Skip to main content

Siamese Manhattan LSTM Implementation for Predicting Text Similarity and Grading of Student Test Papers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless Communication

Abstract

This paper presents a method to grade answer papers written by the students by assessing the semantic similarity between the written answers and the actual answers and grading them accordingly based on the amount of semantic similarity between the two. There is a need for automatic grading of answers for faster checking of papers and to reduce the work of the teachers, also the method of text similarity can be used in search engines to find a particular document on the Internet or by question-answer sites such as Quora to determine similar questions. We have implemented this by using Manhattan LSTM (Long short-term memory) which is a Siamese deep neural network. This method uses word embedding vectors to create embedded matrices which are fed to LSTM and similarity function to get the result of the similarity between answers and then scaled to the appropriate grade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yih W, Toutanova K, Platt J, Meek C (2011) Learning discriminative projections for text similarity measures. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on computational natural language learning, pp 247–256

    Google Scholar 

  2. He H, Gimpel K, Lin J (2015) Multi-perspective sentence similarity modeling with convolutional neural networks. In: EMNLP, pp 1576–1586

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohler M, Mihalcea R (2009) Text-to-text semantic similarity for automatic short answer grading. In: Proceedings of the 12th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adrien S (2018) Text similarities: estimate the degree of similarity between two texts. https://medium.com/@adriensieg/text-similarities-da019229c894

  6. Jonas M, Aditya T (2016) Siamese recurrent architectures for learning sentence similarity. In: Thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tai KS, Socher R, Manning CD (2015) Improved semantic representations from tree-structured long short-term memory networks. ACL, pp 1556–1566

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tomas M, Kai C, Greg C, Jeffrey D (2013) Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv:1301.3781v3[cs.CL]

  9. Burstein L, Braden-Harder M, Chodorow S, Hua B, Kaplan K, Kukich C, Lu J, Nolan D, Rock S, Wolff (1998) Computer analysis of essay content for automated score prediction: a prototype automated scoring system for GMAT analytical writing assessment essays. ETS Res Rep Ser 1:i–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burrows S, Gurevych I, Stein B (1995) The eras and trends of automatic short answer grading. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25:60–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Leeuwen J (ed) (1995) Computer science today. Recent trends and developments. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1000. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elad H, Nir A (2015) Deep metric learning using triplet network. In: Similarity-based pattern recognition, Springer, pp 84–92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to take this opportunity to thank our faculty mentor Dr. Sunil Karamchandani for providing us a competitive platform for the implementation of such projects. We would like to convey our gratitude to Dr. Hari Vasudevan, our Principal, for granting us the use of the college library and Internet facilities for the purposes of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wallace Dalmet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dalmet, W., Das, A., Dhuri, V., Khaja, M., Karamchandani, S.H. (2020). Siamese Manhattan LSTM Implementation for Predicting Text Similarity and Grading of Student Test Papers. In: Vasudevan, H., Gajic, Z., Deshmukh, A. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless Communication . Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 36. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1002-1_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1002-1_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1001-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1002-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics