Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Entrepreneurship in an Institutionally Distant Context: Bangladeshi Diaspora Entrepreneurs in Denmark

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diaspora Networks in International Business

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 1065 Accesses

Abstract

Extant studies have not highlighted how country of origin (COO) and country of residence (COR) in institutionally distant context shape diasporans’ behaviour, rationales, and capabilities, leading to the growth and success of entrepreneurial ventures in the COR; our paper contributes to this gap.

Investigating seven cases (micro, small, and medium enterprises) of Bangladeshi diasporans’ in Denmark, our study presents an in-depth understanding of the impact of dual institutional characteristics, whereby the relatively higher importance of COR institutional features shape diaspora entrepreneurial motivation and management. Motivation and management styles vary due to the length of a diaspora’s stay in the COR, their educational background, relevant previous experience, and degree of social integration in the COR. Some important personality traits, which are shaped by dual institutional features, determine the degree to which diaspora can develop cultural intelligence and social capital in the COR context. This helps the diaspora develop suitable entrepreneurial capabilities to grow the venture, while the personality traits and social capital derive from the diasporans’ educational background and involvement in sports and social activities in the Danish context. This study postulates four broad categories of motivational factors, namely (a) income security and financial success, (b) social recognition and status, (c) work achievement, and (d) independence and autonomy of work, which manifest different types of entrepreneurship depending on the diaspora’s personal background and the nature of the Danish (COR) institutional features. We find a mixed influence of COO and COR institutions on various features of management. Finally, we develop an analytical model, called the ‘House Model’, to explain diasporas’ venture creation and venture management processes in an institutionally distant context and argue that researchers should take into account both the COO’s and COR’s institutional features when examining the growth and survival of diaspora entrepreneurship. Our study contributes to the understanding and practice of transnational diaspora entrepreneurship and management as well as policy formulation by institutional actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akehurst G, Simarro E, Mas-Tur A (2012) Women entrepreneurship in small service firms: motivations, barriers and performance. Serv Ind J 32(15):2489–2505

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz N, Friedman BA, Bopieva A, Keles I (2013) Entrepreneurial motives and perceived problems: an empirical study of entrepreneurs in Kyrgyzstan. Int J Bus Res 18(2):163–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Bae J-H, Salomon R (2010) Institutional distance in international business research. In: Devinney T, Pedersen T, Laszlo T (eds) The past, present and future of international business and management, advances in international management, vol 23. Emerald Group, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzing C, Chu HM, Kara O (2009) Entrepreneurs in Turkey: a factor analysis of motivations, success factors, and problems. J Small Bus Manag 47(1):58–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The social construction of reality. Doubleday Anchor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff JM (2016) Institutional reform and diaspora entrepreneurs – the in-between advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen L (2006) Intercultural organizational communication: five corporate cases in Japan. CBS Press, Frederiksberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series 4(16):386–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins CJ, Hanges PJ, Locke EA (2004) The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior: a meta-analysis. Hum Perform 17(1):95–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Green K, Slevin DP (2006) Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation-sales growth rate relationship. Entrep Theory Pract 30(1):57–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker A (2015) Transnational entrepreneurship and opportunity recognition. In: 1st Global diaspora business conference 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Dej D, Stephan U, Gorgievski M (2012) Subjective entrepreneurial success: development of a multidimensional measurement instrument. In: Academy of management annual meeting, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Drori I, Honig B, Wright M (2009) Transnational entrepreneurship: an emergent field of study. Entrep Theory Pract:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman FL, Brush GC, Manolova ST (2010) Start-up motivations and growth intentions of minority nascent entrepreneurs. J Small Bus Manag 48(2):174–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo M (2013) Diaspora entrepreneurs in and from an emerging market – narratives from Uzbekistan. 12th Vaasa conference on international business, Vaasa, Finland, 21–23 Aug 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo M (2016) Typology of diaspora entrepreneurship: case studies in Uzbekistan. J Int Entrep 14(1):121–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin S, Mickiewicz T, Stephan U (2013) Entrepreneurship, social capital, and institutions: social and commercial entrepreneurship across nations. Entrep Theory Pract 37(3):479–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Serrano J, Romero I (2012) Entrepreneurial quality and regional development: characterizing SME sectors in low income areas. Pap Reg Sci 92(3):495–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner WB, Mitchell TR, Vesper KH (1989) A taxonomy of new business ventures. J Bus Ventur 4(3):169–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghauri PN, Firth R (2009) The formalization of case study research in international business. Markt 48:29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacomin O, Janssen F, Pruett M, Shinnar RS, Llopis F, Toney B (2011) Entrepreneurial intentions, motivations and barriers: differences among American, Asian and European students. Int Entrep Manag J 7(2):219–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorgievski M, Ascalon ME, Stephan U (2011) Small business owners’ success criteria, a values approach to personal differences. J Small Bus Manag 49(2):207–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansemark OC (2000) Predictive validity of TAT and CMPS on the entrepreneurial activity, ‘start of a new business’: a longitudinal study. J Manag Psychol 15:634–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansemark OC (2003) Need for achievement, locus of control and the prediction of business start-ups: a longitudinal study. J Econ Psychol 24:301–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Hortoványi L (2012) Entrepreneurial management (doctoral dissertation). Corvinus University of Budapest, Department of Strategic Management, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson G, Deeg R (2008) Comparative capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. J Int Bus Stud 39:540–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayawarna D, Rouse J, Kitching J (2011) Entrepreneur motivations and life course. Int Small Bus J 31(1):34–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Josafath JF (2014) Management styles in Denmark. http://www.minorccbs.com/skills/leadership/item/management-styles-in-denmark. Accessed 23 Mar 2016

  • Kruja A (2014) Entrepreneurial orientation as a performance promoter of business organizations. In: International conference on entrepreneurship IEC, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuada J (2015) Entrepreneurship in Africa – a classificatory framework and a research agenda. Afr J Econ Manag Stud 6(2):148–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachman R (1980) Toward measurement of entrepreneurial tendencies. Manag Int Rev 20(2):108–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis RD (2006) When cultures collide: leading across cultures. Nicholas Brealey International

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Clarifying entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):135–172

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland DC (1965) Achievement and entrepreneurship: a longitudinal study. J Pers Soc Psychol 1:389–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer HH, Walker WB, Litwin GH (1961) Motive patterns and risk preferences associated with entrepreneurship. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 63(3):570–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manag Sci 29(7):770–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G, Campbell J, Crouch C, Pedersen OK, John C (2010) Introduction. The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford Handbooks Online

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkongolo-Bakenda J-M, Chrysostome EV (2013) Engaging diasporas as international entrepreneurs in developing countries: in search of determinants. J Int Entrep 11(1):30–64

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 25(1):45–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips N, Tracey P, Karra N (2009) Rethinking institutional distance: strengthening the tie between new institutional theory and international management. Strateg Organ 7(3):339–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana MB (2014) Rethinking business system theory from the perspective of civil society, transnational community, and legitimacy: strategies of European MNCs in Bangladesh. Department of Business and Management, Aalborg University, pp 144–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana MB (2015) Tri-Space framework for understanding MNC behaviour and strategies: an institutionalism and business system perspective. In: Marinova ST (ed) Institutional impacts on firm internationalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana MB, Elo M (2016) Diaspora, civil society actors, emerging market entry. In: Elo M, Riddle L (eds) Diaspora and business. Inter-Disciplinary Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana MB, Elo M (2017) Transnational diaspora and civil society actors driving MNE internationalization: the case of Grameenphone in Bangladesh. J Int Manag 23(1):87–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana MB, Morgan G (2015) A systematic review of literature using business systems theory: lessons for international business research, EIBA 2015 conference proceedings. European International Business Academy, Rio, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana MB, Sørensen OJ (2014) Sentiments that affect socio-political legitimation of TNCs in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan: sustainable strategic management from an institutional perspective. J Trans Manag 19(1):62–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrep Theory Pract 33(3):761–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding G (2005) The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism. J Int Bus Stud 36(2):123–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle L, Brinkerhoff J (2011) Diaspora entrepreneurs as institutional change agents – the case of thamel.com. Int Bus Rev 20(6):670–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (2008) Institutions and organisations: ideas and interests, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen K, Steinmo S (1992) Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In: Steinmo S, Thelen K, Longstreth F (eds) Structuring politics: historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, New Series 185(4157):1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley R (1992) European business systems: firms and markets in their national contexts. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley R (2007) Business systems and organisational capabilities: the institutional structuring of competitive competences. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley R (2010) The institutional construction of firms. In: Morgan G, Campbell JL, Crouch C, Pedersen OK, Whitley R (eds) The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund J, Shepherd D (2003) Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strateg Manag J 24(13):1307–1314

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu D, Shenkar O (2002) Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Acad Manag Rev 27(4):608–618

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Mohammad B. Rana

  2. International Business Centre, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Foujia Sultana Nipa

Authors
  1. Mohammad B. Rana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Foujia Sultana Nipa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad B. Rana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics, Belt & Road, Institute of International Business, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China

    Maria Elo

  2. Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

    Maria Elo

  3. Migration Institute of Finland, Turku, Finland

    Maria Elo

  4. Mona School of Business and Management, The University of West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica

    Indianna Minto-Coy

  5. International Migration Research Centre, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Canada

    Indianna Minto-Coy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rana, M.B., Nipa, F.S. (2019). Entrepreneurship in an Institutionally Distant Context: Bangladeshi Diaspora Entrepreneurs in Denmark. In: Elo, M., Minto-Coy, I. (eds) Diaspora Networks in International Business. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91095-6_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation