Abstract
Nervous system toxicity is revealed by overt neurological signs that are patently observable, as well as by more subtle effects on behavioral adaptation to ever-changing environments. The latter requires refined testing but is worth the effort, as the impairments that are revealed can be highly informative about the subtle effects of low-level exposure. These effects fall under the umbrella of cognitive effects and are typically reflected in operant or respondent conditioning phenomena as well as “simpler” processes such as habituation and sensitization. They entail manipulation of plastic behavior that has been trained or established during the course of a lifetime. Impairment is reflected in the course of acquisition or in the expression of behavior during a stable baseline. The return for the investment in the extensive testing that is required is the revelation of effects on memory, learning, perception, sensory–motor function, or other subtle effects that significantly impair functioning in an industrialized society (Weiss and Cory-Slechta 1994).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alsop B, Davison M (1991) Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent schedule and signal-detection procedures. J Exp Anal Behav 5(6):67
Amin-Zaki L, Majeed MA (1981) Methylmercury poisoning in the Iraqi suckling infant: a longitudinal study over five years. J Appl Toxicol 1:210–214
Bakir F, Rustam H, Tikriti S, Al-Damluji SF, Shihristani H (1980) Clinical and epidemiological aspects of methylmercury poisoning. Postgrad Med J 5(6):1
Barone S Jr, Haykal-Coates N, Parran DK, Tilson HA (1998) Gestational exposure to methylmercury alters the developmental pattern of trk-like immunoreactivity in the rat brain and results in cortical dysmorphology. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 10(9):13
Bemis JC, Seegal RF (1999) Polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury act synergistically to reduce rat brain dopamine content in vitro. Environ Health Perspect 10(7):879
Beuter A, De Geoffroy A, Edwards R (1999) Analysis of rapid alternating movements in Cree subjects exposed to methylmercury and in subjects with neurological deficits. Environ Res 80:64
Bishop DV, Bishop SJ, Bright P, James C, Delaney T, Tallal P (1999) Different origin of auditory and phonological processing problems in children with language impairment: evidence from a twin study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42:155
Buelke-Sam J, Kimmel CA, Adams J, Nelson CJ, Vorhees CV, Wright DC, St Omer V, Korol BA, Butcher RE, Geyer MA (1985) Collaborative behavioral teratology study: results. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 7:591–624
Cagiano R, De Salvia MA, Persichella M, Renna G, Tattoli M, Cuomo V (1990) Behavioral changes in the offspring of rats exposed to diazepam during gestation. Eur J Pharmacol 177:67–74
Carter DE, Werner TJ (1978) Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. J Exp Anal Behav 2(9):565
Catania AC (1991) Glossary. In: Iversen IH, Lattal KA (eds) Experimental analysis of behavior: part 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp G1–G44
Charleston JS, Bolender RP, Mottet NK, Body RL, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM (1994) Increases in the number of reactive glia in the visual cortex of Macaca fascicularis following subclinical long-term methyl mercury exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 12(9):196
Charleston JS, Body RL, Mottet NK, Vahter ME, Burbacher TM (1995) Autometallographic determination of inorganic mercury distribution in the cortex of the calcarine sulcus of the monkey Macaca fascicularis following long-term subclinical exposure to methylmercury and mercuric chloride. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 13(2):325
Choi BH, Lapham LW, Amin-Zaki L, Saleem T (1978) Abnormal neuronal migration, deranged cerebral cortical organization, and diffuse white matter astrocytosis of human fetal brain: a major effect of methylmercury poisoning in utero. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 3(7):719
Cory-Slechta DA (1990) Behavioral measures of neurotoxicity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Bridging experimental animal and human behavioral toxicity studies. p 137–158
Cory-Slechta DA (1994) Implications of changes in schedule-controlled operant behavior. In: Weiss B, O’Donoghue J (eds) Neurobehavioral toxicity: analysis and interpretation. Raven Press, New York, pp 195–214
Davison M, McCarthy D (1988) Matching models of signal detection: the matching law. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 216–248
Davison M, Nevin JA (1999) Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration. J Exp Anal Behav 7(1):439
Day J, Reed M, Newland MC (2005) Neuromotor deficits in aging rats exposed to methylmercury and n-3 fatty acids. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2(7):629
Eccles CU, Annau Z (1982) Prenatal methyl mercury exposure, II: alterations in learning and psychotropic drug sensitivity in adult offspring. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol 4:377–382
Evans HL, Garman RH, Laties VG (1982) Neurotoxicity of methylmercury in the pigeon. Neurotoxicology 3:21–36
Faro LR, Duran R, Do Nascimento JL, Alfonso M, Picanco-Diniz CW (1997) Effects of methyl mercury on the in vivo release of dopamine and its acidic metabolites dopac and hva from striatum of rats. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 3(8):95
Faro LR, Do Nascimento JL, Alfonso M, Duran R (1998) Acute administration of methylmercury changes in vivo dopamine release from rat striatum. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 6(0):632
Faro LR, Do Nascimento JL, Alfonso M, Duran R (2002) Mechanism of action of methylmercury on in vivo striatal dopamine release: possible involvement of dopamine transporter. Neurochem Int 4:455
Fitch RH, Miller S, Tallal P (1997) Neurobiology of speech perception. Annu Rev Neurosci 20:331
Griffiths RR, Brady JV, Bradford LD (1977) Advances in behavioral pharmacology. In: Predicting the abuse liability of drugs with animal drug self-administration procedures: psychomotor stimulants and hallucinogens. Academic Press, New York, pp 164–208
Hughes JA, Sparber SB (1978) D-amphetamine unmasks postnatal consequences of exposure to methylmercury in utero: methods for studying behavioral teratogenesis. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 8:365–375
Kulig BM, Jaspers RMA (1999) Assessment techniques for detecting neurobehavioral toxicity. In: Niesink RJM, Jaspers RMA, Kornet LMW, van Ree JM, Tilson HA (eds) Introduction to neurobehavioral toxicology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 70–113
Marr MJ (1979) Second-order schedules and the generation of unitary response sequences. Advances in the analysis of behavior. In: Zeiler MD, Harzem P (eds) Reinforcement and the organization of behavior, vol 1. Wiley, New York, pp 223–260
Maurissen JPJ (1995) Neurotoxicology: approaches and methods. Academic Press, San Diego. Neurobehavioral methods for the evaluation of sensory functions, pp 239–264
McCarthy D, Davison MC (1980) Independence of sensitivity to relative reinforcement rate and discriminability in signal detection. J Exp Anal Behav 3(4):273
McCarthy DC, Davison MD (1991) The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering. J Exp Anal Behav 8(6):51
Meacham CA, Freudenrich TM, Anderson WL, Sui L, Lyons-Darden T, Barone S Jr, Gilbert ME, Mundy WR, Shafer TJ (2005) Accumulation of methylmercury or polychlorinated biphenyls in in vitro models of rat neuronal tissue. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 20(5):177
Miller DB, Eckerman DA (1986) Learning and memory measures. In: Annau Z (ed) Neurobehavioral toxicology. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 94–149
National Research Council (2000) Toxicological effects of methylmercury. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, Committee on the Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury
Nevin JA, Cate H, Alsop B (1993) Effects of differences between stimuli, responses, and reinforcer rates on conditional discrimination performance. J Exp Anal Behav 5(9):147
Newland MC (1994) Operant behavior and the measurement of motor dysfunction. In: Weiss B, O’Donoghue JL (eds) Neurobehavioral toxicity: analysis and interpretation. Raven Press, New York, pp 273–297
Newland MC (1995) Motor function and the physical properties of the operant: applications to screening and advanced techniques. In: Chang LW, Slikker W (eds) Neurotoxicology: approaches and methods. Academic, San Diego, pp 265–299
Newland MC, Paletz EM (2000) Animal studies of methylmercury and PCBs: what do they tell us about expected effects in humans. Neurotoxicology 21:1003–1027
Newland MC, Reile PA (1999) Blood and brain mercury levels after chronic gestational exposure to methylmercury in rats. Toxicol Sci 5(0):106
Newland MC, Reile PA, Langston JL (2004) Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2(6):179
O’Kusky J (1985) Synaptic degeneration in rat visual cortex after neonatal administration of methylmercury. Exp Neurol 8(9):32
O’Kusky JR, McGeer EG (1989) Methylmercury-induced movements and postural disorders in developing rat: high-affinity uptake of choline, glutamate, and gamma-aminobutyric acid in the cerebral cortex and caudate-putamen. Neurochemistry 5(3):999
O’Kusky JR, Boyes BE, McGeer EG (1988) Methylmercury-induced movement and postural disorders in developing rat: regional analysis of brain catecholamines and indoleamines. Brain Res 43(9):138
Parran DK, Mundy WR, Barone S Jr (2001) Effects of methylmercury and mercuric chloride on differentiation and cell viability in pc12 cells. Toxicol Sci 5(9):278
Parran DK, Barone S Jr, Mundy WR (2003) Methylmercury decreases ngf-induced trka autophosphorylation and neurite outgrowth in pc12 cells. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 14(1):71
Parran DK, Barone S Jr, Mundy WR (2004) Methylmercury inhibits trka signaling through the erk1/2 cascade after ngf stimulation of pc12 cells. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 14(9):53
Paule MG, Forrester TM, Maher MA, Cranmer JM, Allen RR (1990) Monkey versus human performance in the nctr operant test battery. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1:503–507
Paule MG, Chelonis JJ, Buffalo EA, Blake DJ, Casey PH (1999) Operant test battery performance in children: correlation with IQ. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2:223–230
Rasmussen EB, Newland MC (2001) Developmental exposure to methylmercury alters behavioral sensitivity to d-amphetamine and pentobarbital in adult rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 23:45–55
Rice DC (1988) Quantification of operant behavior. Toxicol Lett 4(3):361
Rice DC (1989) Delayed neurotoxicity in monkeys exposed developmentally to methyl-mercury. Neurotoxicology 1(0):645
Rice DC (1994) Neurobehavioral toxicity: analysis and interpretation. Raven Press, New York. Testing effects of toxicants on sensory system function by operant methodology,. pp 299–318
Rice DC (1996) Sensory and cognitive effects of developmental methylmercury exposure in monkeys, and a comparison to effects in rodents. Neurotoxicology 1(7):139
Rice DC, Gilbert SG (1990) Effects of developmental exposure to methyl mercury on spatial and temporal visual function in monkeys. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 10(2):151
Rice DC, Gilbert SG (1992) Exposure to methyl mercury from birth to adulthood impairs high-frequency hearing in monkeys. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 11(5):6
Rice DC, Gilbert SG (1995) Effects of developmental methylmercury exposure or lifetime lead exposure on vibration sensitivity function in monkeys. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 13(4):161
Rossi AD, Ahlbom E, Ogren SO, Nicotera P (1997) Prenatal exposure to methylmercury alters locomotor activity of male but not female rats. Exp Brain Res 117:428–436
Sager PR, Doherty RA, Rodier PM (1982) Effects of methylmercury on developing mouse cerebellar cortex. Exp Neurol 7(7):179
Sakamoto M, Wakabayashi K, Kakita A, Hitoshi T, Adachi T, Nakano A (1998) Widespread neuronal degeneration in rats following oral administration of methylmercury during the postnatal developing phase: a model of fetal-type Minamata disease. Brain Res 78(4):351
Schick K (1971) Operants. J Exp Anal Behav 1(5):413
Trasande L, Landrigan PJ, Schecter C (2005) Public health and economic consequences of methylmercury toxicity to the developing brain. Environ Health Perspect 11(3):590
Watanabe C, Satoh H (1996) Evolution of our understanding of methylmercury as a health threat. Environ Health Perspect 104(Suppl 2):367–379
Weiss B (1981) Microproperties of operant behavior as aspects of toxicity: quantification of steady-state operant behavior. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 249–265
Weiss B, Cory-Slechta DA (1994) Principles and methods of toxicology. Raven Press, New York. Assessment of behavioral toxicity, pp 1091–1155
White KG, McKenzie J (1982) Delayed stimulus control: recall for single and relational stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav 3(8):305
White KG, Wixted JT (1999) Psychophysics of remembering. J Exp Anal Behav 7(1):91
Widholm JJ, Villareal S, Seegal RF, Schantz SL (2004) Spatial alternation deficits following developmental exposure to Aroclor 1254 and/or methylmercury in rats. Toxicol Sci 82:577
Wood RW (1981) Determinants of irritant termination behavior. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 6(1):260
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nabi, S. (2014). Mercury and Cognition. In: Toxic Effects of Mercury. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1922-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1922-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1921-7
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1922-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)