Abstract
Abstract As emerging technologies and globalization result in political, social, economic, and cultural changes, the transformation of educational system is urged to meet the challenges. However, how and where should the process of curriculum change start? This study guided by Tyler’s (1949) classic model of curriculum development conducts a needs assessment of American school curriculum change. It surveys participants of American school education, school administrators, teachers, preservice teachers, students, and parents through social networks. Findings validate the need for school curriculum change and provide meaningful insight for the process.
The future of our economy, the strength of our democracy, and even the health of our planet’s ecosystems all depend on our educating future generations in ways that are very different from how the vast majority of us were schooled and how most schools function today
(Academy 21’s Chief Executive Officer, Robert Witt)
What year are you preparing your students for? 1973? 1995? Can you honestly say that your school’s curriculum and the program you use are preparing your students for 2015 or 2020? Are you even preparing them for today?
(Heidi Hayes Jacobs, 2010).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasythesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
Academy 21. (n.d.a). A new dialogue – Schools haven’t changed, but our world has. Retrieved from http://www.academy21.org/homepage
Academy 21. (n.d.b). Rethink and redesign. Creating frameworks for transformational changes. Retrieved from http://www.academy21.org/framework
Andalo, D. (2007, March 12). All primary schools to teach foreign languages by 2010. Education Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2007/mar/12/schools.uk
Bridgeland, J. M., Dilulio, J. J., Streeter, R. T., & Mason, J. R. (2008) One dream, two realities: Perspectives of parents on America’s high schools. (ED. 503358). A report by Civic Enterprises in association with Peter D. Hart Research Associates for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/41/e1/0f.pdf
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.
Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: The Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
Doll, R. C. (1996). Curriculum improvement: Decision making and process (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Gray, P. (2010, March 18). When less is more: The case for teaching less math in schools. [Web blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedomlearn/201003/when-less-is-more-the-case-teaching-less-math-in-schools
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.
Jacobs, H. H. (2010). Curriculum 21: Essential education for a changing world. Alexandria, VA: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jeynes, W. H. (2005). The effects of parental involvement and family structure on the academic achievement of adolescents. Marriage and Family Review, 37(3), 99–116.
Jiang, L. (2001). Web-based instruction for education faculty: A needs assessment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(4), 385–399 (EJ635448).
Kerlinger, F. (1986). Foundations of behavior research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum: For English-medium teaching and learning in years 1–13. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media Limited. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Curriculum-documents
Oliva, P. F. (2009). Developing the curriculum (7th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Orban, L. (2007). Multilingualism is a plus-factor for European integration, competitiveness, growth and better jobs – Speech. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/orban/news/docs/speeches/071206_euroean_voice/071206_European_Voice_en.pdf
Pufahl, I., Rhodes, N. C., & Christian, D. (September 2001). What can we learn from foreign language teaching in other countries. Retrieved from: http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/0106pufahl.html
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. (2007). Curriculum development: Theory into practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
The American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education (AACTE) & the Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21). (2010). 21st Century Knowledge and Skills in Educator Preparation. Retrieved from http://aacte.org/pdf/Publications/Reports_Studies/AACTE-P21%20White%20Paper%20vFINAL.pdf
The Eurydice European Unit. (2002). Key competencies. A developing concept in general compulsory education. Retrieved from http://www.see-educoop.net/education_in/pdf/compulsary-edu-oth-enl-t05.pdf
The National Work Readiness Council. (2010). National work readiness credential – Candidate handbook. Washington, DC: National Work Readiness Council. Retrieved from http://www.castleworldwide.com/nwrc/documentation/candidate_handbook.pdf
The New Commission on the Skills of American Workforce. (2007). Tough choices or tough times. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy. Retrieved from http://www.skillscommission.org/executive.htm
The North Central Regional Educational Laboratory & the Metiri Group (NCREL/Metiri). (2002). EnGauge 21st century skills: Digital literacies for a digital age.Retrieved from http://www.metiri.com/features.html
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). Beyond the three Rs: Voters attitudes towards the 21st century skills. Retrieved from http://64.130.44.78/documents/p21_ pollreport_2 pg.pdf
Treadwell, M. (2008a). Whatever next: The global conceptual curriculum. Tauranga New Zealand: Teachers@Work. Retrieved from http://www.schoolv2.net/
Treadwell, M. (2008b). The new education XE “Education” paradigm. In M. Treadwell, Whatever: School v2.0 (pp. 9–25). Tauranga: Teachers@Work. Retrieved from http://www.schoolv2.net/
Trilling, B. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Tucker, M. (n.d.). NCEE’s (The National Center on Education and the Economy) mission. Retrieved from http://www.ncee.org/ncee/mission/index.jsp;jsessionid=aRrYBtfkRKhc?setProtocol=true
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wagner, T. (2008a). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need – and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books.
Wagner, T. (2008b). Rigor redefined. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 20–25. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/oct08/vol66/num02/Rigor_Redefined.aspx
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wan, G. (2011). A Needs Assessment: Reforming the U.S. School Curriculum. In: Wan, G., Gut, D. (eds) Bringing Schools into the 21st Century. Explorations of Educational Purpose, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0268-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0268-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0267-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0268-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)