Skip to main content

What Constitutes Urban Biodiversity?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Green City
  • 949 Accesses

Abstract

Biodiversity is often perceived only as species diversity. However, the structure of habitats is part of it and makes biodiversity comprehensible. This also applies to urban biodiversity. Like urban nature as a whole, designed biodiversity is based on urban structures and their maintenance and management. Biodiversity is shaped in the city and can therefore also be increased or reduced.

There is often a broad view of urban that always sees it (only) in the context of ecosystem and thus subsumes all the services of urban under the name “biodiversity”. However, this devalues the concept of biodiversity and detaches it from its content.

Biodiversity in cities, like biodiversity in general, is diversity of species and habitats and genetic diversity of species. That this has a positive effect on people as city dwellers is often claimed, but needs concretisation, also to improve and expand this effect. People usually perceive biodiversity only fragmentarily and “in passing”, so to speak, but often do not know what lies behind the term. This is confirmed by many studies. However, they perceive and value the diversity of natural structures and (observable) species very accurately. If diversity is valued positively, this also applies to biological diversity. Contact with nature is generally seen as positive and is in demand, even in cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angold PG, Sadler JP, Hill MO, Pullin A, Rushton S, Austin K, Small E, Wood B, Wadsworth R, Sanderson R, Thompson K (2006) Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Sci Total Environ 360:196–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbeitsgruppe Methodik der Biotopkartierung im besiedelten Bereich (1986) Flächendeckende Biotopkartierung im besiedelten Bereich als Grundlage einer ökologisch bzw. am Naturschutz orientierten Planung: Grundprogramm für die Bestandsaufnahme und Gliederung des besiedelten Bereichs und dessen Randzonen. Natur Landsch 61(10):371–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbeitsgruppe Methodik der Biotopkartierung im besiedelten Bereich (1993) Flächendeckende Biotopkartierung im besiedelten Bereich als Grundlage einer am Naturschutz orientierten Planung: Programm für die Bestandsaufnahme, Gliederung und Bewertung des besiedelten Bereichs und dessen Randzonen: Überarbeitete Fassung 1993. Natur Landsch 68(10):491–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedé L, Weber W, Resende S, Piper W, Schulte W (1997) Manual para mapeamento de Biótopos no Brazil. Funacao Alexander Brandt, Belo Horizonte

    Google Scholar 

  • Beierkuhnlein C (1998) Biodiversität und Raum. Erde 128:81–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Biadun W (1994) The breeding avifauna of the parks and cemeteries of Lublin (SE Poland). Acta Ornithol 29:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • BioFrankfurt (2018) https://www.biofrankfurt.de/. Accessed 7 May 2018

  • Breuste J (1994a) “Urbanisierung” des Naturschutzgedankens: Diskussion von gegenwärtigen Problemen des Stadtnaturschutzes. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 26(6):214–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuste J (1994b) Flächennutzung als stadtökologische Steuergröße und Indikator. Geobotan Kolloquium 11:67–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuste J, Schnellinger J, Qureshi S, Faggi A (2013a) Investigations on habitat provision and recreation as ecosystem services in urban parks – two case studies in Linz and Buenos Aires. In: Breuste J, Pauleit S, Pain J (eds) Stadtlandschaft – vielfältige Natur und ungleiche Entwicklung. Schriftenreihe des Kompetenznetzwerkes Stadtökologie. CONTUREC 5, Darmstadt, pp 5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuste J, Schnellinger J, Qureshi S, Faggi A (2013b) Urban ecosystem services on the local level: urban green spaces as providers. Ekologia 32(3):290–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuste J, Pauleit S, Haase D, Sauerwein M (2016) Stadtökosysteme. Funktion, Management, Entwicklung. Springer Spektrum, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (BmU) (2007) Nationale Strategie zur biologischen Vielfalt. Vom Bundeskabinett am 7. November 2007 beschlossen. Reihe Umweltpolitik, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit, Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BmU, BfN) (2016) Naturbewusstsein 2015. Bevölkerungsumfrage zu Natur und biologischer Vielfalt, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (COP) (2009) Report on the first expert workshop on the development of the City Biodiversity Index in the first expert workshop on the development of the City Biodiversity Index, Singapore City, February 10–12. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/city/ewdcbi-01/official/ewdcbi-01-03-en.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2010

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (COP) (2010) Report on the second workshop on the development of the City Biodiversity Index in the second expert workshop on the development of the City Biodiversity Index, Singapore City, July 1–3. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/city/ewdcbi-02/official/ewdcbi-02-03-en.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2010

  • Czermak P (2008) Ökologische Bewertung von Parkanlagen der Stadt Linz auf der Basis des Datenbestandes der Brutvogelkartierung. Master Thesis, Facutly Natural Sciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Deichsel R (2007) Habitatfragmentierung in der urbanen Landschaft – Konsequenzen für die Biodiversität und Mobilität epigäischer Käfer (Coleoptera: Carabidae und Staphylinidae) am Beospiel Berliner Waldfragmente. Ph.D Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2015) Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities: final report of the horizon 2020 expert group on “Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities” (full version). Brussels, S 1–70. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/towards-eu-research-and-innovation-policy-agenda-nature-based-solutions-re-naturing-cities. Accessed 7 Dec 2021

  • European Commission, European Commission’s Directorate-General Environment (2012) The multifunctionality of green infrastructure, science for environment policy | In-depth reports | DG Environment News Alert Service. Brussels, pp. 1–37. www.ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/.../Green_Infrastructure.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Flade M, Grüneberg C, Sudfeldt C, Wahl J (2008) Birds and biodiversity in Germany – 2010 target. Dachverband Deutscher Avifaunisten, Steckby

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3(4):390–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gloor S, Bontadina F, Heggelin D, Deplazes P, Breitenmoser U (2001) The rise of urban fox populations in Switzerland. Mamm Biol 66:155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand KL, Freeman C, Seddon PJ, Stein A, van Heezik Y (2016) A novel method for fine-scale biodiversity assessment and prediction across diverse urban landscapes reveals social deprivation-related inequalities in private, not public spaces. Landsc Urban Plan 151:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobohm C (2000) Biodiversität. UTB 2162. Quelle & Meyer, Wiebelsheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Hof A, Keul A (2017) Objektive und subjektive Biodiversität städtischer Parks. AGIT J Angewandte Geoinform 3:364–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki J (1999) Occurence of breeding bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broad-scales variables. Urban Ecosyst 3(1):21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabisch N, Frantzeskaki N, Pauleit S, Artmann M, Davis M, Haase D, Knapp S, Korn H, Stadler J, Zaunberger K, Bonn A (2016) Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas – perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, opportunities and barriers for action. Ecol Soc 21:39. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239. Accessed 13 Mar 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (1992) Das Besondere der städtischen Flora und Vegetation. In: Natur in der Stadt – der Beitrag der Landespflege zur Stadtentwicklung. Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rates für Landespflege 61:33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (1998) Auswirkungen der Urbanisierung auf Arten und Lebensgemeinschaften – Risiken, Chancen und Handlungsansätze. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 29:173–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity and conservation. Environ Pollut 159(8–9):1974–1983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn I, Brandl R, Klotz S (2004) The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evol Ecol Res 6:749–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmhöfer A (2010) Die üppig Blühende. Frankfurter Rundschau. 7 October, S R2

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Ewing K (2001) Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restor Ecol 9(3):280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller N, Werner P, Kelcey JG (2010) Urban biodiversity and design. Blackwell, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NABU (2018) Fast nur Verlierer unter den Gartenvögeln. News. https://www.nabu.de. Accessed 28 May 2018

  • Naturkapital Deutschland – TEEB DE (2016) Ökosystemleistungen in der Stadt – Gesundheit schützen und Lebensqualität erhöhen. Edited by Ingo Kowarik, Robert Bartz und Miriam Brenck. Technische Universität Berlin, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ. Berlin, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Kotze J, Ashworth A, Brandmayr P, Desender K, New T, Penev L, Samways M, Spence J (2000) The search for common anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity: a global network. J Insect Conserv 4:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottich I, Bönsel D, Gregor T, Malten A, Zizka G (2009) Natur vor der Haustür – Stadtnatur in Frankfurt am Main. E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Palliwoda J, Kowarik I, Moritz von der Lippe (2017) Human-biodiversity interactions in urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning 157:394–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Peris S, Montelongo T (2014) Birds and small urban parks: a study in a high plateau city. Turk J Zool 38(3):316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pett TJ, Shwartz A, Irvine KN, Dallimer M, Davies ZG (2016) Unpacking the people – biodiversity paradox. A conceptual framework. Bioscience 66(7):576–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pysek P (1998) Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82:282–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raino J, Niemelä J (2003) Ground beetles (Colooptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 12:487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandström UG, Angelstam P, Mikusinski G (2006) Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landsc Urban Plan 77:39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler T, Obrist MK, Duelli P, Moretti M (2011) Urban arthropod communities: added value or just a blend of surrounding biodiversity? Landsc Urban Plan 103:347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N, Moretti M, Bugalho MN, Davies ZG, Haase D, Hack J, Hof A, Melero Y, Pett TJ, Knapp S (2017) Understanding biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships in urban areas: a comprehensive literature review. Ecosyst Serv 27:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz A, Turbé A, Simon L, Julliard R (2014) Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: an experiment. Biol Conserv 171:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp H, Kunick W, Schneider C (1980) Biotopkartierung im besiedelten Bereich von Berlin (West): Part II: Zur Methodik von Geländearbeit. Gart Landsch 7:565–569

    Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (2011) TEEB Manual for cities: ecosystem services in urban management. http://www.naturkapitalteeb.de/aktuelles.html. Accessed 26 Aug 2014

  • Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thiess C (2002) Characteristics of insect populations in habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1992) Convention on biological diversity, Rio de Janeiro. www.dgvn.de/fileadmin/user…/UEbereinkommen_ueber_biologische_Vielfalt.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2018

  • User’s Manual on the Singapore Index on Cities’ Biodiversity (also known as the City Biodiversity Index) (2014) https://www.cbd.int/…/city/…/subws-2014-01-singapore-index-m. Accessed 2 June 2018

  • Voigt A, Kabisch N, Wurster D, Haase J, Breuste J (2014) Structural diversity – a multi-dimensional approach to assess recreational services in urban parks. Ambio 43(3):480–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl J, Dröschmeister R, Gerlach B, Grüneberg C, Langgemach T, Trautmann S, Sudfeldt C (2015) Vögel in Deutschland 2014. Dachverband Deutscher Avifaunisten, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissmair W, Rubenser H, Brander M, Schauberger R (2000–2001) Linzer Brutvogelatlas. Naturkundliches Jahrbuch der Stadt Linz 46(47):1–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner P (1996) Welche Bedeutung haben räumliche Dimensionen und Beziehungen für die Verbreitung von Pflanzen und Tieren im besiedelten Bereich. Gleditschia 24(1–2):303–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner P (2011) Stadtbiotopkartierung, City Biodiversity Index und Co.: Biodiversität der Städte im Spiegelbild von Indikatoren und Naturschutzzielen. 5. Conturec-Tagung: Stadtlandschaft – vielfältige Natur und ungleiche Entwicklung, Laufen und Salzburg 22.–24.09.2011, Presentation 22 Sept 2011 – Laufen

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner P, Zahner R (2009) Biologische Vielfalt und Städte. In: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (ed) BfN-Skripten 245. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford V, Ennos AR, Handley JF (2001) City form and natural processes – indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 57(2):91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 12:213–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1977) Evolution of species diversity in land communities. Evol Biol 10:1–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig R, Niekisch M (2014) Biodiversität. Grundlagen, Gefährdung, Schutz. Springer Spektrum, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurster D, Artmann M, Breuste J (2014) Meeting supply and demand of ecosystem services in built-up areas: an illusion? Korea, Unveröffentlichtes Vortragsmaterial URBIO Konferenz

    Google Scholar 

  • Zippel S (2016) Urban parks in Shanghai. Study of visitors’ demands and present supply of recreational services. Master Thesis, Faculty Environmental Sciences, Techn. University Dresden, Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziter C (2016) The biodiversity-ecosystem service relationship in urban areas: a quantitative review. Oikos 125:761–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen Breuste .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Breuste, J. (2022). What Constitutes Urban Biodiversity?. In: The Green City. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63976-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics