Skip to main content

Development of Literacies Through Multimodal Writing in L2 Classrooms: Challenges and Prospects for Teachers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multimodal Composing in K-16 ESL and EFL Education

Abstract

Drawing on sociocultural theories of literacy and empirical studies of multimodal media production (MMP), this chapter examines pedagogical issues related to employing multimodal writing pedagogy in L2 classrooms. Using authors’ personal reflections as researchers in two different settings, this chapter investigates the impacts of multimodal composing on in-school and out-of-school literacies and potential tensions in implementing multimodal pedagogies in classrooms. Additionally, it proposes guidance teachers can find helpful in multimodal writing in L2 classrooms. This study contributes to educators’ and teachers’ understanding of pedagogical concerns, which they find helpful to execute multimodal pedagogy in L2 classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajayi, L. (2008). Meaning-making, multimodal representation, and transformative pedagogy: An exploration of meaning construction instructional practices in an ESL high school classroom. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 7, 206–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association for the Teaching of English. (n.d.). Retrieved February 16, 2008, from www.actate.org.au/docs/Summary%20of%20Multiliteracies.ppt.

  • Belcher, D. (2017). On the becoming facilitators of multimodal composing and digital design. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 80–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. W. (2005). Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English language-learners in an online fanfiction community. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49, 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blikstein, P. (2008). Travels in Troy with Freire: Technology as an agent for emancipation. In P. Noguera & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Paulo Freire: The possible dream. New York: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. In R. Johnson (Ed.), Essays on art and literature. Columbia: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. New York: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, P. B., Hoey, L., & Perlman, L. K. (2001). Sticking with my dreams: Defining and refining youth media in the 21st century. Retrieved September 7, 2005, from www.campbell-kibler.com/youth_media.html.

  • Cimasko, T., & Shin, D. (2017). Multimodal resemiotization and authorial agency in an L2 writing classroom. Written Communication, 34(4), 387–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009a). A grammar of multimodality. International Journal of Learning., 16, 361–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009b). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 164–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DUSTY. (n.d.). D.U.S.T.Y. Mission. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://oaklanddusty.org/mission.php.

  • Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, R. (2002). Communicating: The multiple modes of human interconnection. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Bergin & Garvey Publishers, INC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J., & Hayes, E. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of new capitalism. Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. (2003). Teaching youth media: A critical guide to literacy, video production, and social change. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordo, B. (2004). The “digital divide” and the persistence of urban poverty. In Progressive planning reader 2004. Planners Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. (2004). A review of school-based initiative in media literacy education. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(42).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Shultz, K. (Eds.). (2002). School’s out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. (2003). Youth culture and digital media: New literacies for new times. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, L. F. (2000). New technologies, new literacies: Focus discipline research and ESL learning communities. Language, Learning and Technology, 4(2), 105–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G. M. (2015). Transcultural digital literacies: Cross-border connections and self- representations in an online forum. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, E., & Warriner, D. (2012). Transnationalism and literacy: Investigating the mobility of people, languages, texts, and practices in contexts of migration. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (1956/1998). Becoming virtual: Reality in the digital age (R. Bononno, Trans.). Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahiri, J. (2004). Street scripts: African American youth writing about crime and violence. In J. Mahiri (Ed.), What they don’t learn in school. London: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M., & McLuhan, E. (1988). Laws of media. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (2008). The multiple languages and literacies of English. In V. Ellis, C. Fox, & B. Street (Eds.), Rethinking English in schools: A new and constructive stage (pp. 174–182). Continuum International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. (2010). Reframing multimodal composing for student learning: Lessons on purpose from the Buffalo DV project. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, E., & Duncan-Andrade, J. (2004). What they do learn in school: Hip-Hop as a bridge to canonical poetry. In J. Mahiri (Ed.), What they don’t learn in school: Literacy in the lives of urban youth. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, S. M., Yusof, N. M., & Hong, Su C. (2013). Comparing the effects of the story telling method and the conventional method on the interest, motivation and achievement of Chinese primary school pupils. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences., 116, 3989–3995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. E. (2006). Mode, meaning, and synaesthesia in multimedia L2 writing. Language, Learning and Technology, 10(2), 56–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandya, J. Z. (2012). Unpacking Pandora’s box: Issues in the assessment of ELLs’ literacy skill development in multimodal classrooms. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 56(3), 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclove, R. E. (1994). Democratizing technology. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 40(19).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholle, D., & Denski, S. (1993). Reading and writing the media: Critical media literacy and postmodernism. In C. Lankshear & P. McLaren (Eds.), Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern (pp. 297–321). State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultana, S. [sabihasultana]. (2016, December 5). Social dispositions against women: Using critical media literacy to promote social justice [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Dh466e3Mps.

  • Sultana, S., & Turner, K. C. N. (2019). Social dispositions against women: Using critical media literacy to promote social justice. In E. A. Mikulec, S. Bhatawadekar, & C.T. McGivern (Eds.), Readings in Language Studies Volume 7: Intersections of Peace and Language Studies (pp. 133–150). ISLS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, K. C. N. (2008). Multimodal media production in the development of multiliteracies (Doctoral dissertation). Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L., Black, R. W., & Sykes, J. M. (2009). Second language use, socialization, and learning in Internet interest communities and online gaming. Modern Language Journal, 93, 802–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2004). National education technology plan. Retrieved on September 12, 2005, from http://www.nationaledtechplan.org/.

  • Ware, P. D. (2008). Language learners and multimedia literacy in and after school. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3, 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, W. D. J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. W. (2007). Organizing MySpace: Youth walkouts, pleasure, politics and new media. Unpublished manuscript, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Y. (2010). Adolescent multilingual writer’s transitions between in- and out-of-school writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Y. (2014). Possibilities and challenges of multimodal literacies in the learning and teaching of second and world languages. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(4), 158–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Y., & Angay-Crowder, T. (2016). Multimodal pedagogies for teacher education in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 988–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Y., & Choi, J. (2015). Teachers’ views of multimodal practices in K‐12 classrooms: Voices from teachers in the United States. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 838–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.219.

  • Yi, Y., Shin, D., & Cimasko, T. (2019) Multimodal literacies in teaching and learning English. In L. de Oliveira (Ed.), Handbook of TESOL in K-12 (pp. 163–178). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Y., Shin, D., & Cimasko, T. (2020). Multimodal composing in multilingual learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSLW.2020.100717

  • Youth Outlook. (n.d.). About us. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.youthoutlook.org/news/.

  • Youth Radio. (n.d.). About us. Retrieved February 19, 2004, from http://www.youthradio.org.

  • Youth Sounds. (n.d.). About: Mission. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://youthsounds.org/.

  • Zeni, J. (1994). Literacy, technology, and teacher education. In C. L. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. The Modern Language Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabiha Sultana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sultana, S., Turner, K.C.N. (2021). Development of Literacies Through Multimodal Writing in L2 Classrooms: Challenges and Prospects for Teachers. In: Shin, Ds., Cimasko, T., Yi, Y. (eds) Multimodal Composing in K-16 ESL and EFL Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0530-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0530-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0529-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0530-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics