Abstract
Generally speaking, when studying history, students read for information from a position of perceived ignorance. As teachers, we try to instil in them the need to interrogate secondary sources for argument and primary sources for context. We rarely talk with them about the equally important need to understand their own position as historians and what they, as unique individuals, bring to the history construction process. By introducing students to post-qualitative research practices, it is possible to help them recognise the expansive and dynamic nature of the history discipline, the important shaping role of the historian and the way in which the past and the present are intimately linked in embodied historical experiences.
If students are to become aware of their own historicity in order to understand the human condition, they should, among other things, be able to position themselves as historical beings in the context of narratives that extend beyond the story of their own lives.
Van Straaten, Wilshut and Oostdam, ‘Making history relevant to students by connecting past, present and future’, (2016).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baby Boxes. (2012). thejournal.ie. thejournal.ie/baby-boxes-hatches-ban-eu-un-692215-Dec2012.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187.
Barnett, C. (2008). Political affects in public space: Normative blind-spots in non-representational ontologies. Transactions—Institute of British Geographers, 33(2), 186–200.
Blaise, M., Rooney, T., & Pollitt, J. (2019). Weather wanderings. Journal of Public Pedagogies, 4, 165–170.
Braidotti, R. (2012). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. Colombia University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press.
Bright, J., & Clark, G. (2014). An introduction to the tokens at the Foundling Museum. The Foundling Museum.
Charteris, J. (2014). Epistemological shudders as productive aporia: A heuristic for transformative teacher learning. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 104–121.
Charteris, J., Nye, A., & Jones, M. (2017). Wild choreography of affect and ecstasy: Contentious pleasure (joussiance) in the academy. In S. Riddle, M. Harmes, & P. Danaher (Eds.), Producing pleasure within the contemporary university (pp. 49–64). Sense Publishers.
Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2016). Professional learning as ‘diffractive’ practice: Rhizomatic peer coaching. Reflective Practice, 17(5), 544–556.
Curtis, T. (2012). Coram’s cloths. In T. Curtis (Ed.), Tokens for the Foundlings (p. 43). Siren.
Davies, B. (2014). Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 734–741.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Feely, M. (2020). Assemblage analysis: An experimental new-materialist method for analysing narrative data. Qualitative Research, 32(7), 909–928.
Filipponi, S., Mazzocchi, E., & Sebregondi, L. (Eds.). (2016). The Museo degli Innocenti. Mandragora.
Gannon, S., Gottschall, K., & Camden Pratt, C. (2013). ‘A quick sideways look and wild grin’: Joyful assemblages in moments of girlhood. Girlhood Studies, 6(1), 13–29.
Gold, K. (2012). A space for stories: Revisiting relational poetry as inquiry on everyday practice. Qualitative Social Work, 12(6), 849–857.
Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Duke University Press.
Haraway, D. (1997). Modest-Witness@Second-Millenium. FemaleMan-Meets-OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2004). The Haraway Reader. Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Affect as method: Feelings, aesthetics and affective pedagogy. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 79–95). Edinburgh University Press.
Hickey-Moody, A., Palmer, H., & Sayers, E. (2016). Diffractive pedagogies: Dancing across new materialist imaginaries. Gender and Education, 28(2), 213–229.
Hill, C. M. (2017). More-than-reflective practice: Becoming a diffractive practitioner. Teacher Learning and Professional Development, 2(1), 1–17.
Jackson, A. Y. (2016). An ontology of a backflip. Cultural Studies, 16(2), 183–192.
Kertzer, D. I. (1991). Gender ideology and infant abandonment in nineteenth-century Italy. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 22(1), 1–25.
Kertzer, D. I. (1994). Cheating the angel-makers: Surviving infant abandonment in nineteenth-century Italy. Continuity and Change, 9(3), 451–480.
Kofoed, J., & Ringrose, J. (2012). Travelling and sticky affects: Exploring teens and sexualized cyberbullying through a Butlerian-Deleuzian-Guattarian Lens. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33(1), 5–20.
Lambert, L. (2013). The funambulist pamphlets, Vol. 03: Deleuze. Punctum Books.
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 265–281.
Massumi, B. (1987). Translator’s forward in Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Mazzei, L. A. (2014). Beyond an easy sense: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 742–746.
Mazzei, L. A., & Jackson, A. (2016). Voice in the agentic assemblage. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1090–1098.
Ott, B. L. (2017). Affect in critical studies. https://www.academia.edu/34096680/Affect_in_Critical_Studies.
Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 818–838). Sage Publications.
Richardson, L., & St Pierre, E. A. (2018). Writing as a method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 818–838). Sage Publications.
Ringrose, J. (2011). Beyond discourse? Using Deleuze and Guattari’s schizoanalysis to explore affective assemblages, heterosexually striated space and lines of flight online and at school. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 589–618.
Smartt Gullion, J. (2018). Diffractive ethnography: Social sciences and the ontological turn. Routledge.
Somerville, M. (2007). Postmodern emergence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(2), 225–243.
Somerville, M. (2008). ‘Waiting in the chaotic place of unknowing’: Articulating postmodern emergence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21(3), 209–220.
Springgay, S. (2011). ‘The Chinatown Foray’ as sensational pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(5), 363–656.
Springgay, S., & Truman, S. (2019). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: Walkinglab. Routledge.
St Pierre, E. A. (1997a). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175–189.
St Pierre, E. A. (1997b). Nomadic inquiry in the smooth spaces of the field: A preface. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(3), 365–383.
St Pierre, E. A. (2014). Post qualitative theory. Keynote lecture, Australian Association of Research in Education, New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, 2 December 2014.
St Pierre, E. A. (2018). Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 603–608.
Styles (2010). Threads of feeling: The London Foundling Hospital's textile tokens (pp. 1740–1770). The Foundling Museum.
Tamas, S. (2016). Written raw: Omissions, overshares, and the shameful ethics of personal narrative. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry through a critical lens (pp. 122–123). Routledge.
Tumarkin, M. (2018). Axiomatic. Brow Books.
Van Straaten, D., Wilschut, A., & Oostdam, R. (2016). Making history relevant to students by connecting past, present and future: A framework for research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(4), 479–502.
Wolfe, M. (2017). Affective schoolgirl assemblages making school spaces of non-belonging. Emotion, Space and Society, 25, 63–70.
Acknowledgement
We thank Jennifer Charteris for her comments on this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nye, A., Clark, J. (2021). Positioning: Making Use of Post-qualitative Research Practices. In: Nye, A., Clark, J. (eds) Teaching History for the Contemporary World. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0247-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0247-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0246-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0247-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)