Skip to main content

Day-Ahead Electricity Price Forecasting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Analytics in Power Markets
  • 550 Accesses

Abstract

Short-term locational marginal price (LMP) forecasting is the traditional problem of market participants and other institutions maximizing their profit. Most electricity market organizers in the world release the data of LMP along with its three components, i.e., the energy, congestion, and loss components. The series of the three components have their own patterns and driving factors, and can be utilized to improve the accuracy of LMP forecasting. However, most existing studies have focused on direct LMP forecasting and have barely noticed this characteristic. In this chapter, we aim to bridge the gap between the released data of the three components and LMP forecasting through a componential and ensemble approach. Three individual forecasting models are selected and trained for these components, and an ensemble framework that stacks the summation LMP results and the direct results is proposed to enhance the overall accuracy and robustness. Numerical experiments with real market data are conducted to show the good performance of this novel approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The component data can be achieved from the ISO/RTO’s website. In some special cases when the ISO/RTO does not release the component data separately, a generator node with a high capacity could be chosen as the reference node, and its LMP is regarded as the MCE. The MCC is regarded as the difference in the LMP between the nodes because the MCL is usually small and can be neglected.

References

  1. Rahimiyan, Morteza, and Luis Baringo. 2016. Strategic bidding for a virtual power plant in the day-ahead and real-time markets: A price-taker robust optimization approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 31 (4): 2676–2687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Toubeau, Jean-François., Jérémie. Bottieau, François Vallée, and Zacharie De Grève. 2019. Deep learning-based multivariate probabilistic forecasting for short-term scheduling in power markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 34 (2): 1203–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baltaoglu, Sevi, Lang Tong, and Qing Zhao. 2019. Algorithmic bidding for virtual trading in electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 34 (1): 535–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholson, Emma. 2014. Price formation in organized wholesale electricity markets. Technical Report Docket No. AD14-14-000, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20426.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weron, Rafał. 2014. Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future. International Journal of Forecasting 30 (4): 1030–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karakatsani, Nektaria V, and Derek W Bunn. 2008. Forecasting electricity prices: The impact of fundamentals and time-varying coefficients. International Journal of Forecasting 24 (4): 764–785.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor, James W. 2010. Exponentially weighted methods for forecasting intraday time series with multiple seasonal cycles. International Journal of Forecasting 26 (4): 627–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chitsaz, Hamed, Payam Zamani-Dehkordi, Hamidreza Zareipour, and Palak P Parikh. 2018. Electricity price forecasting for operational scheduling of behind-the-meter storage systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 9 (6): 6612–6622.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pircalabu, Anca, and Fred Espen Benth. 2017. A regime-switching copula approach to modeling day-ahead prices in coupled electricity markets. Energy Economics 68: 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ma, Yaming, Peter B Luh, Krishnan Kasiviswanathan, and Eman Ni. 2004. A neural network-based method for forecasting zonal locational marginal prices. In IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 296–302. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abedinia, Oveis, Nima Amjady, and Hamidreza Zareipour. 2016. A new feature selection technique for load and price forecast of electrical power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 32 (1): 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadeghi-Mobarakeh, Ashkan, Mahdi Kohansal, Evangelos E Papalexakis, and Hamed Mohsenian-Rad. 2017. Data mining based on random forest model to predict the California ISO day-ahead market prices. In 2017 IEEE Power Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, Dongliang, Hamidreza Zareipour, William D Rosehart, and Nima Amjady. 2012. Data mining for electricity price classification and the application to demand-side management. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 3 (2): 808–817.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wan, Can, Zhao Xu, Yelei Wang, Zhao Yang Dong, and Kit Po Wong.2014. A hybrid approach for probabilistic forecasting of electricity price. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 5 (1): 463–470.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wan, Can, Ming Niu, Yonghua Song, and Xu. Zhao. 2017. Pareto optimal prediction intervals of electricity price. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 32 (1): 817–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lago, Jesus, Fjo De Ridder, Peter Vrancx, and Bart De Schutter. 2018. Forecasting day-ahead electricity prices in Europe: The importance of considering market integration. Applied Energy 211: 890–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo, Shuman, and Yang Weng. 2019. A two-stage supervised learning approach for electricity price forecasting by leveraging different data sources. Applied Energy 242: 1497–1512.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lago, Jesus, Fjo De Ridder, and Bart De Schutter. 2018. Forecasting spot electricity prices: Deep learning approaches and empirical comparison of traditional algorithms. Applied Energy 221: 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang, Zihan, Yang Zhang, and Wenbo Chen. 2019. Electricity price prediction based on hybrid model of Adam optimized LSTM neural network and wavelet transform. Energy 187: 115804.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hubicka, Katarzyna, Grzegorz Marcjasz, and Rafa L. Weron. 2018. A note on averaging day-ahead electricity price forecasts across calibration windows. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 10 (1): 321–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rokach, Lior. 2010. Ensemble-based classifiers. Artificial Intelligence Review 33 (1–2): 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bordignon, Silvano, Derek W Bunn, Francesco Lisi, and Fany Nan. 2013. Combining day-ahead forecasts for British electricity prices. Energy Economics 35: 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nowotarski, Jakub, Bidong Liu, Rafał Weron, and Tao Hong. 2016. Improving short term load forecast accuracy via combining sister forecasts. Energy 98: 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee, Duehee, Hunyoung Shin, and Ross Baldick. 2018. Bivariate probabilistic wind power and real-time price forecasting and their applications to wind power bidding strategy development. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 33 (6): 6087–6097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chai, Songjian, Xu. Zhao, and Youwei Jia. 2019. Conditional density forecast of electricity price based on ensemble ELM and logistic EMOS. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 10 (3): 3031–3043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. California ISO. 2017. California ISO Market Notice: Interface specification for OASIS 2017 release. http://www.caiso.com/Documents/OASIS-InterfaceSpecification_v4_3_5Clean_Spring2017Release.pdf.

  27. Litvinov, Eugene, Tongxin Zheng, Gary Rosenwald, and Payman Shamsollahi. 2004. Marginal loss modeling in LMP calculation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 19 (2): 880–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eldridge, Brent, Richard P O’Neill, and Anya Castillo. 2017. Marginal loss calculations for the DCOPF. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Technical Report. https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/marginallosscalculations.pdf.

  29. Zechun, Hu., Haozhong Cheng, Zheng Yan, and Furong Li. 2010. An iterative lMP calculation method considering loss distributions. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 25 (3): 1469–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Deng, Weisi, Yuting Ji, and Lang Tong. Probabilistic forecasting and simulation of electricity markets via online dictionary learning. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Science.

    Google Scholar 

  31. California ISO. 2018. California ISO business practice manual for market operations. https://bpmcm.caiso.com/Pages/BPMDetails.aspx?BPM=Market.

  32. Wang, Yi., Qixin Chen, Mingyang Sun, Chongqing Kang, and Qing Xia. 2018. An ensemble forecasting method for the aggregated load with subprofiles. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 9 (4): 3906–3908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hong, Tao, Jingrui Xie, and Jonathan Black. 2019. Global energy forecasting competition 2017: Hierarchical probabilistic load forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting 35 (4): 1389–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Geurts, Pierre, Damien Ernst, and Louis Wehenkel. 2006. Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning 63 (1): 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chun, Yu., and Weixin Yao. 2017. Robust linear regression: A review and comparison. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 46 (8): 6261–6282.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Tofallis, Chris. 2015. A better measure of relative prediction accuracy for model selection and model estimation. Journal of the Operational Research Society 66 (8): 1352–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Science Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chen, Q., Guo, H., Zheng, K., Wang, Y. (2021). Day-Ahead Electricity Price Forecasting. In: Data Analytics in Power Markets. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4975-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4975-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4974-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4975-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics