Abstract
Many problems in decision theory intersect problems in action theory. But although this is widely realized, the connections between the two fields have rarely been systematically discussed in the literature. This essay will attempt to articulate some of those connections and a number of important problems they raise. The general topic is large, and I shall have to work with simple decision-theoretic models and to restrict my attention chiefly to normative decision theory as applied to individual decision. Some implications for group decision theory, and for empirical issues concerning decision, should be apparent; but my main focus will be on individual cases, particularly in relation to standards of rationality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Audi, R.: 1972, The Concept of Believing’, The Personalist 53, 43–62.
Audi, R.: 1973, The Concept of Wanting’, Philosophical Studies 24, 1–21.
Audi, R.: 1982, ‘Believing and Affirming’, Mind 91, 115–120.
Audi, R.: 1985a, ‘Rationality and Valuation’, in G. Seebass and R. Tuomela (eds.), Social Action (Theory and Decision Library, vol. 43), D. Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 243–277.
Audi, R.: 1985b, ‘Rationalization and Rationality’, Synthese 65, 157–184.
Brand, M.: 1984, Intending and Acting, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Brandt, R. B.: 1979, A Theory of the Good and the Right, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Brandt, R. B.: 1983, ‘The Concept of Rational Action’, Social Theory and Practice 9, 143–164.
Churchman, C. W.: 1970, ‘Kant—A Decision Theorist?’, Theory and Decision 1, 107–116.
Cohen, L. J.: 1981, ‘Can Human Rationality be Experimentally Demonstrated?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 317–370.
Hempel, C. G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.
Kyburgh, H. E.: 1983a, Epistemology and Inference, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Kyburgh, H. E.: 1983b, ‘Rational Belief’, Behavior and Brain Sciences 6, 231–273.
Leinfellner, W.: 1978, ‘Marx and the Utility Approach to the Ethical Foundation of Microeconomics’, in H. W. Goettinger and W. Leinfellner (eds.), Decision Theory and Social Ethics, Issues in Social Choice, D. Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, pp. 33–58.
Marks, J.: forthcoming, The Ways of Desire, Precedent Publishing Co., Chicago.
Samuelson, P. A.: 1963, ‘Risk and Uncertainty: A Fallacy of Large Numbers’, Scientia 98, 108–113.
Schank, R. and R. Abelson: 1977, Script, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Lawrence Earlbaum, Hilsdale, New Jersey.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1981, ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’, Science 211, 453–458.
Weirich, P.: (forthcoming), ‘Expected Utility and Risk’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Audi, R. (1986). Action Theory as a Resource for Decision Theory. In: Audi, R. (eds) Action, Decision, and Intention. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4696-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4696-5_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8588-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4696-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive