Skip to main content

Formation of SO3 in Flue Gas Under SNCR Conditions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Clean Coal and Sustainable Energy (ISCC 2019)

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ESE))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 729 Accesses

Abstract

Experimental and numerical studies were conducted to investigate the formation of sulfur trioxide (SO3) during the selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) process. The effects of the inlet NH3/NO ratio (RAN), reaction temperature, inlet mole fractions of SO2, O2, CO and H2O were assessed. The experiments were conducted using a perfectly stirred reactor (PSR) and SO3 mole fraction was determined using the sulfur balance method. Corresponding numerical simulation was performed using detailed chemistry developed by Mueller and coworkers. Both experimental and numerical results revealed that the SO3 formation was considerably affected by RAN, SO2 and O2 mole fractions. The experimental results demonstrated that under typical SNCR conditions, 0.5 ~ 1.0% of SO2 was converted into SO3, and SO3 mole fraction was 5–10 ppm. The SO3 formation was noticeably enhanced by the addition of NH3 when RAN < 0.5. The conversion rate decreased as the initial SO2 increased. A small amount of O2 could promote the SO3 formation remarkably, but this effect became much weaker as inlet O2 mole fraction ≥1%. The numerical simulation indicated that the increase of the reaction temperature significantly promoted the SO3 formation when the temperature was above 1173 K. A small amount of CO could significantly enhance the SO3 formation. The H2O addition could inhibit SO3 formation. The detailed chemical kinetic analyses showed that the main reaction paths of the SO3 formation were the oxidization reaction of SO2 with O radical via SO2 + O (+M) → SO3 (+ M) (52.3) and the one of SO2 with NO2 via SO2 + NO2 → SO3 + NO (52.4). The effect of the operational parameters, i.e., RAN, reaction temperature, and SO2, O2, CO, H2O mole fractions, could be well explained by the variation of the reaction rates of Eqs. 52.3) and (52.4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams B, Senior C (2006) Curbing the blue plume: SO3 formation and mitigation. Power 150(4):39–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony EJ, Granatstein DL (2001) Sulfation phenomena in fluidized bed combustion systems. Prog Energy Combust Sci 27(2):215–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl L (1992) Corrosion in flue gas desulfurization plants and other low temperature equipment. Mater Corros 43(6):298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleig D, Normann F, Andersson K et al (2009) The fate of sulphur during oxy-fuel combustion of lignite. Energy Procedia 1(1):383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleig D, Andersson K, Johnsson F et al (2011) conversion of sulfur during pulverized oxy-coal combustion. Energy Fuels 25(2):647–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Luan T, Peng JW et al (2013) DeNOx performance of SCR catalyst for exhaust gas from coal-fired power plant. CIESC J 64(7):2611–2618

    Google Scholar 

  • Glarborg P, Kubel D, Kristensen PG et al (1995) Interactions of CO, NOx and H2O under post-flame conditions. Combust Sci Technol 110–111(1):461–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu JG, Li WH, Han GY et al (2018) Influence of SNCR denitration reform on the formation of SO3. Boiler Technol 49(2):75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouravand S, Kermani AM (2018) Clean power production by simultaneous reduction of NOx and SOx contaminants using Mazut Nano-Emulsion and wet flue gas desulfurization. J Cleaner Prod 201:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Wu YX, Yang HR et al (2013) Simulation and optimization of SNCR process. CIESC J 64(5):1789–1796

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z-K, Ågren J, Hillert M (1996) Application of the Le Chatelier principle on gas reactions. Fluid Phase Equilib 121(1):167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marier P, Dibbs HP (1974) The catalytic conversion of SO2 to SO3 by fly ash and the capture of SO2 and SO3 by CaO and MgO. Thermochim Acta 8(1):155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda S, Kamo T, Kato A et al (1982) Deposition of ammonium bisulfate in the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 21(1):48–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEP (2011) Emission standards of air pollutants for thermal power plants, GB13223–2011. Ministry of Environmental Protection of China

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser RE (2006) SO3’s impacts on plant O&M: part I. Power 150(8):40–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller MA, Yetter RA, Dryer FL (2000) Kinetic modeling of the CO/H2O/O2/NO/SO2 system: implications for high-pressure fall-off in the SO2 + O(+M) = SO3(+M) reaction. Int J Chem Kinet 32(6):317–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S-H, Lee K-M, Hwang C-H (2009) Influences of heat loss on NOx formation in a premixed CH4/air-fueled combustor. Energy Fuels 23(9):4378–4384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen WF, Xiang BX, Zhang H et al (2017) Numerical simulation on formation of SO3 during SNCR process in pulverized coal-fired boiler. CIESC J 68(8):3225–3231

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein-Brzozowska G, Norling R, Viklund P et al (2014) Fireside corrosion during oxyfuel combustion considering various SO2 contents. Energy Procedia 51:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HZ (2008) Analysis of SCR impact on denitration efficiency and SO2 translation. Elect Power Sci Eng 24(5):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu N, Song Q, Li SQ et al (2006) Measurement of SO2 and SO3 in SCR flue gas denitrification. Coal Conversion 29(02):84–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang BX, Shen WF, Zhang M et al (2017a) Effects of different factors on sulfur trioxide formations in a coal-fired circulating fluidized bed boiler. Chem Eng Sci 172:262–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang BX, Zhang M, Wu YX et al (2017b) experimental and modeling studies on sulfur trioxide of flue gas in a coal-fired boiler. Energy Fuel 31(6):6284–6297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao HP, Dong L, Ning X (2016) Heterogeneous catalytic mechanism of SO2 oxidation with Fe2O3. In: Proceedings of the CSEE 2016, vol 21, p 36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1710251).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Tsinghua University Press.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, K. et al. (2022). Formation of SO3 in Flue Gas Under SNCR Conditions. In: Lyu, J., Li, S. (eds) Clean Coal and Sustainable Energy. ISCC 2019. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1657-0_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1657-0_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1656-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1657-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics