Skip to main content

Regelungsaufgaben und Auslegungsziele

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flugregelung

Zusammenfassung

Das oberste Ziel bei der Auslegung von Flugzeugen ist die Sicherheit ; diesem sind alle übrigen Ziele untergeordnet. Ob es sich darum handelt, einen einzelnen Passagier nach einem Stadtrundflug wieder auf dem Ausgangsflugplatz zu landen, oder ob hunderte von Menschen in einem Großraumflugzeug von Frankfurt nach Tokio befördert werden sollen, immer geht es im zivilen Bereich ausschließlich darum, Menschen sicher an ihren Bestimmungsort zu bringen. Wirtschaftlichkeit, Flugkomfort und Pünktlichkeit sind zwar ebenfalls wichtige Ziele; sie sind demgegenüber aber von untergeordneter Bedeutung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literaturverzeichnis zu Kapitel 11

  • Adam, V.: On-board planning and control of 4D-trajectories in the TMA. In: DLR-Mitt. 89–23, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, P.: Flugsicherung in Deutschland. Motorbuch Verlag, Stuttgart 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhret, H.: Realisierungsprobleme eines integrierten Flugregelungssystems unter besonderer Berücksichtigung gekrümmter Flugbahnprofile. DLR Mitt. 74–29, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus, R.: Flugführungsprobleme des Steilanflugs. DLR-Mitteilungen 74–29 und 39–42, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalk, C.R. et al.: Backround information and user’s guide for MIL F-8785 B (Military specifications-flying qualities of piloted airplanes). AFFDL-TR-69–72, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A.: European Air Traffic Management. Ashgate Publishing, Abingdon, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, E.G., Harper, R.P.: The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities. NASA TN D-5153, Washington 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, W.P., Schafranek, D. et al.: Final report on a simulator study into low speed longitudinal handling qualities of ACT transport aircraft. GARTEUR TP 055, NLR TP 89387L, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieroff, M.: Flugführungskonzept mit GPS. DGON-Symposium „Satellitennavigation in der Flugführung“, Braunschweig 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dippe, D.: 4D-planner – a ground-based planning system for time accurate approach guidance. In: Integrated air traffic management. DLR-Mitt. 89–23, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, H.: Fliegbarkeitskriterien bei begrenzter Stellgeschwindigkeit. DLR-FB 97–15, Dissertation, TU Braunschweig 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, C., Varga, A., Bennani, S., Selier, M.: Advanced techniques for clearance of flight control laws. Springer LNCIS 283, Heidelberg 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.C.: The definition, understanding and design of aircraft handling qualities. Delft University of Technology, Report LR-756, Delft 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.C.: Development of a methodology for excellence in handling qualities design for fly by wire aircraft. Delft University Press, Delft 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverland, M.: Ein lernender Regler für die Flugzeuglängsbewegung. Dissertation, TU Braunschweig 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, O.: Flugsicherung. Springer, Berlin 1975.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, J.: Aircraft handling qualities. AIAA Education Series. AIAA, Reston, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhne, G.: Roll racheting: cause and analysis. Dissertation, TU Braunschweig 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joos, H.-D., Bals, J.: A multi-objektive optimisation-based software environment for control systems design. 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control System Design Proceedings, September 18–20, 2002. Glasgow, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, R.: Beiträge zur Erhöhung der Flugsicherheit in Windscherungen. Dissertation TU Braunschweig 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magni, J.-F., Bennani, S., Terlouw, J. (Hrsg.): Robust flight control – a design challenge. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 224. Springer, Berlin 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, D.T., Krendel, E.S.: Mathematical models of human pilot behaviour. AGARDograf Nr. 188, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, D.T., et al.: Aviation safety and pilot control – understanding and preventing unfavourable pilot vehicle interactions. National Academy Press, Washington 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensen, H.: Moderne Flugsicherung. Springer, Berlin 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miski, T.: Über die Eigenschaften der verallgemeinerten quadratischen Regelfläche. DLR-FB 74- 45, Dissertation TU Braunschweig 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchel, D.G., Klyde, D.H.: A critical examination of PIO prediction criteria. AIAA-98-4335, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooij, H.A.: Criteria for low speed longitudinal handling qualities of transport aircraft with closed-loop flight control systems. Dissertation, TH Delft 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K.: Minimale Realisierung von stationär genauen \(H_{2}/H_{\infty}\)-Reglern. Z. Automatisierungstechnik 40, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, T.P., Smith, R.E.: An in-flight investigation to develop control system design criteria for fighter aircraft. AFFDL-TR-70-04 Vol. 1, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, F.: Handling criteria. Journal of Royal Aeronautical Society, vol. 71, S. 271–291, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppelt, W.: Kleines Handbuch technischer Regelvorgänge. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim 1956.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Röger, W., Beh, H.: Gain and phase margin as a basis of longitudinal flying qualities evaluation. AGARD, Criteria for Handling Qualities of Military Aircraft, Conference Proceedings No. 333, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schänzer, G.: Design criteria for flight control systems. ICAS, paper 86-5.3.2, London 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selier, M., Korte, U., Fielding, C., Luckner, R.: New analysis techniques for clearance of flight control laws. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conferenceand Exhibit, Austin, Texas, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, D., Kaufhold, R.: Kopplung von Arrival- und Departure-Manager im Rahmen des Projektes K-ATM. DFS, Informationen aus dem Bereich Forschung und Entwicklung, Ausgabe 02/06, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundermeyer, P.: Untersuchungen zur Verlagerung der Pilotentätigkeit auf eine höhere hierarchische Stufe der Flugführung. Dissertation, TU Braunschweig 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobie, H.N., Elliot, E.M., Malcom, L.G.: A new longitudinal handling qualities criterion. Proceedings of the National Aerospace Electronics Conference S. 93–99, Dayton 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Étude de la sécurité des aéronefs en utilisation – ESAU. Association des Constructeurs de Materiel Aérospatial – AECMA, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Aerospace Flight Control Systems – General Specification for Design, Installation and Test of Piloted Military Aircraft. Aerospace Standard AS 94900, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Background information and users guide for MIL-F-9490D (General specifications for flight control systems – design, installation and test of piloted aircraft). AFFDL-TR-74-116, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Certification specifications for normal, utility, aerobatic and commuter category airplanes, CS-23. European Aviation Safety Agency EASA, Brussels 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Certification specifications for large aeroplanes, CS-25. European Aviation Safety Agency EASA, Brussels 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Certification Specifications for All Weather Operation, CS-AWO. European Aviation Safety Agency EASA, Brussels 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration. ISO 2631-1 Part I: General Requirements, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Federal aviation regulations FAR, Part 23 airworthiness standards, normal, utility and acrobatic airplanes. Federal Aviation Administration FAA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Federal Aviation Regulations FAR, Part 25 Airworthiness Standards, Transport Airplanes. Federal Aviation Administration FAA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Federal Aviation Regulations FAR, Part 33 Aircraft engines, Paragraphen 33.67 und 33.73. Federal Aviation Administration FAA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Flight Control Design – Best Practices. RTO-TR-029, Neuilly-Sur-Seine Cedex, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Guidance and control design considerations for low-altitude and terminal-area flight. AGARD CP 240, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Manual on „Flying Qualities Testing“. USAF-TPS, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Handling qualities criteria. AGARD-CP-106, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Handling qualities of unstable highly augmented aircraft. AGARD Advisory Report 279, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Joint Aviation Requirements. JAR-OPS 1, Commercial Air Transportation (Aeroplanes), Amendment 13, 1 May 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Luftfahrthandbuch der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. (AIP), Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH, Langen 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Lufttüchtigkeitsforderungen. Deutsche Übersetzung der US Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 23 und 25, Herausgegeben vom Luftfahrt-Bundesamt, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Luftverkehrsverordnung (LuftVO). Bundesanstalt für Flugsicherung – Büro Nachrichten für Luftfahrer, Frankfurt/Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Military Specification - Flight Control System – Design, Installation and Test of Piloted Aircraft. MIL-F-9490 D, US Air Force Department, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Military Standard – Flying qualities of piloted aircraft. MIL-STD-1797A, US Air Force Department, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Rules of the Air and Air Traffic Services. Doc. 4444-RAC/501, 13th Edition, ICAO, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Software considerations in airborne systems and equipement certification. RTCA DO-178B, Washington, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: USAF TPS Flight test handbook. Flying qualities: Theory (Vol. 1) and Flight Test Techniques (Vol. 2). AFFTC-TIH-79–2, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, J.C.: Wake Turbulence Aspects of Airbus A380-800 Aircraft. ICAO State Letter TEC/OPS/SEP-08-0294.SLG, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brockhaus, R., Alles, W., Luckner, R. (2011). Regelungsaufgaben und Auslegungsziele. In: Flugregelung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01443-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics