Abstract
Experimental and numerical studies were conducted to investigate the formation of sulfur trioxide (SO3) during the selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) process. The effects of the inlet NH3/NO ratio (RAN), reaction temperature, inlet mole fractions of SO2, O2, CO and H2O were assessed. The experiments were conducted using a perfectly stirred reactor (PSR) and SO3 mole fraction was determined using the sulfur balance method. Corresponding numerical simulation was performed using detailed chemistry developed by Mueller and coworkers. Both experimental and numerical results revealed that the SO3 formation was considerably affected by RAN, SO2 and O2 mole fractions. The experimental results demonstrated that under typical SNCR conditions, 0.5 ~ 1.0% of SO2 was converted into SO3, and SO3 mole fraction was 5–10 ppm. The SO3 formation was noticeably enhanced by the addition of NH3 when RAN < 0.5. The conversion rate decreased as the initial SO2 increased. A small amount of O2 could promote the SO3 formation remarkably, but this effect became much weaker as inlet O2 mole fraction ≥1%. The numerical simulation indicated that the increase of the reaction temperature significantly promoted the SO3 formation when the temperature was above 1173 K. A small amount of CO could significantly enhance the SO3 formation. The H2O addition could inhibit SO3 formation. The detailed chemical kinetic analyses showed that the main reaction paths of the SO3 formation were the oxidization reaction of SO2 with O radical via SO2 + O (+M) → SO3 (+ M) (52.3) and the one of SO2 with NO2 via SO2 + NO2 → SO3 + NO (52.4). The effect of the operational parameters, i.e., RAN, reaction temperature, and SO2, O2, CO, H2O mole fractions, could be well explained by the variation of the reaction rates of Eqs. 52.3) and (52.4).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams B, Senior C (2006) Curbing the blue plume: SO3 formation and mitigation. Power 150(4):39–41
Anthony EJ, Granatstein DL (2001) Sulfation phenomena in fluidized bed combustion systems. Prog Energy Combust Sci 27(2):215–236
Dahl L (1992) Corrosion in flue gas desulfurization plants and other low temperature equipment. Mater Corros 43(6):298–304
Fleig D, Normann F, Andersson K et al (2009) The fate of sulphur during oxy-fuel combustion of lignite. Energy Procedia 1(1):383–390
Fleig D, Andersson K, Johnsson F et al (2011) conversion of sulfur during pulverized oxy-coal combustion. Energy Fuels 25(2):647–655
Gao Y, Luan T, Peng JW et al (2013) DeNOx performance of SCR catalyst for exhaust gas from coal-fired power plant. CIESC J 64(7):2611–2618
Glarborg P, Kubel D, Kristensen PG et al (1995) Interactions of CO, NOx and H2O under post-flame conditions. Combust Sci Technol 110–111(1):461–485
Hu JG, Li WH, Han GY et al (2018) Influence of SNCR denitration reform on the formation of SO3. Boiler Technol 49(2):75–80
Kouravand S, Kermani AM (2018) Clean power production by simultaneous reduction of NOx and SOx contaminants using Mazut Nano-Emulsion and wet flue gas desulfurization. J Cleaner Prod 201:229–235
Li Q, Wu YX, Yang HR et al (2013) Simulation and optimization of SNCR process. CIESC J 64(5):1789–1796
Liu Z-K, Ågren J, Hillert M (1996) Application of the Le Chatelier principle on gas reactions. Fluid Phase Equilib 121(1):167–177
Marier P, Dibbs HP (1974) The catalytic conversion of SO2 to SO3 by fly ash and the capture of SO2 and SO3 by CaO and MgO. Thermochim Acta 8(1):155–165
Matsuda S, Kamo T, Kato A et al (1982) Deposition of ammonium bisulfate in the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides with ammonia. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 21(1):48–52
MEP (2011) Emission standards of air pollutants for thermal power plants, GB13223–2011. Ministry of Environmental Protection of China
Moser RE (2006) SO3’s impacts on plant O&M: part I. Power 150(8):40–40
Mueller MA, Yetter RA, Dryer FL (2000) Kinetic modeling of the CO/H2O/O2/NO/SO2 system: implications for high-pressure fall-off in the SO2 + O(+M) = SO3(+M) reaction. Int J Chem Kinet 32(6):317–339
Park S-H, Lee K-M, Hwang C-H (2009) Influences of heat loss on NOx formation in a premixed CH4/air-fueled combustor. Energy Fuels 23(9):4378–4384
Shen WF, Xiang BX, Zhang H et al (2017) Numerical simulation on formation of SO3 during SNCR process in pulverized coal-fired boiler. CIESC J 68(8):3225–3231
Stein-Brzozowska G, Norling R, Viklund P et al (2014) Fireside corrosion during oxyfuel combustion considering various SO2 contents. Energy Procedia 51:135–147
Wang HZ (2008) Analysis of SCR impact on denitration efficiency and SO2 translation. Elect Power Sci Eng 24(5):17–21
Wu N, Song Q, Li SQ et al (2006) Measurement of SO2 and SO3 in SCR flue gas denitrification. Coal Conversion 29(02):84–87
Xiang BX, Shen WF, Zhang M et al (2017a) Effects of different factors on sulfur trioxide formations in a coal-fired circulating fluidized bed boiler. Chem Eng Sci 172:262–277
Xiang BX, Zhang M, Wu YX et al (2017b) experimental and modeling studies on sulfur trioxide of flue gas in a coal-fired boiler. Energy Fuel 31(6):6284–6297
Xiao HP, Dong L, Ning X (2016) Heterogeneous catalytic mechanism of SO2 oxidation with Fe2O3. In: Proceedings of the CSEE 2016, vol 21, p 36
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1710251).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Tsinghua University Press.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, K. et al. (2022). Formation of SO3 in Flue Gas Under SNCR Conditions. In: Lyu, J., Li, S. (eds) Clean Coal and Sustainable Energy. ISCC 2019. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1657-0_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1657-0_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-1656-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-1657-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)