Skip to main content

Interaction of Structural Member with Near Field Detonation: Effect on Shock Wave Pattern and Overpressure Profile

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Composite Materials for Extreme Loading

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 1239 Accesses

Abstract

During a detonation of high energetic material in Air (free air detonation), a spherical shock wave is generated with a peak overpressure corresponding to the Friedlander curve. The peak overpressure changes when the detonation of the charge is carried under the Soil (e.g. land mine detonation). The differences in peak overpressure and the distribution pattern are observed on considering both the detonation conditions (buried under the Soil and free Air). The changes are more significant in the case of the near field scenario (scaled distance < 0.2 m/kg1/3) when compared to the far-field scenario (scaled distance > 0.2 m/kg1/3). The shock wave pressure distribution in the near field gets further affected when the target objects (a structural member, a person, or both) are interacting with the detonation. The structural member could be a part of a protective equipment or a standard equipment. When interacting with the detonation, the structural member or person changes the shock wave pattern and alters the overpressure experienced by one another. Also, based on the shape and size of the structural member, the value of overpressure and pattern exposed to the person could be different. The current numerical study summarises the effect of introducing a structural member in a near field scenario when the detonation of a charge is carried out under the Soil. The study is performed using a simulation technique called MM-ALE (multi-material arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian) available in commercially available software, LS-Dyna. A numerical simulation has been performed for a detonation event by introducing different structural members in the near field. Variation of peak overpressure in the close range has been studied. It has been found that the predicted pattern of the overpressure agrees with the Friedlander curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Haladuick T (2014) Numerical Simulation of Blast Interaction with the Human Body: Primary Blast Brain Injury Prediction

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kingery CN, Pannill BF (1964) Peak overpressure vs scaled distance for TNT surface bursts (hemispherical charges). Army ballistic research lab Aberdeen proving ground

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kingery CN, Bulmash G (1984) Airblast parameters from TNT spherical air burst and hemispherical surface burst. US Army Armament and Development Center, Ballistic Research Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swisdak MM Jr (1994) Simplified Kingery airblast calculations. Naval surface warfare center Indian head div MD

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd SD (2000) Acceleration of a plate subject to explosive blast loading-trial results. Defence science and technology organisation Melbourne (Australia)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Neuberger A, Peles S, Rittel D (2007) Scaling the response of circular plates subjected to large and close-range spherical explosions. Part II: buried charges. Int J Impact Eng 34(5):874–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neuberger A, Peles S, Rittel D (2009) Springback of circular clamped armor steel plates subjected to spherical air-blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 36(1):53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rigby SE et al (2019) Predicting the response of plates subjected to near-field explosions using an energy equivalent impulse. Int J Impact Eng 128:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goel MD, Matsagar VA, Gupta AK, Marburg S (2012) An abridged review of blast wave parameters. Def Sci J 62(5):300–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritzel DV, Parks SA, Roseveare J, Rude G, Sawyer TW (2011) Experimental blast simulation for injury studies

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang J (2001) Simulation of landmine explosion using LS-DYNA3D software: benchmark work of simulation of explosion in soil and air. Defence science and technology organisation canberra (Australia)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rigby S, Tyas A (2013) Blast.m - a simple tool for predicting blast pressure parameters. http://cmd.sheffield.ac.uk/?q=software/blastm-simple-tool-predicting-blast-pressure-parameters

  13. UN (2017) Kingery-Bulmash Blast Parameter Calculator. UN SaferGuard International Ammunition Technical Guidelines. United Nations. https://www.un.org/disarmament/un-saferguard/kingery-bulmash/

  14. Verma PK, Sankrityayan R, Dubey DK, Chawla A (2021) A comparative analysis of computation of peak overpressure in near field scenario during high energetic material's detonation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8138-0_38

  15. Dua A, Braimah A, Kumar M (2019) Contact explosion response of RC columns: experimental and numerical investigation. Proc Inst Civ Eng Build 173:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trajkovski J, Kunc R, Perenda J, Prebil I (2014) Minimum mesh design criteria for blast wave development and structural response – MMALE method. Lat Am J Solids Struct 11:1999. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-78252014001100006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. LSTC, LS-DYNA® keyword user's manual–vol 1–version R8.0 (2015) vol I

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kinney GF, Graham, KJ (1985) Explosive shocks in air, 2 edn.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kamberoglu M, Karahan M, Alpdogan C, Karahan N (2017) Evaluation of foot protection effectiveness against AP mine blasts: effect of deflector geometry. J Test Eval 45(2):356–368. https://doi.org/10.1520/Jte20150171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thankfully acknowledge the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) for funding the project vide grant #DFTM/03/3203/M/01/JATC. The authors would also like to thank Mr. Rohit Sankrityayan, Mr. Baljinder Singh, and Dr. Amit Kumar of the Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT Delhi for their valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Devendra K. Dubey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Verma, P.K., Dubey, D.K., Mukherjee, S., Chawla, A. (2022). Interaction of Structural Member with Near Field Detonation: Effect on Shock Wave Pattern and Overpressure Profile. In: Krishnapillai, S., R., V., Ha, S.K. (eds) Composite Materials for Extreme Loading . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4138-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4138-1_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-4137-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-4138-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics