Abstract
Biodiversity is often perceived only as species diversity. However, the structure of habitats is part of it and makes biodiversity comprehensible. This also applies to urban biodiversity. Like urban nature as a whole, designed biodiversity is based on urban structures and their maintenance and management. Biodiversity is shaped in the city and can therefore also be increased or reduced.
There is often a broad view of urban that always sees it (only) in the context of ecosystem and thus subsumes all the services of urban under the name “biodiversity”. However, this devalues the concept of biodiversity and detaches it from its content.
Biodiversity in cities, like biodiversity in general, is diversity of species and habitats and genetic diversity of species. That this has a positive effect on people as city dwellers is often claimed, but needs concretisation, also to improve and expand this effect. People usually perceive biodiversity only fragmentarily and “in passing”, so to speak, but often do not know what lies behind the term. This is confirmed by many studies. However, they perceive and value the diversity of natural structures and (observable) species very accurately. If diversity is valued positively, this also applies to biological diversity. Contact with nature is generally seen as positive and is in demand, even in cities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Angold PG, Sadler JP, Hill MO, Pullin A, Rushton S, Austin K, Small E, Wood B, Wadsworth R, Sanderson R, Thompson K (2006) Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Sci Total Environ 360:196–204
Arbeitsgruppe Methodik der Biotopkartierung im besiedelten Bereich (1986) Flächendeckende Biotopkartierung im besiedelten Bereich als Grundlage einer ökologisch bzw. am Naturschutz orientierten Planung: Grundprogramm für die Bestandsaufnahme und Gliederung des besiedelten Bereichs und dessen Randzonen. Natur Landsch 61(10):371–389
Arbeitsgruppe Methodik der Biotopkartierung im besiedelten Bereich (1993) Flächendeckende Biotopkartierung im besiedelten Bereich als Grundlage einer am Naturschutz orientierten Planung: Programm für die Bestandsaufnahme, Gliederung und Bewertung des besiedelten Bereichs und dessen Randzonen: Überarbeitete Fassung 1993. Natur Landsch 68(10):491–526
Bedé L, Weber W, Resende S, Piper W, Schulte W (1997) Manual para mapeamento de Biótopos no Brazil. Funacao Alexander Brandt, Belo Horizonte
Beierkuhnlein C (1998) Biodiversität und Raum. Erde 128:81–101
Biadun W (1994) The breeding avifauna of the parks and cemeteries of Lublin (SE Poland). Acta Ornithol 29:1–13
BioFrankfurt (2018) https://www.biofrankfurt.de/. Accessed 7 May 2018
Breuste J (1994a) “Urbanisierung” des Naturschutzgedankens: Diskussion von gegenwärtigen Problemen des Stadtnaturschutzes. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 26(6):214–220
Breuste J (1994b) Flächennutzung als stadtökologische Steuergröße und Indikator. Geobotan Kolloquium 11:67–81
Breuste J, Schnellinger J, Qureshi S, Faggi A (2013a) Investigations on habitat provision and recreation as ecosystem services in urban parks – two case studies in Linz and Buenos Aires. In: Breuste J, Pauleit S, Pain J (eds) Stadtlandschaft – vielfältige Natur und ungleiche Entwicklung. Schriftenreihe des Kompetenznetzwerkes Stadtökologie. CONTUREC 5, Darmstadt, pp 5–22
Breuste J, Schnellinger J, Qureshi S, Faggi A (2013b) Urban ecosystem services on the local level: urban green spaces as providers. Ekologia 32(3):290–304
Breuste J, Pauleit S, Haase D, Sauerwein M (2016) Stadtökosysteme. Funktion, Management, Entwicklung. Springer Spektrum, Berlin
Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (BmU) (2007) Nationale Strategie zur biologischen Vielfalt. Vom Bundeskabinett am 7. November 2007 beschlossen. Reihe Umweltpolitik, Berlin
Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit, Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BmU, BfN) (2016) Naturbewusstsein 2015. Bevölkerungsumfrage zu Natur und biologischer Vielfalt, Berlin
Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69
Convention on Biological Diversity (COP) (2009) Report on the first expert workshop on the development of the City Biodiversity Index in the first expert workshop on the development of the City Biodiversity Index, Singapore City, February 10–12. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/city/ewdcbi-01/official/ewdcbi-01-03-en.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2010
Convention on Biological Diversity (COP) (2010) Report on the second workshop on the development of the City Biodiversity Index in the second expert workshop on the development of the City Biodiversity Index, Singapore City, July 1–3. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/city/ewdcbi-02/official/ewdcbi-02-03-en.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2010
Czermak P (2008) Ökologische Bewertung von Parkanlagen der Stadt Linz auf der Basis des Datenbestandes der Brutvogelkartierung. Master Thesis, Facutly Natural Sciences, University of Salzburg, Salzburg
Deichsel R (2007) Habitatfragmentierung in der urbanen Landschaft – Konsequenzen für die Biodiversität und Mobilität epigäischer Käfer (Coleoptera: Carabidae und Staphylinidae) am Beospiel Berliner Waldfragmente. Ph.D Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin
European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2015) Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities: final report of the horizon 2020 expert group on “Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities” (full version). Brussels, S 1–70. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/towards-eu-research-and-innovation-policy-agenda-nature-based-solutions-re-naturing-cities. Accessed 7 Dec 2021
European Commission, European Commission’s Directorate-General Environment (2012) The multifunctionality of green infrastructure, science for environment policy | In-depth reports | DG Environment News Alert Service. Brussels, pp. 1–37. www.ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/.../Green_Infrastructure.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2018
Flade M, Grüneberg C, Sudfeldt C, Wahl J (2008) Birds and biodiversity in Germany – 2010 target. Dachverband Deutscher Avifaunisten, Steckby
Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3(4):390–394
Gloor S, Bontadina F, Heggelin D, Deplazes P, Breitenmoser U (2001) The rise of urban fox populations in Switzerland. Mamm Biol 66:155–164
Hand KL, Freeman C, Seddon PJ, Stein A, van Heezik Y (2016) A novel method for fine-scale biodiversity assessment and prediction across diverse urban landscapes reveals social deprivation-related inequalities in private, not public spaces. Landsc Urban Plan 151:33–44
Hobohm C (2000) Biodiversität. UTB 2162. Quelle & Meyer, Wiebelsheim
Hof A, Keul A (2017) Objektive und subjektive Biodiversität städtischer Parks. AGIT J Angewandte Geoinform 3:364–373
Jokimäki J (1999) Occurence of breeding bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broad-scales variables. Urban Ecosyst 3(1):21–34
Kabisch N, Frantzeskaki N, Pauleit S, Artmann M, Davis M, Haase D, Knapp S, Korn H, Stadler J, Zaunberger K, Bonn A (2016) Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas – perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, opportunities and barriers for action. Ecol Soc 21:39. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239. Accessed 13 Mar 2018
Kowarik I (1992) Das Besondere der städtischen Flora und Vegetation. In: Natur in der Stadt – der Beitrag der Landespflege zur Stadtentwicklung. Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rates für Landespflege 61:33–47
Kowarik I (1998) Auswirkungen der Urbanisierung auf Arten und Lebensgemeinschaften – Risiken, Chancen und Handlungsansätze. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 29:173–190
Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity and conservation. Environ Pollut 159(8–9):1974–1983
Kühn I, Brandl R, Klotz S (2004) The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evol Ecol Res 6:749–764
Lehmhöfer A (2010) Die üppig Blühende. Frankfurter Rundschau. 7 October, S R2
Marzluff JM, Ewing K (2001) Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restor Ecol 9(3):280–292
Müller N, Werner P, Kelcey JG (2010) Urban biodiversity and design. Blackwell, Singapore
NABU (2018) Fast nur Verlierer unter den Gartenvögeln. News. https://www.nabu.de. Accessed 28 May 2018
Naturkapital Deutschland – TEEB DE (2016) Ökosystemleistungen in der Stadt – Gesundheit schützen und Lebensqualität erhöhen. Edited by Ingo Kowarik, Robert Bartz und Miriam Brenck. Technische Universität Berlin, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ. Berlin, Leipzig
Niemelä J, Kotze J, Ashworth A, Brandmayr P, Desender K, New T, Penev L, Samways M, Spence J (2000) The search for common anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity: a global network. J Insect Conserv 4:3–9
Ottich I, Bönsel D, Gregor T, Malten A, Zizka G (2009) Natur vor der Haustür – Stadtnatur in Frankfurt am Main. E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart
Palliwoda J, Kowarik I, Moritz von der Lippe (2017) Human-biodiversity interactions in urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning 157:394–406
Peris S, Montelongo T (2014) Birds and small urban parks: a study in a high plateau city. Turk J Zool 38(3):316–325
Pett TJ, Shwartz A, Irvine KN, Dallimer M, Davies ZG (2016) Unpacking the people – biodiversity paradox. A conceptual framework. Bioscience 66(7):576–583
Pysek P (1998) Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82:282–294
Raino J, Niemelä J (2003) Ground beetles (Colooptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 12:487–506
Sandström UG, Angelstam P, Mikusinski G (2006) Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landsc Urban Plan 77:39–53
Sattler T, Obrist MK, Duelli P, Moretti M (2011) Urban arthropod communities: added value or just a blend of surrounding biodiversity? Landsc Urban Plan 103:347–361
Schwarz N, Moretti M, Bugalho MN, Davies ZG, Haase D, Hack J, Hof A, Melero Y, Pett TJ, Knapp S (2017) Understanding biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships in urban areas: a comprehensive literature review. Ecosyst Serv 27:161–171
Shwartz A, Turbé A, Simon L, Julliard R (2014) Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: an experiment. Biol Conserv 171:82–90
Sukopp H, Kunick W, Schneider C (1980) Biotopkartierung im besiedelten Bereich von Berlin (West): Part II: Zur Methodik von Geländearbeit. Gart Landsch 7:565–569
TEEB (2011) TEEB Manual for cities: ecosystem services in urban management. http://www.naturkapitalteeb.de/aktuelles.html. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thiess C (2002) Characteristics of insect populations in habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239
United Nations (1992) Convention on biological diversity, Rio de Janeiro. www.dgvn.de/fileadmin/user…/UEbereinkommen_ueber_biologische_Vielfalt.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2018
User’s Manual on the Singapore Index on Cities’ Biodiversity (also known as the City Biodiversity Index) (2014) https://www.cbd.int/…/city/…/subws-2014-01-singapore-index-m. Accessed 2 June 2018
Voigt A, Kabisch N, Wurster D, Haase J, Breuste J (2014) Structural diversity – a multi-dimensional approach to assess recreational services in urban parks. Ambio 43(3):480–491
Wahl J, Dröschmeister R, Gerlach B, Grüneberg C, Langgemach T, Trautmann S, Sudfeldt C (2015) Vögel in Deutschland 2014. Dachverband Deutscher Avifaunisten, Münster
Weissmair W, Rubenser H, Brander M, Schauberger R (2000–2001) Linzer Brutvogelatlas. Naturkundliches Jahrbuch der Stadt Linz 46(47):1–318
Werner P (1996) Welche Bedeutung haben räumliche Dimensionen und Beziehungen für die Verbreitung von Pflanzen und Tieren im besiedelten Bereich. Gleditschia 24(1–2):303–314
Werner P (2011) Stadtbiotopkartierung, City Biodiversity Index und Co.: Biodiversität der Städte im Spiegelbild von Indikatoren und Naturschutzzielen. 5. Conturec-Tagung: Stadtlandschaft – vielfältige Natur und ungleiche Entwicklung, Laufen und Salzburg 22.–24.09.2011, Presentation 22 Sept 2011 – Laufen
Werner P, Zahner R (2009) Biologische Vielfalt und Städte. In: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (ed) BfN-Skripten 245. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn
Whitford V, Ennos AR, Handley JF (2001) City form and natural processes – indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 57(2):91–103
Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 12:213–251
Whittaker RH (1977) Evolution of species diversity in land communities. Evol Biol 10:1–67
Wittig R, Niekisch M (2014) Biodiversität. Grundlagen, Gefährdung, Schutz. Springer Spektrum, Berlin
Wurster D, Artmann M, Breuste J (2014) Meeting supply and demand of ecosystem services in built-up areas: an illusion? Korea, Unveröffentlichtes Vortragsmaterial URBIO Konferenz
Zippel S (2016) Urban parks in Shanghai. Study of visitors’ demands and present supply of recreational services. Master Thesis, Faculty Environmental Sciences, Techn. University Dresden, Dresden
Ziter C (2016) The biodiversity-ecosystem service relationship in urban areas: a quantitative review. Oikos 125:761–768
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breuste, J. (2022). What Constitutes Urban Biodiversity?. In: The Green City. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63976-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63976-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63975-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63976-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)