Skip to main content

Experiential Learning Through Web-Based Application for Peer Review of Project: A Case Study Based on Interdisciplinary Teams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Second International Conference on Computing, Communications, and Cyber-Security

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 203))

  • 1788 Accesses

Abstract

Engineering is collaborative by nature, and this study was conducted to further embed these traits through the experiential learning-based inter-disciplinary project activity spanned over three weeks. Students of three different branches of engineering voluntarily worked on common projects to develop understanding on common topics. They also reviewed the projects of their peer through a Web-based peer review process (AmiPREP) specifically developed to bring technical uniformity in selected projects. After the completion of the projects, participants were interviewed and their responses implicated that the activity proved to be meaningful, interesting and effective to work in inter-disciplinary teams and understand the significance of mathematical modeling through MATLAB/Simulink.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lattuca LR, Knight DB, Ro HK, Novoselich BJ (2017) Supporting the development of engineers’ interdisciplinary competence. J Eng Educ 106(1):71–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borrego M, Newswander LK (2010) Definitions of interdisciplinary research: toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes. Rev High Educ 34(1):61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rullkoetter P, Whitman R, DeLyser R (2000) Engineering the future: an integrated engineering design experience. In: 30th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, F1C-12–17, 30th annual volume, Kansas City, 18–21 Oct 2000

    Google Scholar 

  4. Desmond A, Jaeger M (2014) Managing the interdisciplinary approach to engineering design. Int J Mech Eng Educ 42(2):174–185

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coso AE, Bailey RR, Minzenmayer E (2010) How to approach an interdisciplinary engineering problem: characterizing undergraduate engineering students’ perceptions. In: Proceedings—40th frontiers in education conference, Washington, DC, 27–30 Oct 2010

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drezek KM, Olson D, Borrego M (2008) Crossing disciplinary borders: a new approach to preparing students for interdisciplinary research. In: 38th proceedings—frontiers in education conference, Saratoga Springs, New York, 22–25 Oct 2008

    Google Scholar 

  7. McNair LD, Newswander C, Boden D, Borrego M (2010) Student and faculty interdisciplinary identities in self-managed teams. J Eng Educ 100(2):374–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coşkun S, Gençay E, Kayıkcı Y (2016) Adapting engineering education to industries: 4.0 vision. In: Proceedings of the 16th production research symposium, pp 258–263, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–14 Oct 2016

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bongomin O, Ocen GG, Nganyi EO, Musinguzi A,  Omara T (2020) Exponential disruptive technologies and the required skills of industry 4.0. J Eng Educ 2020:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  10. National Academy of Engineering (2004) The engineer of 2020: visions of engineering in the new century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. National Academy of Sciences, Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academies Press , Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Royal Academy of Engineering (2007) Educating engineers for the 21st century. The Royal Academy of Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  12. O’Donnell AM, Derry SJ (1997) Cognitive processes in interdisciplinary groups: problems and possibilities. In: Interdisciplinary collaboration: an emerging cognitive science, Research Monograph No. 5, National Institute for Science Education University of Wisconsin-Madison

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taajamaa V, Westerlund T, Liljeberg P, Salakoski T (2013) Interdisciplinary capstone project. In: 41th SEFI annual conference, Leuven, Belgium, 16–20 Sep 2013

    Google Scholar 

  14. Renate G (2018) Klaassen,: Interdisciplinary education: a case study. Eur J Eng Educ 43(6):842–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein JT, Newell WH (1997) Advancing interdisciplinary studies. In Gaff JG, Ratcliff JL, Associates (eds) Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: a comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change, pp 393–415. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  16. Newell WH (2008) The intertwined history of interdisciplinary undergraduate education and the association for integrative studies: an insider’s view. Issues Integr Stud 26:1–59

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kolb AY, Kolb DA (2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manage Learn Educ 4(2):193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. https://in.mathworks.com/videos/determining-mechanical-loads-for-wind-turbines-81627.html

  19. https://in.mathworks.com/discovery/finite-element-analysis.html

  20. https://in.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/51815-calculation-of-the-modal-parameters-of-a-suspension-bridge

  21. Liu EZ, Lin SS, Chiu CH, Yuan SM (2001) Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Trans Educ 44(3):246–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Topping KE, Ehly SE (2001) Peer-assisted learning. J Educ Psychol Consul 12(2):113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Purchase HC (2000) Learning about interface design through peer assessment. Assess Eval High Educ 25(4):341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Macías-Guarasa J et al (2006) A project-based learning approach to design electronic systems curricula. IEEE Trans Educ 49(3):389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Usher M, Barak M (2018) Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: comparing between on-campus and online learning environments. Assess Eval High Educ 43(5):745–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gadola M, Chindamo D (2017) Experiential learning in engineering education: the role of student design competitions and a case study. Int J Mech Eng Educ 47(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cornelius S, Gordon C, Harris M (2011) Role engagement and anonymity in synchronous online role play. Int Rev Res Open Dist Learn 12(5):57–73

    Google Scholar 

  28. David H (2005) Introduction to matlab for engineering students. Northwestern University

    Google Scholar 

  29. https://amizone.net/AdminAmizone/WebForms/naac/DirectProgrammeStructure

  30. Schaffer SP, Chen X, Zhu X, Oakes WC (2012) Self-efficacy for cross-disciplinary learning in project-based teams. J Eng Educ 101(1):82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaluža M, Troskot K, Vukelić B (2018) Comparison of front-end frameworks for web applications. J Polytechnic Rijeka 6(1):261–282

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dao V(2016) Thesis on ‘Development of a front-end application using angular JS: 1UP media company case’. Leppävaara Laurea University of Applied Sciences Leppävaara

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chunnu K, Pritam S (2018) Application of firebase in android app development—a study. Int J Comput Appl 179(46):49–53

    Google Scholar 

  34. Domes S (2017) Progressive web based apps with react: create lighting fast wed apps with native power using recat and firebase app. Packt Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kim J et al (2018) m’Hybrid mobile-app. on multi-MEC platforms in NFV environment. Int J Eng Technol 7(4):383–386

    Google Scholar 

  36. Singh PK, Kar AK, Singh Y, Kolekar MH, Tanwar S (2019) Recent innovations in computing, vol 597. Springer Nature, Switzerland AG. ISBN: 978-3-030-29406-9

    Google Scholar 

  37. Singh PK, Panigrahi BK, Suryadevara NK, Sharma SK, Singh AK (eds) (2019) Proceedings of ICETIT 2019, Emerging trends in information technology, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (LNEE), Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30577-2

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Pallavi Asthana or Sudeep Tanwar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Asthana, P., Tanwar, S., Kumar, A., Yadav, A., Mishra, S. (2021). Experiential Learning Through Web-Based Application for Peer Review of Project: A Case Study Based on Interdisciplinary Teams. In: Singh, P.K., Wierzchoń, S.T., Tanwar, S., Ganzha, M., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C. (eds) Proceedings of Second International Conference on Computing, Communications, and Cyber-Security. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 203. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0733-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0733-2_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0732-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0733-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics