Skip to main content

Mercury and Cognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Toxic Effects of Mercury
  • 1372 Accesses

Abstract

Nervous system toxicity is revealed by overt neurological signs that are patently observable, as well as by more subtle effects on behavioral adaptation to ever-changing environments. The latter requires refined testing but is worth the effort, as the impairments that are revealed can be highly informative about the subtle effects of low-level exposure. These effects fall under the umbrella of cognitive effects and are typically reflected in operant or respondent conditioning phenomena as well as “simpler” processes such as habituation and sensitization. They entail manipulation of plastic behavior that has been trained or established during the course of a lifetime. Impairment is reflected in the course of acquisition or in the expression of behavior during a stable baseline. The return for the investment in the extensive testing that is required is the revelation of effects on memory, learning, perception, sensory–motor function, or other subtle effects that significantly impair functioning in an industrialized society (Weiss and Cory-Slechta 1994).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alsop B, Davison M (1991) Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent schedule and signal-detection procedures. J Exp Anal Behav 5(6):67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin-Zaki L, Majeed MA (1981) Methylmercury poisoning in the Iraqi suckling infant: a longitudinal study over five years. J Appl Toxicol 1:210–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir F, Rustam H, Tikriti S, Al-Damluji SF, Shihristani H (1980) Clinical and epidemiological aspects of methylmercury poisoning. Postgrad Med J 5(6):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone S Jr, Haykal-Coates N, Parran DK, Tilson HA (1998) Gestational exposure to methylmercury alters the developmental pattern of trk-like immunoreactivity in the rat brain and results in cortical dysmorphology. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 10(9):13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bemis JC, Seegal RF (1999) Polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury act synergistically to reduce rat brain dopamine content in vitro. Environ Health Perspect 10(7):879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beuter A, De Geoffroy A, Edwards R (1999) Analysis of rapid alternating movements in Cree subjects exposed to methylmercury and in subjects with neurological deficits. Environ Res 80:64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop DV, Bishop SJ, Bright P, James C, Delaney T, Tallal P (1999) Different origin of auditory and phonological processing problems in children with language impairment: evidence from a twin study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42:155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buelke-Sam J, Kimmel CA, Adams J, Nelson CJ, Vorhees CV, Wright DC, St Omer V, Korol BA, Butcher RE, Geyer MA (1985) Collaborative behavioral teratology study: results. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7:591–624

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cagiano R, De Salvia MA, Persichella M, Renna G, Tattoli M, Cuomo V (1990) Behavioral changes in the offspring of rats exposed to diazepam during gestation. Eur J Pharmacol 177:67–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter DE, Werner TJ (1978) Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. J Exp Anal Behav 2(9):565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania AC (1991) Glossary. In: Iversen IH, Lattal KA (eds) Experimental analysis of behavior: part 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp G1–G44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charleston JS, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Body RL, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM (1994) Increases in the number of reactive glia in the visual cortex of Macaca fascicularis following subclinical long-term methyl mercury exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 12(9):196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charleston JS, Body RL, Mottet NK, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM (1995) Autometallographic determination of inorganic mercury distribution in the cortex of the calcarine sulcus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical exposure to methylmercury and mercuric chloride. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 13(2):325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi BH, Lapham LW, Amin-Zaki L, Saleem T (1978) Abnormal neuronal migration, deranged cerebral cortical organization, and diffuse white matter astrocytosis of human fetal brain: a major effect of methylmercury poisoning in utero. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 3(7):719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cory-Slechta DA (1990) Behavioral measures of neurotoxicity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Bridging experimental animal and human behavioral toxicity studies. p 137–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Cory-Slechta DA (1994) Implications of changes in schedule-controlled operant behavior. In: Weiss B, O’Donoghue J (eds) Neurobehavioral toxicity: analysis and interpretation. Raven Press, New York, pp 195–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison M, McCarthy D (1988) Matching models of signal detection: the matching law. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 216–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison M, Nevin JA (1999) Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration. J Exp Anal Behav 7(1):439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day J, Reed M, Newland MC (2005) Neuromotor deficits in aging rats exposed to methylmercury and n-3 fatty acids. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2(7):629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles CU, Annau Z (1982) Prenatal methyl mercury exposure, II: alterations in learning and psychotropic drug sensitivity in adult offspring. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 4:377–382

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans HL, Garman RH, Laties VG (1982) Neurotoxicity of methylmercury in the pigeon. Neurotoxicology 3:21–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faro LR, Duran R, Do Nascimento JL, Alfonso M, Picanco-Diniz CW (1997) Effects of methyl mercury on the in vivo release of dopamine and its acidic metabolites dopac and hva from striatum of rats. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 3(8):95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faro LR, Do Nascimento JL, Alfonso M, Duran R (1998) Acute administration of methylmercury changes in vivo dopamine release from rat striatum. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 6(0):632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faro LR, Do Nascimento JL, Alfonso M, Duran R (2002) Mechanism of action of methylmercury on in vivo striatal dopamine release: possible involvement of dopamine transporter. Neurochem Int 4:455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch RH, Miller S, Tallal P (1997) Neurobiology of speech perception. Annu Rev Neurosci 20:331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Brady JV, Bradford LD (1977) Advances in behavioral pharmacology. In: Predicting the abuse liability of drugs with animal drug self-administration procedures: psychomotor stimulants and hallucinogens. Academic Press, New York, pp 164–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JA, Sparber SB (1978) D-amphetamine unmasks postnatal consequences of exposure to methylmercury in utero: methods for studying behavioral teratogenesis. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 8:365–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulig BM, Jaspers RMA (1999) Assessment techniques for detecting neurobehavioral toxicity. In: Niesink RJM, Jaspers RMA, Kornet LMW, van Ree JM, Tilson HA (eds) Introduction to neurobehavioral toxicology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 70–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr MJ (1979) Second-order schedules and the generation of unitary response sequences. Advances in the analysis of behavior. In: Zeiler MD, Harzem P (eds) Reinforcement and the organization of behavior, vol 1. Wiley, New York, pp 223–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurissen JPJ (1995) Neurotoxicology: approaches and methods. Academic Press, San Diego. Neurobehavioral methods for the evaluation of sensory functions, pp 239–264

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy D, Davison MC (1980) Independence of sensitivity to relative reinforcement rate and discriminability in signal detection. J Exp Anal Behav 3(4):273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy DC, Davison MD (1991) The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering. J Exp Anal Behav 8(6):51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meacham CA, Freudenrich TM, Anderson WL, Sui L, Lyons-Darden T, Barone S Jr, Gilbert ME, Mundy WR, Shafer TJ (2005) Accumulation of methylmercury or polychlorinated biphenyls in in vitro models of rat neuronal tissue. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 20(5):177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DB, Eckerman DA (1986) Learning and memory measures. In: Annau Z (ed) Neurobehavioral toxicology. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 94–149

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2000) Toxicological effects of methylmercury. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, Committee on the Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevin JA, Cate H, Alsop B (1993) Effects of differences between stimuli, responses, and reinforcer rates on conditional discrimination performance. J Exp Anal Behav 5(9):147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newland MC (1994) Operant behavior and the measurement of motor dysfunction. In: Weiss B, O’Donoghue JL (eds) Neurobehavioral toxicity: analysis and interpretation. Raven Press, New York, pp 273–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Newland MC (1995) Motor function and the physical properties of the operant: applications to screening and advanced techniques. In: Chang LW, Slikker W (eds) Neurotoxicology: approaches and methods. Academic, San Diego, pp 265–299

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newland MC, Paletz EM (2000) Animal studies of methylmercury and PCBs: what do they tell us about expected effects in humans. Neurotoxicology 21:1003–1027

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newland MC, Reile PA (1999) Blood and brain mercury levels after chronic gestational exposure to methylmercury in rats. Toxicol Sci 5(0):106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newland MC, Reile PA, Langston JL (2004) Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2(6):179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kusky J (1985) Synaptic degeneration in rat visual cortex after neonatal administration of methylmercury. Exp Neurol 8(9):32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kusky JR, McGeer EG (1989) Methylmercury-induced movements and postural disorders in developing rat: high-affinity uptake of choline, glutamate, and gamma-aminobutyric acid in the cerebral cortex and caudate-putamen. Neurochemistry 5(3):999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kusky JR, Boyes BE, McGeer EG (1988) Methylmercury-induced movement and postural disorders in developing rat: regional analysis of brain catecholamines and indoleamines. Brain Res 43(9):138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parran DK, Mundy WR, Barone S Jr (2001) Effects of methylmercury and mercuric chloride on differentiation and cell viability in pc12 cells. Toxicol Sci 5(9):278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parran DK, Barone S Jr, Mundy WR (2003) Methylmercury decreases ngf-induced trka autophosphorylation and neurite outgrowth in pc12 cells. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 14(1):71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parran DK, Barone S Jr, Mundy WR (2004) Methylmercury inhibits trka signaling through the erk1/2 cascade after ngf stimulation of pc12 cells. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 14(9):53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paule MG, Forrester TM, Maher MA, Cranmer JM, Allen RR (1990) Monkey versus human performance in the nctr operant test battery. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1:503–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paule MG, Chelonis JJ, Buffalo EA, Blake DJ, Casey PH (1999) Operant test battery performance in children: correlation with IQ. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen EB, Newland MC (2001) Developmental exposure to methylmercury alters behavioral sensitivity to d-amphetamine and pentobarbital in adult rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 23:45–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice DC (1988) Quantification of operant behavior. Toxicol Lett 4(3):361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice DC (1989) Delayed neurotoxicity in monkeys exposed developmentally to methyl-mercury. Neurotoxicology 1(0):645

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice DC (1994) Neurobehavioral toxicity: analysis and interpretation. Raven Press, New York. Testing effects of toxicants on sensory system function by operant methodology,. pp 299–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice DC (1996) Sensory and cognitive effects of developmental methylmercury exposure in monkeys, and a comparison to effects in rodents. Neurotoxicology 1(7):139

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice DC, Gilbert SG (1990) Effects of developmental exposure to methyl mercury on spatial and temporal visual function in monkeys. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 10(2):151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice DC, Gilbert SG (1992) Exposure to methyl mercury from birth to adulthood impairs high-frequency hearing in monkeys. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 11(5):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice DC, Gilbert SG (1995) Effects of developmental methylmercury exposure or lifetime lead exposure on vibration sensitivity function in monkeys. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 13(4):161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi AD, Ahlbom E, Ogren SO, Nicotera P (1997) Prenatal exposure to methylmercury alters locomotor activity of male but not female rats. Exp Brain Res 117:428–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sager PR, Doherty RA, Rodier PM (1982) Effects of methylmercury on developing mouse cerebellar cortex. Exp Neurol 7(7):179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto M, Wakabayashi K, Kakita A, Hitoshi T, Adachi T, Nakano A (1998) Widespread neuronal degeneration in rats following oral administration of methylmercury during the postnatal developing phase: a model of fetal-type Minamata disease. Brain Res 78(4):351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick K (1971) Operants. J Exp Anal Behav 1(5):413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trasande L, Landrigan PJ, Schecter C (2005) Public health and economic consequences of methylmercury toxicity to the developing brain. Environ Health Perspect 11(3):590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe C, Satoh H (1996) Evolution of our understanding of methylmercury as a health threat. Environ Health Perspect 104(Suppl 2):367–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss B (1981) Microproperties of operant behavior as aspects of toxicity: quantification of steady-state operant behavior. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 249–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss B, Cory-Slechta DA (1994) Principles and methods of toxicology. Raven Press, New York. Assessment of behavioral toxicity, pp 1091–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • White KG, McKenzie J (1982) Delayed stimulus control: recall for single and relational stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav 3(8):305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White KG, Wixted JT (1999) Psychophysics of remembering. J Exp Anal Behav 7(1):91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widholm JJ, Villareal S, Seegal RF, Schantz SL (2004) Spatial alternation deficits following developmental exposure to Aroclor 1254 and/or methylmercury in rats. Toxicol Sci 82:577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood RW (1981) Determinants of irritant termination behavior. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 6(1):260

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nabi, S. (2014). Mercury and Cognition. In: Toxic Effects of Mercury. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1922-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics