Abstract
The interface between soil and root system of a plant is referred to as rhizosphere. A complex microbiome is present in the ecosystem of rhizosphere that produces different metabolites and proteins to enhance the growth and yield of different plant species. To understand the complexity of rhizosphere, different multi-OMICS techniques are being used in modern sciences. The success of rhizosphere science depends upon the successful implementation of multi-OMICS technique and use of robust bioinformatics software and databases which have been used to analyze the complex data. In this chapter, the recent advances, challenges, bioinformatics tools, and latest OMICS technologies to study the rhizosphere dynamics have been discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen R, Iii W, Borkum MI et al (2017) From data to knowledge: the future of multi-omics data analysis for the rhizosphere. Rhizosphere 3:222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.05.001
Asay CD (2008) The general public license version 3.0: making or breaking the foss movement. Michigan Telecommun Technol Law Rev 14:265–301
Badri DV, Zolla G, Bakker MG et al (2013) Potential impact of soil microbiomes on the leaf metabolome and on herbivore feeding behavior. New Phytol 198:264–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12124
Bao Z, Okubo T, Kubota K et al (2014) Metaproteomic identification of Diazotrophic Methanotrophs and their localization in root tissues of field-grown Rice plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:5043–5052. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00969-14
Bastida F, Algora C, Hernández T, García C (2012) Feasibility of a cell separation-proteomic based method for soils with different edaphic properties and microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 45:136–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.10.017
Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM (2012) The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci 17:478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001
Bona E, Massa N, Novello G et al (2019) Metaproteomic characterization of the Vitis vinifera rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 95:fiy204. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy204
Bulgarelli D, Rott M, Schlaeppi K et al (2012) Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488:91–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11336
Caldwell AC, Carneiro L, Silva F, Can C (2015) Prokaryotic diversity in the rhizosphere of organic, intensive, and transitional coffee farms in Brazil. PLoS One 10:1–17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11120
Chatterjee A, Macaulay EC, Ludgate JL et al (2017) Comparative assessment of DNA methylation patterns between reduced representation bisulfite sequencing and Sequenom EpiTyper methylation analysis. Epigenomics 9:823–832. https://doi.org/10.2217/epi-2016-0176
Csala A, Zwinderman AH (2019) Multivariate statistical methods for high-dimensional multiset omics data analysis. In: Holger Husi DSN (ed) Computational biology. Codon Publication, Brisbane, pp 1–212
Faure C, Veyssière M, Boëlle B et al (2020) Long-read genome sequence of the sugar beet rhizosphere mycoparasite Pythium oligandrum. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 10:431–436. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400746
Franzosa EA, Mciver LJ, Rahnavard G et al (2018) Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat Methods 15:962–968. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0176-y
Gao R, Hao DC, Hu W et al (2019) Transcriptome profile of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading fungi isolated from Taxus rhizosphere. Curr Sci 116:1218–1228. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i7/1218-1228
Goodacre R, Vaidyanathan S, Dunn WB et al (2004) Metabolomics by numbers: acquiring and understanding global metabolite data. Trends Biotechnol 22(5):245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.03.007
Hiraoka S, Okazaki Y, Anda M et al (2019) Metaepigenomic analysis reveals the unexplored diversity of DNA methylation in an environmental prokaryotic community. Nat Commun 10(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08103-y
Hirsch PR, Mauchline TH, Clark IM (2010) Culture-independent molecular techniques for soil microbial ecology. Soil Biol Biochem 42:878–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.019
Hoefler BC, Konganti K, Straight PD (2013) De novo assembly of the Streptomyces sp. strain Mg1 genome using PacBio single-molecule sequencing. Genome Announc 1(4):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00535-13
Hunt M, Newbold C, Berriman M et al (2014) A comprehensive evaluation of assembly scaffolding tools. Genome Biol 15:1–15
Knief C, Chaffron S, Stark M et al (2012) Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice. ISME J 6:1378–1390. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.192
Krishnaraj PU, Pasha MA (2017) Metagenome of rhizosphere and endophytic ecosystem. In: Singh RP, Kothari R, Koringa PG, Singh SP (eds) Understanding host-microbiome interactions—an omic approach. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., Singapore, pp 125–156
Kumar S, Kumar A, Mohd K et al (2019) Data in brief metaproteomic data of maize rhizosphere for deciphering functional diversity. Data Br 27:104574–104580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104574
Lagos LM, Navarrete OU, Maruyama F et al (2014) Bacterial community structures in rhizosphere microsites of ryegrass (Lolium perenne var. Nui) as revealed by pyrosequencing. Biol Fertil Soils 50:1253–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-014-0939-2
Lagos ML, Maruyama F, Nannipieri P et al (2015) Current overview on the study of bacteria in the rhizosphere by modern molecular techniques: a mini-review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 15:504–523. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162015005000042
Li Z, Wang Y, Yao Q et al (2014) Diverse and divergent protein post-translational modifications in two growth stages of a natural microbial community. Nat Commun 5:4405. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5405
Lin W, Wu L, Lin S et al (2013) Metaproteomic analysis of ratoon sugarcane rhizospheric soil. BMC Microbiol 13(1):135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-135
Marschner P, Neumann G, Kania A et al (2002) Spatial and temporal dynamics of the microbial community structure in the rhizosphere of cluster roots of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Soil 246:167–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020663909890
Mendes R, Kruijt M, De Bruijn I et al (2011) Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332(6033):1097–1100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203980
Mendes LW, Chaves MGD, Fonseca MDC et al (2019) Resistance breeding of common bean shapes the physiology of the rhizosphere microbiome. Front Microbiol 10:2252–2262. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02252
Mhlongo M, Piater LA, Madala NE et al (2018) The chemistry of plant—microbe interactions in the rhizosphere and the potential for metabolomics to reveal signaling related to defense priming and induced systemic resistance. Front Plant Sci 9:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00112
Moretti M, Minerdi D, Gehrig P et al (2012) A bacterial-fungal metaproteomic analysis enlightens an intriguing multicomponent interaction in the rhizosphere of Lactuca sativa. J Proteome Res 11:2061–2077. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr201204v
Mueller CW, Carminati A, Kaiser C et al (2019) Editorial: rhizosphere functioning and structural development as complex interplay between plants, microorganisms and soil minerals. Front Environ Sci 7:130–133. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00130
Murray IA, Clark TA, Morgan RD et al (2012) The methylomes of six bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 40:11450–11462. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks891
Navarrete A, Van Veen JA, Mendes LW et al (2014) Taxonomical and functional microbial community selection in soybean rhizosphere. ISME J 8:1577–1587. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.17
Newman MM, Lorenz N, Hoilett N et al (2016) Science of the total environment changes in rhizosphere bacterial gene expression following glyphosate treatment. Sci Total Environ 553:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.078
Niedringhaus TP, Milanova D, Kerby MB et al (2012) Landscape of next-generation sequencing technologies. Anal Chem 83:4327–4341. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac2010857
Odelade KA, Babalola OO (2019) Bacteria, fungi and archaea domains in rhizospheric soil and their effects in enhancing agricultural productivity. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:3873–3891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203873
Oksman-Caldentey KM, Inzé D (2004) Plant cell factories in the post-genomic era: new ways to produce designer secondary metabolites. Trends Plant Sci 9:433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.07.006
Peiffer JA, Spor A, Koren O et al (2013) Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. PNAS 110:6548–6553. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302837110/-/DCSupplemental.www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1302837110
Pinu FR, Beale DJ, Paten AM et al (2019) Systems biology and multi-omics integration: viewpoints from the metabolomics research community. Meta 9:76. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9040076
Rinke C, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A et al (2013) Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499:431–437. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12352
Roudier P, Ritchie A, Hedley C, Medyckyj-scott D (2015) The rise of information science: a changing landscape for soil science. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 25:012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/25/1/012023
Schmidt P, Bálint M, Greshake B et al (2013) Illumina metabarcoding of a soil fungal community. Soil Biol Biochem 65:128–132
Schneider T, Keiblinger KM, Schmid E et al (2012) Who is who in litter decomposition? Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biogeochemical functions. ISME J 6:1749–1762. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.11
Shi S, Nuccio E, Herman DJ et al (2015) Successional trajectories of rhizosphere bacterial communities over consecutive seasons. MBio 6:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00746-15
Shinano T (2019) Research on ways to improve crop productivity through the regulation of rhizosphere environments. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 66:10–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2019.1666301
Sørensen J, Nicolaisen MH, Ron E et al (2009) Molecular tools in rhizosphere microbiology-from single-cell to whole-community analysis. Plant Soil 321:483–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9946-8
Sun J, Zhang Q, Zhou J et al (2014) Illumina amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA tag reveals bacterial community development in the rhizosphere of apple nurseries at a replant disease site and a new planting site. PLoS One 9:e111744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111744
Turner TR, Ramakrishnan K, Walshaw J et al (2013) Comparative metatranscriptomics reveals kingdom level changes in the rhizosphere microbiome of plants. ISME J 7:2248–2258. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.119
Unno T (2015) Bioinformatic suggestions on MiSeq-based microbial community analysis. J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:765–770
Uroz S, Buée M, Murat C et al (2010) Pyrosequencing reveals a contrasted bacterial diversity between oak rhizosphere and surrounding soil. Environ Microbiol Rep 2:281–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00117.x
Uzasci L, Auh S, Cotter RJ et al (2016) Mass spectrometric phosphoproteome analysis of HIV-infected brain reveals novel phosphorylation sites and differential phosphorylation patterns. Proteom Clin Appl 10:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/prca.201400134
Van Dam NM, Bouwmeester HJ (2016) Metabolomics in the rhizosphere: tapping into belowground chemical communication. Trends Plant Sci 21:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.008
Vandenbygaart AJ, Allen OB (2011) Experiment design to achieve desired statistical power. Can J Soil Sci 91:309–310. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS2010-068
VerBerkmoes NC, Denef VJ, Hettich RL et al (2009) Systems biology: functional analysis of natural microbial consortia using community proteomics. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2080
Verma A, Kumar S, Kumar G, et al (2018) Rhizosphere metabolite profiling: an opportunity to understand plant-microbe interactions for crop improvement. In: Crop improvement through microbial biotechnology. Elsevier, pp 343–361
Wu L, Wang H, Zhang Z et al (2011) Comparative metaproteomic analysis on consecutively Rehmannia glutinosa-monocultured rhizosphere soil. Plos One 6:e20611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020611
Yergeau E, Tremblay J, Joly S et al (2018) Soil contamination alters the willow root and rhizosphere metatranscriptome and the root—rhizosphere interactome. ISME J 12:869–884. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-017-0018-4
Zampieri E, Chiapello M, Daghino S et al (2016) Soil metaproteomics reveals an inter-kingdom stress response to the presence of black truffles. Sci Rep 6:25773. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25773
Zhang W, Sun J, Cao H et al (2016) Post-translational modifications are enriched within protein functional groups important to bacterial adaptation within a deep-sea hydrothermal vent environment. Microbiome 4:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0194-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ijaz, M. et al. (2021). Rhizosphere Dynamics: An OMICS Perspective. In: Pudake, R.N., Sahu, B.B., Kumari, M., Sharma, A.K. (eds) Omics Science for Rhizosphere Biology. Rhizosphere Biology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0889-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0889-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0888-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0889-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)