Skip to main content

Banking the Poor: Policies to Bring Low- and Moderate-Income Households in the United States into the Financial Mainstream

  • Chapter
New Frontiers in Banking Services

9.5 Conclusion

Low- and moderate-income households who use alternative financial service providers pay a high price to convert their income into cash, pay their bills, and obtain credit, and they lack a regular means to save. The high cost of alternative financial services undermines key income redistribution policies for the poor, including the EITC. Existing banking products are often not well designed to meet the needs of the poor, and few banks compete with alternative financial services providers for low-income customers, particularly in low-income neighborhoods. The cost to individual financial institutions of research, product development, account administration, staff training, marketing and financial education with respect to new financial products for the poor, relative to their expected financial return, means that the market is unlikely to change quickly on its own. In addition, network externalities in electronic payments systems and distribution networks suggest that net social benefit could be obtained through further expansion.

Financial and technological innovation has been a hallmark of U.S. financial markets. Financial institutions can harness that innovation to meet the needs of low-income Americans. Governmental incentives appear to be important to catalyze private sector efforts to use financial and technological progress to expand access to financial services for low- and moderate-income families. By helping these families to enter the financial services mainstream, the policies outlined here can help to transform financial services for low-income persons. Such a transformation is a key to promoting greater economic opportunities for low-income households.

This paper was originally published in an extended format as “Banking the Poor” in the Yale Journal on Regulation, vol. 21:121 (2004), © 2004, Yale Journal on Regulation, and was published in approximately its current form as Banking the Poor: Policies to Bring Low-Income Americans into the Financial Mainstream, Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Policy Brief (September 2004). The article is reproduced and adapted here with permission. For full citations please see Yale Journal on Regulation. The issues raised here are further explored in a new survey the author has just completed of low-and moderate-income households, the “Detroit Area Household Financial Services Study,” see http://www-personal.umich.edu/~msbarr/.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

9.6 References

  • Barr M. (2004), Banking the Poor, in “Yale Journal on Regulation”, vol. 21:121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr M. (2004), Banking the Poor: Policies to Bring Low-Income Americans into the Financial Mainstream, Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Policy Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berube A. et al. (2002), The Price of Paying Taxes: How Tax Preparation and Refund Loan Fees Erode the Benefits of the EITC, Brookings Institute & Progressive Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caskey J. (1994), Fringe Banking: Check-Cashing Outlets, Pawnshops, and the Poor, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove Consulting & U.S. Department of the Treasury (2000), Survey of Non-Bank Financial Institutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove Associates & U.S. Department of the Treasury (1998), ETA Initiative, Final Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove Associates & U.S. Department of the Treasury (1998), ETA Initiative: Optional Account Features, Economic Waterfall Analyses, Ed Bachelder & Isabelle Aguerre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove Associates (1999), ETA Conjoint Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve Bank (1998), A Summary of Consumer and Business Attitudes on Direct Deposit and Direct Payment, A National ACH Market Research Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve System (2002), Retail Payments Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve System (2002), Retail Payments Research Project: A Snapshot of the U.S. Payments Landscape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes G.R and J. K. Walton II (2002), The Use of Checks and Other Non-Cash Payment Instruments in the United States, in “Federal Reserve Bulletin”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan T.H. et al. (2000), To Surcharge or Not to Surcharge: An Empirical Investigation of ATM Pricing, in “Federal Reserve Board, Finance & Economics Discussion Series”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes T. et al. (2002), ATM Deployer Study, Dove Consulting Group & NYCE Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey D.B. and A.N. Berger (1990), Market Failure and Resource Use: Economic Incentives to Use Different Payment Instruments, in “The U.S. Payment System: Efficiency, Risk and the Role of the Federal Reserve”, (David B. Humphrey ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennickell A.B. et al. (2000), Recent Changes in U.S. Family Finances: Results from the 1998 Survey of Consumer Finances, in “Federal Reserve Bulletin”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyser B. (2001), Selected Characteristics of State EBT Systems, National Consumer Law Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orozco M. (2004), The Remittance Marketplace: Prices, Policy and Financial Institutions, Georgetown University, Institute for the Study of International Migration, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegman M.A. (1999), Savings for the Poor: the Hidden Benefits of Electronic Banking, Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegman M.A. and R. Faris (2003), Payday Lending: A Business Model That Encourages Chronic Borrowing, in “Economic Development Quarterly”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suro R. et al. (2002), Inter-American Development Bank, Billions in Motion: Latino Immigrants, Remittances and Banking, Pew Hispanic Center & Multilateral Investment Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Treasury (2002), Partnership for Prosperity: Report to President Vicente Fox & President George W. Bush.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barr, M.S. (2007). Banking the Poor: Policies to Bring Low- and Moderate-Income Households in the United States into the Financial Mainstream. In: Anderloni, L., Braga, M.D., Carluccio, E.M. (eds) New Frontiers in Banking Services. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46498-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics