9.5 Conclusion
Low- and moderate-income households who use alternative financial service providers pay a high price to convert their income into cash, pay their bills, and obtain credit, and they lack a regular means to save. The high cost of alternative financial services undermines key income redistribution policies for the poor, including the EITC. Existing banking products are often not well designed to meet the needs of the poor, and few banks compete with alternative financial services providers for low-income customers, particularly in low-income neighborhoods. The cost to individual financial institutions of research, product development, account administration, staff training, marketing and financial education with respect to new financial products for the poor, relative to their expected financial return, means that the market is unlikely to change quickly on its own. In addition, network externalities in electronic payments systems and distribution networks suggest that net social benefit could be obtained through further expansion.
Financial and technological innovation has been a hallmark of U.S. financial markets. Financial institutions can harness that innovation to meet the needs of low-income Americans. Governmental incentives appear to be important to catalyze private sector efforts to use financial and technological progress to expand access to financial services for low- and moderate-income families. By helping these families to enter the financial services mainstream, the policies outlined here can help to transform financial services for low-income persons. Such a transformation is a key to promoting greater economic opportunities for low-income households.
This paper was originally published in an extended format as “Banking the Poor” in the Yale Journal on Regulation, vol. 21:121 (2004), © 2004, Yale Journal on Regulation, and was published in approximately its current form as Banking the Poor: Policies to Bring Low-Income Americans into the Financial Mainstream, Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Policy Brief (September 2004). The article is reproduced and adapted here with permission. For full citations please see Yale Journal on Regulation. The issues raised here are further explored in a new survey the author has just completed of low-and moderate-income households, the “Detroit Area Household Financial Services Study,” see http://www-personal.umich.edu/~msbarr/.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
9.6 References
Barr M. (2004), Banking the Poor, in “Yale Journal on Regulation”, vol. 21:121.
Barr M. (2004), Banking the Poor: Policies to Bring Low-Income Americans into the Financial Mainstream, Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Policy Brief.
Berube A. et al. (2002), The Price of Paying Taxes: How Tax Preparation and Refund Loan Fees Erode the Benefits of the EITC, Brookings Institute & Progressive Policy Institute.
Caskey J. (1994), Fringe Banking: Check-Cashing Outlets, Pawnshops, and the Poor, Sage.
Dove Consulting & U.S. Department of the Treasury (2000), Survey of Non-Bank Financial Institutions.
Dove Associates & U.S. Department of the Treasury (1998), ETA Initiative, Final Report.
Dove Associates & U.S. Department of the Treasury (1998), ETA Initiative: Optional Account Features, Economic Waterfall Analyses, Ed Bachelder & Isabelle Aguerre.
Dove Associates (1999), ETA Conjoint Research.
Federal Reserve Bank (1998), A Summary of Consumer and Business Attitudes on Direct Deposit and Direct Payment, A National ACH Market Research Study.
Federal Reserve System (2002), Retail Payments Study.
Federal Reserve System (2002), Retail Payments Research Project: A Snapshot of the U.S. Payments Landscape.
Gerdes G.R and J. K. Walton II (2002), The Use of Checks and Other Non-Cash Payment Instruments in the United States, in “Federal Reserve Bulletin”.
Hannan T.H. et al. (2000), To Surcharge or Not to Surcharge: An Empirical Investigation of ATM Pricing, in “Federal Reserve Board, Finance & Economics Discussion Series”.
Hayes T. et al. (2002), ATM Deployer Study, Dove Consulting Group & NYCE Corp.
Humphrey D.B. and A.N. Berger (1990), Market Failure and Resource Use: Economic Incentives to Use Different Payment Instruments, in “The U.S. Payment System: Efficiency, Risk and the Role of the Federal Reserve”, (David B. Humphrey ed.).
Kennickell A.B. et al. (2000), Recent Changes in U.S. Family Finances: Results from the 1998 Survey of Consumer Finances, in “Federal Reserve Bulletin”.
Leyser B. (2001), Selected Characteristics of State EBT Systems, National Consumer Law Center.
Orozco M. (2004), The Remittance Marketplace: Prices, Policy and Financial Institutions, Georgetown University, Institute for the Study of International Migration, June.
Stegman M.A. (1999), Savings for the Poor: the Hidden Benefits of Electronic Banking, Brookings Institute.
Stegman M.A. and R. Faris (2003), Payday Lending: A Business Model That Encourages Chronic Borrowing, in “Economic Development Quarterly”.
Suro R. et al. (2002), Inter-American Development Bank, Billions in Motion: Latino Immigrants, Remittances and Banking, Pew Hispanic Center & Multilateral Investment Fund.
U.S. Department of the Treasury (2002), Partnership for Prosperity: Report to President Vicente Fox & President George W. Bush.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barr, M.S. (2007). Banking the Poor: Policies to Bring Low- and Moderate-Income Households in the United States into the Financial Mainstream. In: Anderloni, L., Braga, M.D., Carluccio, E.M. (eds) New Frontiers in Banking Services. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46498-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46498-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46497-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46498-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)