Abstract
Knowledge of the stress–strain properties of rock and rock mass is important for any rock engineering project involving rock. Deformability behaviour of rock or rock mass is denoted by modulus of deformation (Ed). Deformation modulus of intact rock can be evaluated in the laboratory, whereas field testing is required for in-situ modulus of discontinuous rock mass. Uniaxial jacking test is one of the direct methods used for the assessment of in-situ deformation modulus. Indirect methods based on correlations between rock mass classifications and deformation modulus developed by many researchers are also available. Results of 28 in-situ tests conducted on fresh, hard, compact, medium-grained sandstone have been compared with values derived from empirical equations developed by Bieniawski (Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 15(5):237–247, [9]), Barton et al. (Application of the Q-system in design decisions concerning dimensions and appropriate support for underground installations, pp. 553–561, [13]), Serafim and Pereira (Consideration of the geomechanics classification of Bieniawski, pp. II33–II42, [10]), Barton (The influence of joint properties in modelling jointed rock masses. Balkema, Rotterdam [11], Barton in Estimating Rock Mass Deformation Modulus for Excavation Disturbed Zone Studies, [14]) and Singh and Bhasin (Q-system and deformability of rock mass, pp. 57–67, [15]). Q values of rock mass range from 3.4 to 10. The study reveals that the modulus from indirect estimates gives very high modulus of rock mass. Indirect estimate suggested by Barton (Barton in Estimating Rock Mass Deformation Modulus for Excavation Disturbed Zone Studies, [14]) for excavation disturbed zone, provides value near to direct estimate, i.e. in-situ data set. Study further reveals the empirical equations based on Q-system of rock classifications are valid for Q > 1.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bieniawski, Z.T.: Rock Mechanics Design in Mining and Tunneling, 272 p. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam (1984)
Lama, R.D., Vutukuri, V.S.: Handbook on Mechanical Properties of Rocks, 2nd edn. Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (1978)
Heuze, F.E., Salem, A.: Rock deformability measured in-situ—problems and solutions. In: Proceedings of International Congress on Field Measurements in Rock Mechanics (FMRM 77), pp. 375–387, Zurich, Switzerland, April (1977)
Hoek, Diederichs: Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 43(2), 203–215 (2006)
Hari Dev: Stress-deformation properties of rock material and rock mass – An overview. J. Rock. Mech. Tunn. Technol. (JRMTT) 26(1), 41–51 (2020)
Palmström, A., Singh, R.: The deformation modulus of rock masses—comparisons between in-situ tests and indirect estimates. Int J Tunnel. Underground Space Technol. 16(3), 115–131 (2001)
IS-7317: Code of practice for uniaxial jacking test for deformation modulus of rock mass. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi (2015)
ISRM: The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006, (Blue Book) ISRM, Turkey
Bieniawski, Z.T.: Determining rock mass deformability: experience from case histories. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abst. 15(5), 237–247 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)90956-7
Serafim, J.L., Pereira, J.P.: Consideration of the geomechanics classification of Bieniawski. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Engineering Geological Underground Openings, Lisbon, vol. 1. pp. II33–II42 (1983)
Barton, N.: The influence of joint properties in modelling jointed rock masses. In: Keynote Lecture, 8th Congress of ISRM, Tokyo, vol. 3. Balkema, Rotterdam (1995)
Barton, N.: Some new Q value correlations to assist in site characterisation and tunnel design. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 39, 185–216 (2002)
Barton, N., Loset, F., Lien, R., Lunde, J.: Application of the Q-system in design decisions concerning dimensions and appropriate support for underground installations. In: International Conference on Subsurface Space, Rockstore, Stockholm, Subsurface Space, vol. 2, pp. 553–561 (1980)
Barton, N.: Estimating rock mass deformation modulus for excavation disturbed zone studies. In: International Conference on Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive waste, pp. 133–144, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (1996)
Singh, R., Bhasin, R.: Q-system and deformability of rock mass. In: Proceedings of Conference on Recent Advances in Tunnelling Technology, New Delhi, pp. 57–67 (1996)
Hoek, E., Brown, E.T.: Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 34(8), 1165–1186 (1997)
Acknowledgements
Authors gratefully acknowledge the motivation and encouragement of Sh. S. L. Gupta, Director, CSMRS during the preparation of manuscript. Sincere thanks to project authorities for the support extended during testing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sarwade, D.V., Senthil, P., Kumar, P., Dev, H. (2022). Assessment of Deformability Characteristics of Sandstone by Direct and Indirect Methods—A Case Study. In: Satyanarayana Reddy, C.N.V., Muthukkumaran, K., Satyam, N., Vaidya, R. (eds) Ground Characterization and Foundations. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 167. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3383-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3383-6_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3382-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3383-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)