Skip to main content

Application of Rapid X-Ray Diffraction (Xrd) and Cluster Analysis to Grade Control of Iron Ores

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 10th International Congress for Applied Mineralogy (ICAM)

Abstract

Traditionally, grade control of iron ores has relied on elemental analysis of sampled materials such as blast cone drill cuttings. This analysis provides a standard elemental suite (Fe, SiO2, Al2O3, P, Mn, S, MgO, CaO and TiO2 along with loss on ignition) that is used in grade control to assign mined material as grade blocks to high grade, low grade or waste destinations. However, the mineralogy of the sample is often not considered or at best inferred from visual geological logging of the sampled material. As such, mineral contaminants such as gibbsite, kaolinite and substituted goethite that cannot be identified visually and/or by chemical analysis alone are often not quantified. To address this issue Rio Tinto Iron Ore (RTIO) has trialled the application of rapid X-ray diffraction (XRD) to grade control in iron ore mining. RTIO provided PANalytical with 110 samples from two of its mine sites, referred to here as deposits A and B. The samples included high grade, low grade and waste materials. All samples were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively for major phases such as hematite Fe2O3 and goethite FeOOH and minor phases including kaolinite Al2Si2O5(OH)4, gibbsite Al(OH)3, quartz SiO2 and calcite CaCO3. Automated Rietveld quantification was undertaken for all samples to determine the phase composition. Substituted goethite was identified as a discrete phase. The analysis of the resultant mineralogical data was undertaken in three steps: data clustering, phase identification and phase quantification. Once the mineralogy of the samples was established the spatial distribution of the detected minerals was plotted for both deposits. Based on these plots the stratigraphy could be demarcated and mineralogically characterised. The additional information also provided the opportunity to blend and/or isolate these minerals throughout the defined theoretical grade blocks which included high grade, high grade with minor gibbsite, high grade beneficiation, low grade beneficiation, low grade other and waste. As such material with a propensity for higher degrees of beneficiation was identified and domained. Conversely, material with limited upgrade potential could be identified and not submitted to traditional forms of beneficiation. Based on this trial, rapid XRD analysis and associated cluster analysis was shown to offer additional criteria for the definition of theoretical grade blocks in iron ore mining which is potentially advantages compared with definitions based only on chemistry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Upadhyay, KR, Venkatesh, AS, and Roy, S (2010): Mineralogical characteristics of iron ores in Joda and Khondbond areas in Eastern India with implications on beneficiation. Resource Geology (60/2): 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, S, and Venkatesh, AS (2009): Mineralogy and geochemistry of banded iron formation and iron ores from eastern India with implications on their genesis. Journal of Earth Systems Science (118/6): 619–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, M, Ryan, E, Mackenzie, P, and Danaher, E (2011): It’s not just about the grades – using mineralogical data to enhance product quality in iron ore mining. In: Proceedings of Iron Ore 2011: in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaoka, Y, Nagaoka, S, Yamada, Y, and Ando, R (1974): Effects of gibbsite on sintering property and sinter quality. Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute Japan (14): 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L, Holmes, RJ, and Manuel, JR (2007): Effects of alumina on sintering performance of hematite iron ores. The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan (47/3): 349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, U, and Gobbo, L (2009): Modern X-ray diffraction techniques as a fast industrial analysis method for iron ores-from exploration to process control. In: Proceedings of Iron Ore 2009, Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Publication Series (No 7): 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Paine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paine, M., König, U., Staples, E. (2012). Application of Rapid X-Ray Diffraction (Xrd) and Cluster Analysis to Grade Control of Iron Ores. In: Broekmans, M. (eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Congress for Applied Mineralogy (ICAM). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27682-8_59

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics