Skip to main content

Assessing the Carbon Foot Print of an Ayurveda Medical Institute: A Case of National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur, India

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Industrial Production (ICEM 2020)

Abstract

The According to the “Paris Agreement”, India has committed to greenhouse gas emission. By 2030, India’s greenhouse gas emission intensity per unit gross domestic product (GDP) will be reduced by 33–35% compared to the 2005 baseline. In this context, similar goals are encouraged to be followed by all fields of business, including hospitals and academic institutions. In order to contribute to the country's efforts on this issue, this study presents the 2020 greenhouse gas emission account of the Ayurveda medical institute at the National Institute of Ayurveda (NIA) Jaipur, India, based on the academic and hospital activities established in the year of 2020. This study was conducted using IPCC methodology with scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3. Scope 1 includes in-house transportation, refrigerants, chemical, and consumption of liquefied petroleum gas. In Scope 2, electricity is the only source of emissions, while Scope 3 includes personnel commuting, water supply, cloths, surgical accessories, wastewater treatment, oils, chemicals, stationery items, papers, polyethylene, biomedical waste, and solid waste, etc. The results show that at the Ayurveda medical institute, commuting, water, and wastages (Scope 3) generates 71.73% of carbon emissions, which is the highest. Liquefied petroleum gas consumption, refrigerant usage, in-house transportation and chemicals usage emissions (Scope 1) are 16.57% and direct emissions (Scope 2) are 11.57%. Refrigerant usage is the most influential activity in Scope 1 emissions. Commuting is the most dominant activity in Scope 3 emissions, accounting for more than 38% of the overall carbon footprint of the NIA, Jaipur, India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rogelj J, Den Elzen M, Höhne N, Fransen T, Fekete H, Winkler H, Meinshausen M (2016) Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534(7609):631–639

    Google Scholar 

  2. Güereca LP, Torres N, Noyola A (2013) Carbon footprint as a basis for a cleaner research institute in Mexico. J Clean Prod 47:396–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dangayach GS, Gaurav G (2020) Assessment of greenness through carbon footprint. MATTER Int J Sci Technol 6(1)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dangayach GS, Gaurav G, Gupta S (2020) Development of footprint framework of performance measurement system for SMMOs. J Adv Manag Res 17(5):727–756. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-05-2020-0070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaurav G, Sharma A, Dangayach GS, Meena ML (2020) Assessment of jojoba as a pure and nano-fluid base oil in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) hard-turning of Ti–6Al–4V: a step towards sustainable machining. J Clean Prod 272:122553

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gaurav G, Sharma A, Dangayach GS, Meena ML (2020) Bibliometric analysis of machining of titanium alloy research. Mater Today Proc (in Press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.217

  7. Gaurav G, Sharma A, Dangayach GS, Meena ML (2020) A review of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) based on bibliometry. Curr Mater Sci (in Press). ISSN: 2666-1462

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mishra H, Gaurav G, Khandelwal C, Dangayach GS, Rao PN (2020) Environmental assessment of an Indian municipal wastewater treatment plant in Rajasthan. Int J Sustain Eng (in Press). https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1862349

  9. Cucek L, Klemes JJ, Kravanja Z (2012) A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J Clean Prod 34:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cortese AD (2003) The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Plan High Educ 31(3):15–22

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ozawa-Meida L, Brockway P, Letten K, Davies J, Fleming P (2013) Measuring carbon performance in a UK University through a consumption-based carbon footprint: De Montfort University case study. J Clean Prod 56:185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lozano R, Lukman R, Lozano FJ, Huisingh D, Lambrechts W (2013) Declarations for sustainability in higher education: becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. J Clean Prod 48:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sangwan KS, Bhakar V, Arora V, Solanki P (2018) Measuring carbon footprint of an Indian university using life cycle assessment. Procedia CIRP 69:475–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bantanur S, Mukherjee M, Shankar R (2015) Emerging dimensions of sustainability in institutes of higher education in India. Int J Sustain Built Environ 4(2):323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eckelman MJ, Sherman J (2016) Environmental impacts of the US health care system and effects on public health. PloS One 11(6):e0157014

    Google Scholar 

  16. SDU (Sustainable Development Unit, UK National Health Service) (2013) Carbon footprint update for the NHS in England 2015. NHS Sustainable Development Unit, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chung JW, Meltzer DO (2009) Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US health care sector. JAMA 302(18):1970–1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malik A, Lenzen M, McAlister S, McGain F (2018) The carbon footprint of Australian health care. Lancet Planet Health 2(1):e27–e35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. IPCC (2006) Intergovernmental panels for climate change. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/

  20. DEFRA (2016) (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2016

  21. Emission factors in kg CO2-equivalent per unit. https://www.winnipeg.ca/finance/findata/matmgt/documents/2012/682-2012/682-2012_Appendix_H-WSTP_South_End_Plant_Process_Selection_Report/Appendix%207.pdf. Last accessed 2020/11/21

  22. Central Electricity Authority (CEA), India. https://cea.nic.in/reports/annual/annualreports/annual_report-2013.pdf. Last accessed 2020/11/21

  23. Yaman C (2020) Application of sterilization process for inactivation of Bacillus stearothermophilus in biomedical waste and associated greenhouse gas emissions. Appl Sci 10(15):5056

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support of Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, India. We also thank National Institute of Ayurveda (NIA) Jaipur, India for contributing their data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gaurav, G. et al. (2022). Assessing the Carbon Foot Print of an Ayurveda Medical Institute: A Case of National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur, India. In: Agrawal, R., Jain, J.K., Yadav, V.S., Manupati, V.K., Varela, L. (eds) Recent Advances in Industrial Production. ICEM 2020. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5281-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics