Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 476))

  • 1871 Accesses

Abstract

The automation of road intersections is increasingly considered as an inevitable next step toward a higher level of autonomy on our roads. For the particular case of fully automated vehicles, we propose a distributed model predictive control approach in which multiple agents are able to pass the intersection simultaneously while keeping a sufficient safety distance to conflicting agents. Therefore, each agent solves a local optimization problem subject to non-convex safety constraints which couple the agents. In order to handle these coupling constraints, we propose constraint prioritization. With that methodology, for two pairwise conflicting agents, the safety constraint is only imposed on the agent with lower priority which does not imply any a priori intersection passing order. Finally, we can solve the distributed optimization problem in parallel without any nested iterations. To solve the local non-convex optimization problems, we apply a semidefinite programming relaxation in combination with randomization to obtain appropriate and feasible solutions. A simulation study finally proves the efficacy of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This article extends the previous publication [20] published by the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC).

References

  1. Chen, L., Englund, C.: Cooperative intersection management: a survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17(2), 570–586 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wymeersch, H., de Campos, G.R., Falcone, P., Svensson, L., Ström, E.G.: Challenges for cooperative its: improving road safety through the integration of wireless communications, control, and positioning. In: International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications, pp. 573–578 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kamal, M.A.S., i. Imura, J., Hayakawa, T., Ohata, A., Aihara, K.: A vehicle-intersection coordination scheme for smooth flows of traffic without using traffic lights. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16(3), 1136–1147 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Murgovski, N., de Campos, G.R., Sjberg, J.: Convex modeling of conflict resolution at traffic intersections. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4708–4713 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quinlan, M., Au, T.C., Zhu, J., Stiurca, N., Stone, P.: Bringing simulation to life: a mixed reality autonomous intersection. In: Proceedings of IROS 2010-IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2010) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Campos, G.R., Falcone, P., Wymeersch, H., Hult, R., Sjoberg, J.: Cooperative receding horizon conflict resolution at traffic intersections. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2932–2937 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hafner, M.R., Cunningham, D., Caminiti, L., Vecchio, D.D.: Cooperative collision avoidance at intersections: algorithms and experiments. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 14(3), 1162–1175 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qian, X., Gregoire, J., de La Fortelle, A., Moutarde, F.: Decentralized model predictive control for smooth coordination of automated vehicles at intersection. In: European Control Conference, pp. 3452–3458 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hult, R., Campos, G.R., Falcone, P., Wymeersch, H.: An approximate solution to the optimal coordination problem for autonomous vehicles at intersections. In: IEEE American Control Conference, pp. 763–768 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, K.D., Kumar, P.R.: An mpc-based approach to provable system-wide safety and liveness of autonomous ground traffic. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 59(12), 3341–3356 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gregoire, J., Bonnabel, S., de La Fortelle, A.: Optimal cooperative motion planning for vehicles at intersections. In: Accurate Positioning and Mapping for Intelligent Vehicles, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hafner, M.R., Vecchio, D.D.: Computational tools for the safety control of a class of piecewise continuous systems with imperfect information on a partial order. SIAM J. Control Optim. 49(6), 2463–2493 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dresner, K., Stone, P.: A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 31(1), 591–656 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kowshik, H., Caveney, D., Kumar, P.R.: Provable systemwide safety in intelligent intersections. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 60(3), 804–818 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahn, H., Colombo, A., Vecchio, D.D.: Supervisory control for intersection collision avoidance in the presence of uncontrolled vehicles. In: 2014 American Control Conference, pp. 867–873 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bruni, L., Colombo, A., Vecchio, D.D.: Robust multi-agent collision avoidance through scheduling. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3944–3950 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Colombo, A., Vecchio, D.D.: Least restrictive supervisors for intersection collision avoidance: a scheduling approach. IEEE Transa. Autom. Control 60(6), 1515–1527 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, K.D.: Collision free autonomous ground traffic: a model predictive control approach. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), pp. 51–60 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Medina, A.I.M., Van De Wouw, N., Nijmeijer, H.: Automation of a T-intersection using virtual platoons of cooperative autonomous vehicles. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1696–1701 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Katriniok, A., Kleibaum, P., Joševski, M.: Distributed model predictive control for intersection automation using a parallelized optimization approach. In: IFAC World Congress (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Frazzoli, E., Mao, Z.H., Oh, J.H., Feron, E.: Resolution of conflicts involving many aircraft via semidefinite programming. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 24(1), 79–86 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johansson, B., Keviczky, T., Johansson, M., Johansson, K.H.: Subgradient methods and consensus algorithms for solving convex optimization problems. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4185–4190 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nedic, A., Ozdaglar, A.: Distributed subgradient methods for multi-agent optimization. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 54(1), 48–61 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Margellos, K., Falsone, A., Garatti, S., Prandini, M.: Proximal minimization based distributed convex optimization. In: IEEE American Control Conference, pp. 2466–2471 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wei, E., Ozdaglar, A.: On the o(1 = k) convergence of asynchronous distributed alternating direction method of multipliers. In: IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, pp. 551–554 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. de Campos, R., Falcone, P., Sjöberg, J.: Traffic safety at intersections: a priority based approach for cooperative collision avoidance. In: International Symposium on Future Active Safety Technology Towards Zero Traffic Accidents, pp. 9–15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Semidefinite Programming Relaxations of Non-Convex Problems in Control and Combinatorial Optimization, pp. 279–287. Springer, Boston (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng, Y., Haghighat, S., Cairano, S.D.: Robust dual control MPC with application to soft-landing control. In: IEEE American Control Conference, pp. 3862–3867 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. d’Aspremont, A., Boyd, S.: Relaxations and Randomized Methods for Nonconvex QCQPs. Stanford University, Stanford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fujisawa, K., Nakata, K., Yamashita, M., Fukuda, M.: SDPA project: solving large-scale semidefinite programs. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Jap. 50(4), 278–298 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This contribution extends the previous publication [20] which is under copyright of the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), 2017. Parts of this contribution (modeling, description, and implementation of the control and optimization problem) have been reused with the permission of IFAC which is acknowledged with high appreciation. This chapter, though, provides a more comprehensive overview of the applied algorithms and an extensive analysis of simulation results in a different intersection scenario.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Katriniok .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Katriniok, A., Kleibaum, P., Joševski, M. (2019). Automation of Road Intersections Using Distributed Model Predictive Control. In: Waschl, H., Kolmanovsky, I., Willems, F. (eds) Control Strategies for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Autonomous Driving Functions . Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 476. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91569-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics