Skip to main content

Performance Measure of the Proposed Cost Estimation Model: Advance Use Case Point Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Computing: Theories and Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 742))

  • 835 Accesses

Abstract

Estimating size and cost of a software system is one of the primary challenges in software project management. An estimate is of critical significance to a project’s success, hence the estimate should go through a rigorous assessment process. The estimate should be evaluated for its quality or accuracy, and also to ensure that it contains all of the required information and is presented in a way that is easily understandable to all project stakeholders. Software cost model research results depend on model accuracy measures such as MRE, MMRE and PRED. Advance Use Case Point Method (AUCP) is an enhancement of UCP. AUCP is our previously proposed and published model (Srivastava et al in Int. J. Control Theor. Appl. Eval. Softw. Project Estimation Methodol. AUCP 9(41):1373–1381, 2017) [1]. In this paper, performance evaluation of AUCP is carried out using the three widely accepted metrics including MRE, MMRE and percentage of the PRED.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Srivastava, A., Singh, S.K., Abbas, S.Q.: Int. J. Control Theor. Appl. Eval. Softw. Project Estimation Methodol. AUCP 9 (41),1373–1381 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ko, A.J., Abraham, R., Beckwith, L., Blackwell, A., Burnett, M., Erwing, M., Scaffidi, C., Lawrance, J., Lieberman, H., Myers, B., Rosson, M.B., Rothermel, G., Shaw, M., Wiedenbeck, S.: The state of the art in end-user software engineering. ACM Comput. Surv. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gelderman, M.: The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance. Inf. Manag. 34, 11–18 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lieberman, H., Paterno, F., Klann, M., Wulf, V.: End-user development: an emerging paradigm. End User Development, pp. 1–8 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Srivastava, A., Singh, S.K., Abbas, Q.: airccse.org/journal/ijsea/papers/6215ijsea01.pdf

  6. Karner, G.: Objective systems resource estimation for objectory projects SF AB (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Srivastava, A., Singh, S.K., Abbas, S.Q.: Evaluation of software project estimation methodology. In: AUCP 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Computing Techniques in Engineering, Science and Management (SCESM-2017), 27–28 Jan 2017

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sholiq, Sutanto, T., Widodo, A.P., Kurniawan, W.: Effort rate on use case point method for effort estimation of website development. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 63(1) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conte, S.D., Dunsmore, H.E., Shen, V.Y.: Software Engineering Metrics and Models. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jørgensen, M.: Experience with the accuracy of software maintenance task effort prediction models. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 21(8) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conte, S.D., Dunsmore, H.E., Shen, V.Y.: Software Engineering Metrics and Models. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc, Menlo Park, Calif (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Menzies, T., Port, D., Chen, Z., Hihn, J., Stukes, S.: Validation methods for calibrating software effort models. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wieczorek, I., Ruhe, M.: How valuable is company-specific data compared to multi-company data for software cost estimation? In: Proceeding for the Eights IEEE Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS 02) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jørgensen, M., Shepperd, M.: A systematic review of software development cost estimation studies. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33(1) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Srivastava, A., Abbas, S.Q., Singh, S.K.: Enhancement in function point analysis. Proc. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 3, 129–136

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Archana Srivastava .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Srivastava, A., Singh, S.K., Abbas, S.Q. (2019). Performance Measure of the Proposed Cost Estimation Model: Advance Use Case Point Method. In: Ray, K., Sharma, T., Rawat, S., Saini, R., Bandyopadhyay, A. (eds) Soft Computing: Theories and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 742. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0589-4_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics