Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Opportunities and Challenges for the Design of Inherently Safe Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Robotics

Abstract

An approach for solving the challenges that arise from the increased complexity of modern assembly tasks is believed to be human robot co-operation. In these hybrid workplaces humans and robots do not only work on the same task or interact during certain assembly steps, but also have overlapping workspaces. Therefore, ‘safe robots’ should be developed that do not harm workers in case of a collision. In this chapter, an overview of methods for designing a hardware based soft robot that is inherently safe in human-machine interaction is given. Recent projects show that robots could be soft enough for interaction but they are not able to resist forces that occur in the assembly process. Current solutions show that the designer of such robots must face a trade-off between softness and dexterity on the one hand and rigidity and load carrying capabilities on the other hand. A promising approach is to integrate variable stiffness elements in the robotic system. The chapter classifies two main design rules to achieve stiffness variability, the tuning of material properties and geometric parameters. Existing solutions are described and four concepts are presented to show how different mechanisms and materials could be combined to design safe assembly robots with a variable stiffness structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trivedi D, Rahn C, Kier W, et al. (2008) Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research. Appl. Bionics and Biomechanics 5(3): 99–117

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim S, Laschi C, Trimmer B (2013) Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolutions in robotics. Trends in Biotechnology 31(5):287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bischoff R, Kurth J, Schreiber G, et al (2010) The KUKA-DLR Lightweight Robot arm - a new reference platform for robotics research and manufacturing. 41st Robotics (ISR) and 6th German Conf. on Robotics (ROBOTIK): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matthias B, Kock S, Jerregard H, et al. (2011) Safety of Collaborative Industrial Robots. IEEE Int. Symp. on Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM): 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rolf M, Steil J (2012) Constant curvature continuum kinematics as fast approximate model for the Bionic Handling Assistant. IEEE /RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems: 3440–3446

    Google Scholar 

  6. Seok S, Onal C, Cho K, Wood R (2012) Meshworm: A Peristaltic Soft Robot with An-tagonistic Nickel Titanium Coil Actuators. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics: 1485–1497

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kang R, Branson D, Zheng T, et al. (2013) Design, modeling and control of a pneumati-cally actuated manipulator inspired by biological continuum structures. Bioinspiration & Biometrics 8(3)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ranzani T, Cianchetti M, Gerboni G, et al. (2013) A modular soft manipulator with vari-able stiffness. 3rd Joint Workshop on New Technologies for Computer/Robot Assisted Surgery

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng N, Lobovsky M, Keating S, et al. (2012) Design and Analysis of a Robust, Low cost, Highly Articulated Manipulator Enabled by Jamming of Granular Media. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation: 4328–4333

    Google Scholar 

  10. Majidi C (2013) Soft Robotics: A Perspective – Current Trends and Prospects for the Fu-ture. Soft Robotics 1(1):5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim Y, Cheng S, Kim S, Iagnemma K (2013) A Novel Layer Jamming Mechanism With Tunable Stiffness Capability for Minimally Invasive Surgery. IEEE Transactions on Ro-botics 29(4): 1031–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmitt J, Last P, Löchte C, Raatz A (2009) TRoBS – A Biological Inspired Robot. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Biomimetics: 51–56

    Google Scholar 

  13. Follmer S, Leithinger D, Olwal A, et al. (2012) Jamming User Interfaces: Programmable Particle Stiffness and Sensing for Malleable and Shape-Changing Devices. 25th ACM Symp.on User interface software and technology: 519–528

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taniguchi H, Miyake M, Suzumori K (2010) Development of New Soft Actuator Using Magnetic Intelligent Fluids for Flexible Walking Robot. Int. Conf. on Control, Automa-tion and Systems, Oct., 2010: 1797–1801

    Google Scholar 

  15. Majidi C, Wood R J (2010) Tunable elastic stiffness with microconfined magnetorheo-logical domains at low magnetic field. Applied Physics Letters 97: 164104-1-164104-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Calvert P (2009) Hydrogels for Soft Machines. Adv. Materials 21: 743–756

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haraguchi K (2007) Nanocomposite hydrogels. Current Opinion in Solid State Materials and Science 11:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  18. Loizou E, Butler P, Porcar L, et al. (2006) Dynamic Responses in Nanocomposite Hy-drogels. Macromolecules 39:1614–1619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Löchte C, Kunz H, Schnurr R, Dietrich F, Raatz A, Dilger K, Dröder K. (2013) Form-Flexible Handling Technology for Automated Preforming. 19th Int. Conf. on Composite Materials (ICCM), Montreal, Canada, e-proc

    Google Scholar 

  20. Takashima K, Noritsugu T, Rossiter J, et al. (2011). Development of Curved Type Pneu-matic Artificial Rubber Muscle Using Shape-memory Polymer. SICE Annual Confer-ence, Tokyo, Japan: 1691–1695

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers J A (2013) A Clear Advance in Soft Actuators. Material Science 341:968–969

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hu T M, Park Y-J, Cho K-J (2012) Design and Analysis of a Stiffness Adjustable Struc-ture Using an Endoskeleton. Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 13(7): 1255–1258

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mc Knight G P Henry C P (2010) Deformable variable-stiffness cellular structures. US Patent 7,678,440

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hayashibara Y (2008) Study on Variable Stiffness Mechanism Using Wire Spring. Ro-botics and Mechatronics 20(2): 296-301

    Google Scholar 

  25. Galloway K C, Clark J E, Koditschek D E (2009) Design of a tunable stiffness composite leg for dynamic locomotion. Proc. of IDETC/CIE 2009: 1-8

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zuo S, Iijima K, Tokumiya T, Masamune K (2013) Variable stiffness outer sheath with “Dragon skin” structure and negative pneumatic shape-locking mechanism. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 2014: 1-9

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vos R, Barret R, Romkes A (2011) Mechanics of pressure-adaptive honeycomb. Intelli-gent Material Systems and Structures 22(10): 1041-1055

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shan Y, Lotfi A, Philen M (2008) Fluidic Flexible Matrix Composites for Autonomous Structural Tailoring. Proc. of SPIE 6525: 652517-1-652517-14

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shepherd et al. (2011) Multigait soft robots. Proc. of the National Academy of Science 108(51):20400-20403

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    Annika Raatz, Sebastian Blankemeyer, Gundula Runge, Christopher Bruns & Gunnar Borchert

Authors
  1. Annika Raatz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sebastian Blankemeyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gundula Runge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher Bruns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gunnar Borchert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer IPA, Stuttgart, Germany

    Alexander Verl

  2. DLR Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics, Wessling, Germany

    Alin Albu-Schäffer

  3. TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Oliver Brock

  4. Leibniz University of Hannover, Garbsen, Germany

    Annika Raatz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Raatz, A., Blankemeyer, S., Runge, G., Bruns, C., Borchert, G. (2015). Opportunities and Challenges for the Design of Inherently Safe Robots. In: Verl, A., Albu-Schäffer, A., Brock, O., Raatz, A. (eds) Soft Robotics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44506-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44506-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44505-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44506-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation