Skip to main content

Effect of Successional Reservoir Stimulation on the Production in Tight Gas Reservoir

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2020 (IFEDC 2020)

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering ((SSGG))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing and acidizing are the primary ways of reservoir stimulation for tight sandstone gas reservoir. The supplement of formation energy and complex fracture network induced by stimulation are favorable contributors to increase production. However, since the factors affecting the EUR are various, gas production is not always positively related to stimulation due to the possible formation damage. Specifically, the production of a well from deep Tarim basin was found to reduce after several ways of stimulation. In this study, a numerical model coupled the gas flow in reservoir, including the matrix and natural fractures, with that in the primary and secondary hydraulic fractures was established to describe the relationship between multi-scale systems. In addition, history match and production capacity prediction methods were used to determine the effectiveness of each stimulation way. The numerical results of the gas production and oil pressure were matched with the field data and the reason for low production was analyzed. Results indicate that production increases after each stimulation, but the effect of stimulation get worse and worse after superposition of these stimulations. The reason may results from the accumulative damage to the formation and the later stimulation may not be able to effectively expand the control volume (fracture half length) and hardly improve the conductivity of hydraulic fractures (fracture width). The study provides enlightenment on whether a secondary or more times stimulations are proper after the first stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(m_{m}\) :

 = gas mass in matrix, kg

\(m_{nf}\) :

 = gas mass in natural fractures, kg

\(u_{m}\) :

 = gas velocity in matrix, m3/s

\(u_{nf}\) :

 = gas velocity in natural fractures, m3/s

\(t\) :

 = time, s

\(Q_{m - nf}\) :

 = mass exchange rate of gas between matrix and natural fracture, kg/s

\(\rho\) :

 = density, kg/m3

\(p_{m}\) :

 = matrix pressure, MPa

\(p_{nf}\) :

 = natural fracture pressure, MPa

\(\mu\) :

 = viscosity, mPa.s

\(\sigma_{m - nf}\) :

 = shape factor, m2

\(m_{pf}\) :

 = gas mass in primary fractures, kg

\(m_{sf}\) :

 = gas mass in secondary fractures, kg

\(u_{pf}\) :

 = gas velocity in primary fractures, m3/s

\(u_{sf}\) :

 = gas velocity in secondary fractures, m3/s

\(k\) :

 = absolute permeability, mD

\(p_{i}\) :

 = initial reservoir pressure, MPa

\(h\) :

 = reservoir thickness, m

\(\phi\) :

 = porosity, %

\(T\) :

 = temperature, ℃

\(x_{f}\) :

 = fracture half length, m

\(x_{pf}\) :

 = propped fracture half length, m

\(h_{f}\) :

 = fracture height, m

\(\rho_{p}\) :

 = proppant concentration, kg/m3

\(\omega_{a}\) :

 = average fracture width, mm

\(\omega_{m}\) :

 = maximum fracture width, mm

References

  • Xie, H., Li, Y., Huang, S., Lei, G.: Natural gas exploration in Kuqa foreland thrust belt. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference (2013). https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-16733-Abstract

  • Liu, X., Liu, Y., Gu, Y., et al.: “Sweet spot” prediction of tight sandstone in Dibei gas pool. Henan Sci. 37(10), 1670–1675 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, H., Xie, Y., Mo, T., et al.: Fracture Characteristic and Its Contribution to Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Tight Sandstone Reservoir in Dibei Gas Pool in Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin. Xinjiang Pet. Geol. 36(06), 702–707 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjbar, E., Hassanzadeh, H., Chen, Z.: Effect of fracture pressure depletion regimes on the dual-porosity shape factor for flow of compressible fluids in fractured porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 12(34), 1681–1693 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Z., Grigg, R.: A Criterion for non-darcy flow in porous media. Transp. Porous Media 63(1), 57–69 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-yan Qu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Qu, Hy., Hu, Jw., Zhou, Fj., Zhong, Yc. (2021). Effect of Successional Reservoir Stimulation on the Production in Tight Gas Reservoir. In: Lin, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2020. IFEDC 2020. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0761-5_299

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0761-5_299

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0762-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0761-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics