Abstract
The integrity of the Australian Height Datum (AHD) has remained in some question ever since its adoption in 1971. Indeed, its creators commented that using 30 tide gauges ‘placed a strain’ on the least-squares network adjustment of the —97,230 km of spirit levelling used to realise the AHD. Although the AHD seems to have served Australians well, the question remains — can the AHD be improved? Of course, re-levelling an entire continent the size of Australia is prohibitively expensive, especially in the current climate of economic rationalism. Therefore, a proposal is made to enhance and redefine the AHD using the additional levelling data collected since 1971, mean sea level observations made at new tide gauges, models of the sea-surface topography, nation-wide GPS height networks and a regionally refined gravimetric geoid model. This proposal is balanced against the arguments in favour of retaining the existing AHD, coupled with a geoid model that has been warped to fit the existing AHD using nation-wide GPS networks co-located with AHD benchmarks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allister N, Featherstone WE (2001) Determination of Helmert orthometric heights using digital barcode levelling, observed gravity and topographic mass-density data over part of the Darling Scarp, Western Australia. Geom Res Aust 75 (in press)
Carroll D, Morse MP (1996) A national DEM for resource and environmental management, Cartography 25: 395–405
Claessens S, Featherstone WE, Barthelmes F (2001) Experiments with free-positioned point-mass geoid modelling in the Perth region of Western Australia. Geom Res Aust 75 (in press)
Featherstone WE (1998) Do we need a gravimetric geoid or a model of the base of the Australian Height Datum to transform GPS heights? Aust Surv 43: 273–280
Featherstone WE (2000a) Towards unification of the AHD between the Australian mainland and Tasmania using GPS and AUSGeoid98. Geom Res Aust 73: 33–54
Featherstone WE (2000b) Refinement of a gravimetric geoid using GPS and levelling data. J SurvEng 126: 27–56
Featherstone WE, Guo W (2001) A spatial evaluation of the precision of AUSGeoid98 versus AUSGeoid93 using GPS and levelling data. Geom Res Aust 74: 75–102
Featherstone WE, Kirby JF (2000) The reduction of aliasing in gravity anomalies and geoid heights using digital terrain data. Geophys J Int 141: 204–212
Featherstone WE, Kirby JF, Kearsley AHW, Gilliland JR, Johnston GM, Steed J, Forsberg R, Sideris MG (2001) The AUSGeoid98 geoid model of Australia: data treatment, computations and comparisons with GPS-levelling data. J Geod 75: 313–330.
Forsberg R, Featherstone WE (1998) Geoids and cap sizes. In: Forsberg R, Feissl M, Dietrich R (eds) Geodesy on the Move, Springer, Berlin, pp 194–200
Hipkin RG (2000) Modelling the geoid and sea-surface topography in coastal areas, Phys Chem Earth 25: 9–16
Johnston GM, Luton GC (2001) GPS and the Australian Height Datum. Proc 5th Int Symp on Satellite Navigation Technology and Applications, Canberra, July.
Kirby JF, Featherstone WE (1999) Terrain correcting Australian gravity observations using the national digital elevation model and the fast Fourier transform. Aust J Earth Sci 46: 555–562
Kirby JF, Featherstone WE (2001) Anomalously large gradients in the “GEODATA 9 SECOND” Digital Elevation Model of Australia, and their effects on gravimetric terrain corrections, Cartography 30: 1–10.
Kirby JF, Forsberg R (1998) A comparison of techniques for the integration of satellite altimeter and surface gravity data for geoid determination. In: Forsberg R, Feissl M, Dietrich R (eds) Geodesy on the Move, Springer, Berlin, pp 207–212
Lemoine FG and 14 other authors (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96, TP-1998–206861, NASA, Maryland.
Martinec Z, Vanìcek P, Mainville A, Veronneau M (1996) Evaluation of topographical effects in geoid computation from densely sampled heights. J Geod 70: 746–754
Murray AS (1997) The Australian national gravity database. AGSO JAust Geol & Geovhvs 17:145–155
Roelse A, Granger HW, Graham JW (1971) The adjustment of the Australian levelling survey 1970–71, Report 12, Division of National Mapping, Canberra
Sandwell DT, Smith WHF (1997) Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS 1 satellite altimetry. J Geophys Res 102: 10039–10054
Sargeant B, Featherstone WE (submitted) Comparison of the 1971 free and fixed adjustments of the AHD with seasurface topography models. Geom Res Aust (submitted Jan 2001)
Smith DA, Roman DR (1999) GEOID99 and G99SSS: 1arc-minute geoid models for the United States. J Geod 75: 469–490
Tziavos IN, Featherstone WE (2000) First results of using digital density data in gravimetric geoid computation in Australia. In: Sideris MG (ed) Gravity, Geoid and Geodynamics 2000, Springer, Berlin, pp 335–340
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Featherstone, W.E. (2002). Prospects for the Australian Height Datum and Geoid Model. In: Ádám, J., Schwarz, KP. (eds) Vistas for Geodesy in the New Millennium. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 125. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04709-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04709-5_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07791-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04709-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive