Skip to main content

An Efficient Obstacle Detection Scheme for Low-Altitude UAVs Using Google Maps

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Management, Analytics and Innovation

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles have shown great potential in fast shipping and delivery, including delivering emergency support and services to the disaster (natural or manmade) hit areas where manual reach is infeasible. For accurate and effective emergency service delivery at the adverse sites, the UAVs need to fly close to the ground. Due to the low-altitude flight, there may be many stationary obstacles (e.g., trees and buildings) on the path of a UAV. Detecting these obstacles is crucial for successful mission accomplishment and evading crash. The existing obstacle detection methods limit the flying speed of a UAV due to the latency in processing and analysing the in-flight sensed data. To mitigate this, we propose to equip the UAV with the prior information of the obstacles on its trajectory. In case of an obstacle, the UAV slows down to avoid the obstacle; otherwise, it travels with a much higher speed. As experiment, we fed the UAVs with the satellite images from the Google Maps. It is observed that the proposed approach improves the overall flying speed of the UAVs to a great extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Erdelj M, Król M, Natalizio E (2017) Wireless sensor networks and multi-UAV systems for natural disaster management. Comput Netw 124:72–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin P, Payton O, Fardoulis J, Richards D, Yamashiki Y, Scott T (2016) Low altitude unmanned aerial vehicle for characterising remediation effectiveness following the FDNPP accident. J Environ Radioact 151(Part 1):58–63

    Google Scholar 

  3. Djimantoro MI, Suhardjanto G (2017) The advantage by using low-altitude UAV for sustainable urban development control. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 109(012014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen J, Zhou Y, Lv Q, Deveerasetty KK, Dike HU (2018) A review of autonomous obstacle avoidance technology for multi-rotor UAVs. In: IEEE international conference on information and automation (ICIA), Wuyishan, China

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pham H, Smolka SA, Stoller SD, Phan D, Yang J (2015) A survey on unmanned aerial vehicle collision. arXiv: 1508.07723

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yasin JN, Mohamed SAS, Haghbayan M-H, Heikkonen J, Tenhunen H, Plosila J (2020) Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): collision avoidance systems and approaches. IEEE Access 8:105139–105155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sampedro C, Bavle H, Sanchez-Lopez JL, Fernández RAS, Rodríguez-Ramos A, Molina M, Campoy P (2016) A flexible and dynamic mission planning architecture for uav swarm coordination. In: International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), Arlington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hadi G, Varianto R, Trilaksono B, Budiyono A (2014) Autonomous UAV system development for payload dropping mission. J Instrum Autom Syst 1(2):72–22

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramirez-Atencia C, Camacho D (2018) Extending QGroundControl for automated mission planning of UAVs. Sensors 7(18):23–39

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ryan A, Hedrick J (2005) A mode-switching path planner for UAV-assisted search and rescue. In: 44th IEEE conference on decision and control, Seville, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  11. Castelli T, Sharghi A, Harper D, Tremeau A (2016) Autonomous navigation for low-altitude UAVs in urban areas. arXiv: 1602.08141v1

    Google Scholar 

  12. Birk A, Wiggerich B, Bülow H, Pfingsthorn M (2011) Safety, security, and rescue missions with an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). J Intell Rob Syst 64(1):57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bielecki A, Buratowski T, Śmigielski P (2013) Recognition of two-dimensional representation of urban environment for autonomous flying agents. Expert Syst Appl 40(9):3623–3633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haque M, Muhammad M, Swarnaker D, Arifuzzaman M (2014) Autonomous quadcopter for product home delivery. In: International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information & Communication Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gageik N, Benz P, Montenegro S (2015) Obstacle detection and collision avoidance for a UAV with complementary low-cost sensors. IEEE Access 3:599–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McGee TG, Sengupta R, Hedrick K (2005) Obstacle detection for small autonomous aircraft using sky segmentation. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Barcelona, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  17. Odelga M, Stegagno P, Bülthoff HH (2016) Obstacle detection, tracking and avoidance for a teleoperated UAV. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saha S, Natraj A, Waharte S (2014) A real-time monocular vision-based frontal obstacle detection and avoidance for low cost UAVs in GPS denied environment. In: IEEE international conference on aerospace electronics and remote sensing technology, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng L, Zhang P, Tan J, Li F (2019) The obstacle detection method of UAV based on 2D lidar. IEEE Access 7:163437–163448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hrabar S (2008) 3D path planning and stereo-based obstacle avoidance for rotorcraft UAVs. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Nice, France

    Google Scholar 

  21. Branson S, Wegner J, Hall D, Lang N, Schindler K, Perona P (2018) From Google maps to a fine-grained catalog of street trees. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 135:13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wegner JD, Branson S, Hall D, Schindler K, Perona P (2016) Cataloging public objects using aerial and street-level images-urban trees. In: The IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Las Vegas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li X, Ratti C, Seiferling I (2018) Quantifying the shade provision of street trees in urban landscape: a case study in Boston, USA, using Google street view. Landsc Urban Plan 169:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Prasetia AS, Wai RJ, Wen YL, Wang Y (2019) Mission-based energy consumption prediction of multirotor UAV. IEEE Access 7:33055–33063

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sinhababu, N., Pramanik, P.K.D. (2022). An Efficient Obstacle Detection Scheme for Low-Altitude UAVs Using Google Maps. In: Sharma, N., Chakrabarti, A., Balas, V.E., Bruckstein, A.M. (eds) Data Management, Analytics and Innovation. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 71. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2937-2_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics