in supply chains. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg
Sheffi Y, Rice JB (2005) A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 47(1):41–48
Spekman RE, Davis EW (2004) Risky business: expanding the discussion on risk and the extended enterprise. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 34(5):414–433
Stecke KE, Kumar S (2009) Sources of supply chain disruptions, factors that breed vulnerability, and mitigating strategies. J Mark Channels 16(3):193–226
Świerczek A (2014) The impact of supply chain integration on the “snowball effect” in the transmission of disruptions: an empirical evaluation of the model. Int J Prod Econ 157:89–104
Tang C, Tomlin B (2008) The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. Int J Prod Econ 116(1):12–27
The Straits Times (2020) Hundreds of flights cancelled as Shanghai tackles coronavirus outbreak, 24 Nov. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/hundreds-of-flights-cancelled-as-shanghai-tackles-coronavirus-outbreak
Wagner SM, Bode C (2006) An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability. J Purch Supply Manag 12(6):301–312
Wakolbinger T, Cruz JM (2011) Supply chain disruption risk management through strategic information acquisition and sharing and risk-sharing contracts. Int J Prod Res 49(13):4063–4084
Wilson MC (2007) The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 43(4):295–320
Wirtz J, Johnston R (2003) Singapore Airlines: what it takes to sustain service excellence—a senior management perspective. Manag Serv Qual 13(1):10–19
Zhang A, Lam JSL (2014) Daily Maersk’s impacts on shipper’s supply chain inventories and implications for the liner shipping industry. Marit Policy Manag 42(3):246–262
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lam, J.S.L., Yin, Y. (2022). Integrated Cost and Risk Management Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience. In: Kolathayar, S., Pal, I., Chian, S.C., Mondal, A. (eds) Civil Engineering for Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5312-4_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5312-4_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5311-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5312-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)